Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00Muneer Malik sahib, you are seeing letters and letters, judges are writing letters against each other.
00:06We are sitting outside and watching what is happening in the Supreme Court.
00:10One judge writes a letter and says, the first senior judge, why don't you talk about legality?
00:16The second judge writes an answer, there is no question of legality in that,
00:21but the opposing judge says that they are lazy, they don't come, they finish at 11 o'clock, they go on leave.
00:27What is happening, sir?
00:30This is unfortunate, but if a judge recuses himself from a bench, then there is nothing wrong with that.
00:43Sir, but he didn't recuse himself technically.
00:46You tell me, what is the irony position of this?
00:50Look, if we go back in time, do you remember the murder trial of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto in the past?
00:58Yes, yes.
01:00In that, Justice Waheeduddin sahib wrote a letter to the Supreme Court,
01:06that I am ill, for a while, this case should be postponed.
01:16Okay.
01:17That case was not postponed.
01:20Okay.
01:22The Supreme Court went on.
01:25Okay.
01:26Sir, but on the intention of each other…
01:29Just tell me a little about your viewpoint.
01:33Yes, sir.
01:36That case went on.
01:38Okay.
01:39And a decision came in it.
01:43That was during the middle of the hearing.
01:49So, that is not the viewpoint of the new case.
01:55Okay?
01:56Okay, sir.
01:57At this time, Respected Justice Muneeb Akhtar did not even recuse himself,
02:08and is also a part of the bench.
02:15He is so learned that he will be able to state this contradiction himself.
02:24A small legislator like me cannot state this.
02:32Sir, we are waiting for him.
02:33But my question, sir, is a big one.
02:35But there cannot be a single paralysis of the Supreme Court.
02:40There cannot be a paralysis.
02:41The Supreme Court cannot stop working.
02:43What I have read, he says,
02:45the Supreme Court shall consist of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court,
02:53and such other judges as may be appointed under law.
03:00This is my understanding, right?
03:03Absolutely, sir.
03:04But listen to my question, sir.
03:06It also says that the committee has been formed for nine months.
03:09The CRP, which you suddenly had to put on the committee agenda in the 17th meeting,
03:16the 18th, 7th, and 24th,
03:19you put this on the committee agenda for the first time.
03:23And when there was no bench, you said that the senior judge will lead it.
03:28Now, you have assumed the command of this case.
03:32This is a case of 63A, which will have a big impact in the coming politics,
03:37for reasons that are unknown.
03:39Now, there are not direct accusations against each other, but indirectly.
03:45You realize that?
04:10That is also a political act.
04:13Okay?
04:14Okay?
04:45Now, this is another thing, right?
04:47Which breakfast tastes better?
04:53There are two kinds of views in that.
04:56One is this view, which people say,
05:00that what is written on the breakfast menu,
05:05it says, dal, chana, and chaar.
05:09Okay?
05:10Okay, sir.
05:12One will say, dal and chana should be there.
05:16The other person will say,
05:19onions are also there with chana.
05:23This is another point of view.
05:26Okay?
05:27Okay.
05:28So, this is a legal debate.
05:33Sir, this is a legal debate, but it has become a personal debate.
05:37At the end of the day,
05:41the decision of the Supreme Court,
05:44I am always very fond of Justice Jackson.
05:48Okay.
05:49It is not that we are right because we are final.
05:58It is because we are final, that's why we are right.
06:01We are final.
06:03Look, there is no such decision, Mr. Abbasi.
06:10You are so senior.
06:12Sir, there is no such thing as a decision.
06:14The real problem in this is that
06:15these people are beating each other up in politics.
06:17One says, you don't come on time, you take leave.
06:19The other says, you…
06:21Who says that?
06:22You don't remember the 9th,
06:23now suddenly you remember that you have to make a bench.
06:25Who says that?
06:26Who says that?
06:27Who can say that
06:31that a judicial decision does not have political undertones?
06:38This is something that lives in the imaginary world.
06:42Sir, you are saying that there are political undertones.
06:44Sir, thank you very much.
06:45Actually, this is what I wanted to ask.
06:47He is saying that there are political undertones.
06:49Hasnath is present with me.
06:50Hasnath, what is happening in your Supreme Court?
06:54Look, Mr. Raghupat Hassan is also ready
06:56to tell Hasnath the inside story.
06:58Yes, of course, of course.
07:02The news is coming out.
07:05And you have seen the situation.
07:08And at the moment, it is very clear
07:11that there is a difference between the Supreme Court
07:15and the other side.
07:17And today, if you look at it,
07:19the question that Justice Muneeb Akhtar raised,
07:23the question that Justice Mansoor Ali Shah raised in the letter
07:27that the Supreme Court is being held through Alimax,
07:29you did not answer it.
07:31Secondly, on July 18,
07:34which was proposed by the bank after the decision of the special parties,
07:38that was different.
07:40And now that you have changed it,
07:42and you are representing the bank yourself,
07:43tell us the reason.
07:44You changed the bank without reason.
07:46So these were the things that needed to be told.
07:50And secondly, we will request Justice Muneeb Akhtar again.
07:53It has become very unusual that if a judge is not available,
07:56then the charge is that he was in the bank and the seat was vacant.
08:00And he, I did not think that he would be able to...
08:04But Hasnath, has the fight intensified?
08:08Yes, of course.
08:09Has it become more heated,
08:10as Mr. Chand says, has it become heated, Mukhtariya?
08:14The point is that Justice Muneeb Akhtar has written another letter
08:18in which he has raised further questions.
08:21But now these things are not going to stop at the letter.
08:24Chief Justice Rani Faisal,
08:26it is evident that he has only one claim,
08:28that it seems that the judicial package somehow reached the completion,
08:32and there is no movement from the Supreme Court.
08:34If he has five seats in the Supreme Court,
08:37and it seems that the Supreme Court has 144 seats.