Eva Bargiela,y Facundo Moyano protagonizan un nuevo escándalo tras una audiencia de mediación fallida. Sin llegar a un acuerdo sobre la división de bienes, el caso se dirige a los tribunales. La abogada Ana Rosenfeld, conocida por su tenacidad, representa a Bargiela en este proceso. Mientras tanto, la modelo se mantiene firme en no hablar más sobre su ex pareja públicamente.
#ALaTarde
#ALaTarde
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Another last moment, another last moment, guys, this Friday is on fire and we go with an information that our partner Diego Estevez brings us, the protagonists, I don't say it, Diego Estevez says it.
00:15Another former First Lady in this case.
00:18And somehow, yes.
00:20The former First Lady of trade unionism.
00:23Exactly.
00:24We can say.
00:25Yes.
00:26Eva Bargiela.
00:27Yes.
00:28And Facundo Moyano.
00:29There was a mediation hearing.
00:31The first one lacked Facundo Moyano.
00:34And yesterday, I understand, there was another mediation hearing.
00:39Failed.
00:40And they go to trial for the division of goods.
00:43Oh, la, la.
00:44Rosenfeld, who has bigger and bigger fangs.
00:47We have communication with Dr. Rosenfeld from Miami.
00:50As you have said, she has been filing her fangs more and more sharp.
00:55So right away we are going to be talking to her.
00:57But we have a clip of presentation of this topic that begins like this, look.
01:03Last moment.
01:05Uncommon scandal.
01:08Facundo Moyano.
01:10Eva Bargiela.
01:12There was no agreement.
01:15And everything will end in court.
01:20I don't talk about my ex anymore.
01:22I understand that if other people like to talk on TV, these things, it is valid.
01:27But I don't talk about him anymore.
01:28It's my past.
01:29I raised the separation ten months ago.
01:32And I think it is natural that if the relationship ends, let's say, there is a divorce.
01:39I am not surprised at all because it has been a long time since all the things that are known are not known on my side.
01:45I don't know where they are known because I don't know.
01:48But nothing comes out of my side and suddenly a lot of things come out on TV.
01:51Some are true, others are false.
01:53But I really don't care to talk about the subject anymore.
01:56I tried to make it between us.
01:59But, well, it's difficult.
02:01I am very surprised by Facundo that he says that he doesn't like the media.
02:04Your wife is part of Bailando.
02:07Bailando is something that bothers you.
02:12We are separated and I am not going to talk about the subject because it does not correspond to me.
02:18Nothing to add.
02:20How are you?
02:21Everything to me is surprising.
02:23The truth is that it is not that I found out on TV that we were separated or in crisis.
02:27We were bad, we were distant.
02:29What surprised me was that they said it on TV.
02:38They are seeing each other, they are seeing each other.
02:40I clarified many times that we have a lot of friends in common and that we share a lot of plans.
02:46Nothing more than that.
02:48Do you miss him? Do you miss him?
02:51I have nothing to tell you.
03:01Who is married here?
03:04Congratulations, Eri.
03:13There it is, boys.
03:14Very nice, both of you.
03:15Very gallant.
03:18I don't like exposure.
03:19I work on TV.
03:20I love working on TV.
03:21But I don't like to expose my life.
03:23I never exposed it.
03:24So, well, this is a mess.
03:25I don't like to expose my life.
03:26I never exposed it.
03:27So, well, this is a mess.
03:29Real exclusive information.
03:33Coming up.
03:34Coming up.
03:40Well, very well, then.
03:41There was no agreement between Facundo Moyano and Eva Bargiela, who are going to trial.
03:47Well, there is a controversy, right?
03:49We had already told you, but it is not bad to refresh it.
03:52Facundo Moyano, what he insists is that Eva Bargiela signed a separation of assets when they got married a few years ago.
04:01Finally, they got divorced.
04:03And when they got divorced, there was a separation of assets.
04:05There are no assets, a conjugal society.
04:08There are no common assets.
04:09Yes.
04:10Closed topic.
04:11Now, Rosenfeld comes in, reviews the documentation and sees that the separation of assets was poorly made.
04:20Because there was never a relevance of the assets that were of one and the other.
04:24As Rosenfeld says, it has to be and it has to be joined, as the Civil and Commercial Code says.
04:29From that, they say, that separation of assets is not valid.
04:33And we are going to ask for the division of assets.
04:36And for that, Rosenfeld puts the magnifying glass, as he knows how to do it.
04:39Totally.
04:40And he is making a record of the assets, which is an enigma.
04:43Totally.
04:44Nobody knows what are the assets that Facundo Moyano has.
04:47What a difficult situation.
04:48Because just 10 or 11 days ago, Eva Bargiela's mother died suddenly.
04:53Yes.
04:54So we send her a giant kiss.
04:56Because in the midst of all this pain, this situation also appears.
05:00We go with Dr. Rosenfeld, who is Eva Bargiela's lawyer.
05:03And she is communicating with us from Miami.
05:05How are you, doctor?
05:06Welcome to the afternoon.
05:07Good, how are you?
05:09Well, tell us, Ana, how does this situation come for Eva?
05:13Well, in reality, you heard throughout all the TEDs that happened,
05:18is that Eva never wanted this topic to be public.
05:21In reality, she wants it to remain private.
05:23But, of course, dealing with the other side of Facundo Moyano
05:27and, obviously, the public character that he has,
05:30there are things that transcend.
05:32The only thing I can tell you is that there were two mediations.
05:36The second, which I thought of postponing precisely
05:40because it was a few days after the sad death of Eva's mother.
05:45Eva told me, no, Ana, do it to end this conflict once and for all.
05:51And, well, it was closed without agreement.
05:53So the next step is the courts.
05:56Ah, well.
05:57And this, when would the trial begin, doctor?
06:01It is almost on the machine.
06:03So, in short, I calculate that in less than a month
06:06we can be talking that already less.
06:08It was closed without agreement, doctor?
06:10There is the demand.
06:12Ana, sorry, it was closed without agreement
06:14because Eva's part demanded a lot
06:16or because Facundo's part did not want to give in at all?
06:20In reality, it was closed without agreement
06:23because he did not consider Mr. Moyano to owe anything to Eva,
06:28neither for economic compensation nor for the liquidation of marital society.
06:33He considers that there was nothing that was generated during the marriage,
06:38that what he won was consumed, so to speak.
06:45So, in short, it is in a work that Eva has already been doing,
06:50because of course I can find out,
06:52but the client is the one who gives me all the basic information.
06:55She gave me absolutely all the documentation
06:57so that I can ask for a liquidation of a marital society
07:01and show that despite what people say,
07:04well, you enjoyed, you got married, you traveled,
07:07all the beautiful things that can happen to you
07:10when you go through that relationship with a wealthy man,
07:14far from helping Eva in her work, it deteriorated her a lot.
07:18Why? Because marrying a politician has consequences.
07:21Now, Ana, what Facundo Moyano says is,
07:24she signed the separation of assets,
07:26that is the role that is worth and the division of assets,
07:29in fact, they already presented it.
07:31How are you going to turn that around?
07:33Look, they had also said that a divorce had been signed.
07:37Do you remember that on one occasion I made them notice
07:40that Eva believed that she had signed a divorce
07:43and it was the famous article 214,
07:45incisus secundum, which was repealed in 2015.
07:48So it was impossible for Eva to be on her way to a divorce
07:52when what they had made her sign was a paper
07:54that did not match the current legislation.
07:57We are talking about 2015-2024.
08:01In the same way, in the civil registry,
08:04a cross-examination is signed,
08:06saying which regime you choose at the time of divorce,
08:10and they signed the cross-examination,
08:12but they did not take the formal step,
08:14which is to make a public disclaimer
08:16that you come to administer one
08:18and that you come to administer the other.
08:20With which, that process was absolutely ...
08:23Ana, and are you going to report that episode?
08:27That they tried to make Eva Bargiela believe
08:32that she had signed the divorce,
08:34with something that no longer existed.
08:36Are you going to claim that in court?
08:38Are you going to report it?
08:40No, the divorce was finally resolved.
08:43That was really a blow.
08:46More than a blow, it seems to me, right?
08:49Well, a mockery.
08:51More than a mockery, I think it was.
08:53Whatever they want, but it was horrible.
08:55And that's what worried Eva.
08:57Because, in short, she was convinced
09:00that since the divorce is not administrative today,
09:04but it is by way of the presentation.
09:08It can be either of the two that do it.
09:10She was convinced that she had already presented herself.
09:12But it's a kind of scam.
09:14I don't know how to qualify it exactly,
09:16but it's really serious.
09:18Well, that's why there was a change of sponsorship.
09:22I showed up and signed the divorce.
09:25I understand, Ana, but there was a lawyer
09:27who put his face on Moyano's side,
09:30who represented Moyano,
09:32who told Eva,
09:33Eva, everything is perfect.
09:35With this, it's a divorce.
09:37I mean, there was a lawyer,
09:39do you understand what I'm saying?
09:40A lawyer who wanted to...
09:43Scam.
09:44Scam.
09:46Isn't that a complaint?
09:48I'm not going to say anything
09:50because, in that instance,
09:51Eva is the one who has to decide
09:52if she wants to take any kind of injury.
09:54I show up from that moment on.
09:56And from that moment on,
09:58what I did was sign a divorce,
10:00as the new code foresees,
10:03with a regulatory pact,
10:05which, of course, is Eva's claim,
10:08and the reserve of economic compensation,
10:11which is precisely all the damage she suffered
10:14as a result of getting married
10:16and now this divorce, the way it happened.
10:19Ana, one question.
10:21Sorry, one question,
10:22which has to do with Facundo's side.
10:24What do they say?
10:25We have nothing to give,
10:26no compensation,
10:27or that there was no profitability
10:29during the narrow space of the marriage?
10:32Let's remember that the relationship with Eva
10:34was much longer,
10:35it had two crises in the middle,
10:37but the marriage was very brief.
10:38What do they say on his side?
10:41Well, of course,
10:42if a mediation is closed without agreement,
10:44it's because they consider that they don't owe him anything.
10:47So they are in the work that Eva has been doing
10:50for a long time,
10:51which is to gather all the information
10:53to show that there is damage,
10:57that there is compensation,
10:58and that there are probably also
11:00profitable assets.
11:02Let's see, Alicia.
11:03Anita, good afternoon.
11:04Alicia Pedrelli.
11:05Hello, Alicia.
11:06How are you?
11:07You know what?
11:08I have a question.
11:09How do you believe a person
11:11who, at first,
11:12makes you sign a paper
11:14as if it were a divorce,
11:15and then tells you
11:16that he has nothing to give away?
11:18These are very delicate things
11:20that both have to do
11:21with the person of his ex-wife,
11:23and with which both
11:25would leave her on the street.
11:28Look, what you are saying is very human,
11:31because you have just given, precisely,
11:33in the point,
11:34an algebra, not of the legal,
11:36but of the ethical and moral.
11:38What does it have to do with?
11:40When you marry someone,
11:41of course you may want to have
11:44a certain type of protection,
11:46especially if you come from
11:47a previous marriage,
11:48if you received property
11:49by inheritance, and so on.
11:50Then you want to protect a heritage
11:53of what can eventually
11:54be a future marriage.
11:56In the case of Eva,
11:58she married for love.
12:00At no time did she prioritize
12:02the economic, as at some point,
12:04as she said there on TV,
12:05as if saying,
12:06the economic, the economic,
12:08she cares about money.
12:09No, when she signed,
12:11she signed in the total,
12:13in the belief that this marriage
12:15was not a circumstance
12:17that was going to happen so fast,
12:19but that it was for love
12:21and that it was going to last.
12:22She trusted him.
12:23Many times women trust
12:25that men prepare.
12:27What is worth more, Ana?
12:28What is worth more,
12:29the compensation or confidentiality
12:31of all the years lived
12:33between Facundo Moyano and Eva Bargiela?
12:37I can't anticipate
12:38what my work strategy will be,
12:40but believe me that Eva,
12:43first she lived in a glass box,
12:47protecting the intimacy,
12:49as you made all those notes
12:51where she said,
12:52I don't want to talk about anything,
12:53I want this to be confidential,
12:55the one who speaks is him.
12:56She always protected the bond
12:59and the relationship and the couple,
13:01or what the couple was.
13:02And it's very good.
13:04Let me, let me.
13:05Of course, it's very good.
13:06But then, when she saw
13:08on the other side
13:09the mediatization of things
13:11that didn't have to happen
13:13and Moyano's sayings,
13:14she was really offended and angry
13:16and that's why now
13:17she wants what's right for her.
13:19Very little, but what's right by law.
13:22Ana, sorry,
13:24I know it's hard for you to talk
13:25because she's your client and so on,
13:27but I want to know one thing.
13:29Is it true that Moyano
13:30went to Eva's mother's funeral
13:33and they didn't let him pass?
13:36Look, the only thing
13:37I can tell you about
13:38that sad circumstance
13:40is that Eva had a gift from people,
13:43in the beginning,
13:44because they were on vacation
13:46in the north of Argentina
13:48and when what happened happened,
13:50Eva contacted a friend
13:52who was her husband
13:54and he summarized the details.
13:57I don't even want to anticipate
13:59saying something
14:00that may not be true
14:01because I understood from Eva
14:03that he made a health plane
14:06to be able to give the remains of the mother.
14:08That was a gesture
14:11that Eva recognizes at all times.
14:13Now, whether it was a funeral or not,
14:14I don't know.
14:15I do know that he had this gesture
14:16and that Eva told me
14:18to tell the lawyer
14:20when you have the mediation
14:21that I thank you very much for what you did.
14:23Well, that's amazing, right?
14:24Because he had that gesture
14:25so beautiful, so noble,
14:27that I also pay homage
14:29to the relationship they had
14:31and that they can't finish
14:32agreeing on what corresponds,
14:34simply that it is
14:36a separation of assets
14:40and that Eva does not leave
14:41that marital society
14:43without anything, right?
14:44It seems incredible to me,
14:45but we also have a nice surprise
14:47in the middle of everything.