Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00What else should I tell you?
00:02First of all, you said that Mr. Khan did not talk about it.
00:06This is a very simple question.
00:08What was the relationship with General Faiz?
00:10And if there was, what was the nature of it?
00:12And how frequently?
00:14To what extent did you meet regularly?
00:16But your party, since Mr. Khan has gone in,
00:20I am also hearing an allegation that
00:22he was running your party's affairs.
00:24That has nothing to do with Mr. Khan.
00:26Obviously, he will not get any approval from there.
00:28What is the relationship with the party, General Faiz?
00:30Look, the thing is that
00:32if a member of a party,
00:34for example, if there is an MNA,
00:36or an MP, or someone from their circle,
00:38or someone from Chakwal, or Jhelum,
00:40or if they have been in contact with someone,
00:42and if they say hello or hi at some place,
00:44that you are our old associate,
00:46or if there is any interaction with someone like that,
00:48then that does not mean that
00:50they should associate with Imran Khan.
00:52Yes, if someone related to Imran Khan says
00:54that this is a political instruction of Mr. Khan,
00:56that he should associate with Mr. Khan,
00:58or associate with PTI,
01:00or get involved in such activities,
01:02then definitely we should respond to that.
01:04Now, if he has contact with 100 people in Pakistan,
01:06or if someone has left PTI,
01:08or is with PTI,
01:10or is not with PTI,
01:12or is involved in someone's marriage,
01:14then that does not mean that
01:16Imran Khan or PTI
01:18are involved in a conspiracy against Pakistan.
01:20So, do look at it in that sense.
01:22Absolutely right.
01:24Now, you are saying that
01:26there can be personal contact,
01:28but are General Faiz making decisions
01:30about running the party?
01:32No, no, absolutely not.
01:34General Faiz is not making any decisions
01:36about running the party.
01:38Imran Khan is the head of the party,
01:40and somehow he is not involved
01:42in our political activities.
01:44And secondly, Imran Khan has also said
01:46that General Bajwa should also be
01:48investigated.
01:50His wife's account,
01:52she also mentioned that
01:54everyone should be investigated.
01:56And she also said that
01:58the Army Chief
02:00used to go and tell the generals
02:02that he wants to make
02:04General Faiz the Army Chief.
02:06Even though he himself was doing
02:08meetings for the extension.
02:10So, I was blamed for it,
02:12even though there was no such situation.
02:14Absolutely right.
02:16Finally, tell me one more question.
02:18This is a separate topic.
02:20Tell me, sir,
02:22you have made a very strong claim
02:24that we have no political contact
02:26with General Faiz
02:28regarding 9th of May,
02:30or with anyone else.
02:32If these contacts are established,
02:34if it is somehow proven
02:36that he was giving instructions
02:38and directions to your party,
02:40of course, he will have a phone,
02:42he will have WhatsApp,
02:44many news will be leaked,
02:46which I am telling you now,
02:48and he will tell you
02:50that he also
02:52gave a statement
02:54or admitted it.
02:56Then what will you do?
02:58First of all, you know
03:00that our intelligence agencies
03:02leak people's data,
03:04recordings,
03:06audio, videos,
03:08everything is leaked.
03:10So, more than 200 cases
03:12have been made on Mr. Khan,
03:14they bring those records
03:16If it hasn't come out yet,
03:18then definitely there was nothing.
03:20Because you have seen before
03:22that 50 times there were things
03:24in which people were blatantly blackmailed
03:26about someone's audio, video, pictures,
03:28different things kept coming.
03:30So, such things are there
03:32because they have access to WhatsApp
03:34and everything else,
03:36so they have everything.
03:38So, they didn't need to trace
03:40anything new through Faiz.
03:42If we had something like this with Faiz,
03:44you would have been able to record
03:46everything without authority
03:48and then run it later.
03:50Yes, things would have come out from there.
03:52Yes, it is true that if something had happened,
03:54it would have come out by now.
03:56Here the conversations of mothers-in-law
03:58have come out.
04:00Judges' mother-in-laws
04:02phones were being recorded.
04:04If something had happened,
04:06it would have come out,
04:08but it is possible that it may
04:10have come out now.
04:12Shukla, finish it quickly.
04:14If someone is made a witness
04:16to a promise,
04:18like Azam Khan was arrested
04:20and his statement was taken,
04:22then any statement on force
04:24is of no value in any study.
04:26If someone is made a witness
04:28to a promise against Mr. Khan,
04:30then it has no value
04:32because if he had given
04:34an independent statement,
04:36then it would have been
04:38valued by the buyer.
04:40If you want to prove
04:42on the basis of a documentary
04:44or an on-record evidence,
04:46then he did not have anything
04:48that he would have brought
04:50to the court today.
04:52It would be wrong
04:54if someone took that statement
04:56and made a decision.
04:58But you are saying that
05:00if the statement comes out
05:02or the promise is made,
05:04then it will be seen and challenged.