'How Did We Get To Where We Are Right Now?': Mark Penn Discusses Online 'Censorship'

  • 4 months ago
Mark Penn, founder and CEO of Stagwell, Inc. joins "Forbes Newsroom" to discuss a new major Stagwell survey about news consumption and advertising. Penn spoke about brand safety and censorship.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:



https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00 So what do you think the message to American publishers and newspapers,
00:05 magazines, publications should be based on this data? I think first this whole
00:11 brand safety thing has been overblown and you see this massively expanding set
00:18 of keywords about things you shouldn't advertise in here. That's got to be shrunk
00:22 you know down considerably and kind of re-evaluated because the social good for
00:28 a brand isn't helping further important news get into consumers. And I think the
00:34 second big message is advertisers look at news. What percentage of your budget
00:40 should really go to news? Probably you're underestimating how much should go to
00:45 news and probably you're undervaluing that and you're not achieving what you
00:50 could with your media buy. So advertisers should be spending more. Concerns about
00:55 brand safety are overblown. How did the concerns about brand safety get
01:00 overblown? How did we get to where we are right now? Well I think that obviously
01:05 the internet itself does produce a lot of controversial content. There are a
01:10 lot of bad things out there but this brand safety seemed to involve almost
01:15 into a censorship type regime where it would really call for
01:23 the demonetization of certain stories and influence. And maybe it was a good
01:27 thing when you're talking about some completely hysterical post that you
01:31 don't want to monetize. But what you really found is it spread to mainstream
01:35 journalism and stories about Biden and Trump or Israel and Hamas. I mean those
01:40 are the kinds of stories we need journalists to be able to have the funds
01:44 to really get to the bottom of. They have to be able to cover wars and
01:48 campaigns really effectively. And so I think that this thing got off track. So
01:55 you want the nation's top advertisers to see this data and perhaps reallocate
02:00 their spend? Yes I think if they run their computer models, evaluate all the
02:05 rates, they'll probably find that they've been over spending on entertainment and
02:12 sports, under spending on news and information, and rebalance their media
02:17 buys and get everybody appropriately funded.

Recommended