KHABAR | Aniqa Nisar | ARY News | 5th September 2024 - video Dailymotion

ARY NEWS

#pmlngovt #nawazsharif #imrankhan #armychief #faizhameed #dgispr   ۔"Ye Aik Haqeeqat Hai kay Imran Kan ko Sahulat Aik Idare say Nahi..." Javed Latif's Huge Statement  Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY  Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP  ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.  Official Facebook: https://www.fb.com/arynewsasia  Official Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/arynewsofficial  Official Instagram: https://instagram.com/arynewstv  Website: https://arynews.tv  Watch ARY NEWS LIVE: http://live.arynews.tv    Listen Live: http://live.arynews.tv/audio  Listen Top of the hour Headlines, Bulletins & Programs: https://soundcloud.com/arynewsofficial #ARYNews  ARY News Official YouTube Channel. For more videos, subscribe to our channel and for suggestions please use the comment section.

Transcript

00:00In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most Merciful.

00:02I am Anika Nisar with the program Khabar.

00:04Today there was a very important press conference.

00:06DGISPR had a lot of topics on which there was a lot of controversy.

00:10Questions were being raised regarding the military courts,

00:12regarding Imran Khan's trial,

00:14regarding what General Faiz did,

00:16and regarding the Jalsa.

00:18After all, who approved the Jalsa?

00:20All the answers were given today.

00:22In return for the answers, more questions were born.

00:25Or the answers were clear.

00:27We will talk about this.

00:28In today's press conference of DGISPR,

00:31the actions of the military courts were made clear.

00:34That this is such an institution,

00:36the army is such an institution,

00:38in which the actions of the military courts continue.

00:40Other institutions will also have to follow this.

00:44If this is followed in this way,

00:46or the actions of the military courts are carried out in every institution,

00:50then in Pakistan,

00:52which we call the flood of the flood,

00:54will this happen or not?

00:57And what did Faiz Hameed do?

01:00For personal interests,

01:02or for personal purposes,

01:04let's listen to it together with the political community.

01:08The Pakistan Army believes in the actions of the military courts.

01:11On August 12, 2024,

01:13in the announcement issued by the ISPR,

01:15Lt. Gen. Retired Faiz Hameed

01:17was told about the proceedings of the court martial.

01:20In the Top City case,

01:22a request was made against the retired officer.

01:25This matter was sent to the Pakistan Army through the Ministry of Defense.

01:29In April 2024,

01:31a high-level court of inquiry was ordered by the Pak Army.

01:35Based on the firm evidence,

01:37after the detailed inquiry was completed,

01:39the Pakistan Army officially announced

01:42that the retired officer had violated the Pakistan Army Act.

01:47After retirement,

01:49various incidents of violation of the Pakistan Army Act have also emerged.

01:54On these grounds,

01:55the proceedings of the field general court martial have begun.

01:59This allegation is also on the retired officer.

02:01For personal purposes,

02:03he crossed the legal and legal limits

02:06on the basis of special political elements.

02:09Whoever will be involved in this case,

02:12will not be out of the grasp of the law,

02:14whether he has any position or any position.

02:18Now when it was said that anyone who would be involved in such matters,

02:22whether he has any position or any position,

02:25the legal proceedings will be seen in that case.

02:29Then the question arises,

02:30can Imran Khan, Bani Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf,

02:33also be a part of this action?

02:36Can there be a trial in the military courts against him or not?

02:40This question is coming from both sides,

02:43the government and the opposition.

02:46But DGISPR gave a clear answer to this question today.

02:52He is the leader of Tehreek-e-Insaf.

02:54He is expressing his concerns that the Bani PDI

02:57can be taken to the military court

03:00or a military act can be carried out against them.

03:04I will tell you this,

03:06according to the military law,

03:08if anyone,

03:09an individual or an individual,

03:11who is subject to the Army Act,

03:13uses them for his personal or political purposes,

03:17and his evidence and evidences are present,

03:19then the law will make its own way.

03:23In response to this,

03:24Robert Ayub clearly said that there will be no military trial.

03:26And once again demanded

03:28that the footage of the 9th May incident should be brought forward.

03:34This type of military trial, God willing, will not take place.

03:36We are all sitting here on 9th May.

03:39These are all fictitious cases.

03:41If you bring the video forward,

03:43why don't you bring the video?

03:44Everyone is a political prisoner at the moment.

03:46There is nothing called a government in the country.

03:49On the one hand,

03:50there is the issue of a military trial.

03:52On the other hand,

03:53there is the issue of the law being implemented,

03:55which legally allows any civilian to go to the military court

03:58for a trial,

03:59or makes a way for them.

04:01So, on the other hand,

04:02once again,

04:03it was said by Mr. Rahul Qasim,

04:05that the Jalsa was to be held on 22nd,

04:07but it was contacted by the establishment to postpone it.

04:10This is what many leaders of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf have been repeating.

04:13That in reality,

04:14the postponement of the Jalsa

04:17was due to the request of the establishment.

04:21This question was also asked by TGISPR.

04:23And what is the answer?

04:24Listen.

04:26Any Jalsa,

04:27the location,

04:28the date,

04:29this is purely a matter of district administration.

04:32Army is focused towards its own professional matters.

04:36Now, if it is a matter of professional matters,

04:38then again,

04:39only professional matters

04:40or there is interference in political matters as well.

04:42Because,

04:43on both sides,

04:44it is said that

04:45the establishment's political interference

04:47has remained in Pakistan

04:48as a reality.

04:50So, when it comes to political interference,

04:52the first question that arises is that

04:55is the establishment standing with a political party at this time?

04:59Or is it opposing a political party?

05:01Or is it creating ease or difficulty for a political party?

05:06On this, TGISPR gave its opinion.

05:10Pakistan Army is a national army.

05:13It is neither an opponent of any political party

05:16nor a supporter.

05:17The army has a professional and governmental relationship with every government.

05:22The Pak Army has a clear opinion.

05:25The army will be kept safe from use as a national and state institution

05:30in order to achieve any specific political interest.

05:39When this became clear,

05:40it also became clear that

05:41the government will not be supported in any way.

05:44The government will have to solve the issues on its own.

05:46And the government will have to solve the issues on its own.

05:48So, the question arises that

05:49didn't the Pakistan Muslim League know

05:51how difficult the situation would be?

05:53Didn't they know that they would not be able to handle it?

05:56After the PDM's government,

05:57after the caretaker set-up,

05:58it had become very clear

06:00that the economy of Pakistan

06:01has reached the point

06:03where the problems will arise for the next government.

06:07Officially, the leaders of Pakistan Tariq-e-Insaaf

06:10off the record admit that

06:12even if the PTI would have come,

06:14there would have been a lot of problems for them.

06:17Mr. Ahsan Iqbal admitted that

06:19we were not blind

06:20that we could not see

06:21how many problems there were.

06:24When we took over the government in April 22,

06:26we were not so blind

06:28that we could not see what was ahead.

06:31It was very easy

06:32to break the assemblies in a month

06:34and announce the election.

06:35I can tell you with confidence

06:37that we came back with two-thirds majority.

06:39We damaged our politics

06:41but we defended the state of Pakistan.

06:43On one hand,

06:44you want to stay within the system

06:46and on the other hand,

06:47you want to rock the system.

06:49This is not the service of Pakistan.

06:51This is a disgusting game

06:53with the economic development of Pakistan.

06:57For this discussion,

06:58we have with us

06:59Mr. Mian Javed Latif,

07:00the senior leader of PMLN.

07:02Thank you very much for joining us.

07:03Mr. Mian,

07:04Mr. Ahsan Iqbal said

07:05that we knew how many problems there were.

07:07We knew that

07:08these problems would not be easy.

07:10We knew that

07:11we were kicking ourselves

07:12but we were making it easy

07:13for the state of Pakistan.

07:15On the other hand,

07:16the allegation on this government

07:18is that you have support

07:19and that is why you are sitting.

07:20You could not sit without support.

07:21The DJI and SPR clearly said

07:23that we are not with any political party.

07:25This impression

07:26which is sometimes very powerful,

07:28Mr. Mian,

07:29now that impression has also been lost.

07:30They clearly said

07:31that we are not with anyone

07:32or in opposition to anyone.

07:33So now,

07:34will there be problems for the government

07:36or do you think

07:37it will continue

07:38as it is

07:39on the basis of status quo?

07:44Thank you, Anika.

07:45What you said in the beginning

07:47that there will be a blind person

07:49who will not know

07:50about the future

07:52and who will be making the government.

07:54Certainly,

07:55all these things were in the knowledge.

07:57And there was no ease for the government

07:59before

08:00and there is no ease now.

08:02In difficult circumstances,

08:04there was a government of 18 months

08:06and in the most difficult circumstances,

08:08there is a government of today.

08:10Be it economically,

08:11be it socially,

08:12be it politically,

08:14be it defense-wise,

08:16there are difficulties.

08:18It is true that

08:20everyone has the passion

08:22to sacrifice for the state.

08:24Yes,

08:25I have always had an objection.

08:27Even today,

08:28I am with the objection

08:30that the great sacrifice

08:32that we made for the acceptance

08:34of the state,

08:36it did not benefit the state

08:38as much as our sacrifice.

08:40Why is that?

08:41That is why I have an objection

08:43that if our sacrifice did not benefit

08:45the state,

08:46then what is the benefit of this sacrifice?

08:48Then we should have at least

08:50saved this sacrifice

08:52so that at some time

08:54we can benefit the state

08:56with this acceptance.

08:59I am sorry,

09:00I am cutting you short.

09:01Just tell me

09:02why the sacrifice of acceptance

09:04did not benefit the state?

09:06What were the issues?

09:08What were the problems?

09:12Anika,

09:13the problem is simple.

09:15Today,

09:16the statement given by the ISPR

09:18that we are not with any Jamaat

09:20and we are not against any Jamaat.

09:22Yes.

09:23I wish that

09:25the government of 18 months

09:27before taking over,

09:29or while taking over,

09:31during that time,

09:33it should have been said

09:35that in 2014,

09:37how it was planned

09:39and in 2017,

09:41how it was implemented

09:43and in 2018,

09:45how a government was formed.

09:47And what was the loss

09:49to the state?

09:51And who broke the agreement

09:53with the financial institutions?

09:55How many difficulties are there?

09:57The institutions should have said this.

09:59If they had done it today,

10:01it would have been good.

10:03Instead of expecting that from the institutions,

10:05why didn't Mr. Nawaz Sharif

10:07make it clear

10:09that if the government of that time

10:11had fallen on someone's head,

10:13then the government would not have been taken over?

10:15The reason for this, Anika,

10:17is that against us,

10:19such a heavy investment

10:21was made

10:23and so much financing was made

10:25from all over the world

10:27for the people

10:29and the countries

10:31in Pakistan

10:33that whatever you

10:35talk to yourself,

10:37the way our faces

10:39were rubbed

10:41by the media,

10:43that cannot be washed away.

10:45Along with the media,

10:47I am also saying the words

10:49of the facts to your institutions.

10:51I am not saying that someone should speak

10:53in our face.

10:55If you tell the facts,

10:57then all these things

10:59can be corrected

11:01and Pakistan

11:03and the youth

11:05can go to the right direction.

11:07Otherwise, it is getting late.

11:09If you talk about bypass,

11:11it may not be as beneficial

11:13as it should be.

11:15Now let's come to

11:17what you quoted

11:19It is a good thing.

11:21I call it a good thing.

11:23The more it is praised,

11:25the less it is.

11:27Because it has been a fact

11:29that even though there is

11:31a way of self-accountability

11:33in the institutions,

11:35there has never been

11:37self-accountability.

11:39In those institutions,

11:41the support of political

11:43groups or the leadership

11:45of political figures

11:47has always been there.

12:17Do you think this will be correct?

12:21Anika,

12:23if you allow me,

12:25I would like to say

12:27that the DGISPR

12:29that I am quoting,

12:31I am quoting it because

12:33if one institution has started

12:35self-accountability,

12:37according to the statement

12:39of DGISPR,

12:41there is no self-accountability

12:43in other institutions.

12:45Imran Khan's convenience

12:47was not only from one institution,

12:49but from all the institutions.

12:53Good to see you.

12:55Someone's statement

12:57or letter of address

12:59or the statements of

13:01the judges sitting

13:03in the courts.

13:05Whatever is said

13:07in their statements,

13:09a lot of things

13:11come to people's minds.

13:13I think there should be

13:15self-accountability

13:17in other institutions as well.

13:19If after 77 years,

13:21it has come to the point

13:23that one institution

13:25has started self-accountability,

13:27then other institutions

13:29should also start self-accountability.

13:31As far as your question

13:33about Imran Khan's military trial

13:35is concerned,

13:37I don't think

13:39there should be

13:41two systems in Pakistan.

13:43There should be one system.

13:45So I say this

13:47with honesty that

13:49without respecting anyone,

13:51in Pakistan,

13:53till today,

13:55who has played

13:57with Pakistan,

13:59who has attacked

14:01Pakistan's institutions,

14:03who has attacked

14:05Pakistan's atomic defense institutions,

14:07and according to

14:09Imran Khan's laws,

14:11there should be a military trial.

14:13I am sorry, I am cutting you short.

14:15You are endorsing

14:17that there should be

14:19a military trial

14:21of a leader of a political party.

14:23And that will be right.

14:25Tell me, Anika,

14:27if a person kills a member

14:29of a political party,

14:31will you let him go

14:33because he is a leader

14:35of a political party?

14:37No, brother.

14:39The window you opened

14:41on 9th and 10th May,

14:43I don't care

14:45who is coming, who is going,

14:47who is getting caught,

14:49and who is getting released.

14:51I care about the fact

14:53that we have spent our time.

14:55For the coming generations,

14:57if you leave this window open,

14:59then again, God willing,

15:01people will come

15:03and leave their

15:05windows open.

15:07They will make

15:09appointments

15:11on their own.

15:13And this should reach

15:15the end of the month.

15:17And why not?

15:19You are starting a military trial.

15:21And this is a fact.

15:23If someone denies this,

15:25then I think

15:27he is defaming himself

15:29and the state.

15:31Is this not a fact?

15:33We are talking about 9th and 10th May.

15:35On 9th and 10th May,

15:37there was a very interesting statement

15:39by Rana Sanaullah.

15:41Please pay attention

15:43to the discussion.

16:03He is saying that

16:05if everyone sits together,

16:07then we can

16:09get rid of this situation.

16:11Mr. Nawaz Sharif also says

16:13that everyone should sit together

16:15including PTI.

16:17Mr. Nawaz Sharif,

16:19there was no condition on 9th May.

16:21Mr. Rana Sanaullah,

16:23who apologized on 9th May,

16:25himself said that Mr. Nawaz Sharif

16:27did not keep that condition.

16:29Did Mr. Nawaz Sharif forgive him?

16:31Anika,

16:33I am telling you responsibly

16:35that Mr. Nawaz Sharif

16:37did not say anything

16:39about 9th and 10th May

16:41or PTI.

16:43No one said that

16:45he should be ridiculed.

16:47Mr. Rana Sanaullah,

16:49you are giving a wrong statement.

16:51Let me tell you something.

16:53I am telling you

16:55that what Mr. Rana Sanaullah

16:57said

16:59about PTI

17:01or what Mr. Shabaz Shiv

17:03said,

17:05I am not in favour of that.

17:07This is not in the

17:09party's notice.

17:11I am saying that

17:13who has the power

17:15to do this?

17:17Who has the power

17:19to do this?

17:21If someone

17:23from Pakistan

17:25is a terrorist

17:27and he does not have

17:29the right to do this,

17:31then he should

17:33say that

17:35he is wrong.

17:37He should say

17:39that he was involved

17:41in a wrong way.

17:43You are right,

17:45but this is

17:47our own channel

17:49and we believe

17:51that Mr. Nawaz Sharif,

17:53Mr. Rana Sanaullah

17:55Mr. Nawaz Sharif knows

17:57the details of these

17:59discussions and

18:01this is a secret

18:03between them

18:05and everyone else does not know.

18:07Will Mr. Rana Sanaullah

18:09give a statement

18:11on his own?

18:17Listen to me.

18:19I have no knowledge

18:21about the Prime Minister.

18:23I am saying this

18:25on behalf of Mr. Nawaz Sharif

18:27that he did not say this.

18:29Now you can say whatever you want.

18:31So, Mr. Rana Sanaullah

18:33is making a false statement.

18:35I am not saying

18:37that he should answer

18:39on his own.

18:41I am saying this on behalf

18:43of Mr. Nawaz Sharif

18:45that Mr. Nawaz Sharif

18:47did not say this

18:49and he did not involve

18:51in this discussion.

18:55Where would it lead?

18:59The discussion

19:01should be conducted

19:03by all political forces

19:05and all opposition parties.

19:07I am very clear

19:09that it should be conducted

19:11by Mr. Akhtar Mengal,

19:13Mr. Mahmood Achakzai,

19:15Maulana Fazlur Rahman

19:17and all other parties

19:19who believe in the

19:21rule of law.

19:23They have always

19:25fought for the rule of law.

19:27They have always

19:29fought for the rule of law.

19:31They have always

19:33fought for the rule of law.

19:35They have always

19:37fought for the rule of law.

19:39They have always

19:41fought for the rule of law.

19:43They have always

19:45fought for the rule of law.

19:47They have always

19:49fought for the rule of law.

20:17The window is open

20:19at another place.

20:21You are talking about

20:23the violation of the rule of law.

20:25You are talking about

20:27the responsibility of the chair.

20:29There is corruption

20:31going on in your city.

20:33It is a matter of crores.

20:35It is a matter of crores.

20:37It is a matter of crores.

20:39It is a matter of crores.

20:41It is a matter of crores.

20:43It is a matter of crores.

20:45I know that

20:47I know that

20:49you are talking about

20:51a government gang

20:53a government gang

20:55which is a fraud.

20:57I am admitting that

20:59this is a fraud

21:01which is a fraud

21:03on the budget of

21:05Punjab.

21:07People who

21:09live in the same place

21:11every year

21:13and many powerful people, and I am saying this word, powerful people, unfortunately, it started with the era of PTI and billions of rupees,

21:28people used to hear that someone made properties in Canada, someone in London, someone in America,

21:37after that, today, the situation is that they have made so many properties in Pakistan, in Lahore, factories,

21:48and those who were on motorcycles yesterday, today they have made so many properties, and I will tell you a little more.

21:54Sir, it started in the era of PTI, but this cannot be an excuse that in the era of PMLN, this corruption continues, if you are saying this.

22:02Sir, I totally agree with you, but I have a doubt that whenever they were caught in NAB or anti-corruption, they used to give money and escape,

22:16and at that time, powerful people used to support them, and even today, and one name is Saleem Bajwa,

22:24if you catch Saleem Bajwa, then you will know that which powerful people he used to favor in the past, and which powerful people he favors today,

22:35and you will see his connection, that in the elections of 8th February 2024, the 5 seats were bought by a gold mafia, and a big rascal,

22:53and a powerful person of Lahore, and I got a lot of courage today from the statement of DGISPR, that no matter how powerful he is,

23:05no matter which organization he is related to, we will hold him accountable, I hope that he will definitely be seen,

23:12and whatever happened in Lahore, and billions of rupees, and he will have an inter-connection with them, and this 40-50 billion,

23:22that is very interesting, I just gave a suggestion, you have told the story, but we will continue discussing it on another show,

23:29Mr. Javed Lateef, thank you very much for joining me in the program, we will go towards the break, and we will come back after the break,

23:33so in the country, the one who drinks water, is no longer the one who drinks, why?

23:39Welcome back after the break, for the common people, on one hand, there are economic problems, on the other hand, social problems,

23:44and on the third hand, political problems, and on the fourth hand, there is a problem, which is a big challenge for the people of Pakistan,

23:52drinking water is not prohibited in some cities, but where it is available, is it drinkable or not, this is becoming an important question,

23:59in 29 cities, 61% of the water is non-drinkable, and why is it non-drinkable?

24:06because somewhere, there is some adulteration going on, whether it is chemical adulteration, or microbial adulteration,

24:12in the National Assembly, it was collected, and today, the answer to this question was asked,

24:16in most of the cities of Pakistan, the underground water reservoirs, have been declared as polluted,

24:22in the survey conducted by the Council for the Research of Water Resources, it has been made clear,

24:26that the underground water of 29 big cities of the country, is polluted and harmful,

24:32Shaheed Bain, Azerabad, Mirpur Khas, Gilgit Baltistan's water is 100% unsafe,

24:37while Multan's, 94% in Karachi, 93% in Badin, 92% in Bahawalpur, 76% in Sargodha, 83% in Hyderabad, 80% in Muzaffarabad,

24:48and 67% in Sakkhar, according to the WHO and UNICEF report, only 36% of the population in Pakistan,

24:59uses clean drinking water, the rest of the population uses non-drinkable water,

25:04Mahini says that the use of non-drinkable water, is the cause of cancer and many other serious diseases,

25:13because in the water, there are unhealthy amounts of arsenic,

25:18drinking polluted water, people are suffering from skin diseases, breathing problems,

25:23and heart problems, and the Pakistan health system will not be able to bear the burden of this,

25:30along with this, getting seawater, in the aquifers of clean water, is also a very serious problem,

25:36which has to be solved, Dr. Hassan Abbas is with us,

25:39Mahir, this is Amoor, thank you very much for joining us, it's a pleasure having you in the program,

25:43Doctor, we can't even drink clean water, this is even more worrisome,

25:48that working from day to night, and going home, or drinking water during the day,

25:53that is also a way to kill you, why is this, where is our planning?

25:57See, our planning, from the beginning, has been on surface water,

26:02all your big projects, in the water sector, are on surface water,

26:08if you look at Pindi Islamabad, there are 3 big projects on surface water,

26:12of Simli Dam, Rawal Dam, and Khanpur Dam,

26:16if I give you an example of these 3 projects,

26:20these 3 projects that have been done, many years ago,

26:24if you have to do these 3 projects in today's time,

26:28this is an investment of more than 1 billion dollars,

26:31but despite these 3 projects, the water needs that are being fulfilled here,

26:36that 70% of the water needs are from ground water,

26:39people do it because it is boring,

26:41yes, so 70% still in this city, which is your capital city,

26:45along with Mallika, Twin City, Rawalpindi,

26:48here also, 70% of your water is coming from ground water,

26:54so basically your resource is ground water,

26:57but all your planning, all your investment is on surface water,

27:02your research and management on ground water is not serious at all,

27:09if you look at any big water department,

27:13VAPDA, VASA, Irrigation Department,

27:16all these departments have at best civil engineers for water management,

27:22I have also done civil engineering,

27:25and I know that water management is not taught in civil engineering,

27:29it has nothing to do with water, especially cleanliness,

27:32I have nothing against civil engineers,

27:35I am also a civil engineer,

27:37civil engineers can tell you how to build a project,

27:41they cannot tell you why to build a project,

27:44water experts will tell you why,

27:46fair enough,

27:47now the question arises that our ground water is so polluted,

27:53a common man spends a lot of money on his house,

27:56gets water from it and uses it,

27:59now this water has chemical issues,

28:03it also has microbial contamination,

28:05along with that the unhealthy levels of arsenic,

28:08these are automatically going towards slow poisoning,

28:11how to deal with this existing poisoning,

28:14how to clean it,

28:15and how to stop further poisoning of our aquifers,

28:18underground aquifers.

28:20The first thing is that your aquifers are being polluted,

28:26you talked about arsenic,

28:28arsenic is a very serious problem,

28:30and where does arsenic come from in water,

28:32basically your soil,

28:34naturally there is arsenic in it,

28:37but that arsenic is not present until its chemical mobilization is not there,

28:43when we add potassium based fertilizers,

28:48or add pesticides,

28:51or these chemicals which are used in our big irrigation system,

28:56the inert arsenic in the soil,

29:00with that the chemical reaction mobilizes it,

29:03and then it dissolves with water and starts.

29:07So the first thing is that this is a very serious problem,

29:11you are adding these chemicals and fertilizers

29:15on top of the soil,

29:18and with that the water which is absorbed underground,

29:22in that arsenic is mobilized.

29:24So this is one reason.

29:25You have to revisit your irrigation methods and agricultural chemicals

29:30with some order,

29:33with some angle,

29:35we have to revisit them in other words.

29:37Yes, but here your farmer and your farming community,

29:42they have not been educated about this,

29:45and they just see how to maximize their crop production,

29:49and whatever chemical companies advertise,

29:53they add it and the crop becomes good,

29:55and they don't think of more than that,

29:58whereas their own children are drinking water from the ground.

30:01Now the chemical and microbial contamination,

30:04where does it come from and how to deal with it,

30:06tell us the overall solution.

30:07The overall solution is that your chemical and microbial,

30:10your microbial comes from the sewage system,

30:12if you don't arrange your sewage disposal properly,

30:16We have put the sewage system in the rivers, unfortunately.

30:18Exactly, see your Leh river,

30:20which passes through the middle of Pindi Islamabad,

30:22this is the biggest source of recharging the groundwater,

30:26and all our waste, untreated,

30:29all even solid waste,

30:31is thrown in the middle of this,

30:33in Islamabad and Rawalpindi,

30:35and this is going into your groundwater.

30:37This is the condition of the Sawa river as well.

30:38After that it goes into the Sawa,

30:40from there your Rawal dam comes,

30:42from there your Kurang river comes,

30:44from here the Leh river comes.

30:45In Karachi, there are open sewage channels.

30:47Yes, yes, in the same way,

30:48this is the same thing there as well,

30:49because this sewage and this sewage and the waterway,

30:52this is basically a natural system,

30:54to recharge the groundwater of nature.

30:56We have started throwing pollution and waste in between them,

31:00so now obviously it will ultimately go into the groundwater.

31:02And does chemical contamination come from factories?

31:05See, the issue of chemical contamination in Pakistan is very serious.

31:09First of all, all your factories, sugar mills,

31:13all these are throwing their own chemical fluid,

31:18they are either throwing it in the drains,

31:20the drains of your scarp,

31:22the drains of irrigation,

31:23they are throwing it in those,

31:24and ultimately it comes into the river from there.

31:27And from the river, it pollutes its water.

31:30The second big issue you have,

31:32is that when you made the SINTAS agreement,

31:35you accepted that the four dirty drains of India,

31:39will come and fall in Ravi and Satluj.

31:42Now, if you control all kinds of pollution in your country,

31:46then what will you do about the international agreement you made from there?

31:49Environmental terrorism is happening from there.

31:51By the way, tell me this,

31:52where is the Environmental Protection Agency?

31:54I have 30 seconds.

31:56See, what will the Environmental Protection Agency do about this?

31:59Because the Environmental Protection Agency can only tell you

32:02that you don't have to do this work.

32:04How many powers does it have to enforce?

32:07And who has to enforce this?

32:09This is not just the job of an Environmental Protection Agency.

32:11This is the job of your mayor level people,

32:14the people of your district administration.

32:17Okay, right.

32:18Dr. Hassan, thank you very much for joining me in the program.

32:21We will go towards the break with this.

32:22See you after the break.

32:25Welcome back after the break.

32:26Gaza is still burning.

32:27Whether we talk or not,

32:28whether we get busy in our lives,

32:30but more than 50,000 people have been martyred in Gaza.

32:34According to the data of Euromet,

32:36there are actually 48,380 people who have been martyred.

32:40And this data is from August 21.

32:42Before this, the data was continuously updated.

32:46But Israel has actually targeted journalists,

32:50targeted those people who have organizations,

32:52including UNRWA,

32:54and there are many other organizations of the UN

32:56that used to provide data,

32:58targeted hospitals,

33:00targeted schools,

33:01targeted refugee camps,

33:03targeted ambulances,

33:05so that the circulation of data to the rest of the world is also stopped.

33:09And now the situation has reached to the point

33:11that it is being planned in Gaza to erase it properly.

33:17Recently, Netanyahu showed a picture

33:20in which the West Bank is also not present.

KHABAR | Aniqa Nisar | ARY News | 5th September 2024

Category

Transcript

Recommended