• 2 days ago
During a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Thursday, David Perdue, President Trump’s China Ambassador nominee, spoke about Elon Musk’s influence within the Trump Administration.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00And I turn the floor over to Senator Van Hollen.
00:05Thank you, Senator, and congratulations to both of you.
00:08Senator, it's good to see you again, and I enjoyed the conversation in my office.
00:13I'm just going to cover a couple topics here today.
00:17You mentioned in response to a question that it was important to have our friends and allies
00:22with us in a unified stance with respect to our policy in China.
00:29I fully agree.
00:30One of the things we hear from our allies in East Asia, Japan, South Korea, friends
00:36like Taiwan, is that what happens in Ukraine matters to what happens with respect to Taiwan.
00:44In other words, that President Xi has one eye on what's happening in Ukraine and another
00:50with respect to Taiwan in terms of U.S. resolve and the credibility of our allies.
00:57Do you agree with that simple statement?
00:58Well, I think that's a complex comparison, and I'm not sure of what President Xi is thinking
01:04or not thinking except what he says, and he has said over and over the last 10 years that
01:10the reunification is very important to the PRC and the CCP.
01:14Our role in that is simply that we're going to continue to honor the one China policy
01:20as stated in the Taiwan Relations Act, also backed up by the three communiques and the
01:26six assurances.
01:28So the situation is a little more complex than just making a binary comparison between,
01:32I think, Ukraine and Taiwan.
01:34Well, certainly there are differences between Taiwan and Ukraine.
01:38I wasn't suggesting otherwise, but I was suggesting what our allies tell us.
01:43You just said it was important to be united with our allies.
01:47I can just tell you what our allies have been telling us repeatedly is that what happens
01:53in Ukraine impacts and influences the way Xi thinks about Taiwan and the situation there.
02:02I think all of us, not all of us, but on a bipartisan basis, many of us have been deeply
02:06concerned with the way President Trump threw Ukraine under the bus and President Zelensky
02:11under the bus and called Ukraine the aggressor.
02:17At the same time, we know that China has been supporting Russia.
02:23Of course, President Xi famously said that the bonds of friendship between China and
02:29Russia know no boundaries.
02:33The previous administration made clear that if China was to supply military assistance
02:39to Russia, that that would result in some kind of sanctions or punitive response from
02:46the United States.
02:47Do you agree that we should make it clear to China that that kind of assistance would
02:53be unacceptable from our point of view?
02:56You know, the situation is, with regard to Ukraine, is not – I wouldn't characterize
03:02it as throwing them under the bus, Senator.
03:04I would just personally disagree with that.
03:06I think over 300 and plus – Senator, I know how this works.
03:09I get that.
03:10If you could just answer the question.
03:12I asked you – I do, I do.
03:13Do you agree that the previous administration's policy, that it would trigger sanctions from
03:20the United States if China were to provide offensive – or to provide military equipment
03:24to Russia?
03:25Well – Do you agree or disagree?
03:27I agree, and we already have sanctions on them about cross-border trade right now between
03:31China and Russia on dual use, and we know that 80 percent of what Russia has available
03:37to it on dual use comes from China, and we know a lot of that is ending up in the Ukraine.
03:41So yes, I fully support that.
03:43I think President Trump's strategy does the same.
03:46Okay.
03:47So I do want to follow up on some of the questions Senator Merkley raised, because I think it's
03:52indisputable that Elon Musk has an enormous amount of influence in this administration.
03:57He's single-handedly gone about, you know, firing lots of federal employees.
04:03He said he was going to put AID through the wood chipper.
04:06He actually said it was a criminal enterprise.
04:11And I think others have pointed out, including Senator Shaheen, that on a bipartisan basis
04:15we've thought that AID has been an important part of U.S. soft power.
04:21And we've already seen instances of where AIDs retreated in the last couple months that
04:27China has worked to fill the void.
04:30And I do want to just read a statement by Vivek Ramaswamy, who was originally, of course,
04:37Musk's partner in the Doge effort before he left it.
04:41This is what he said in 2023.
04:44Quote, Tesla is increasingly beholden to China.
04:48And then on his podcast, he said, and I quote, I have no reason to think Elon won't jump
04:56like a circus monkey when Xi Jinping calls in the hour of need, unquote.
05:03He also referred to Musk as a Chinese puppet.
05:07So do you agree, would you agree that we should have concerns that somebody with the
05:13amount of influence that Elon Musk has in this administration is getting briefings at
05:22the Defense Department?
05:23Fortunately, they called off, apparently, the war plan on Taiwan.
05:26But doesn't it concern you that somebody like that might have an inordinate amount of influence
05:30with respect to our policies?
05:31Well, first of all, I'm not going to discredit the individual, but that comment is coming
05:35from an individual who was fired basically by the Doge for not doing his job.
05:39So my view is that what they're doing is absolutely necessary.
05:43I think we all.
05:44Are you Vivek Ramaswamy?
05:45Yes.
05:46Being fired?
05:47Yeah.
05:48Okay.
05:49I think that, you know, what they're trying to do, I think we all would agree to.
05:50I mean, we've got to find a way to get better use of the money we spend in the federal government.
05:55When it relates to the breadth of responsibility of what Doge is doing, the president has said
06:02publicly, this is 132 days.
06:04They're well into that now.
06:06They had a, I think they had a press conference this week about the results so far.
06:10Look, there's, when you go in, I've done this several times in the corporate world, and
06:13when you go in and do this kind of effort, there's going to be some areas that you have
06:18to come back and clean up.
06:19And even Elon Musk said that this week, as a matter of fact.
06:22So I agree with you that it's a careful process.
06:26We need to make sure we don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
06:28At the same time, again, I'll relate my comment earlier about the debt funding of everything
06:33we're doing here.
06:34And by the way, the overhead of USAID, let me say this one more time.
06:38The overhead of USAID is redundant in so many cases.
06:41I think that CARE does a great job around the world.
06:44It's about a billion dollar benefit.
06:45We fund about a third of that.
06:47A friend of mine runs it.
06:49But they only have about a 10% overhead.
06:51So if you add USAID overhead on top of what CARE is doing, you end up with an unacceptable
06:57level of overhead.
06:58I'll end with this.
07:00With respect, this committee, the chairman of this committee, has not held a hearing
07:04so that we could ask these very questions.
07:07Senator Shaheen has had two rump hearings with AID officials, which tell a very different
07:12story than is being portrayed by Elon Musk and company, who again called it a criminal
07:17enterprise, which, as I've said, makes every member of this committee a co-conspirator
07:21in a criminal enterprise.
07:22Well, I don't issue that kind of proclamation, Senator.
07:24I don't want to be associated with that.
07:26But what I just said, I'll stand by in terms of the overhead.
07:29He's the one that did that at AID, and that is what he said.
07:32And he said he wanted to put it through the woodchipper, not reform.
07:34So we should be very clear about what they're doing, not what they want us to think they're
07:38doing.
07:39Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
07:40Thank you, Senator.

Recommended