FEMISODE 0120 Loving Gardening

FOOTPATHS IN CRISIS films

This is:  WORLDWIDE SOLUTIONS  PLANETTE EARTH MOTHER  IDEAS FOR A NEW WORLD  (Full Series Playlist Link Just Below)   This new series is based on my essay that a sexist at Facebook blocked. I will be publishing the scripts in essay form as I release each Femisode of the series.   Many, many more links to my full body of work including music, film, writing are at the bottom of this description.   PLANETTE EARTH MOTHER Series: Femisodes Scripts: http://jasonwadehoward.blogspot.com/2024/06/worldwide-solutions-planette-earth.html?m=1   Full Playlist For This Series: https://www.dailymotion.com/playlist/x8fhs0   Original essay: http://jasonwadehoward.blogspot.com/2024/04/superspecielle-feminism.html?m=1   All my feature length documentaries that cover common land and footpath rights issues in West Norfolk and many other very serious concerns in this region and our nation, are available on this channel in 30min episodes ... check out my full links list below for shortcuts to the documentary films   My three latest projects are also on DAILYMOTION now. I have just completed a documentary series about the sugar beet industry, and my new pre-series called Talking And Walking has started on DAILYMOTION: it is the prologue to this series.   It is time to Feminise Reality :)   ... Merci Les Bien, Thank You Very Much Everyone    LINKS:   Official Governmental Petition For Equal Representation For Women In Every Political Constituency   https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/659743/sponsors/new?token=at-a-DZ9X2gpr2pYhzMZ   Dailymotion: 30min Versions Of "Footpaths In Crisis" Documentaries:  Channel: https://www.dailymotion.com/uk_footpaths_in_crisis  Playlist: https://www.dailymotion.com/playlist/x83hta   (PLEASE CHECK OUT THE SANDRINGHAM DOCUMENTARIES HERE ON DAILYMOTION, AND THERE IS ALSO VERY IMPORTANT INFORMATION IN ALL THE OTHER FILMS ALSO INCLUDED HERE ON DAILYMOTION ; Merci, thankyou )   Dailymotion: Sugarbeet Problems:  Playlist: https://www.dailymotion.com/playlist/x8a7ja   Dailymotion: Talking And Walking:  Playlist: https://dailymotion.com/playlist/x8b12w   Dailymotion: West Norfolk Shorts:  Playlist: https://www.dailymotion.com/playlist/x87iaw   Main Blog:  https://jasonwadehoward.blogspot.com   Metaphysical Theory Of Infinity:  http://jasonwadehowardadditional.blogspot.com/2013/03/infinitys-evolving-strata-and-life.html?m=1   THE.CACOPHONIC.QUADRANT. Music Channel:  https://www.youtube.com/@the.cacophonic.quadrant.   Search Me Blog:  https://jasonwadehoward.blogspot.com/p/blog-page.html?m=1   YouTube: Full Length Versions Of "Footpaths In Crisis" Documentaries:  https://www.youtube.com/@UKFootpathsInCrisis  https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5QNfRoQzoKaz6Np0_sFIA0KBtwQ3dae6   CONTACT:  Facebook:   Jason HowardLove: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100090638659423   Twitter:  Jason HowardLove: https://twitter.com/JasonHowardLove   Email Contact:  jason_howard@hotmail.co.uk   #Leziate #Love #Feminism #Equality  #HilGay

Transcript

00:00In this series I am discussing the essential need for this planet and all her peoples to

00:25feminise our viewpoints and behaviours.

00:30World Wide Solutions, Planet Earth Mother, Ideas for a New World.

00:35Please see my previous documentaries as a valuable introduction to this series.

00:39Sugar Beet Problems Conclusion Episodes 4 and 5 and my Talking and Walking mini-series

00:44of three episodes are important viewing and essential to contextualise this project.

00:49I will be publishing the minutes script from each episode of the series onto my blog page

00:54jasonwadehoward.blogspot.com as I release each episode.

00:59My original blog post for the first version of this essay was blocked by someone at Facebook

01:03who invoked the spam application to get my blog URL marked as an unshareable on Facebook

01:08link.

01:09This redraft includes the info from the first essay but it largely expands its coverage.

01:24Prejudicial Gardening, Ethical Gardening, Duty of Care

01:46As people whom look after spaces on planet earth mother many of us often find we are

01:52in a position of compassionately providing a duty of care for all plants and trees and

01:58other than human animal organisms within set out areas of planet earth mothers surface.

02:05We are provided a stable environment in which to live and thrive by earth mothers cuddle.

02:11And as her children and of her very flesh we are part of one family of organisms that

02:16all are cherished by our mothers eternal huggly cuggly snuggly wuggly buggly motherly

02:22loverly lovey wovey woo woos.

02:26In a new world of love such disgusting and prejudicial terms like referring to some plants

02:31as weeds are to be made illegal.

02:35People whom tend gardens at present seem to think they can kill any plants and destroy

02:39their habitats with no thought to ethical considerations towards plants and trees and

02:45peoples who live there like microorganisms and insects and birds and small mammals.

02:52All these peoples have rights to remain and thrive without hindrance and upset and plant

02:58life has the same rights.

03:02Man has bought into the idea that he is the lord and master of all he surveys but this

03:07is certainly not the case.

03:09A new feminine world removes man from his self supposed pedestal and gives all rights

03:16to occupants of land regardless of their species across the whole tree of life.

03:22When tending gardens the well being of plants is of utmost importance and at times the most

03:28unethically overlooked consideration in the minds of garden minders.

03:34People seem to have a god like assumption of themselves and certainly do not look after

03:37those organisms within their care to even minimum levels of ethical care considerations.

03:44Plants at times are left in seriously detrimental condition to their well being health, serious

03:50conditions of biocellular torment.

03:53One can think of every cell in an organism as an independent microorganism that is in

03:58a vulnerable life experience due to their interdependence upon the health of the organism

04:04as a whole entity, a person worthy of love and cherishment.

04:10The way we tend gardens as regards the watering and feeding of plants has effects upon the

04:14garden as a whole as there are untold other species reliant upon the health and nourishment

04:20supplied by plants.

04:22The frequency of watering and quality of water are very important for all organisms to be

04:28healthy.

04:30Gardeners do not get this right because they do not have the prerequisite knowledge to

04:35tend the people of that garden effectively and lovingly.

04:39As a society as a whole we have a duty of care towards every garden and the well being

04:46of every gardener, so for to ensure the ability to provide care to ensure the non suffering

04:53of every plant person and every animal person including microorganisms.

04:59If someone is unable to provide care to a complex space like a small backyard or large

05:04formal gardens they must be helped in doing so, in energy and love and understanding and

05:11knowledge.

05:13When people are freed from the eternal torment of doing jobs they do not want to do they

05:18find a new love and blossoming cherishment conceptualises within their hearts mind towards

05:24the enjoyment and loving nurturing of spaces they now feel enthusiastically energised

05:29to tend to with burgeoning compassionising and forever cuddly wuddly woo woos.

05:36The duty of loving care we all have for all organisms within gardens and wider environmental

05:42settings.

05:44Man does not think he has a duty of care towards all peoples and organisms on this planet.

05:49He only thinks of his duty of care towards his own individual bank balance or institutions

05:54of behaviour that can contribute to his individual bank balance.

05:58So a global financial war not a feministic cuddle.

06:03This attitude translates across the whole of planet earth mother's body.

06:07Man sees the world as his garden not as women's and children's of all species.

06:12Not as the mummy of all peoples of all species.

06:16Not as the loving mother of all people of our super species.

06:21We have to have consideration towards all species of all sizes.

06:25All animal life on planet earth mother suffers and the majority of the suffering is down

06:29to man's indifference towards the duty of care that children and women and kind men

06:35know we are responsible to provide towards all species and all environments.

06:41In a garden setting every organism deserves to be cared for to the highest abilities possible

06:46and of the most ethically considerate viewpoint.

06:49We may think that soil and water or plant food is enough but we have a duty of care

06:54to understand the individual requirements of each plant person and all the other animal

06:59life within the garden setting.

07:01Of course we have to be knowledgeable or seek help to ensure plants get suitable soil substrates

07:06and correct water mineralisations as per their individual species needs.

07:11Simply planting and expecting a generalistic approach to be ethical is completely unacceptable

07:16and will be made illegal.

07:19The setting in which a plant finds herself is also of utmost importance as light requirements

07:24and all year round exposure to the elements reactions differs according to plant species

07:29and individuals.

07:31Real time scanning of plants and their biological systems is an essential treatment process

07:36so for to ensure that they are happy and content because some plants will grow adaptive physiological

07:41biochemical mechanisms and macro structural biomechanisms to cope with ideal or non-ideal

07:48conditions alike and we need to fully understand these mechanisms of adaptive growth so for

07:53to provide the absolutely highest standard of love and care.

07:57The coping with non-optimal conditions can be facilitated with acquisition of advanced

08:01real time physiological knowledge to develop correct nutritional supplementation schedules

08:06and malleable and reactive environment considerations so for to ensure a plant living outside of

08:12her Goldilocks zone can maintain her rights to remain by those whom would be responsible

08:17to love her meeting wellbeing legislation requirements to cuddle in flourishment.

08:24This knowledge does not provide one with leeway to just plant wherever and see what happens

08:28through experimental torture. This has been the method of mass murder in the past and

08:33can no longer be ever ever accepted. We do have to look at all existing plants worldwide

08:38and build up a database of knowledge so for to ensure torture symptomatic anatomical phenotypical

08:43morphologies are not ever seen again in any plant species. Such biochemical, biomolecular

08:50and biomechanical torture meted out upon any species in the tree of life can never

08:55again be permissible. Men running the world can't even get minimal care right as regards

09:00their own kids diets and psychological sheltering from rape and torture or even cherish their

09:05own bodies with healthy only food and zero substance abuse let alone deliver a duty of

09:11care to microorganisms, plants, insects and all other animal species. Women of the world

09:18are nurturers and will not settle for anything less than total and inclusive mothering for

09:24all of planet earth mothers bubbers. So such things as water quality in a garden is not

09:29enough. Can you believe tap water is used to semi poison plants worldwide? Correct water

09:36mineralisations per each plants biochemical wishes are essential and will be legislated

09:42for. In a future girly world of snuggle cuggles for all baby boo boos the killing of any plants

09:49and mutilation of their bodies could be made illegal. The eating of any fruits before they

09:54have dropped could be made illegal. The eating of seeds could also be made illegal and the

09:59referring to any species as weeds will be outlawed. Certain tenets I have just suggested

10:06may very well become ideals that I am willing to politically fight for I just haven't had

10:11enough time to consider the full implications of not allowing plants their life cycles and

10:16bodies and babies unattacked. The moving of plant species including trees is highly controversial

10:24as many people agree that plants have mother given rights to their own space without interference.

10:31The moving of plants or trees one might say should only be done if the plant requires

10:36optimal circumstances that are at present denied by their location. But some people

10:41feel that one should make good a plant's location because that location is theirs i.e. facilitate

10:48optimal light through utilisation of lights and or mirrors or sunscreens or filters and

10:55not plant species next to each other that might hinder each other either by physical

11:00growth incursion on each other's space that can be a detriment or indeed even allow plants

11:05to harm each other by poisoning each other accidentally via entwining. Of course plants

11:11should never really end up in non-optimal conditions and we must ensure they always

11:15find a home conducive to their own personalistic preferences. Plants speak to us and let us

11:21know their preferences through the medium of anatomy, structuralisations and physiological

11:27conditionings. We have to be knowledgeable enough and we have to care enough to respond

11:32immediately. So as I suggest new real time scanning studies have to be forthcoming so

11:38for to ensure the perfectional life experiences all life deserves. Whenever moving anything

11:45in a garden we must be fully aware of the ramifications upon well being of anyone affected.

11:50It is not for members of our species to prioritise our own overbearing desires as regards spacing

11:57and planting and moving of structures without talking to all other animal species first

12:02and considering the rights to space of all plants and trees that already have and hold

12:06accommodation rights within the garden space. Anybody whom has lifted an item in a garden

12:13knows that underneath there could be plant roots that will now be exposed or ants or

12:18wood lice or other species that have their homes there. Of course in the future all these

12:24species will be able to liaise and will have their own buildings and cities and stuff.

12:29So such considerations will be of less to no regard. But on our way to achieving our

12:34new world of all species communication we must hold ourselves at all times to the highest

12:39of ethical considerations. All peoples of all species whom suffer, and this does include

12:45the biomolecular and biomechanical suffering of plant life, we all deserve to be treated

12:52with the greatest possible respect at all times. Every time a tree has been felled since

12:58the dawn of time genocide has been committed against those peoples whom live on that tree.

13:04Men care not for bird people and mammal people that build homes in trees and the insects

13:10living on a tree can be multitudinous in number. The main population of people that live on

13:15a tree are microorganisms. People whom live and breathe and feed and have babies. Absolutely

13:23no regard is paid to these people whom feel joy and pain and suffer under the murderous

13:29ways of men whom assume superiority to just felled trees and cut them up as they see fit.

13:35When trees are cut the people living on the bark and into the woods flesh are killed without

13:40mercy in horrendous ways. Massacred with saws and chemical treatments, scalding oils

13:47and burnt alive in heat treatments. When trees are felled untold amounts of larger species

13:53are mortally scared and displaced and man cares for nothing but money and convenience.

14:00The severity of murder enacted upon native species across vast areas of planet earth

14:04mothers skin has been the horror story of mass serial murderous deforestation that man

14:10has mercilessly slaughtered his way down through the ages amongst uncountable corpses

14:15of any and all species that seeks refuge amongst the verdant fecundity of planet wide forest

14:22that no longer exists. Man has murdered his way to lands devoid of trees, to barren fields

14:29that within he commits mass murder of mammals, insects and micro-peoples year on year by

14:35spraying poison murder chemicals and taking away the food for his selfish self only. And

14:41the people whom would stop him are starved and systematically monetarily raped into subservience

14:48with pointless jobs to make more money for rich profit stealing murderers. All those

14:53whom with conscience would battle him caught in a money trap of systematic rape and murder.

14:59We live in a system of misery and murder against all species and lowly working classes and

15:04man's complicity is his evidence of guilt, his judge, his jury and ultimate executioner

15:12for the salvation of this world and prosperousness for all and life extension is held beyond

15:18reach by selfish greed. We want our trees back and luscious plantiferous cuddly wuddly

15:25spaces for superspecial enjoyment and eternal snuggle buggle cuggle huggle. Techniques to

15:32make materials for building and furniture and boats are possible to acquire that do

15:38not involve genocide reminding tree felling, materials that have the same properties or

15:44better than tree flesh. They can be made by 3D printing techniques using renewable energies

15:51far cheaper than tree murder and mass genocide of millions of species. But rich on the top

15:57of the world business that doesn't profit anyone but himself, man, just seems to want

16:01to continue to commit serial murder and genocide just to please his murderous nature and make

16:07cash. Every time a plant is killed or burnt or moved to a different location murderous

16:13genocide is committed against the microorganism people that live on their plant mama. Every

16:20time you boil a vegetable you are burning microorganism people alive, cephalized peoples

16:26whom feel pain. We must begin the process of rescuing micro-peoples from suffering and

16:32part of this is not allowing micro-peoples to perish during the cooking of food like

16:37vegetables and fruits. The torture of grass eating peoples by grass being too short is

16:44another consideration that men have been oblivious to, another thing they are to apologise for.

16:51The grass is very uncomfortable for grazing animal peoples to consume and man's intentional

16:57obliviousness to this obvious fact shows his lack of morality. That coupled with the fact

17:02grass seeds provide vast amounts of nutrition but men prefer to cut grass just for the sake

17:09of cutting it rather than allowing his present day and historically paedophilically raped

17:14dead body slaves to eat well and heartily and without strain. And the assumption that

17:21herbivores are not omnivores considering the amount of animal life they are consuming through

17:26the eating of grass covered in micro-peoples is just evidence of man's lack of knowledge

17:32and disregard towards the lives of micro-peoples. Every time a man mass murders a mower over

17:39grass he commits genocide upon micro-peoples and insects. Cutting grass is micro-peoples

17:46genocide and insect mass murder. Even walking on grass commits mass murder as the micro-peoples

17:54you squash under your foot and whom live on the bottom of your foot can be crushed to

17:59death. We have to rescue all micro-peoples worldwide and provide them with their own

18:05homely spaces that do not involve dangers. Even having a shower at present is genocide

18:11because of the micro-peoples living on your skin. When you wash your bedclothes you are

18:17committing genocide. So for to extend ourselves maximally upon the certainty of reparational

18:25need and ethical justice we have to figure an illimitable compassionised movement of

18:31lamentation and infinite respect so for to bestow upon all species whom have toiled and

18:37suffered and perished, peoples of all species and sizes, a befitting and extended period

18:44of full-heartened mourning. In this now told and illimitable regard the immediate cessation

18:52of many civilisation activities has to be undertaken. An immediate end to murder and

18:58dead body consumption is not going to be sufficient to find justice and resting peace

19:03for the peoples whom have been lost. An immediate end to all tree felling across planet earth

19:10mother is essential because every time a tree is cut down it is genocide. Out of respect

19:16for the hundreds of millions of years of lives lost to natural and intentional tree felling

19:22we will have to have a meaningful break from cutting down trees. The loss of life because

19:28of deforestation has been of such horrific severity so to make a number of a decillion

19:34babies murdered to a small figure. I would suggest that we stop cutting trees down for

19:40one hundred years and then reassess. But a thousand years would seem insignificant, a

19:47million an insult to all loving morality. Vast numbers of mothers babies have been lost

19:54to natural tree felling by various mechanisms since the evolution of plants themselves.

20:00Just because lives have been lost because of natural occurrences it does not justify

20:05a disgusting right to not meaningfully and lovingly memorialise all peoples and their

20:11babies. And trees have been intentionally felled by large species for hundreds of millions

20:18of years. I do not see us ever cutting trees down ever again in the future because the

20:25ability to make materials with multifarious material properties makes tree flesh obsolete

20:31as a building material. The only way we could have ever cut a tree down would have been

20:36if she was uncolonised by peoples of all sizes. But this has never been the case. And

20:43the fact that this has been such a severe and unendingly extended horrific tragedy coupled

20:48with the truth that we do not need tree based materials anymore I see no reason to seek

20:54to continue to fell trees in the future even if it could be done with no loss of life other

21:01than the trees. Due to the genocide upon uncountable populations of peoples whom have

21:07called trees their homes, whom have perished upon the loss of their home mother's life,

21:12the destroying of all objects and artefacts that have ever been made from tree flesh,

21:16including books, is not an ethical decision we can make, only a compassionately logical

21:21certainty of love truth. Such decisions are unmakeable by their very nature of obviousness

21:28directioned moral imperative. Certainly many decisions like this cannot be made by referendum

21:36because the answers are so obvious when utilising compassionate logic that to ask the questions

21:41and allow a yes no answer or even a yes defer answer would be utterly disgusting and an

21:47unending insult to morality. Destroying all objects made of tree flesh herself however

21:54is an ethos of compassion that a lot of people could support I think. Definitely all items

21:59made of leather or ivory, any body pieces will have to be destroyed but secondary items

22:06like tree flesh and plant matter fabricated items like clothes and books and furniture

22:12and plastics and paintings. Is the strength found to draw the line at secondary items

22:20or primary items within such a moral question? Are these items secondary? Certainly the wider

22:29reaching extrapolations of this concept is the destruction of all buildings on planet

22:33earth mother, a raising to the ground of all structures due to the use of wood and dead

22:38body fuels like coal in the heating of steel and baking of bricks. This would probably

22:44be too much of an emotional step for people to accept or even be expected to accept due

22:49to the R story of suffering and lack of ability to stop this suffering sooner. It is feasible

22:55we could have done better but we couldn't or we would have. Cause and effect is a prison

23:02of the conscience. To lose the beautiful side of our heritage is very emotional and yet

23:08women were kept subservient and raped throughout. But of recent times good people have led lives

23:16to the highest of possible moral standards in cherishment of their partners and children

23:21and friends and family and they have made art utilising materials that could be deemed

23:26unworthy of remaining. Where do we draw the line? Does a painting have to be repainted

23:34utilising compassionately pure materials, materials we develop for our future? If we

23:40repaint a painting that was originally created with ethically unacceptable material can we

23:46moralise its recreation? Can a painting ever be painted because its very concept is tainted?

23:55Should an innocent child producing beautiful art be expected to give up their original

23:59works in adulthood due to the manoeuvrings of existential cause and effect? Can we feel

24:07that we are simply once again being punished by this reality we are born into? Can we expect

24:14ourselves to give up so much of that which we have lovingly created, places we have loved

24:20in and died in? To raise this planet to the ground is difficult to contemplate. And also

24:27in this regard should we seriously consider the possibility that we can no longer justify

24:33the continued using of the book physio concept? Books have always been made from genocidally

24:40acquired materials and in the same way that women want every building a girl has ever

24:44been raped in knocked down, the whole book as a physical item concept is a difficult

24:49one to moralise retainment of. Some especially kind and considerate people may suggest we

24:55do away with the written word itself based upon such like understandably understandable,

25:00lovingly moral considerations. Such questions require decisions upon morality of the compassionatist

25:08cuddling. And women are perfectly positioned psychologically to lead us all forwards in

25:14squidgy booboo's lovey woos. And in this regard we have to create love, decisions for how

25:21long each species of vegetable will no longer be eaten. As genocide moral reparations are

25:27to take precedence over our rights to not care and our rights to eat. Picking a list

25:33of vegetables and fruits to not eat for say a two year period out of respect and to cycle

25:39the species we select for respectful hiatus is an approach of moral reparation that the

25:45girls might think was very appropriate. The cutting of branches of trees and plants has

25:51massive ethical considerations too as this is genocide upon micro-peoples whom live on

25:56leaves and branches. The history of murder is massive and a definite reason to stop all

26:02intentional damage to plants and trees out of respect for those whom have died. Also

26:07to mention a plant's rights to her own flesh. We also have ethical considerations towards

26:14the eating of seeds and nuts as they are babies of trees. And plants and trees produce a lot

26:20of babies that we have a duty of care towards. Do we eat them or nurture them? Do inedible

26:26plants often have edible seeds that we could eat? Is it ethical to leave them to perish

26:33when they could be eaten instead of being left to fail in their propagation phase? So

26:38the ethics of consuming seeds as they are plant babies and the fact far too many seeds

26:43are produced for the land available also presents the possibility of contraception techniques

26:49for plant life that is also possible without chemicals. Utilising methods I will not explain

26:55here. Is it ethical to force contraception upon plants and use morality as the excuse

27:03to enforce? So contraception for plants with non-chemical technology and the ethics of

27:09non-permission so far too reduced seeds produced has socio-emotio ethical implications as many

27:16kind people are very determined to promote the concept that all seeds deserve life. The

27:23fact permission can't be acquired is of massive consideration. Seeds may be in dormant state

27:30as in not biochemically animated until they are rehydrated so it is not to take a life

27:35to eat a seed but to not give a life as in not to plant. But of course being emotional

27:42and ethical custodians of planet earth mother's womb we must consider our duty of care towards

27:47not allowing seeds to dehydrate in the first place so as to cuddle a continuation of life

27:54without a cellular torment dehydration phase. Contraception for micro-peoples and the ethics

28:00of non-permission is also of massive consideration. One can acquire permission from micro-peoples

28:07upon their reaching the ability to lingualise and the possibilities of raised cognitive

28:12functions due to increased brain sizes facilitated by enough care so far to nurture for body

28:18size increases that are inherent to certain species but difficult to attain due to their

28:23challenging eco-systemal conditions are of cuddle importance. Or utilisation of technologies

28:31I will not mention here to allow their bodies and or brains to increase in size when genetics

28:37stroke phenotypics does not allow so for to create loving and full family centric lives.

28:44The ethics of plant consumption itself and the loving insistence that all plants deserve

28:49their life cycle to not only be provided but be nurtured in optimal conditions is of serious

28:55regard to many plant lovers. Many plants are grown in climates they are not native to and

29:01then they suffer mortal die back. Planet earth mother is cooler now and many plants are reliant

29:07by circumstance upon their seeds to propagate for their lineages to continue. We as non-caring

29:13eaters of plant matter rarely respect or hold plants needs in high regard. We plant such

29:19species as tomato or cucumber but do not safeguard their lives throughout cold winters and they

29:26will rarely if ever survive despite the fact their natural life cycle is far longer if

29:31they receive loving care. It is easy to conclude that fruit having evolved for the express

29:37reasons of consumption justifies our rights to pick and eat and be joyous but to allow

29:42healthy plants to freeze to death is not harmonious and lovely at all. Individual tomato plants

29:50can grow into giant vines that can have body sizes comparable to large trees and still

29:56produce delicious fruits for our taste buds delight. So to cherish plants for many years

30:02is an ethical certitude in a new moral world of plant protection legislation. And such

30:08communal legislating considerations would have many concerns encuddled within their

30:14remit. How can we justify eating whole plants that have fuller life cycles? And the eating

30:20of dieback plant matter is ethical in theory excepting the aforementioned lack of caring

30:26conditions, as in dieback does not occur if plants are cared for. One can theoretically

30:32take potatoes from a potato plant if one protects the plant from dieback, so for to protect

30:39a plant, persons life. Tree bark consumption is maybe ok if found on the floor. Branches

30:46could potentially be eaten but branches should not fall and plants should not lose parts

30:51of their body or be damaged if well cared for. So fruits could be eaten but they contain

30:57seeds that are babies and some might say the fruit is for the baby's growth upon burial

31:02in soil and not for our consumption. Some seeds may potentially be better off without

31:08the fruit surrounding them under certain or all conditions. Fruits facilitate the carrying

31:13of seeds to new locations. Some large seeds like pits are not consumed but find places

31:19to grow quickly when fruit is eaten. Many fruits have evolved to be tasty so as to facilitate

31:25their symbiosis of reproduction, functionality, personality interfacing with animal species.

31:31But of course many subspecies of fruit baby plants have been artificially selected by

31:36humans so the fruits and their tastiness is an aberration and skewing of biological

31:43evolutionary need. The ethics surrounding this complex dynamic is a matter for extended

31:48study with an ethical premise so for to acquire meaningful and loving conclusions. I certainly

31:54cannot cover this in a hundred words. And nuts are tree babies too.

32:00We could eat plants just before they die but with genetic aging reversal a certainty in

32:05application to plant life as well as animal life, how can we justify the murder of a plant

32:11for our own benefit? The word garden itself surely must be abolished due to its being

32:17a descriptor in relation to historical cases of mass murder and genocide meted out upon

32:23poisoned and boiled to death insect nests and wholesale poisoning and slaughtering of

32:27mammals. And the complete disregard for micro-peoples despite knowing of their existence in recent

32:33times. They too are poisoned by proxy when other species are targeted for poisoning or

32:39feeding or infection treatments in plants and on and on and on. Is it even ethical to

32:45have trees in seasonal climes considering the torture of seasonal conditions? Surely

32:51being so cognitively adept our duty of care should extend to giving trees warmth and happiness

32:57so they do not have to be cold at all ever. Then there is the flower torture murder trade

33:03where flowers are farmed and cut from their plant and sold for the supposed joy of making

33:08a lovely statement which is just murder and selfishness. Flowers look beautiful on their

33:13mummy plants. So no picking flowers for our own selfish gratification and destruction

33:19fulfilment that is disturbing to behold on the faces of disc-lethal flower destroyers

33:24and discarders. The ethics of our interactions with other species including plants is one

33:30of the most fundamentally important subjects for women of this new millennium and the men

33:36of the world are choosing to simply ignore the discussions and media bury the worries

33:40and concerns but we can no longer accept this. We might have to accept that we can't morally

33:47call plants people and accept we have to continue to eat plant matter whilst ensuring the higher

33:52standards of care towards their well-being. But millions of lovely people disagree and

33:57wish to not only call plants people but to develop alternative food sources that do not

34:02involve taking lives of people that have their own rights to their own lives just as we do.

34:08Can we only eat fruits and nuts and seeds and parts of plants that are non-detrimental

34:12to a plant's overall health? Can we find ethical ways to eat certain plant biomatter or are

34:18the ethics insurmountable? Calling plants people then enslaving them for food purposes

34:24upsets a lot of people as we see in the conclusion that all plants are people but they can't

34:30run away. It's disturbing to contemplate the need to compartmentalise our minds this way.

34:37To compartmentalise by calling plants people as is our want to do because we care but then

34:42eat them. We are creating serious moral issues because of acceptance of people death and

34:48people life execution. Just as before with animal murder so would we be again stuck within

34:54an acceptance of murder under a different legal guise. Could we call non-edible plants

35:00people but not give edible plants this moniker? The prejudicial implications of life consumption

35:07run far beyond the present widespread understanding and concerns of the population of this world.

35:14Even if we choose to continue to eat biomatter we can't ignore the death and suffering and

35:18torture and murder meted out in its name upon animal species and some would say upon plant

35:24species themselves. The eating of only synthetic foods either structurally copied from plant

35:30matter or new inventive non-plant inspired synthetics food structures designed for nutrition

35:35purposes in the form of carbohydrates, proteins, fats is something people may think of as an

35:41ethical choice as it would protect life in all of its forms. The 3D printing of complex

35:47molecular foodstuffs is something many people may be interested in because they are upset

35:51about the history of food consumption and do not feel happy about continuing to eat

35:56plant based foods because they want to think of plants as people or simply forms of life

36:01that deserve to have their own life without hindrance or mutilation or life cycles interfered

36:06with as in the eating of fruits, seeds and nuts. The ethical considerations of reversing

36:12ageing of plants without permission is also worthy of regard. Of course mushrooms and

36:18funguses would be people too within such considerations. And what of yeasts and bacteria? They too live.

36:27Then we have flavour profile ethics where existing plant flavours could not be reproduced

36:32intentionally or accidentally as the implications would be disturbing to possible future morality.

36:38With accidental co-emergence of flavours like existing plant flavours being seen as obscene

36:44unless they happened in the far distant future, by which time people may have forgotten, excepting

36:50those of us who are alive today but who would still be alive with life extension, so new

36:56synthetic flavours only would potentially be considered essential ethicality. Some people

37:02may also have concerns about making complex molecules in the same structures as those

37:07found in living peoples. Structures like carbs, fats, proteins, as these, the very substances

37:14we are demanded by our very biologies to consume are of the flesh of organismal peoples. And

37:21in the ruthless pursuit of such sustenance, horror and suffering has been incessant, so

37:26to forerender many sentient peoples to be of the mind to want to reject the very notion

37:31of the enforced body consumption sustenance matrix per se, and therefore be of the mind

37:37to transfer to a potential alternative method of growth, maintenance and energising. For

37:44many, ethical considerations of creating molecules as those derived from life may loom too much

37:49towards discompassionate imaginings and by proxy memories of horror. The possibility

37:56that non-carbohydrate, non-protein, non-fats alternative sustenance substrate complex molecules

38:03could be formulated seems like an impossibility as that is the very materiel our morphologies

38:08are derived from, and in so being an essentiality for our biomolecular viability. We could seek

38:16the technology of direct re-atomisation of the body, so for to maintain our present state

38:21without food ever needing to be eaten. Transcendency enthusiasts may favour concepts of latent

38:28energy conversions directly into sustenance energy for adaptive transcendent type animated

38:33life that could sustain upon ordinated energy substrata only, with no need for molecular

38:39sustenance. Ordination of such energy absorption mechanisms are down to meta-speculationalisticalisms.

38:48It would certainly remove any ethical considerations excepting the possibility that inanimate matter

38:53itself computes and is aware and has competition rights to matter energy sources we would seek

38:59to absorb. Although it's probably more of a concern as regards our rights to have babies

39:05that we would wish built from matter energy, I suppose free energy is ok to grab unless

39:10energy itself is inherently sentient. To be honest, why do we need more energy when we

39:16could just subsist upon our existing energy matter frame upon transcendent complexificationalisation

39:22and bounce through the cosmos upon the cuddles of levity? Do the stars themselves have the

39:28very rights to their own radiations in perpetuity? Our mummy, called Planet Earth Mother, would

39:36like her own name please, and we so too for recognise her individualistical yummy huggle

39:42of super-super-macro-organismal-multicoloured-superspecial cuddly-woos. What is sure is that reparations

39:50are required. To cease cutting down trees and take hiatus from consuming certain species

39:56of plant-based foods seems a bare minimum. And unreserved apologies to all species from

40:02all of us, especially farmers and slavery abusers, for the atrocities committed.

Category

Transcript

Recommended