Forking cryptocurrencies, usually Bitcoin or one of its offshoots, was all the rage 12 months ago. Today, the spate of new forks has dwindled to a trickle. With the benefit of hindsight, and armed with over a year’s worth of data, it’s possible to determine which forks succeeded and why.
Forking mania has come and gone. Nine months ago, all manner of dead and dying coins were being artificially revived and their prices pumped under the guise of forking them into something better. At least that was the promise. Who can forget Zclassic, this year’s worst performing altcoin, which would now require a 70x for ATH buyers to break even? That wouldn’t be a problem if the forked coin ZCL holders were receiving had performed relatively well, but Bitcoin Private has also proven disastrous. It’s currently trading shy of $3, from a peak of $77, making it 2018’s second worst performing coin. Even the McAfee “magic” couldn’t save BTCP.
It is no coincidence that three of the 10 worst performing coins this year are all Bitcoin forks: Bitcoin Gold, Bitcoin Diamond, and Bitcoin Private are all down by over 90%. Not all forks have resulted in failure however: Bitcoin Cash remains a top four coin by market cap, and top three by adjusted 24-hour transaction volume according to Onchainfx. In many respects, it was the success of BCH that fueled the glut of forks that followed, their developers eyeing the potential rewards of launching a new cryptocurrency under the Bitcoin banner.
While Bitcoin Cash forked fairly with no pre-mine, the same could not be said of Bitcoin Gold. Then there was Bitcoin Private, whose developers, led by Rhett Creighton, made their money by loading up on Zclassic before announcing the fork. The failure of high profile forks such as BTCP and the disaster-prone BTG, both of which created far more losers than winners, have played a major role in dampening public enthusiasm for forks.
Forkdrop.io is a leading resource for tracking cryptocurrency forks. It’s produced a guide detailing the number of Bitcoin forks and their fate to date. It explains: “There are 96 Bitcoin fork projects in total. Of those, 69 are considered active projects relevant to holders of Bitcoin (BTC). The remaining 27 are considered historic and are no longer relevant. Additionally, there are 21 altcoin fork projects which have some similarity to Bitcoin fork projects, but have their heritage from a major altcoin.”
42 of these projects have active blockchains that can be used for transacting, while another 27 are allegedly under development. It remains to be seen, however, what sort of traction is gained by such coins as Bitcoin Pizza or Bitcoin Holocaust. 41 of the coins Forkdrop.io has data on were created as a straight fork, in which the newly birthed coin shares the same history as its BTC parent. 22 were issued as passive or active airdrops and another six used a combination of these methods to distribute coins. After Bitcoin, the most commonly forked cryptocurrenci
Forking mania has come and gone. Nine months ago, all manner of dead and dying coins were being artificially revived and their prices pumped under the guise of forking them into something better. At least that was the promise. Who can forget Zclassic, this year’s worst performing altcoin, which would now require a 70x for ATH buyers to break even? That wouldn’t be a problem if the forked coin ZCL holders were receiving had performed relatively well, but Bitcoin Private has also proven disastrous. It’s currently trading shy of $3, from a peak of $77, making it 2018’s second worst performing coin. Even the McAfee “magic” couldn’t save BTCP.
It is no coincidence that three of the 10 worst performing coins this year are all Bitcoin forks: Bitcoin Gold, Bitcoin Diamond, and Bitcoin Private are all down by over 90%. Not all forks have resulted in failure however: Bitcoin Cash remains a top four coin by market cap, and top three by adjusted 24-hour transaction volume according to Onchainfx. In many respects, it was the success of BCH that fueled the glut of forks that followed, their developers eyeing the potential rewards of launching a new cryptocurrency under the Bitcoin banner.
While Bitcoin Cash forked fairly with no pre-mine, the same could not be said of Bitcoin Gold. Then there was Bitcoin Private, whose developers, led by Rhett Creighton, made their money by loading up on Zclassic before announcing the fork. The failure of high profile forks such as BTCP and the disaster-prone BTG, both of which created far more losers than winners, have played a major role in dampening public enthusiasm for forks.
Forkdrop.io is a leading resource for tracking cryptocurrency forks. It’s produced a guide detailing the number of Bitcoin forks and their fate to date. It explains: “There are 96 Bitcoin fork projects in total. Of those, 69 are considered active projects relevant to holders of Bitcoin (BTC). The remaining 27 are considered historic and are no longer relevant. Additionally, there are 21 altcoin fork projects which have some similarity to Bitcoin fork projects, but have their heritage from a major altcoin.”
42 of these projects have active blockchains that can be used for transacting, while another 27 are allegedly under development. It remains to be seen, however, what sort of traction is gained by such coins as Bitcoin Pizza or Bitcoin Holocaust. 41 of the coins Forkdrop.io has data on were created as a straight fork, in which the newly birthed coin shares the same history as its BTC parent. 22 were issued as passive or active airdrops and another six used a combination of these methods to distribute coins. After Bitcoin, the most commonly forked cryptocurrenci
Category
🗞
News