• 7 months ago
During a White House press briefing on Tuesday, United States Trade Representative Katherine Tai was asked about Trump-era tariffs and criticisms about putting high tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles .

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00 Thank you.
00:01 Thank you, Ambassador Tai.
00:02 I know that these new tariffs are seen as more targeted and strategic, but the administration
00:06 has chosen to keep in place those Trump-era tariffs on some $300 billion worth of goods,
00:10 which Biden himself had said in 2019 that Americans are paying for.
00:15 So why make that decision to keep it in place?
00:17 And aren't you concerned that it's going to keep prices elevated?
00:21 So first of all, let me say a couple things.
00:23 In terms of the price that Americans paid for in the previous era, some of that – maybe
00:29 a lot of it – was about the chaos and unpredictability that it created and the escalation that resulted.
00:37 Secondly, I think what – I'm a trade lawyer by training, and at USTR we are deep into
00:44 the technical issues.
00:46 The Section 301-based review that we undertook required us to look at a couple questions.
00:52 One of them was the effect of the practices on our economy.
00:56 And there you have our response, which is a targeted, strategic response that is meant
01:01 to work together with the investments that we're making.
01:04 The other aspect that we had to look at was the effect of the tariffs on changing China's
01:10 behavior with respect to the IPR abuses and the forced tech transfer.
01:15 There, the findings in my report, which you can find on the USTR website right here – it's
01:21 a serious report – is that not only have we not seen the problematic practices subside,
01:27 in some areas we have seen them get worse.
01:31 And in that light, there is actually no reason for us, no justification to relieving the
01:38 tariff burdens on the trade with Beijing.
01:40 And just quickly, what do you say to critics who say that by putting these high tariffs
01:45 on Chinese EVs you're leaving American consumers with fewer options, more expensive cars, as
01:50 China is very far ahead in creating very cheap EV cars?
01:53 I think what you have to do is remember and revisit the story and the show that we have
01:59 been a part of for the last several decades, which is as you allow China to dominate the
02:06 supply and the production in these industries, your choice is actually made for you.
02:12 You have fewer choices.
02:13 And it lays our entire economy, from consumers and workers all the way up to our government,
02:20 susceptible to the kinds of coercion that we've seen from a government who was willing
02:25 to weaponize the dependencies that it has created when a partner does something that
02:31 it does not like politically.
02:34 On Mexico, you said stay tuned.
02:37 Are you saying that there could be some changes to the USMCA rules or to the law that would
02:43 allow the US to apply tariffs on goods from China that originate in Mexico or other third
02:49 countries?
02:50 What I'm saying is the fact pattern that's developing is one that is of serious concern
02:56 to us and that at USTR we are looking at all of our tools to see how we can address the
03:01 problem.
03:02 Is it going to be from Mexico or from other third countries as well?
03:04 I think just the general fact pattern.
03:05 Is there anything else you can say to elaborate on the problem?
03:08 Stay tuned.

Recommended