• 5 months ago
During a Senate Rules Committee hearing last week, Sen. Laphonza Butler (D-CA) spoke about the Smithsonian's approach to covering controversial episodes in history.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Very good. So next up, we have several new members of the committee. Senator Britt, who
00:06was here earlier, and Senator LaFonza Butler, who is here for 14 months. So she asks her
00:12questions really fast. No, not really. Because she has to get a lot done quickly. So with
00:16that, I turn it over to Senator Butler of the State of California.
00:20Thank you, Chairwoman Klobuchar, Ranking Member Fischer. Secretary, thank you so much
00:27for coming. There's so many accolades, I'm sure, that have been lauded onto you deservingly
00:33about your work here in Washington. But for an Angeleno, it all starts at camp. And your
00:42contribution to generations of Angelenos teaching us about the history of our city and the place
00:52that we belong, I think, was just remarkable. And all the platitudes earned, but I want
01:03to make sure that even Washington, D.C. knows that California was where this started. And
01:09hopefully, and they are continuing to see your leadership from Los Angeles. And so thank
01:16you for your work and service and for being here. I do sort of move a little bit rapidly,
01:23so I'm going to try to move around a couple of big topics pretty quickly in my time. The
01:30Chair has allotted us five minutes for questions, but you have said that there are, in your
01:34strategic plan, sort of five focus points. And you noted just in your response to Senator
01:40Warner, the asset of the Smithsonian as a trusted source for the American people and
01:49indeed travelers around the world who want to understand the history of our country.
01:56And you talk specifically about this trusted source as it relates to complex topics like
02:01social justice, like climate. So here are two quick questions. Can you say a little
02:09bit about how you're working to ensure that Americans who are unable to visit D.C. can
02:16understand the Smithsonian as a trusted source? I think some of what you're talking about
02:21relative to virtual exhibits could be responsive to that. But also, how you and your team are
02:31telling the tough stories that are the truth around these complex issues in the story of
02:38our country. Well, I think first of all, what's really important for us is to use all the
02:43Smithsonian assets to make sure the country reaps the benefit of the Smithsonian. So while
02:49a lot of it is virtual, also it's our traveling exhibitions. The other thing we do is we do
02:54a lot of programs with students that we bring students in from wherever they are into Washington.
03:00So we basically really have, as in our DNA, the recognition that we are more about outside
03:07of Washington than we are inside of Washington. Now, the second question is this real issue
03:11of the difficult issues. And I've really felt that that's really the Smithsonian's job,
03:18that at a time when you need clarity, at a time when there's a debate, you want the Smithsonian
03:24to sort of bring its scholarship, bring its perspective to help people grapple with these
03:30issues. When I built the African American Museum, the real key was to make sure that
03:35I wasn't trying to sort of point fingers of guilt. What I was trying to do was say, here
03:41is a way we understand ourselves by looking at this complexity. And I would argue, whether
03:46it is climate change, whether it is issues of social justice, that the Smithsonian, because
03:51it has art, history, culture, science, can really bring our expertise to bear. But what
03:58we also do is want to recognize that we don't want to sort of get into controversy for controversy's
04:04sake. But we also recognize that if you're going to tell history or science, controversy's
04:09there, so we won't run away from it. So all I ask from my colleagues is, let's think very
04:14carefully about what we do. Let's make sure it's always about driven by scholarship. And
04:20then let's make sure it's always about the greater good, to make sure that this is about
04:24how the Smithsonian is this reservoir of understanding and a reservoir of hope. And if we can continue
04:31to do that, we can help the country move forward.
04:33I love that reservoir of hope. My last question, just in the spirit of time, I know you've
04:40talked a good deal already about the two new museums and the waiver that is necessary from
04:47Congress. Talk to us about the consequences of that waiver not being granted.
04:55In some ways, if the waiver is granted, but it's two years down the road, what it really
05:01means is that you're 15 or 20 years away from an actual museum being built. And so right
05:06now there is attention focused on these museums. There's fundraising. But if people feel that
05:14it's stalled, there's going to be less sort of attention and excitement to it. And now,
05:20candidly, if the waiver isn't granted, then the question is, I'm not sure. Because we've
05:28looked at so many sites, and there are sites that just say, do you knock down a building
05:33and move a whole department of X? I don't think you can do that. So right now I'm committed
05:41and focused to working with people like Senator Klobuchar to make sure that we can get a waiver.

Recommended