Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Agama Tigaraksa resmi menolak gugatan cerai talak yang diajukan oleh komedian Andre Taulany terhadap istrinya, Rien Wartia Trigina atau yang dikenal sebagai Erin Taulany.
Keputusan ini diumumkan pada Selasa (24/9/2024) oleh Humas Pengadilan Agama Tigaraksa, Ummi Azma, dalam sebuah pernyataan resminya yang dikutip YouTube intens investigasi.
"Majelis Hakim menolak permohonan pemohon,” ujar Ummi Azma, Selasa 24 September 2024.
Dalam sidang tersebut, Majelis Hakim menyimpulkan bahwa konflik yang terjadi antara Andre dan Erin bukan merupakan pertengkaran yang signifikan, melainkan hanya persoalan komunikasi.
Category
✨
PeopleTranscript
00:00Andre Taulani was asked to re-refer to Erin's request for a divorce.
00:06The Tribunal of the Three Rakhsas officially rejected the divorce proposal
00:11proposed by the comedian Andre Taulani to his wife,
00:15Rien Wartia Trigina, also known as Erin Taulani.
00:21This decision was announced on September 24, 2024
00:26by the Chief Justice of the Three Rakhsas, Umi Azma,
00:30in an official statement quoted from the Intense Investigation YouTube channel.
00:36The court rejected the request.
00:39Umi Azma was tried on September 24, 2024.
00:45In the trial, the court concluded that the conflict between Andre and Erin
00:51was not a significant dispute,
00:54but only a matter of communication.
00:59The court concluded that the evidence of the dispute
01:04was not proven.
01:06Umi Azma stated.
01:09So the conflict between Andre and Erin
01:12was not a significant dispute,
01:15but only a matter of communication.
01:20According to the Tribunal of the Three Rakhsas,
01:24the reason for the divorce proposed by Andre Taulani
01:27did not meet the conditions set in the Marriage Law.
01:32Therefore, the applicant did not meet article 39, verse 2,
01:36UU no. 1, 1974, about marriage,
01:41article 19, letter F, government regulation no. 9,
01:45article 1975, letter 116, letter F,
01:49compilation of Islamic law.
01:51Umi Azma stated.
01:54In article 39, verse 2,
01:56UU no. 1, 1974,
01:59about marriage, it is explained.
02:02Divorce can only be done in front of the court
02:05after the court is involved in an effort
02:08and fails to pacify both parties.
02:12In article 19, letter F,
02:14government regulation no. 9, 1975, it is stated.
02:19Between husband and wife,
02:21there is constant dispute and conflict
02:24and there is no hope
02:26of living together again in the next house.
02:30This reason is usually the basis
02:32to propose a divorce.
02:34However, in the case of Andre,
02:36the judge assessed that the dispute proposed
02:38cannot be categorized
02:40as a chronic dispute
02:42or cannot be fixed.
02:46From the family members,
02:48applicants and applicants who state
02:50that among applicants and applicants
02:52there is only a lack of communication,
02:54there is no dispute,
02:56there is no continuous dispute resolution.
02:59Beber Rumas, Judicial Court of the Three Rakhsas,
03:02Umi Azma.
03:04There were witnesses who were present
03:06who felt from the family
03:08that there was a dispute.
03:11Both Andre Tolani and Erin
03:13can still propose a divorce
03:15until October 4th.
03:17If they don't divorce,
03:19they are still legitimate
03:21as husband and wife.
03:23This is not yet in force,
03:25so it's still a divorce period.
03:27So it will only be in force
03:29on October 4, 2024.
03:33And only then do we know
03:35if it turns out that there is no comparison
03:37means the applicant and the applicant
03:39are still husband and wife.
03:42What do you guys think?
03:44Don't forget to write your comments
03:46in the comments column.
03:48See you!