Alberto Fernández, expresidente de Argentina, ha sido citado a declaración indagatoria en una causa por violencia de género contra Fabiola Yáñez. El fiscal federal Ramiro González solicitó la indagatoria, que fue aceptada por el juzgado. La causa incluye videos, documentos y fotos que evidencian el supuesto maltrato sufrido por Yáñez en la residencia presidencial. Fernández deberá presentarse ante el juzgado el próximo 11 de diciembre.
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Alberto Fernández for the cause, or in the cause, for gender violence against Fabiola Yáñez.
00:06We reiterate, it is a cause that we have followed very closely from here.
00:11They have just cited him to the indictment in the cause for gender violence against Alberto Fernández.
00:18It is the cause that started that scandal, and the ex-president has it in his sights.
00:25Javi also had videos, documents, photos, Fabiola Yáñez herself,
00:30giving account of the calvary that she claims to have lived,
00:36even within the presidential residence, within the Quinta de Olivos.
00:40Let us remember that it is a request from the federal prosecutor, Ramiro González,
00:45who has requested, precisely, to the judge who understands the cause,
00:49the indictment of the ex-president.
00:53The judge accepted that indictment.
00:57Now we are going to tell you when it will be the same.
01:00Keep in mind that yesterday, Alberto Fernández should have also declared in the indictment
01:07for the cause of insurance.
01:10But that indictment was postponed for the first days of December.
01:15In that cause of insurance that started, Javi, a scandalous year for Alberto Fernández,
01:20for the oblivion, because that was almost entering in 2024,
01:25there is a kind of decision postponed by the justice.
01:31Now it almost advances with an indictment.
01:33Yes, yes, also, that's why.
01:35Let's see, in the case of insurance, the fixed date was yesterday.
01:40Yesterday, about a week and a half ago, a week,
01:45it was announced that a request was postponed,
01:47which had had, precisely, I believe in this case, the prosecutor,
01:51for other tasks that he had, trials and so on.
01:55Then it was postponed for the first days of December.
01:58The same prosecutor, Ramiro González, had requested
02:02Alberto Fernández's indictment for the cause against Fabiola Yañez,
02:06or in this case, Fabiola Yañez against Alberto Fernández.
02:09And now they authorized that indictment, the request that the prosecutor had made.
02:13We will see when the date is.
02:15And one more fact about this situation.
02:18Remember that the insurance cause, for which it will be investigated,
02:22is exclusively for that cause.
02:24But in the investigation of the insurance cause,
02:28when the cell phone of the former secretary of Alberto Fernández, Maria Cantero,
02:33is seized, there is a dialogue between this and Fabiola Yañez
02:36for the issue of violence.
02:38There, a new file is opened regarding this,
02:42regarding Fabiola Yañez's request, which they had found,
02:46and they asked her if she wanted to start a criminal action against Alberto Fernández.
02:53She said no.
02:54When that is known through the media,
02:57they ask her again, and there Fabiola Yañez says,
03:00I will start the criminal action.
03:02In this case, one wonders, of course,
03:04gender violence involves many crimes.
03:07There is no crime that is known as gender violence,
03:11not at least classified.
03:12There are regulations that come to increase penalties
03:15or the criminal scale in crimes such as injuries,
03:18such as suicide.
03:21Is that so? Analia, how are you?
03:23How are you? Good morning to everyone.
03:25Yes, as it is.
03:26Facu, as you mentioned, in this case specifically,
03:29it is for serious injuries and co-active threats,
03:32as Javier just indicated.
03:34At first, when Judge Sarkolini detects this situation in the investigation
03:37for the other cause, she talks to Fabiola.
03:41She tells her if she wanted to start this complaint.
03:42I also always highlighted this, because I think it is important.
03:46Many times women do not want to report violent people
03:49and things happen, as we just saw in Nuñez,
03:51that happen in order not to prevent them,
03:53in order not to generate other situations.
03:55They don't do it, which is very bad.
03:56Well, at that time she didn't do it.
03:58And what happens?
03:59In the interim, it was generated that Alberto began to write threatening messages.
04:03And there she said, there she became aware of the risk.
04:05Did she send a precautionary measure of protection?
04:07No, not yet.
04:08Not yet. That was the discussion, right?
04:10Well, it's like this.
04:10When Sarkolini communicates with Fabiola Chani,
04:14she tells her, she says,
04:16look, we found on the phone of Maria Cantero,
04:19the ex-secretary of her husband,
04:22these conversations in which you tell her about violence
04:26regarding Fernández.
04:29She says, yes, it's true.
04:30She says, well, we have opened an investigation file.
04:34If you are going to initiate criminal action,
04:37we, of course, will go ahead.
04:39She says, I'll answer you again the next day.
04:42When they question her again,
04:44she says, no, I'm not going to take action.
04:46Perfect.
04:47She advances.
04:48Wait.
04:49Because this is important.
04:50Yes.
04:51Weeks later, on a Saturday,
04:55one of our colleagues, Savoia, Claudio Savoia,
04:58publishes this, what we are telling you.
05:02Yes?
05:03And what happens there?
05:04Alberto Fernández calls her
05:06and sends her an intimidating message from Fabiola,
05:09telling her what the press is publishing now with me.
05:14Well, imagine what he told her.
05:16She feels intimidated.
05:18The next day, another colleague publishes
05:21an extension of that Pizzi.
05:24Was it Nicolás Pizzi?
05:25Yes, Nicolás Pizzi.
05:25Just like that.
05:27Obviously, Alberto Fernández insists again
05:30with Fabiola Cháñez.
05:32And the judge, as a result of this,
05:36asks Fabiola Cháñez if she spoke to anyone
05:39about this record.
05:40She said no.
05:41That she hadn't spoken to anyone.
05:43She says, do you want to instigate criminal action?
05:45Yes.
05:45Now, yes.
05:46Well, the information we are giving,
05:48that we are anticipating,
05:49is the indictment.
05:51Let's remember that the indictment
05:52is the first act of defense
05:54that a defendant has.
05:56The ex-president must appear
05:58on December 11.
06:01According to different judicial sources,
06:05he is accused of hitting Fabiola Cháñez
06:08while he was in charge of the executive power.
06:10And in some sections of this story,
06:14it is detailed that some of these facts,
06:17today investigated by the justice,
06:19happened or would have happened
06:21within the fifth presidential election of Olivos.
06:25It is the federal judge, Julian Ercolini,
06:28who cites him in the indictment.
06:30We investigate on December 11
06:33in the federal courts of Comodoro Pires.
06:36Just in 20 days,
06:39this is a cause, of course,
06:40that has generated a lot of stir.
06:44We have seen part of the evidence,
06:47it has been exhibited practically
06:49in the media.
06:51We have seen videos,
06:52we have seen photos
06:53and we have heard the testimony
06:55of Fabiola Cháñez herself.
06:58She exhibited the video
07:00and then also spoke with the media.
07:03We reiterate this information of the last moment.
07:06Alberto Fernández,
07:07cited in the indictment,
07:10is the first act of defense
07:12that has a defendant.
07:15This will be for the date
07:17on December 11
07:20in the federal courts of Comodoro Pires.
07:25We repeat, this is for the cause
07:28or cited in the cause
07:30for gender violence.
07:32In the written statement presented today,
07:35where Judge Ercolini
07:37obviously takes place
07:39to this request of Prosecutor Ramiro González.
07:41Now we are going to see the written statement.
07:43It mentions everything that Facundo told
07:46and also all the positions by the prosecutor
07:48to support the inquiry.
07:50What the written statement says
07:52is that the arguments made
07:55regarding the indictment
07:57formulated by the prosecution
07:59and the documentation of support
08:01We are finishing, Javi,
08:02to prepare the exclusive information,
08:04the document of Javier Díaz
08:05that we put on the screen.
08:07In minutes, I repeat,
08:09exclusive information
08:11that we are presenting
08:13regarding what has just become known.
08:15The federal judge,
08:16Julián Ercolini,
08:17quotes the former president Alberto Fernández
08:20for the 11th of December.
08:22And there Javier already has the documentation
08:24that we are going to put on the screen.
08:25Exactly.
08:26And the documentation of support,
08:28this is the written statement,
08:29in which it is supported, I understand,
08:31says the judge,
08:32that there are sufficient elements of conviction
08:34to advance with the prosecution
08:36and call Alberto Ángel Fernández
08:40to provide an inquiry statement
08:43on the 11th of December
08:45at 11 o'clock in the morning.
08:48The attention to the impeached event
08:50becomes necessary
08:52to adopt the relevant records
08:54both in order to properly guarantee
08:56their full knowledge
08:58for the proper exercise of the right of defense
09:00and to streamline the respective hearing
09:03with the consequent optimization of means and resources.
09:06Well, all this is the formalism
09:08in order to guarantee
09:10what that hearing will be.
09:12The judge says,
09:13for this, it is convenient to anticipate the impeached,
09:16that is, Alberto Fernández and his defense,
09:18that he will be received, listen to this,
09:20a statement for the fact that
09:22the following is transcribed,
09:24which would have taken place
09:26in a context of gender violence
09:28signed by the particular asymmetrical power relationship
09:32between Alberto Ángel Fernández
09:34and Fabiola Andrea Yañez,
09:36at least from the year 2016
09:39until August 6, 2024.
09:42Let's remember, Javi...
09:43I reiterate, I reiterate,
09:45acts of violence
09:47against Fabiola Yañez
09:49from the year 2016
09:52until August 6, 2024,
09:56date on which the victim
09:58insisted on criminal action
10:00in the present file
10:02and the consequent
10:04ban of contact to the appointed person was imposed.
10:06Well, attention, because...
10:07Opportunity, huh?
10:08Let's remember, Javi, Analia,
10:09that there is a minor in between,
10:11in fact, there is a safeguard that we make
10:13of the image of the little one
10:16and this, obviously, is not the same
10:18in the framework of a judicial instance
10:19that there is a minor who does not have it.
10:21It had been said that Fernández was going to maintain
10:23a bond with his son through Fabiola's mother,
10:26who then declared,
10:28and we will have to see how all this is today,
10:31that although it is part of the field of privacy
10:33and the private sphere,
10:35inevitably it is linked to a criminal cause
10:37for gender violence, right?
10:39Yes, when the figures, as in this case,
10:41are not public, right?
10:42And there is an interest in knowing
10:43how the progress of the cause is going.
10:45But it is important to treat it with the respect
10:47that this program always deals with
10:49when there are minors involved,
10:51precisely to keep this
10:53the most careful for them.
10:55But hey, it's the first procedural act,
10:56we have to see what happens on December 11th,
10:58if Alberto declares,
10:59if they decide not to say anything.
11:00Of course, of course,
11:01because there is, unlike when in an instance
11:04or in a judicial case
11:06they quote a witness
11:08who corresponds to the law
11:11of course not to lie and go and declare.
11:14In the case of the indictment,
11:15being a defense act,
11:17here the defendant can deny himself,
11:18he can lie,
11:20he may not remember,
11:21well, anyway,
11:22he can give himself situations,
11:24he can even present a script, right?
11:26Exactly, that's what I was going to say.
11:27Look, three things can happen,
11:28he can either sit down and tell
11:30and answer all the questions they ask him,
11:31he can deny himself to answer.
11:32I have the feeling that
11:33because of how the judicial process came here,
11:35Fernández is going to want to sit down and declare.
11:37I have the feeling
11:38because he has been supporting,
11:40not only in judicial areas,
11:43but also in private areas,
11:45that he supports an ongoing defense
11:48of what he thinks happened.
11:50Yes.
11:51Of course, it is in his right to do so.
11:54We will see, right?
11:55Because here there is also an impact
11:57from a political point of view.
11:58However, the figure of Alberto Fernández
12:00from a political point of view
12:01seems to be finished already, right?
12:03Yes, and we also have to see
12:04the strategy of his lawyer
12:05in these issues.
12:06Here, many times,
12:07the defendants want to declare
12:08and the strategies of the lawyers
12:09are better not to declare
12:10because everything he says
12:12can be used against him
12:13and he may end up harming him
12:15when they think he is going in the other direction,
12:17which is something beneficial,
12:18he can harm him.
12:19So we also have to see
12:20the strategy of the lawyer there,
12:21which is what he indicates,
12:22what is the legal advice.
12:23Let's recap the information.
12:25December 11 is the date, Javi,
12:27chosen by the federal judge,
12:29Julián Alcolini,
12:31to cite him to the indictment.
12:33We are working,
12:34processing practically live
12:36the judicial documentation
12:38to which Javier Díaz
12:40accessed in an exclusive way
12:42to see the detail
12:43of what the justice
12:44is imputing on him, right?
12:46Because let's also remember Analia,
12:47and there I leave you Javi,
12:48that when a person is quoted to declare,
12:52they have to say,
12:53effectively,
12:54why are they quoting him.
12:55Of course,
12:56exactly,
12:57they have to specify
12:58what are the acts
12:59that are imputed on him,
13:00exactly,
13:01and what are the crimes
13:02for which he has that cause.
13:04And obviously,
13:05all the questions
13:06that I consider...
13:07Javi,
13:08we reiterate,
13:09Fabiola Yañez's cause
13:12against Alberto Fernández,
13:14December 11,
13:16at 11 in the morning.
13:18The cause for the insurance
13:20that was postponed,
13:22it had to have been
13:23on the day of yesterday,
13:24passed,
13:25and I rectify,
13:26for the 27th of this month,
13:27that is,
13:28insurance,
13:29next Wednesday,
13:30Alberto Fernández's inquiry.
13:33That is,
13:34on the 15th of this month,
13:35the former president
13:36will be questioned twice.
13:37When he left,
13:38he said,
13:39I am not going to run
13:40for the courts.
13:41Well,
13:42a year ago he left,
13:44and now he will have to do it
13:46twice.
13:49We have to take this into account,
13:51the judge,
13:53the judge of Dr. Ercolini,
13:56who also investigates insurance,
13:58the cause of insurance,
13:59yes,
14:00Judge Ramiro González,
14:01what we were telling,
14:03in his writing,
14:04where he says
14:05that the accusation
14:07for Conel
14:08is in a context
14:09of gender violence,
14:10signed by the particular
14:11asymmetrical power relationship
14:13between Alberto Ángel Fernández
14:15and Fabiola Andrea Yañez,
14:17at least,
14:18at least,
14:19from the year
14:202016
14:22until August 6,
14:232024.
14:25In all that period,
14:28in all that period,
14:29that is,
14:30eight years,
14:31according to what is
14:32within the cause,
14:33that was investigated
14:35by Prosecutor Ramiro González,
14:37he presented it to the judge,
14:39and the judge read it
14:40and endorsed it.
14:41In those eight years,
14:42he was harassing her
14:44with gender violence,
14:46Alberto Fernández
14:47to his own wife,
14:48or partner,
14:49yes,
14:50to his wife.
14:51This is why
14:52Alberto Fernández
14:53has to answer later.
14:54A few days ago,
14:56in the defense
14:57of Alberto Fernández,
14:58he presented a written statement
15:00denouncing his mother-in-law,
15:03Fabiola's mother,
15:04for false testimony.
15:06In these
15:08back and forth.
15:09Alberto Fernández
15:10at one point had said
15:11that Fabiola was lying,
15:12that it was not like that,
15:13everything that had happened.
15:14Well,
15:15now he will have
15:16the possibility to defend himself
15:17and counteract everything.
15:18In a few minutes,
15:19we will be expanding
15:20this information,
15:21because it is information
15:22that was anticipated
15:23from this channel,
15:24from A24,
15:25with exclusive documentation
15:26from Javi.