" Zaati Raye Hai Hukoomat Do Tahai Aksariyat Nahi Rakhti Aeen Ko Haath Nahi Lagana Chahiye,"
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Sir, it would be right to say that the party has already talked about the Nikahs of Noor-Alam's bill and the party has approved it.
00:07So, of course, it goes without saying that the JUIF will support all the Nikahs as per their bill.
00:15Before me, you gave it to Noor-Alam. Why are you getting it amended?
00:22I am not putting my words in your mouth. I am just asking a question.
00:27He does the same work all day. So, don't make me do this work.
00:31No, no, it is very important. It is being discussed all day.
00:34It is like this. It is fixed for tomorrow. This matter is fixed. Maulana was not here today. He had gone somewhere else.
00:40So, he might have reached. This issue is for discussion. Maulana has fixed it for tomorrow.
00:46Okay, I will do it like this. I will make it a little difficult and easy.
00:49So, you said that tomorrow there will be a final decision in this regard. Am I right?
00:53You can call it a final decision or whatever you want to call it. But Maulana has said that it will be discussed.
00:59Tomorrow there will be a discussion about this.
01:01Okay, since you are the legal mind of the party and you said yesterday as well in our program
01:05that if there is any issue related to the amendment of the JUIF, it will come to me because I will give a legal opinion.
01:09So, it is safe for you.
01:11Normally, it happens that wherever there is a legal issue, it is discussed with me.
01:20Exceptions come at times.
01:22So, is Noor Alam's bill an exception that has not been discussed with you or has been discussed with you?
01:27He has booked it himself as a member. It was not in my knowledge.
01:31It came to my knowledge when the media started coming.
01:36You got to know by looking at the ticker of the TV like us.
01:39I got to know later.
01:42Okay, fine.
01:44In the bill of Mr. Daniel Chaudhary, I don't know if you have heard it or not,
01:50he is saying that the number of judges should be increased from 17 to 20.
01:54Is your party clear on this bill or will you not support it?
01:58We had a meeting with the PTI today.
02:05And we have made some decisions in that meeting.
02:08The decision is that we have to move forward issue to issue.
02:13And whatever such matters will be, we will sit and decide among ourselves.
02:18If we have a disagreement, we will also clear it.
02:21So, when two parties are trying to move forward on one issue,
02:25then I think that it would not be right for me to give my verdict in it.
02:31Okay, sir, as a lawyer, you are in favor of this bill.
02:38Mr. Noor Alam was giving his opinion in great detail.
02:41But I have left his opinion. I am asking you as an independent lawyer.
02:45When the representative of the people of Pakistan does not have this right,
02:48which is only made by the law, that he should be subject to dual citizenship,
02:52then a person can be hanged by the pen of a judge.
02:56He should not be subject to dual citizenship at all.
02:58Do you understand this? Is this a good suggestion in your opinion?
03:01It should be like this.
03:03I have another opinion in this.
03:08It is possible that the parties approve it or not.
03:11At this time, we understand that the government is defective and not de jure.
03:18So, when the government is not de jure,
03:21then the matter of making such big amendments is going on.
03:26But I think it is better not to touch the Constitution on the stage.
03:31This is my personal opinion.
03:33It is possible that it is wrong. It is possible that the parties agree with it.
03:35It is possible that the parties do not agree with it.
03:37Okay.
03:38And sir, let me tell you one last time.
03:39Today, there was a hearing of the Law Committee,
03:41in which you and the PTI were present.
03:43So, what is this committee about?
03:46Is this the reason that whatever is going to happen in the future,
03:48there will be an effort by you and the PTI,
03:50so that you can take a common wisdom?
03:53In all matters of legislation,
03:56we will share things with each other.
04:01And if we can move forward together,
04:04we will let them know.
04:06If we cannot move forward together, we will let them know.
04:09I mean, we have an agreement with both the parties
04:13that we will not keep each other in the dark.
04:17If we can work with them in any matter,
04:19we will let them know.
04:20If they can work with us in any matter,
04:22we will let them know.
04:23And if they cannot work with us,
04:24we will let them know.
04:25Keep them in the dark.
04:26Because I think there has already been a lot of darkness
04:28and darkness between the two of you.
04:30Let me tell you the last thing.
04:32Today, the quorum was pointed out
04:34and the hearing did not go ahead.
04:36Now, Mr. Noor-Alam's bill says that
04:38Mr. Maulana will come tomorrow and the matter will be discussed.
04:39So, if the hearing had gone ahead today,
04:41what would have happened today?
04:42Anyway, the study had to go to the committee,
04:43but then what would have happened?
04:45So, it would have gone.
04:46So, it would have gone.
04:47So, the committee would have assumed that
04:49I will move a bill.
04:51The party has an objection tomorrow
04:53because the seat is in the hands of the party.
04:55And if the party has an objection,
04:58then I can withdraw it at that stage as well.
05:02Or if the party approves it,
05:04then the party will take it forward.
05:07Then it will be the responsibility of the party
05:09so that it can get support for it.
05:11Thank you very much, sir.