Pentagon Pressed On Ukraine's Engagement Rules Expanding To Include 'Everywhere' In Russia

  • 3 months ago
Pentagon Press Secretary Pat Ryder was asked about the expansion of Ukraine's engagement rules using US weaponry.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00You go here to CNN. Thanks, General Ryder. So National Security Advisor Sullivan said earlier
00:05this week that with regards to the policy allowing Ukraine to use US-made weapons to
00:10strike over the border into Russia, that policy, quote, extends to anywhere that Russian forces
00:15are coming across the border from the Russian side to the Ukrainian side. So is that consistent with
00:21the Pentagon's understanding of this policy, or has the policy expanded beyond just that kind of
00:26narrow Kharkiv region that it was initially understood to be when this policy decision was
00:31made? Yeah. So there has been no change in the policy. And really, at the end of the day,
00:36this comes down to counterfire, right? And what you saw in the Kharkiv region as Russia was
00:41conducting its offensive was the massing of forces, artillery fire, preparatory fire into
00:48Ukraine as they conducted these operations. And so the ability to be able to fire back when fired
00:55upon is really what this policy is focused on. So again, as we see Russian forces firing across
01:03the border, you know, the ability for Ukraine to fire back at those ground forces using US-provided
01:10munitions, it's self-defense. And so it makes sense for them to be able to do that. And that
01:16applies only to the border areas? Or could it be further into Russia? Or just that? Again,
01:21you know, if you look back at kind of the early days of this war, and you had Russian forces that
01:26were, you know, and still are to a large degree, but in mass within Ukrainian occupied territory,
01:32what you saw were force on force conflicts that were happening within sovereign Ukraine. So in
01:40this case, what you see is Russian forces attempting to use their border as a safe zone from
01:46which to conduct preparatory fires and attacks into Ukraine in support of offensive actions. And
01:52so again, as we see those forces conducting those types of operations from across the border,
01:58we've explained, you know, Ukraine can and does have the right to fire back to defend themselves.
02:04So again, not a change to the policy that was announced earlier. Now, when it comes to long-term
02:09or excuse me, long-range munitions, like ATACMS, again, there's been no change in the policy in
02:15that regard. But it's broader than just Kharkiv, to be clear. Correct. You know, it's focusing on
02:20the strategic intent here, which is counter fire when you're attacked, you know, returning fire.

Recommended