Virginia Foxx Grills OMB Official On 'Thinly Veiled Attempt To Stack The Deck' For Biden Regulations
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Thank you. Chair and I recognize Dr. Fox from North Carolina. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank
00:04you, Mr. Miller, for being here. I have several questions, so I'd like to try to get through as
00:10many of them as I can. The November 2023 revisions to OMB Circular A4 are a departure from the
00:16bipartisan and widely accepted practice and principles dating back to the Clinton era.
00:22The recent revision is little more than a thinly veiled attempt to stack the deck in favor of
00:27extremely costly new regulations. Why did the Biden administration feel the need to depart
00:33from the established bipartisan framework and guardrails for considering different regulatory
00:38approaches seeking to give Americans an accurate representation of the true cost of new regulations?
00:46Congresswoman, thank you for the question. My purview is over our management apparatus,
00:51not our regulatory and information. What I will say is we take cost-benefit analysis
00:56very seriously. The intent of updating A4 was to update approaches that are used to modernize the
01:04way we do cost-benefit analysis to make sure that we're taking all of the costs and all of the
01:08benefits adequately when we're looking at regulation. Again, for specifics, I can come back
01:14to you. I don't oversee our regulatory operations. I have a follow-up. It seems to me that the OMB
01:20circular A4 revisions are just a ploy to allow agencies to overstate the benefits and undercount
01:27the cost regulations that we all know will bankrupt Americans so long as they can contain
01:34certain buzzwords like climate change and social cost of carbon. My concern is that this new
01:40framework will allow even more expensive regulations to be justified moving forward by, quote,
01:47offsetting them, end quote, with so-called inflated so-called benefits. Can you tell
01:54me the total projected cost of new regulations and rules cleared by OMB in the last roughly
02:01six months since the circular A4 was revised in November, and how does that figure compare
02:07to the six-month period before the circular A4 was revised?
02:12Congressman, again, the regulatory and information activities of OMB aren't under my purview.
02:18It is, we take cost-benefit analysis very seriously, making sure that we're having the
02:23most accurate for both costs and benefits. Okay. Well, this is a real specific question I'm
02:29asking you, so I will ask you to give me the information within a week because it shouldn't
02:35be any problem to tell us, compare what I just said to you with the other time. So I'm going
02:41to ask you, Mr. Chairman, for that information within a week. One of the key points made in the
02:46Government Accountability Office's, or GAO, high-risk list is that the Office of Management
02:52and Budget is critical to addressing high-risk areas because of its role in leading and
02:58supporting agencies. How can Congress help OMB conduct more meaningful oversight to help
03:05improve high-risk programs? Thank you, Congresswoman, and this is an area that I've been very
03:09focused on in partnership with GAO. I referenced a recent discussion that we had with the
03:14Bureau of Prisons, which is one of the newest issues added to the high-risk list. Our focus
03:21is making sure that there are two things happening on every single one of the high-risk list
03:25items. One, leadership attention. It is absolutely imperative that we have leadership attention
03:31in an area, making sure that leaders of relevant agencies, if we don't, that would be a shared
03:35interest of OMB and Congress to make sure that we have leadership attention on every
03:39single one of those, and that we're making positive progress everywhere we can. In GAO's
03:43last high-risk list report, they noted that we were making progress on 16 of the high-risk
03:48list areas, which they noted was the most in a two-year period. We still have work to
03:53do, and I would like to do better than that. Well, again, let me have a quick follow-up.
03:58OMB is one of the largest agencies that does not have an Office of Inspector General. What
04:04role do you think an Inspector General at OMB would play, and how would it help make
04:08OMB more accountable? We have been very focused on the oversight community, both GAO and IGs.
04:16In late 2021, December of 2021, we issued guidance to all agencies on the importance
04:24of collaboration between agencies and IGs. That's been a hallmark effort of this administration.
04:32Okay. One more question. I authored the GREAT Act, which set data standards for agency-driven
04:37data collection across the federal government. Can you tell me why each agency is left to its
04:43own devices to design its own grant application processes and post-award forms without
04:50standardization, and are there efforts to standardize the grant application process
04:56across federal agencies? Congresswoman, thank you for that, and this is a topic that has come up
05:01today and something that I appreciate your leadership on. We absolutely want to be moving
05:06towards a broader enterprise approach. We just overhauled our uniform grants guidance to drive
05:11that kind of consistency. We're pushing agencies to implement that guidance by the end of the fiscal
05:16year and to dramatically simplify their approaches to notices of funding opportunity for more
05:21consistency, especially for recipients that are receiving funds from multiple agencies.
05:26Well, it's very important to our constituents all across the country that this be done. They are
05:32suffering as a result of your not doing that, and we need to do it. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I yield back.