During a House Armed Services Committee hearing held before the congressional recess, Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI) questioned Military officials about the Russia, China, North Korea relationship.
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Thank you, General Brunson. I recognize myself first for questions.
00:03Admiral Paparo, how does the growing cooperation between China, Russia, and North Korea present challenges in your area of operations?
00:15Chairman, each country compensates for the other's weaknesses.
00:21In this case, it's quite transactional, and there's a matter of symbiosis among it.
00:25So, for example, China has provided 70% of the machine tools and 90% of the semiconductors that support Russia's rebuilding its war machine.
00:39North Korea provides, as discussed, thousands of rounds in support and troops.
00:46And coming back to China and to North Korea are key capabilities where they would otherwise be behind that would help close the gaps.
00:55Submarine technology, missile technology, and surface-to-wear missiles, and so forth.
01:02This is your transactional symbiosis that poses a serious challenge.
01:07Great.
01:07General Brunson, what does the U.S. gain from our presence on the Korean Peninsula?
01:12And if, in fact, your tri-command of U.S., South Korea, and U.N. forces didn't exist,
01:18what would it cost us to re-establish that kind of foothold on the Asian continent?
01:25Chairman, as you know, that'll be truly a matter of policy.
01:29But from my perspective, what I see is that we've got positional advantage currently.
01:33We've had experience, you asked us in your opening, to sort of highlight these things in regard to our experiences.
01:42And I can say that, honestly, having been a Special Operations Joint Task Force commander in Iraq one year,
01:48I found myself on a FOB that I had been on as a battalion commander six years before.
01:53And we don't want that same condition.
01:55I think what we have to recognize is that the way that we are organized,
01:58the way that we posture ourselves in the region, we ought not to seek credit for it,
02:03but we ought to at least acknowledge the fact that we're in all the places that we need to be.
02:08Capacities aside, the capabilities that are resident within the KTO presently
02:13are right where they need to be, my military assessment.
02:17I think that decisions will be made in the future, but just getting back in there
02:20and what we might be able to provide, again, in terms of protection and sustainment,
02:25which we're able to do across the globe, I think is critically important.
02:29Admiral Paparo, how can the U.S. accelerate the delivery of U.S. weapons to improve Taiwan's self-defense?
02:38How will the Taiwan Security Cooperation Initiative authorized by the FY25 NDAA
02:42help us deliver these needed capabilities to Taiwan?
02:47Chairman, key is to eliminate, remove bureaucratic, in some cases, bureaucratic limitations
02:56in order to do so. Liberalizing the supply bases, certifying supply bases,
03:02a steady flow of funds in order to fund those capabilities and downstream long lead item matters
03:10would greatly enhance our ability to produce at speed.
03:14And do you think that would have a deterrent effect on China's perceived opportunities?
03:21Sir, I think it gains three to five to one leverage for every capability that we provide in defense.
03:28Great. Thank you.