Skip to playerSkip to main contentSkip to footer
  • 3/31/2025
During a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing last week, Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) questioned Michael Polt, a former U.S. ambassador, about improving the State Department’s efficiency.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00I now recognize for five minutes the distinguished gentleman from Tennessee, Mr. Burchett.
00:07Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you all for being here. You don't have to adjust your mics.
00:13This is the way we talk in East Tennessee. It's the only place in America where people
00:17don't speak with an accent, so thank you all. I never know what Lawler's saying. I just look at
00:23him. If our eyes meet, I figure he's talking to me, but I can't never figure out what the heck
00:27he's saying. What did you just say? Yeah, see? There you go. Hey, leave the comedy to me, Lawler.
00:33Anyway, Mr. Chairman, could you give me the... I'm sorry, not Mr. Chairman, but
00:42you know you got me all confused. Could one of y'all tell me the role and the function of the
00:47Bureau of Administration, and what services does it specifically provide for the State Department?
00:54Just give it to me from the heart. You don't have to read something, ma'am. Just tell me what
00:57you think. How about that? Sure. I would say the A Bureau is certainly a collection of interesting
01:04operational functions that are the backbone of the State Department and the operational
01:09services there. Again, as mentioned, travel services is certainly one of those, but logistics
01:15management is a big category. Records management and privacy mandates and FOIA is another one that
01:22people obviously think of. Contracting and procurement is a huge part of what the A Bureau
01:27does, and then real property is certainly something. But we also oversees the overseas school
01:33program, which making sure that those that serve overseas with their families, that their
01:37children can attend schools that are up to U.S. standards and give them the support that they
01:44need for the education of their children. We also do things like language interpretation and
01:49translation. It's far and wide. I kind of always make the joke there was this old life cereal
01:55commercial, like, give it to Mikey, he'll eat it. The A Bureau is kind of that model, quite frankly.
02:00It is the place that lots of little programs that maybe a lot of people don't think about go
02:05that support the State Department as a whole. Sir, would you add or detract anything from that?
02:11Well, the first thing I would like to add, Mr. Bouchet, is that I appreciate the way you talk,
02:16because I'm a graduate of the University of Tennessee at Knoxville, despite my accent,
02:20which is obviously not from Tennessee. Go Vols. What year was that?
02:231977, the year I joined the Foreign Service. Let's see, I was... Wait, so you had 97. No,
02:30my dad was Dean of Student Conduct back then. I doubt he saw you then either. You were probably
02:34one of those overachievers. But he also had the Freshman Honor Society, so I don't know if he
02:39saw you there either. Let me skip around a little bit. Do you think that the State Department is
02:49maintaining facilities that provide little or no benefit to its diplomatic mission? Because I know
02:56we're looking into a lot now at waste and things, and I don't want you to be critical, but I would
03:02like to know if you could see some efficiencies there. I'll speak from my perspective, of course.
03:08I'm happy to have my colleague be much more specific, because she was in charge of the real
03:13estate of the department. I know that there's a plan, or at least some consideration being given
03:21right now, to streamlining our overseas presence in terms of, do we need to have consulates in
03:26various parts of various countries? Can we close smaller posts? Can we go ahead and create more
03:32efficiencies by not being everywhere? First of all, I would certainly recommend and advocate
03:38that we maintain the principle of universality in terms of being present in every country
03:43in which the United States has diplomatic relations. That does not mean that we have to
03:47have a gigantic presence or that we have to have multiple consulates in the same country,
03:53but the embassy can be the focal point of the U.S. diplomatic presence and representing U.S.
03:59interests. So in that context, taking a close look at the multiple consular posts we might have in
04:05certain countries, particularly in the more advanced countries or the more modern parts of
04:11the world, and also whether every agency that is represented overseas needs to be overseas to go
04:19ahead and perform the function on behalf of the American people. In other words, does every agency
04:24right now that has a perch in certain places, can it be done from either regional offices or can it
04:30be done from back in the United States versus having it done in an overseas location? So in
04:35that sense, I think it's very worthwhile to look at efficiencies, not to sort of say, no, we have
04:40to have everything just the way it is, but I would always do it with the consideration of let's not
04:47move the United States out of countries altogether in which we know that Chinese and other interests
04:52will very quickly fill the vacuum that we need. Real quick, you mentioned Chinese, something I
04:57have a real passion for, and I'm not sure if it's with you all or not, is reclaiming desert areas
05:04all across the continent of Africa. Everybody thinks Africa is a country, it's a continent,
05:08but they are reclaiming the desert through a process or several process, don't need to go
05:14into it. And I'm wondering, is that a function that you all would help facilitate through
05:21grants or something like that? In other words, the question being would we...
05:25We don't do it, the Chinese are going to do it. In other words, should we be competing everywhere
05:30in the world, including on the area that you just mentioned right now? My strong recommendation is
05:35categorically so. We should not let Belt and Road be the effort that sort of rules the
05:42roost around the world without the United States being present. I'm way over my time,
05:46but if you all know somebody who's involved with that, if you all could get with me, I would really
05:49love to be involved in that. Yes, sir. It's not worth a vote for me, but I could sleep well at
05:54night knowing that we did something. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I'm way over, but thank you, brother.

Recommended