事主不知情下购入复制车 槟城高庭判陆交局需赔13.9万
新闻报报看 | 假设一个人在不知情下买到了复制车，车子也成功通过了陆路交通局JPJ的注册，但是却在日后遭到了执法单位充公，车主是不是就只能自叹倒霉呢？昨天，槟城高庭对此做出了一个标杆性的裁决，高庭认为新闻中的事主在购买到复制车的问题上，JPJ确实存有疏忽，因此需要赔偿事主13万9千令吉。（主播：庄文杰、林晓倩）
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00 Bufa Group used some means to use the legal information of other cars to pay off the debt of the cars that have not been registered or have been expired.
00:08 This is the so-called "copy car" that everyone often hears.
00:12 Speaking of the sale of second-hand cars, I believe many friends are worried that they will accidentally buy a copy car.
00:18 Here's the problem. If you bought a copy car without knowing it,
00:23 the car has also successfully passed the registration of the JPJ of the Road Traffic Authority.
00:27 If one day the car is confiscated by the law enforcement agency, the owner can only blame himself.
00:33 Yesterday, the City of Peking made a standard ruling.
00:37 The City of Peking believes that the owner is negligent in purchasing a copy car.
00:44 Therefore, the owner must pay a fine of RMB 139,000.
00:48 According to the online media "Free Today"
00:51 A female doctor bought a 2013 Fentanyl Velfire in the absence of knowing the truth.
01:00 After 10 months of buying the car, the JPJ was tampered with with the number of the engine and chassis.
01:07 The reason was that the owner's car was confiscated.
01:09 This made the owner very dissatisfied.
01:11 The owner of the car officially entered the court in May last year
01:14 and sued the director of the Road Traffic Authority of Peking City, the director of the Road Traffic Authority, and the federal government.
01:20 According to the female owner, the JPJ has no way to explain
01:24 why they didn't detect that the car's information had been tampered with when it was registered for the car.
01:32 The owner's lawyer said that the JPJ was negligent,
01:35 which led to the tampering of the number of the chassis and engine of the car.
01:40 The JPJ mentioned in his statement that the car was confiscated and lost in 2019 in Senmeilan.
01:47 The number of the chassis and engine was the same car from another car from Rofo.
01:53 But the Road Traffic Authority said that they didn't have to check the car before registration
01:58 because it was the job of the computer car center, PUSPACOM.
02:03 However, the JPJ's statement did not convince the court.
02:07 The court said that the director of the Road Traffic Authority had a responsibility to ensure that the car was registered accurately.
02:13 Therefore, the JPJ should have started working immediately after it found the copycat car.
02:18 But in these cases, the JPJ had already had evidence in December 2019,
02:22 which is 8 months before the female owner bought the car,
02:27 showing that the car could have been a copycat car.
02:30 But the JPJ did not take any action.
02:34 Finally, the court ruled that the director of the JPJ and the director of the JPJ violated the legal duty.
02:41 Therefore, as the third copycat, the federal government was ordered by the court
02:46 to compensate the female owner for 139,000 RMB,
02:49 including the price of the female owner's car and 10,000 RMB in fines.
02:53 [Music]