• 3 days ago
At today's Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) grilled top Trump Administration intel officials about the leaked group chat about Yemen war plans.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Thank You mr. Chairman, I'll be happy to take your extra 13 seconds, but um, I'm gonna go back to what I addressed at the outset
00:05I mean, this was not only sloppy
00:08Not only violated all procedures
00:11but if this
00:13Information had gotten out
00:17American lives could have been lost
00:19Hooties had this information could reposition
00:23their defensive systems
00:25So I want to get a little more information about this and director Gabbard
00:29Did you participate in the group chat with Secretary of Defense and other Trump senior officials discussing the Yemen war plans?
00:37Senator I don't want to get into this
00:39Did you were you on you're not going to be willing to address so you're not are you denying that?
00:43Will you answer my question ma'am? You are not TG on this group chat
00:49I'm not gonna get into the specific. So you refuse to acknowledge whether you are on this group chat
00:55Senator I'm not going to get into this. Why are they why are you gonna get into specifics?
00:59Is this is it because it's all classified because this is currently under review by the National Security because it's all classified if it's not
01:05classified
01:07share the text now as
01:09The White House previous is it classified or non classified information on this? I can confirm director Radcliffe. Were you on the group chat?
01:18Senator I was on a signal messaging group. So you were the John Radcliffe on that chat
01:24I was thank you. Thank you. Can I provide some context senator to that? Yes, but I've got a series of questions
01:31Well, but I think it's important because at the outset you made a couple of comments about signal messaging using encrypted apps
01:38So that we're clear one of the first things that happened when I was confirmed as CIA director
01:43Was signal was loaded onto my computer at the CIA as it is for most CIA officers
01:50One of the things that I was briefed on very early senator was by the CIA
01:56Records management folks about about the use of signal as a permissible work use
02:01It is that is a practice that preceded the current administration to the Biden admin director Radcliffe. I've got a series of questions
02:09I I do you if you're making the same point. Well, you're making the statement. The signal is a secure channel
02:16No, can I answer that it is I've got a
02:20decryption so it is
02:22It is permissible to use to communicate and coordinate for work purposes provided
02:28provided senator that any decisions that are made are also
02:33Recorded through formal channels. So those were procedures that were implemented
02:39My staff implemented those processes followed those processes
02:44complied with
02:45and and and finally just please
02:48so my
02:50communications to be clear in a signal message group were entirely permissible and
02:56Lawful and did not include classified information
02:59Well, we will we will make that determination because if it's not classified share the text with the committee
03:05You
03:07Know let me go go on director Gabbard. You are the security executive and set access guidelines for classified information
03:16Did you?
03:18Contact the defense secretary or others
03:21After this specific military planning was put out and say hey, we should be doing this in a skiff
03:29There was no classified material that was shared in that
03:33If there was no classified in material share it with the committee
03:38You can't have it both ways these are important jobs, this is our national security
03:45Bobbing and weaving and trying to you know
03:49Filibuster your answer. So please answer the question if this was a right director Gabbard if this was a rank-and-file intelligence officer
03:58Who did this kind of careless behavior, what would you do with them?
04:04Senator I'll reiterate that there was no classified material that was shared in that
04:08And if there's no classified in materials share and then if there's no classified materials then answer that you can't even answer the question
04:16Whether you on the chat, this is strangely familiar
04:18And I think my colleagues remember when you couldn't answer the question is Edward Snowden a traitor
04:25Now I have serious doubts
04:28About your
04:31Director Gabbard
04:33Tweeted just 11 days ago and I'm quoting you any
04:37Unauthorized release of classified information is a violation of the law and will be treated as such
04:43So if this information is classified
04:46What are you going to do?
04:49Senator two points here. First of all, there's a difference between inadvertent release versus
04:56Careless and sloppy malicious leaks of classified information. The second point is there was no classified information
05:02That was on the information
05:05information
05:07Times about how I'm gonna use my 12 seconds up the chairman came director Patel has the FBI launched any investigation of this
05:15Senator I was just briefed about it late last night this morning. I don't have an update
05:18I would like to get an answer by the end of the day
05:22At this point in the

Recommended