23-REF-Deobandi Mullah saving the Prophet [Peace be upon him] from Falling at Pul Siraat-Deobandi Belief-WHY THE DIFFERENCES?
- 10 years ago
REFERENCE #23:For large Original Scans of the Books Please Visit our Site
http://www.allamahkaukabnooraniokarvi.com/the-20--40-references-part-2-why-the-differences.html
Deobandi scholars have saved the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], from slipping on the Pul siraat,[the Bridge] book Bulghatul Haieraan,
page 8.
Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi:
This is the book Bulghatul Haieraan Fi Rabt e Ayaatul Qur’aan by the disciple of Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi and Ghulam Ahmad Khan from Rawalpindi’s teacher. The reference you gave is….
He writes that he saw the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam],in a dream and met and hugged him on the Pul siraat [the bridge over which the righteous will pass into Paradise] and saved him from falling on Pul siraat …though writing text in Arabic and wrote the word Pul siraat in Urdu.
He interpreted the dream as he is saving the religion of the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], by saving the Prophet (Peace be upon him) from falling. But he is clear in saying that he saved the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], falling from Pul siraat see his text here.
Another thing I want to explain here is that some people believe and me too that the world of dreams is quite different from this world. There is difference in the sentences of dream and reality. But such statements about the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], are never said in dreams even. Sometimes people see the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], in dream and say many things about but none ever said anything like that the Prophet (Peace be upon him) was falling from Pul siraat and I saved him.
The one who believes that Allaah Ta'alaa has no prior knowledge about the deeds of the people and comes to know when the deeds are done.
How can we believe in the dreams of such person even though he tells about his good dream?
Because before interpreting a dream the belief of the person who is telling his dream is also considered. His belief [Aqeedah] is not right about the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], because he even writes that it is permissible to call the Prophet (Peace be upon him) a Taghoot. How can we accept his dream truthful? The people who say that it is a statement of the dream I want to tell that before interpreting any dream we have to take into account the belief of the person who dreamt.
Such people tells fake dreams, what they say about the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], cannot be considered true. Those who think about the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], like that are wrong whether they talk about ticket from Madinah to Lahore or say that the Prophet (Peace be upon him) say that Dar ul Uloom Deoband belongs to him. All such dreams are not acceptable because the people who are dreaming them are not dependable. Their condition [Haal] is not such that we can trust them.
http://www.allamahkaukabnooraniokarvi.com/the-40-reference--part-1--why-the-differences.html
http://www.allamahkaukabnooraniokarvi.com/the-20--40-references-part-2-why-the-differences.html
Deobandi scholars have saved the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], from slipping on the Pul siraat,[the Bridge] book Bulghatul Haieraan,
page 8.
Allamah Maulana Kaukab Noorani Okarvi:
This is the book Bulghatul Haieraan Fi Rabt e Ayaatul Qur’aan by the disciple of Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi and Ghulam Ahmad Khan from Rawalpindi’s teacher. The reference you gave is….
He writes that he saw the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam],in a dream and met and hugged him on the Pul siraat [the bridge over which the righteous will pass into Paradise] and saved him from falling on Pul siraat …though writing text in Arabic and wrote the word Pul siraat in Urdu.
He interpreted the dream as he is saving the religion of the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], by saving the Prophet (Peace be upon him) from falling. But he is clear in saying that he saved the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], falling from Pul siraat see his text here.
Another thing I want to explain here is that some people believe and me too that the world of dreams is quite different from this world. There is difference in the sentences of dream and reality. But such statements about the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], are never said in dreams even. Sometimes people see the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], in dream and say many things about but none ever said anything like that the Prophet (Peace be upon him) was falling from Pul siraat and I saved him.
The one who believes that Allaah Ta'alaa has no prior knowledge about the deeds of the people and comes to know when the deeds are done.
How can we believe in the dreams of such person even though he tells about his good dream?
Because before interpreting a dream the belief of the person who is telling his dream is also considered. His belief [Aqeedah] is not right about the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], because he even writes that it is permissible to call the Prophet (Peace be upon him) a Taghoot. How can we accept his dream truthful? The people who say that it is a statement of the dream I want to tell that before interpreting any dream we have to take into account the belief of the person who dreamt.
Such people tells fake dreams, what they say about the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], cannot be considered true. Those who think about the Prophet Muhammad [Sallal Laahu ‘Alaiehi Wa Sallam], like that are wrong whether they talk about ticket from Madinah to Lahore or say that the Prophet (Peace be upon him) say that Dar ul Uloom Deoband belongs to him. All such dreams are not acceptable because the people who are dreaming them are not dependable. Their condition [Haal] is not such that we can trust them.
http://www.allamahkaukabnooraniokarvi.com/the-40-reference--part-1--why-the-differences.html