Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Due to the need for vigilance investigation, a man named Girish Kumar approached the court.
00:05He died.
00:07The court asked his family,
00:10if they were interested in conducting the case.
00:13The family was not interested.
00:15But the court decided to conduct the case with a lot of public interest.
00:20But the case was rejected.
00:22Because the accused did not present enough evidence.
00:26They brought the case forward with the hope that the accused would present enough evidence.
00:31This is the time of contributory pension.
00:34That is why such laws are being introduced.
00:37Because we have to face this danger,
00:40there is such a big injustice here.
00:43That is, the money has gone to the chief minister's daughter's company unjustly.
00:50This is the payment to the chief minister,
00:53the interim settlement board of the state has established.
00:59If we think of taking action against the chief minister in its name,
01:04we will also oppose it.
01:06But shouldn't an investigation be conducted in its name?
01:09For such a situation,
01:11for such a situation,
01:13whether they have any evidence in that matter,
01:16whether they have provided any service in return,
01:19whether they have maintained any system in shortlisting this company,
01:23all these should be investigated, right?