Garret Graves Demands Responsible Party Be Held Accountable After FSK Bridge Collapse

  • 4 months ago
During a House Transportation Committee hearing last week, Rep. Garret Graves (R-LA) questioned witnesses about the Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse and other impacts of other bridges around the country.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Mr. Graves. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I first want to join others in wishing
00:09condolences to the families of those who were lost in the
00:13bridge collapse and also I just find it remarkable the incredible action of
00:19the law enforcement community came in and stopped traffic that could have been
00:22much worse than it was. Last week I had the opportunity to go out to the bridge
00:25and Admiral I'll tell you that Admiral Gilreath and
00:34Captain O'Donnell and even Lieutenant Carter who was behind you a little while
00:39ago, just absolutely remarkable. General, Colonel, your district commander down
00:45there, Colonel Pinchasen, I believe, she was awesome. I had met her
00:51down in New Orleans and she and her team did a great job. They're folks
00:54from DHS that were really, really good and just an incredibly thorough briefing
00:59and gave lots of comfort that the things were under control and I
01:02appreciate all the efforts that are underway down there.
01:06Administrator, I want to ask a question. I want to make sure I understand
01:09something. You said earlier that what's being done in this bridge is
01:13consistent with what's been done in other bridges in the past for
01:17disasters. Is that accurate? Thank you, Representative. I'm trying to think of
01:23what I said. I wrote down that you said it consisted with historic bridge
01:26disasters but there's not another bridge where you just, where FHWA came in and
01:30just designated that it's going to be part of the interstate system. No, we
01:35only learned that it was not part of the interstate system in light of this event.
01:39Okay, so that is an anomaly. Absolutely. Okay, I want to be
01:44clear on that and then secondly, so you've talked about the use of
01:49categorical exclusions and doing some type of expedited NEPA whether you do a
01:53CADEX or you do alternative arrangements. I want to be clear, fully supportive of
01:57it, but in the past, Minneapolis Bridge, the I-35 Bridge, I believe the bridge in
02:02Washington State and others, similar things have been done. Can you cite where
02:06there's been environmental damages or destruction from that approach as
02:10opposed to going through the regular NEPA? So just trying to think through
02:17your question, citing environmental damage by using the expedited approach.
02:21No, I can't cite environmental damage. And I can't either. And actually Colonel,
02:26excuse me, Major General Graham, sorry about that, demoted you. General, you
02:31recall after Hurricane Katrina, the levees were built using alternative
02:34arrangements. Do you remember any type of environmental damages or destruction
02:37that was caused from doing the alternative arrangements? Yeah, I don't
02:42think so either. I think it actually worked out really well. And so my
02:46message to you on this is that right now, the average road project takes somewhere
02:51around seven years and three or four months. As you know, the White House has
02:54just released new rules on NEPA in line with the fiscal, well, attempting to be in
02:59line with the Fiscal Responsibility Act, but failing on some things, but that
03:03would significantly shorten it. But my message is that this shouldn't be
03:08the exception. The environmental damages haven't resulted from using
03:12categorical exclusions or alternative arrangements. Look, I don't know what the
03:16traffic impacts are of this bridge. We have a bridge at home that is the source
03:20of the fourth worst traffic problem in America. The Mississippi River Bridge,
03:24I-10, I-10 going from California to Florida, fourth worst traffic in America.
03:29We have taken seven years to narrow a new bridge alignment down to 32
03:37alignments. Like, you can't make this stuff up. This is outrageous. We have
03:42urgency there as well. Look, I want to be crystal clear. I fully support, fully
03:46support federal funding up front. Let's get this thing built. Let's get it done
03:50as quickly as possible. I fully support categorical exclusion or alternative
03:54arrangements. I've been in touch with the governor of Maryland, and I appreciate
03:56him reaching out. But this is a major anomaly. We've got a toll. We've got a
04:03responsible party. This isn't a natural disaster, and I think that we need to
04:07make sure that we're holding the responsible party accountable. We had a
04:10similar incident in Louisiana in the mid-90s, the Brightfield. A Brightfield
04:14incident came and crashed into the River Walk in Louisiana. It was a Japanese
04:19built vessel. It was run by Chinese. It was, I think, run by Chinese and flagged
04:23in Liberia. Admiral, I want to ask you real quick. Can you think of any similar
04:28incidents with Jones Act vessels that have occurred like this? Not from
04:34deep-draft vessels. Certainly, there are a number of towing. Sure, some barges and
04:39much more minor incidents. Chairman, how many are you aware of anything? And so,
04:45look, one thing I just, I want to point out here, and for the record, she's taking
04:47her head, no. One thing I want to point out here, look, Jones Act vessels, U.S.
04:51built, U.S. crewed, U.S. flagged. We go through annual inspections, a night and
04:56day difference, and I think that's something else we need to take into
04:59consideration here. Lastly, Administrator, this bridge, it is not going to be built
05:03back exactly like it was, will it? It's gonna be wider. You're gonna have
05:06shoulders. You're gonna have a different pier configuration. You're gonna have
05:09different tidal influences. You're gonna have bumpers. You're gonna have dolphins
05:11and other things protecting the pier structures. Is that correct? Yes, sir. Okay.
05:16All right. I just want to make sure that we're noting that this is actually a
05:19different bridge that's being reconstructed with effectively waiving or
05:23providing alternative arrangements or categorical exclusions underneath both.
05:27Yield back.

Recommended