• 5 months ago
At today's Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) questioned Embry J. Kidd, nominee to be United States Circuit Judge for the Eleventh Circuit, about his theory of law.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Thank you, Mr. Chairman, congratulations, Judge. I just want to talk a little
00:08bit about the law. Tell me about the War Powers clauses in Articles 1 and 2.
00:22Well, Senator, my understanding of the War Powers is that the executive maintains significant
00:33authority with regard to the war, but that has to be authorized by Congress.
00:38What do you mean authorized? Senator, I don't have a more, that issue has
00:51not come before me, but I don't have a more specific definition of authorization than
01:00that the Congress has to, it's up to the Congress to, I don't, to authorize it. I can't say
01:10more than that, Senator. Okay. All right, let's talk about another issue
01:17you'll see if you're confirmed with the Eleventh Circuit. It's an issue we struggle with every
01:24day, as do the federal courts. Tell me about the non-delegation doctrine.
01:32My understanding, Senator, of the non-delegation doctrine is that Congress should not delegate
01:42its powers to other branches of government except in certain limited circumstances.
01:47And what are those limited circumstances? I believe, based on my understanding, that
01:55Congress can, for instance, delegate some of its authority to the executive, such as
02:01executive agencies, if that authority is carefully circumscribed.
02:07I'm not following you. The Constitution's pretty clear in Article I that the legislative
02:19power resides in the United States Congress, and we can't give it away. But your argument
02:32is that we can. Senator, it's my understanding that in certain
02:38limited circumstances that are carefully circumscribed, that Congress can delegate some of its authority
02:46to . . . What's the guiding principle, though? Tomorrow,
02:54if Congress passed a law and said, we're no longer going to confirm judges. We're going
03:01to set up a special agency within the executive branch and give that agency the authority
03:10to confirm judges. Somebody's going to litigate it. What would be the principle that the court
03:18would follow? Senator, I would certainly, if that issue
03:24were to come before me on the Eleventh Circuit, if I'm fortunate to be confirmed, I would
03:28research the Supreme Court's precedent and guidance on that issue, and any binding Eleventh
03:37Circuit precedent on the issue, if there is any, and address that issue. But in terms
03:42of the hypothetical situation, Senator, I would leave it at that.
03:48Okay. Well, let me ask you this. Let's set aside what the principle is for a moment.
03:54The Supreme Court has been pretty clear what the principle is. It goes back, I don't know,
04:00eighty years. I must suppose . . . Well, strike that. What I'm trying to understand is how
04:09you think, Judge. What do you think the principle ought to be? I mean, our founders were very
04:17clear that the legislative power is ours, and clearly we've given away that legislative
04:24power in some instances to some administrative agencies. What do you think the principle
04:29ought to be? I mean, could the Congress just come in one week and say, we're tired, let's
04:35just give it all to the President for about six months while we go fishing? Would that
04:40be constitutional? Well, certainly, Senator, I think to that
04:43extent it would unlikely be constitutional based on . . .
04:48Why? Why? Why do you think? Based on the principle that I just stated.
04:55And that you have reiterated that . . . Which is?
04:58The principle. That Congress cannot delegate its authority
05:03except in certain circumstances. And those are?
05:06And those are ones that, Senator, I would not want to speculate about. I can say that I would
05:15follow the Supreme Court's guidance on that, and my understanding of that guidance is that
05:22those circumstances are very narrow. Okay. But you're not familiar with the principle?
05:29Senator, to the extent that you're looking for a specific articulation, I would have
05:35to look at the case law and follow up on that. Okay. Robert, do you have any questions you
05:44want me to ask your dad? You sure? Now's your shot, man. Do you have anything you'd like
05:51to say to us, Robert? It's okay. A wise man once said . . .
05:57I think he had a hello . . . I think he had a hello for you, sir.
05:59A wise man once said nothing. Thank you, Judge. Senator Butler.
06:07Thank you, Mr. Chair. Congratulations, Judge, on your . . .

Recommended