At today's House Weaponization of the Federal Government Committee hearing, Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY) spoke about the case of Bryan Malinowski, a Little Rock man who was killed in an ATF raid.
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00 from New York's witness. Thank you Mr. Chairman. First I want to express my
00:04 condolences to Mrs. Malinowski. I'm terribly sorry for your loss and for
00:09 what you had to endure that day. I do want to get into some of the details
00:15 because I think they're very important. It was actually, you know, the search
00:22 warrant affidavit, without going into great detail, demonstrates that Mr.
00:27 Malinowski did purchase 142 guns from 2019 to February 27, 2024. He resold at
00:37 least nine, because we have the six plus the three to the undercover firearm. He
00:43 also had, at various times, at various gun shows, 12 or 13 firearms on the table to
00:50 be sold. And he offered one witness, who was the one convicted of robbery and
00:58 therefore was a prohibited person, many more firearms than what he
01:03 purchased. Many of these firearms were purchased just days before they were
01:10 sold. So whether or not you want to assert, Mr. Cummings, that this was a
01:18 hobby of his, you agree that there's certainly probable cause to believe that
01:25 he was selling guns to to individuals without a license and without performing
01:33 a background check, because he didn't have a license. There's no
01:37 allegation that he knowingly sold a gun to anyone that was prohibited. That's
01:41 not what probable cause... And under ATS interpretation... But you don't have to,
01:45 you don't have to do that. I just said that he... I'm just answering your question.
01:49 Selling without a license. Like there's certainly probable cause that he was in
01:52 the business of selling without a license. Under ATS interpretation of a
01:57 vague, vague regulation. But not yours. So you would say that if you purchase 142
02:02 firearms within a four-year span as a former US attorney, and you have evidence
02:07 of nine sales within that period of time, plus many other more weapons offered for
02:13 sale, you would say, as you, not the ATF, as you, as the former US attorney, that
02:17 there is no probable cause to believe that this person is in the business of
02:22 selling guns without a license. I would agree that there that could be probable
02:26 cause. Thank you. So we have probable cause. The Little Rock Police is there
02:32 with the ATF. They go in and the one fact that doesn't ever seem to be mentioned
02:41 here, and that the chairman's letter does not mention, is that an ATF agent was
02:50 shot. Is that correct Mr. Cummins? That's correct. Okay. So an ATF agent was shot
02:55 and then in response fired back at Mr. Malinowski. Is that accurate? That is
03:01 accurate. It's also a tragedy. It is a tragedy. I agree. I agree. And, and the, you
03:09 also agree, I assume, I was a assistant US attorney for 10 years, secured many,
03:16 many search warrants, oversaw the execution of them, and arrest warrants,
03:21 they're routinely done at 6 a.m. Is that right? A lot of warrants are executed at
03:27 6 a.m. Whether I agree with that as a tactic is another discussion, but yes,
03:31 that's not uncommon. No, that, okay, I just, I want to understand that we're making a
03:37 big deal out of the 6 a.m. here, but that is the standard time that law enforcement
03:42 executes arrest warrants and executes search warrants. So I, I certainly am
03:49 sorry that this is a tragedy that Mr. Malinowski died. I'm also sorry that Mr.
03:57 Malinowski shot an ATF agent during a search, and I think if he were truly not
04:06 in the business of selling firearms, the way to respond to a search warrant is to
04:13 allow your house to be searched and to cooperate. But it is, it is insane to me
04:21 that we are sitting here criticizing the ATF because they retaliated with deadly
04:29 force after someone shot an agent. That is what happened here. There, this was not
04:36 an out-of-the-ordinary execution of a search warrant. This is standard
04:40 operating procedure. Mr. Cummins acknowledges that there was probable
04:45 cause to do it, and now there is an investigation of this incident. Is that
04:50 right, Mr. Cummins? There has been an investigation. It's been handed over to
04:54 the local prosecutor. So the local prosecutor is investigating it, and you
04:58 know as a prosecutor that none of the witnesses or the relevant people
05:03 involved are allowed to discuss this publicly while an investigation is going
05:09 on, correct? I don't know what the policy of ATF is. Well, was it your policy as a
05:14 prosecutor? It certainly was mine. Witnesses do not talk to the public
05:19 while there's an investigation going on. One last question. As a U.S. attorney, did
05:24 you ever send a notification to a target of yours who's selling a hundred, who's
05:29 buying 140 guns, selling at least nine of them, that, "Hey, you're under
05:35 investigation, just a heads up"? I hope I would have, yes. You would have? You would
05:39 have reached out and said, "Hey, by the way, I'm investigating." So you can go ahead and
05:43 destroy and hide all the evidence? You would have done that? You notified the
05:47 targets that you would have? The gentleman has expired. The gentleman from North Carolina is recognized for five minutes.