• 2 months ago
#supremecourt #judiciary #pmlngovt #pmshehbazsharif #cjp #khabar
#BarristerAqeelMalik #Zarqataimur

"Inko Adat Hai Manpasand Logon ki warna ye Supreme Court Par..."Senator Zarqa taimur's Statement
Transcript
00:00Senator Zarka, he finished the matter as soon as it started, what is your point of view that this matter is so simple and innocent as he is saying, Aqeel Malik sahab is saying?
00:12His condition is such that there is no hope, no situation is visible, he is worried, sometimes there is no solution, sometimes there is no solution.
00:20First, he tried to bring two-thirds of his majority, in which instead of one series of Chief Justice, he brought five names, among which the lowest one was brought up, whatever methods he wanted.
00:34Then that did not happen, we heard the stories of the big joint session, the big gentleman was struggling, but nothing happened.
00:41After that, we heard that the age of the Chief Justice is 65 to 68 or 62, that somehow he should find a way that his choice comes to the Chief Justice, let people work, let people work with justice, whoever the Chief Justice is, let him work.
01:04But no, he has a habit, he has a habit of liking people, otherwise he goes to the Supreme Court, everyone knows the story of Justice Shaukat Aziz, the way he troubled Siddiqui sahab.
01:19This is a funny thing, Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui sahab himself said during his time in the government, the way he was trying to twist his arm, the way he was trying to get his favorite decision against Nawaz Sharif sahab, that is on record.
01:37But it was your people who attacked the Supreme Court, that we were also there, so all these things are proving that he is facing failure everywhere.
01:51But he is not ready to accept that the IPPs are his, his Prime Minister, his relatives and the rest of the Estafia group.
02:20But Senator sahab, I would like us to stay on the topic, if we talk while staying on this topic, which is the matter of judges.
02:29So I wanted to know, if the number of judges is increasing, so what is the problem in your opinion, if the number of judges is increasing and there are many cases related to cybercrime or other cases related to environment, we all know how many pending cases there are, you must also know the number, so what is the problem in this?
02:53Look, the thing is that there are thousands of cases in the Supreme Court, how many thousands are there? 25, 30, 40 thousands. After that, if you come to the High Court, there are lakhs of cases.
03:03If there are lakhs of cases in the district courts, then you need to reform the judiciary. And the real work starts from your lower court. There are many cases in the Supreme Court. If you want to give relief to the public, then do it.
03:19If you want to give relief to the public, then do it. But you should work with a logic. This is an ad-hoc work, the bill will be bulldozed. And this is a very wrong tradition. Legislators work, people spend months and years to bring a bill.
03:37Here the bill is made at night, the next day it goes to the National Assembly, the same day in the evening it is passed by the Senate, because they say that nothing can happen, Speaker and Chairman, Speaker National Assembly and Chairman Senate are already standing with their hands tied.
03:52Legislators, it is a joke, it is an embarrassment to be a legislator when you look at that what work do you have, we are in the minority, whatever we do, we do not have a number. But I am talking about the Senate.
04:08But the problem is that you do this kind of work without your permission. This has to be said with great regret in this country.
04:20I will definitely make a comment. At least appreciate that there is legislation in your parliament. At least we are not taking work from ordinances. We have not opened the factory of ordinances that you have done in your government.
04:38We are bad, you are brought in again and again.
04:56Mr. Malik, the impression is that Mr. Daniyal threw a stone and then you saw the reaction, how the reaction came, now you are supporting that there is no injustice in this. We also say that there is no injustice, but why are you raising objections on this?
05:14One is this, the second is that when Justice Faiz Isa Sahib was becoming the Chief Justice of Pakistan, the announcement was made in June. This time everyone knows who is the senior judge, who is going to be, so why is there so much delay?
05:30I will answer both your questions. First of all, you talked about the private member bill. There was a lot of controversy, there was a lot of talk about it, and it was said that I don't know, a bill has come from the government and the number of judges will increase and the senior judge will come.
05:46The senior judge will be the one whose age has changed, no one's identity card has changed here. First of all, in that, the senior judge will be the same, under Article 3, there is only one way to become the Chief Justice, who will be the senior judge, and everyone knows who the senior judge is.
06:06Now here, without any reason, there was a lot of debate, I saw it all over the weekend, there is a constitutional package coming up on this whole matter. If JUIF was our ally and Noor Alam Khan Sahib brought these bills, then it would have fallen on us. We had to say that the government told them to bring it on the private member day and do it on that.
06:30This is not our unity yet, so they will explain it to themselves. Where you talked about Qazi Faiziza Sahib, it was probably 80 days ago. See, you understand this thing that at that time, because a decision was made on the dissolution of the assemblies, and at that time the caretaker set-up was coming up.
06:50Because of the set-up of that caretaker, their prior time was done, and that is not a precedent. Because at the time of the caretaker, it was not possible to streamline and fizzle out these things at that time. So, the government at that time understood it better. And this is not a precedent that someone came 80 days before, and before the dissolution and all other matters.
07:16So, you can rest assured that the same will happen, which is the intention of Article 175, Sub Article 3. The same Supreme Court Chief Justice will be the same. This is on record. Neither you nor I, nor the government, nor the Supreme Court can be manipulated by the law. So, you can rest assured.
07:36This is on record. Neither you nor I, nor the government, nor the Supreme Court can be manipulated by the law. So, you can rest assured. This is on record. Neither you nor I, nor the government, nor the Supreme Court can be manipulated by the law. So, you can rest assured.
08:06This is on record. Neither you nor I, nor the government, nor the Supreme Court can be manipulated by the law. So, you can rest assured. This is on record. Neither you nor I, nor the government, nor the Supreme Court can be manipulated by the law. So, you can rest assured.
08:36This is on record. Neither you nor I, nor the government, nor the Supreme Court can be manipulated by the law. So, you can rest assured. This is on record. Neither you nor I, nor the government, nor the Supreme Court can be manipulated by the law. So, you can rest assured.
09:06So, you can rest assured.
09:36So, you can rest assured.
10:06So, you can rest assured.
10:37So, you can rest assured.
10:38So, you can rest assured.
10:39So, you can rest assured.
10:40So, you can rest assured.
10:41So, you can rest assured.
10:42So, you can rest assured.
10:43So, you can rest assured.
10:44So, you can rest assured.
10:45So, you can rest assured.
10:46So, you can rest assured.
10:47So, you can rest assured.
10:48So, you can rest assured.
10:49So, you can rest assured.
10:50So, you can rest assured.
10:51So, you can rest assured.
10:52So, you can rest assured.
10:53So, you can rest assured.
10:54So, you can rest assured.
10:55So, you can rest assured.
10:56So, you can rest assured.
10:57So, you can rest assured.
10:58So, you can rest assured.
10:59So, you can rest assured.
11:00So, you can rest assured.

Recommended