• 2 days ago
During a House Homeland Security Committee hearing, Rep. Seth Magaziner (D-RI) questioned witnesses about cybersecurity grants, and took a swipe at the Trump Administration over the leaked Signal group chat of top national security officials.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00I recognize the gentleman from Rhode Island, Mr. Magaziner, for five minutes of questions.
00:04Thank you, Chairman. The state and local cybersecurity grant program is an essential
00:09resource to help states and municipalities protect themselves against cyber attacks. This grant
00:15program helps secure critical infrastructure like schools, hospitals, electric grids,
00:21water systems. And in my home state of Rhode Island, it has been instrumental in providing
00:27cybersecurity training, for example, for staff at state agencies and municipalities so they can
00:32better protect taxpayer data, securing schools and academic institutions from ransomware attacks,
00:38and protecting critical infrastructure from being infiltrated by hackers.
00:43I am concerned by reports of potential delays and cuts to these grants by the Trump and Musk
00:49administration, and I'm glad to see that, at least on this subcommittee, there appears to
00:53be bipartisan support for continuing the program in a robust form. But you would forgive us for
00:59being concerned, because in addition to the reports of delays, we have heard that the Trump
01:06and Musk administration has been firing staff at CISA and at FEMA, the two agencies responsible for
01:13administering this program. And we have also heard from Secretary Noem herself that she plans to,
01:20quote, eliminate FEMA and significantly shrink CISA. She said that in her Senate confirmation
01:27hearing. This would be a tremendous mistake. The threat that we face from foreign malign actors,
01:36from criminal organizations, to critical infrastructure, to cybersecurity,
01:41to our cybersecurity, are immense. The Chinese are working overtime, putting tens of thousands
01:46of people toward trying to infiltrate every system, even in the smallest towns in this country.
01:51Same with the Russians, same with the Iranians, the North Koreans, and of course, criminal cyber
01:56gangs as well. We've had significant breaches in Rhode Island as a result. This is not the time
02:02to take our foot off the gas, as the Secretary said was her intention during her Senate confirmation
02:09hearing. And unfortunately, this is part of a pattern, because when she was governor of North
02:13Dakota, Secretary Noem was one of only two governors in the entire country to refuse to accept
02:19state cybersecurity grants in 2022. Her administration called them, quote, wasteful spending.
02:25In 2023, yet again, she was now the only governor in the entire country to refuse these grants for
02:32her home state. And of course, we have seen that the administration is not off to a great start
02:38with its own cybersecurity practices, with service members' lives being put at risk from
02:47confidential information being discussed in an unsecured group chat, and of course, Elon Musk's
02:53army of unvetted interns going through everybody's personal data with very little transparency. But
03:01given that backdrop, it is more important than ever that Congress send the message that
03:07cybersecurity still matters to us, that we do not consider it to be wasteful spending,
03:12and particularly we want to continue to support states, municipalities,
03:18utilities in our home states with this program. So I have limited time, but Mr. Fuller, can you
03:26elaborate on any reports of delays, cuts or pauses to this program?
03:33What have you seen so far, and what would the negative consequences be?
03:38Thank you, and I appreciate your point that there's a lot of bipartisan support for this
03:42program to continue. Certainly the risk doesn't take politics into account. One of the concerns
03:49we have about the program is some of our states chose not to participate because they were afraid
03:55that the funding would not continue on, and they were afraid to launch a program that might then
03:59get cut, and that created some hesitation for some states. For us, we're all in with the program,
04:06and it has been extremely beneficial. I mentioned in my testimony we've blocked seven
04:10major attacks in the last six months alone, and so we would hope that the funding could
04:19be extended by Congress without delays. Those delays could cause serious problems in adoption
04:24of the program. Thank you, and Mr. Raymond, if FEMA is eliminated and CISA is significantly cut,
04:31as Secretary Noem has promised, what impact would that have on the ability of your state and others
04:39to maintain strong cybersecurity and take advantage of programs like this one?
04:44I do believe that FEMA and our emergency management in Connecticut, along with CISA
04:50on the security side, have been great partners with us on this cyber battle.
04:56State and local governments are not prepared to fight this kind of cyber engagement with
05:04foreign nations. I would say in combination with the reductions to MS-ISAC and CISA support,
05:14additional responsibilities are falling on the states to fight these battles. Should further
05:21reductions, or FEMA reductions for that matter, be put in place, I would say it would diminish
05:28our ability to help the municipalities that are part of our jurisdiction and defend on behalf of
05:34the state. All right, thank you. I'm over time, so I'll yield back. The gentleman yields back.

Recommended