#TheReporters #JusticeBabarSattar #IHC #AsimMunir #Establishment #QaziFaezIsa #Letter #GrandDialogue #ImranKhan #AdialaJail #PTI
Justice Babar Sattar pens another letter to CJP Isa | Inside News
Analyst Hassan Ayub Gives Inside News Regarding Justice Babar Sattar
Will PTI Chief be freed during 'Grand Dialogue'? Big News
Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY
Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP
ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.
Justice Babar Sattar pens another letter to CJP Isa | Inside News
Analyst Hassan Ayub Gives Inside News Regarding Justice Babar Sattar
Will PTI Chief be freed during 'Grand Dialogue'? Big News
Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY
Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP
ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Assalam-o-Alaikum, dear viewers, welcome to the program.
00:14Dear viewers, there have been a lot of developments today.
00:17The case of 190 million pounds has been granted bail.
00:21The decision has been made.
00:24Let's see when the judgment will come.
00:26Sheikh Waqas Akram has been formally nominated by the Sunni Hand Council for the chairmanship of PSE.
00:33Let's see how the government reacts to this.
00:37Another important development is that Iran's Chabahar port has been granted bail.
00:44We will talk about this in detail someday.
00:46What will be the effects of this on Pakistan's Gwadar port?
00:49The stories that we will talk about in today's program will be a big relief.
00:56Bani PTI has been granted bail.
00:58Two days later, their live video will be streamed from Dayala Jail.
01:03When the case will be heard in the Supreme Court.
01:05What is going on with the Grand Dialogue?
01:08What conditions are being set by the Judiciary?
01:11We will talk about this today as well.
01:13The case of Azad Kashmir.
01:15Yesterday, the government took a very good step.
01:19The subsidy of 23 billion rupees was accepted.
01:22But a few hours later, sad news came from Muzaffarabad.
01:29We saw that three protesters were killed there.
01:34What was the reason?
01:35Our reporter will try to find out the details from there.
01:39But our first story today.
01:42You know that a letter was written from six judges.
01:46First, from the Chief Justice of Islamabad High Court.
01:50After that, the same letter reached the Supreme Court.
01:54The Supreme Court first made a commission on it.
01:57After the commission, a notice was taken on it.
02:02Because when the commission was nominated,
02:04former Chief Justice Tasadduk Jilani refused it.
02:08Today, some new developments have emerged in this matter.
02:13A letter was written from Justice Babur Sattar,
02:17Honourable Justice of Islamabad High Court.
02:20He has highlighted in the letter.
02:23Let me show you his notes.
02:26Justice Babur Sattar has written to Chief Justice Amar Farooq
02:30of Islamabad High Court.
02:33He has written that in the case of Audio Leaks,
02:36a message was given to him to step back.
02:39A message was received from the top official of the security establishment.
02:42Step back.
02:44A message was given to me to step back from car surveillance.
02:50I did not pay any attention to such threats.
02:54He basically said that
02:57a secret message was given to me by the security establishment.
03:02After that, there were two press conferences.
03:05Two press conferences.
03:07First, we saw a message, a recorded video.
03:10A message was given by Attorney General Mansoor Abaan.
03:14What is he saying?
03:16When this letter was reported by Babur Sattar on television channels,
03:22the response of the Attorney General to this letter is in front of you.
03:27Neither the government nor any state institution
03:31can or does not interfere in the work of the judiciary.
03:37I strongly deny this impression.
03:41Now that the letter is on social media,
03:45please pay attention to its content
03:47and see what he has said that was in violation of justice.
03:53If a message has been communicated from anywhere,
03:57I would like to clarify that
04:00according to my knowledge,
04:02no security establishment officer has made any kind of direct contact
04:09and neither can nor does he.
04:12So that contact was through the Attorney General's office
04:17and it was to the extent that
04:19such sensitive information should be encamered
04:24and it was to the extent that the request was made.
04:29It is now necessary that this reporting should be done in its proper context.
04:37Similarly, there was a press conference later.
04:40By the way, there was a meeting of the Cabinet.
04:42Information Minister Tatar was present there.
04:45Law Minister was present there.
04:47He also expressed his opinion about this letter
04:50that there is no such thing.
04:52All institutions are working within their limits
04:57and they should work in this way.
04:59A message is given from the representatives of the Attorney General
05:04that the in-camera briefing should be misconstrued,
05:08removed from the context,
05:10and a letter is written on it
05:12that I am being told to step back.
05:14So this is not based on reality at all.
05:17And I understand that if the in-camera briefing was requested,
05:21it was done due to national security.
05:23You have access to the Chief Justice.
05:25So writing a letter to the Chief Justice of the same court
05:28through which you have daily meetings,
05:30I understand that this is a matter of controversy.
05:33And no one gave this message that you should step back.
05:37Only the in-camera briefing was said.
05:39And I understand that the tension should be reduced
05:42and all institutions should work together.
05:45Viewers, the Supreme Court is obviously listening to this case.
05:49I think the next hearing is on 8th June.
05:52Hussain Chaudhry, our representatives cover Islamabad High Court.
05:55We are present.
05:56Hussain, when and when did this news start coming?
05:59Obviously, we do not ask the source, we ask the reporter.
06:03After that, we saw that the government immediately
06:06had to respond to this not that less than the level of the Attorney General.
06:10Yes, Mr. Khabar, thank you very much.
06:12Today, in Islamabad High Court, the case of 190 million was being heard.
06:16And its decision was secured at around 3.15 pm.
06:20During that time, we found out from Islamabad High Court
06:23that Justice Babar Sattar's letter,
06:27or the letter that was written to the Chief Justice,
06:30a part of it, or a paragraph of it, came forward.
06:34And in that, they are listening to the audio leak case.
06:37It has been almost a year since the audio leak case.
06:41Now, the next hearing will be on 29th May.
06:44So, they referred to the audio leak case and said that
06:47I have also received a letter in this regard.
06:50They wrote a letter to their Chief Justice.
06:52And in that, they said that the audio leak case that I am listening to,
06:55in that, the secret institutions, the investigative institutions,
07:00and the other regulatory bodies,
07:02they had taken notices and they were listening to the case
07:05in relation to the scrutiny of the surveillance.
07:07So, in that regard, I was threatened or intervened,
07:12that you should step back from this.
07:14So, they said that...
07:15You used the word or a back-off.
07:17Yes, yes. Step back.
07:18They also said in the letter that I did not pay any attention to it
07:21because I was listening to my case.
07:24And that case is still going on.
07:25Now, obviously, that case is on 29th May.
07:27So, this letter has come forward today.
07:31And let me tell you that the letter they wrote to the Chief Justice,
07:35that letter was in relation to the social media campaign
07:39that was going on against them.
07:40That was also the background of this audio leak case.
07:43Because when this case was going on...
07:45We will discuss that case in the program.
07:47Mr. Choudhary Ghulamzain,
07:48you received a very immediate reaction from your friends.
07:51Tarar brothers are not like that.
07:53They are not brothers.
07:54Obviously, there is a little bit of their relationship.
07:56So, Mr. Tarar, the Law Minister is also Mr. Tarar.
07:59The Information Minister is also Mr. Tarar.
08:01They said, what is this?
08:02I mean, when you feel like it, you write a letter.
08:05You should not write.
08:06They said that they did not have any credible information.
08:36There is a very serious issue involved.
09:04You cannot talk about it in a press conference and save your life.
09:11These things will have to go to the logical conclusion.
09:15Hassan, I have information.
09:18This letter, this information that has come forward today,
09:20it is part of the same letter that has already been written.
09:23There is a case of subjudice in the Supreme Court.
09:26Obviously, the Honorable Judge is looking at it and listening to it.
09:30The decision will be made on it.
09:31So, the information has come forward.
09:33What was the need for the Government of the time,
09:35the Attorney General and the Information Minister?
09:38When they are also saying that there is subjudice,
09:40we do not talk about it, there is no need,
09:42but this is wrong, this should not happen.
09:44And see, the institutions are interfering in each other's affairs for no reason.
09:49The Attorney General had sent a message.
09:51He said that I spoke that the in-camera briefing should be done
09:55because it is an issue of national security.
09:57Now, when the issue of national security,
09:59the issue of national security is of the Attorney General.
10:01So, if his message is taken forward,
10:03then the Honorable Justice Babar Sattar
10:06has broken the facts in his letter.
10:10So, you believe in one party and do not believe in the other.
10:13I am saying that for a minute,
10:14either the Attorney General is lying,
10:16or Honorable Justice Babar Sattar is not stating the facts.
10:19When the matter is in the Supreme Court,
10:21then what was the need?
10:22He did not state the facts correctly.
10:23One of the two situations will be there.
10:24The Supreme Court has to decide.
10:25One is wrong.
10:26Either this side is wrong or that side is wrong.
10:27Who will decide?
10:28Okay, for a minute,
10:29if you imagine,
10:30I am saying this openly.
10:31If the Attorney General,
10:32according to me,
10:33in a very two-way style,
10:34and this is something like this,
10:36I mean, you deal with people,
10:38you know the person,
10:39he is a very credible person.
10:40Where he is wrong,
10:41then he also states that
10:42this is our weakness.
10:44And he does not touch that thing.
10:46He does not state anything wrong.
10:47He has a lot of qualities.
10:49If his statement,
10:50who is a credible person,
10:52his statement,
10:53and my personal experience,
10:54and I am sure that
10:56Babar Sattar also has the same opinion about him.
10:58About Mansoor Osman Awan,
11:00Justice Moses Babar Sattar also has the same opinion.
11:03If he did not state the facts correctly,
11:06then according to me,
11:08the Supreme Judicial Council
11:10should take action against him.
11:12This is misconduct.
11:13If the Attorney General,
11:14if Babar Sattar,
11:15if the Attorney General,
11:16and if the Attorney General is wrong,
11:17then he should resign.
11:19This is the same Attorney General.
11:20He should resign.
11:21Okay, listen, one minute.
11:22Look, these are such positions.
11:24These are such positions,
11:25on which, look,
11:26Hassan, a decision has to be made on this.
11:28Someone has to make a decision.
11:29The Supreme Court is sitting.
11:30It is present in front of the Supreme Court.
11:31We are saying that
11:32we are trying to give this impression
11:34with our statement.
11:35I am telling you,
11:36that whatever the Attorney General has said,
11:38there is no doubt in it
11:41and it is articulated.
11:43This is the same Attorney General, right?
11:45The generations did not form earlier.
11:47He continued with supervision.
11:49If I understand a little,
11:50the people of Pakistan,
11:51he should not have continued with supervision.
11:53Why?
11:54Because the intention of the law is contrary to that,
11:56that the government should not be involved in supervision.
12:00This is your opinion.
12:01According to me,
12:02as far as I know,
12:03the Attorney General of Pakistan
12:04is a very edible man.
12:05What do you think about Bawar Sattar?
12:06He is a very competent man
12:07and even in competence,
12:09there is no match for him.
12:11He is a very clear man.
12:12He is a very clean man.
12:13He is a man who walks straight.
12:14He is a man who speaks the truth.
12:16He gave information
12:17through his signatures
12:18from not one but six judges.
12:21First to his Chief Justice,
12:23then to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
12:25and then to the Supreme Judicial Council.
12:27The matter is referred.
12:28At the moment, it is sub-judice.
12:30This matter is under discussion in front of the Supreme Court.
12:33The Supreme Court has to decide
12:35who is speaking the truth
12:37and who is speaking wrongly.
12:41And during this time,
12:42this information comes.
12:43This is old information.
12:44The media has to report it.
12:45Poor messengers say
12:46don't tell the messenger.
12:48Now, do you think
12:49that this statement by the Attorney General
12:51or the statement by the government of the time
12:54keeping the current situation in view,
12:56is listening to the Supreme Court?
12:58Let them listen to this matter.
13:01Look,
13:03the first thing I will say is
13:05who are we to decide?
13:07Absolutely right.
13:08Who is right?
13:09Who is wrong?
13:10You are absolutely right.
13:11We report.
13:12We should report this theft on both sides.
13:15Secondly,
13:16now,
13:17let's mix all the letters together
13:19and look at the current situation.
13:21Wherever the court is in the world,
13:23it is said that it is blind.
13:26It makes decisions
13:28without any like or dislike,
13:30without any personal benefit.
13:33And this is what happens.
13:35Now, this is a great thing.
13:37The investigation of the court of insult
13:39against the honourable judges,
13:41the campaign against them,
13:43this is a great thing.
13:45Now, of course,
13:46a decision has to be made.
13:48Now, I will request the honourable judges
13:50and all those who are listening to this case
13:52and who may be the victims of this case in the future,
13:55I will request them
13:57that look,
13:58this decision will be made,
14:00you will get justice,
14:01but who will give justice to the Pakistani people?
14:04Who will give justice to all those people
14:06who were insulted?
14:08Who will give justice to all those officials
14:10who were insulted?
14:11Who will give justice to all those people
14:13who have been being insulted by the courts
14:15for 20, 20, 30 years?
14:17Do you want to show the proceedings
14:19directly on the TV?
14:21Do you have the courage to show the proceedings
14:23of the session court directly?
14:25Just look at the session courts
14:27on the lower levels,
14:29what is happening to the people in the courts?
14:31How much corruption is there?
14:33How many decisions are being made there?
14:35How many poor people are being destroyed there?
14:37Let me complete the answer, sir.
14:39Let me complete the answer.
14:41Look, Mr. Naqvi, we have a lot of stories
14:43in front of us.
14:45You have come to the courts to get justice for yourself.
14:47Judges, what are you doing for the people?
14:49Who will give justice to the people?
14:51Who will give justice to the people?
14:53That is why we are talking about this.
14:55Obviously, there are pending cases.
14:57Mr. Naqvi, your words are heard.
14:59Let's move on to the next story.
15:01Today, two larger benches
15:03are made in the Islamabad High Court.
15:05The first bench
15:07heard the case
15:09that there is a bench
15:11running under the leadership
15:13of the Chief Justice of Islamabad.
15:15That bench heard the case
15:17of the case of
15:19the case of
15:21the case of
15:23the case of
15:25the case of
15:27the case of
15:29the case of
15:31the case of
15:33the case of
15:35the case of
15:37the case of
15:39the case of
15:41the case of
15:43the case of
15:45the case of
15:47the case of
15:49the case of
15:51the case of
15:53the case of
15:55the case of
15:57the case of
15:59the case of
16:01the case of
16:03the case of
16:05the case of
16:07the case of
16:09the case of
16:11the case of
16:13the case of
16:15the case of
16:17the case of
16:19the case of
16:21the case of
16:23the case of
16:25the case of
16:27the case of
16:29the case of
16:31the case of
16:33the case of
16:35the case of
16:37the case of
16:39the case of
16:41the case of
16:43the case of
16:45the case of
16:47the case of
16:49the case of
16:51the case of
16:53the case of
16:55the case of
16:57the case of
16:59the case of
17:01the case of
17:03the case of
17:05the case of
17:07the case of
17:09the case of
17:11the case of
17:13the case of
17:15the case of
17:17the case of
17:19the case of
17:21the case of
17:23the case of
17:25the case of
17:27the case of
17:29the case of
17:31the case of
17:33the case of
17:35the case of
17:37the case of
17:39the case of
17:41the case of
17:43the case of
17:45the case of
17:47the case of
17:49the case of
17:51the case of
17:53the case of
17:55the case of
17:57the case of
17:59the case of
18:01the case of
18:03the case of
18:05the case of
18:07the case of
18:09the case of
18:11the case of
18:13the case of
18:15the case of
18:17the case of
18:19the case of
18:21the case of
18:23the case of
18:25the case of
18:27the case of
18:29the case of
18:31the case of
18:33the case of
18:35the case of
18:37the case of
18:39the case of
18:41the case of
18:43the case of
18:45the case of
18:47the case of
18:49the case of
18:51the case of
18:53the case of
18:55the case of
18:57the case of
18:59the case of
19:01the case of
19:03the case of
19:05the case of
19:07the case of
19:09the case of
19:11the case of
19:13the case of
19:15the case of
19:17the case of
19:19the case of
19:21the case of
19:23the case of
19:25the case of
19:27the case of
19:29the case of
19:31the case of
19:33the case of
19:35the case of
19:37the case of
19:39the case of
19:41the case of
19:43the case of
19:45the case of
19:47the case of
19:49the case of
19:51the case of
19:53the case of
19:55the case of
19:57the case of
19:59the case of
20:01the case of
20:03the case of
20:05the case of
20:07the case of
20:09the case of
20:11the case of
20:13the case of
20:15the case of
20:17the case of
20:19the case of
20:21the case of
20:23the case of
20:25the case of
20:27the case of
20:29the case of
20:31the case of
20:33the case of
20:35the case of
20:37the case of
20:39the case of
20:41the case of
20:43the case of
20:45the case of
20:47the case of
20:49the case of
20:51the case of
20:53the case of
20:55the case of
20:57the case of
20:59the case of
21:01the case of
21:03the case of
21:05the case of
21:07the case of
21:09the case of
21:11the case of
21:13the case of
21:15the case of
21:17the case of
21:19the case of
21:21the case of
21:23the case of
21:25the case of
21:27the case of
21:29the case of
21:31the case of
21:33the case of
21:35the case of
21:37the case of
21:39the case of
21:41the case of
21:43the case of
21:45the case of
21:47the case of
21:49the case of
21:51the case of
21:53the case of
21:55the case of
21:57the case of
21:59the case of
22:01the case of
22:03the case of
22:05the case of
22:07the case of
22:09the case of
22:11the case of
22:13the case of
22:15the case of
22:17the case of
22:19the case of
22:21the case of
22:23the case of
22:25the case of
22:27the case of
22:29the case of
22:31the case of
22:33the case of
22:35the case of
22:37the case of
22:39the case of
22:41the case of
22:43the case of
22:45the case of
22:47the case of
22:49the case of
22:51the case of
22:53the case of
22:55the case of
22:57the case of
22:59the case of
23:01the case of
23:03the case of
23:05the case of
23:07the case of
23:09the case of
23:11the case of
23:13the case of
23:15the case of
23:17the case of
23:19the case of
23:21the case of
23:23the case of
23:25the case of
23:27the case of
23:29the case of
23:31the case of
23:33the case of
23:35the case of
23:37the case of
23:39the case of
23:41the case of
23:43the case of
23:45the case of
23:47the case of
23:49the case of
23:51the case of
23:53the case of
23:55the case of
23:57the case of
23:59the case of
24:01the case of
24:03the case of
24:05the case of
24:07the case of
24:09the case of
24:11the case of
24:13the case of
24:15the case of
24:17the case of
24:19the case of
24:21the case of
24:23the case of
24:25the case of
24:27the case of
24:29the case of
24:31the case of
24:33the case of
24:35the case of
24:37the case of
24:39the case of
24:41the case of
24:43the case of
24:45the case of
24:47the case of
24:49the case of
24:51the case of
24:53the case of
24:55the case of
24:57the case of
24:59the case of
25:01the case of
25:03the case of
25:05the case of
25:07the case of
25:09the case of
25:11the case of
25:13the case of
25:15the case of
25:17the case of
25:19the case of
25:21the case of
25:23the case of
25:25the case of
25:27the case of
25:29the case of
25:31the case of
25:33the case of
25:35the case of
25:37the case of
25:39the case of
25:41the case of
25:43the case of
25:45the case of
25:47the case of
25:49the case of
25:51the case of
25:53the case of
25:55the case of
25:57the case of
25:59the case of
26:01the case of
26:03the case of
26:05the case of
26:07the case of
26:09the case of
26:11the case of
26:13the case of
26:15the case of
26:17the case of
26:19the case of
26:21the case of
26:23the case of
26:25the case of
26:27the case of
26:29the case of
26:31the case of
26:33the case of
26:35the case of
26:37the case of
26:39the case of
26:41the case of
26:43the case of
26:45the case of
26:47the case of
26:49the case of
26:51the case of
26:53the case of
26:55the case of
26:57the case of
26:59the case of
27:01the case of
27:03the case of
27:05the case of
27:07the case of
27:09the case of
27:11the case of
27:13the case of
27:15the case of
27:17the case of
27:19the case of
27:21the case of
27:23the case of
27:25the case of
27:27the case of
27:29the case of
27:31the case of
27:33the case of
27:35the case of
27:37the case of
27:39the case of
27:41the case of
27:43the case of
27:45the case of
27:47the case of
27:49the case of
27:51the case of
27:53the case of
27:55the case of
27:57the case of
27:59the case of
28:01the case of
28:03the case of
28:05the case of
28:07the case of
28:09the case of
28:11the case of
28:13the case of
28:15the case of
28:17the case of
28:19the case of
28:21the case of
28:23the case of
28:25the case of
28:27the case of
28:29the case of
28:31the case of
28:33the case of
28:35the case of
28:37the case of
28:39the case of
28:41the case of
28:43the case of
28:45the case of
28:47the case of
28:49the case of
28:51the case of
28:53the case of
28:55the case of
28:57the case of
28:59the case of
29:01the case of
29:03the case of
29:05the case of
29:07the case of
29:09the case of
29:11the case of
29:13the case of
29:15the case of
29:17the case of
29:19the case of
29:21the case of
29:23the case of
29:25the case of
29:27the case of
29:29the case of
29:31the case of
29:33the case of
29:35the case of
29:37the case of
29:39the case of
29:41the case of
29:43the case of
29:45the case of
29:47the case of
29:49the case of
29:51the case of
29:53the case of
29:55the case of
29:57the case of
29:59the case of
30:01the case of
30:03the case of
30:05the case of
30:07the case of
30:09the case of
30:11the case of
30:13the case of
30:15the case of
30:17the case of
30:19the case of
30:21the case of
30:23the case of
30:25the case of
30:27the case of
30:29the case of
30:31the case of
30:33the case of
30:35the case of
30:37the case of
30:39the case of
30:41the case of
30:43the case of
30:45the case of
30:47the case of
30:49the case of
30:51the case of
30:53the case of
30:55the case of
30:57the case of
30:59the case of
31:01the case of
31:03the case of
31:05the case of
31:07the case of
31:09the case of
31:11the case of
31:13the case of
31:15the case of
31:17the case of
31:19the case of
31:21the case of
31:23the case of
31:25the case of
31:27the case of
31:29the case of
31:31the case of
31:33the case of
31:35the case of
31:37the case of
31:39the case of
31:41the case of
31:43the case of
31:45the case of
31:47the case of
31:49the case of
31:51the case of
31:53the case of
31:55the case of
31:57the case of
31:59the case of
32:01the case of
32:03the case of
32:05the case of
32:07the case of
32:09the case of
32:11the case of
32:13the case of
32:15the case of
32:17the case of
32:19the case of
32:21the case of
32:23the case of
32:25the case of
32:27the case of
32:29the case of
32:31the case of
32:33the case of
32:35the case of
32:37the case of
32:39the case of
32:41the case of
32:43the case of
32:45the case of
32:47the case of
32:49the case of
32:51the case of
32:53the case of
32:55the case of
32:57the case of
32:59the case of
33:01the case of
33:03the case of
33:05the case of
33:07the case of
33:09the case of
33:11the case of
33:13the case of
33:15the case of
33:17the case of
33:19the case of
33:21the case of
33:23the case of
33:25the case of
33:27the case of
33:29the case of
33:31the case of
33:33the case of
33:35the case of
33:37the case of
33:39the case of
33:41the case of
33:43the case of
33:45the case of
33:47the case of
33:49the case of
33:51the case of
33:53the case of
33:55the case of
33:57the case of
33:59the case of
34:01the case of
34:03the case of
34:05the case of
34:07the case of
34:09the case of
34:11the case of
34:13the case of
34:15the case of
34:17the case of
34:19the case of
34:21the case of
34:23the case of
34:25the case of
34:27the case of
34:29the case of
34:31the case of
34:33the case of
34:35the case of
34:37the case of
34:39the case of
34:41the case of
34:43the case of
34:45the case of
34:47the case of
34:49the case of
34:51the case of
34:53the case of
34:55the case of
34:57the case of
34:59the case of
35:01the case of
35:03the case of
35:05the case of
35:07the case of
35:09the case of
35:11the case of
35:13the case of
35:15the case of
35:17the case of
35:19the case of
35:21the case of
35:23the case of
35:25the case of
35:27the case of
35:29the case of
35:31the case of
35:33the case of
35:35the case of
35:37the case of
35:39the case of
35:41the case of
35:43the case of
35:45the case of
35:47the case of
35:49the case of
35:51the case of
35:53the case of
35:55the case of
35:57the case of
35:59the case of
36:01the case of
36:03the case of
36:05the case of
36:07the case of
36:09the case of
36:11the case of
36:13the case of
36:15the case of
36:17the case of
36:19the case of
36:21the case of
36:23the case of
36:25the case of
36:27the case of
36:29the case of
36:31the case of
36:33the case of
36:35the case of
36:37the case of
36:39the case of
36:41the case of
36:43the case of
36:45the case of
36:47the case of
36:49the case of
36:51the case of
36:53the case of
36:55the case of
36:57the case of
36:59the case of
37:01the case of
37:03the case of
37:05the case of
37:07the case of
37:09the case of
37:11the case of
37:13the case of
37:15the case of
37:17the case of
37:19the case of
37:21the case of
37:23the case of
37:25the case of
37:27the case of
37:29the case of
37:31the case of
37:33the case of
37:35the case of
37:37the case of
37:39the case of
37:41the case of
37:43the case of
37:45the case of
37:47the case of
37:49the case of
37:51the case of
37:53the case of
37:55the case of
37:57the case of
37:59the case of
38:01the case of
38:03the case of
38:05the case of
38:07the case of
38:09the case of
38:11the case of
38:13the case of
38:15the case of
38:17the case of
38:19the case of
38:21the case of
38:23the case of
38:25the case of
38:27the case of