"Justice Mansoor Ali Shah Aur Qazi Faez Isa Mulki Tareekh Kay...",Hafeez Ullah Niazi's Big Statement

ARY NEWS

#SawalYehHai #ReservedSeats #SupremeCourt #QaziFaezIsa #ReservedSeatsCase #HafeezUllahNiazi #AtherKazmi  Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY  Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP  ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.  Official Facebook: https://www.fb.com/arynewsasia  Official Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/arynewsofficial  Official Instagram: https://instagram.com/arynewstv  Website: https://arynews.tv  Watch ARY NEWS LIVE: http://live.arynews.tv    Listen Live: http://live.arynews.tv/audio  Listen Top of the hour Headlines, Bulletins & Programs: https://soundcloud.com/arynewsofficial #ARYNews  ARY News Official YouTube Channel. For more videos, subscribe to our channel and for suggestions please use the comment section.

Transcript

00:00Is the Parliament supreme or is the Supreme Court's decision-making supreme?

00:07It seems that two important institutions are facing each other.

00:12There is no way to back out.

00:15I don't think anyone has an option.

00:18What do you think is going to happen next?

00:20Will it be firm?

00:21Or do you see some sanity prevailing?

00:25Thank you very much.

00:30I think it has become firm.

00:33If all institutions follow their own laws and regulations,

00:40then what you have said that the Parliament is supreme,

00:44it legislates, its laws have been created,

00:50they have made it,

00:52they have the right.

00:54When it was elected in 1970,

01:00it was named Legislative Assembly Elections.

01:08But there is a saying of the American Chief Justice,

01:12what is the Constitution?

01:13The Constitution is supreme.

01:15The Constitution is made by the Parliament.

01:16But what is the Constitution?

01:17It is what we define.

01:20But there is one thing in it,

01:22when it is defined,

01:24then the nation, the Americans,

01:26or the Indians,

01:28they are not divided.

01:30Then you see,

01:32with the Constitution,

01:34this kind of situation,

01:36this is not the first time.

01:38I was sitting in the program yesterday,

01:41there are 12-14 incidents in my mind.

01:44I have told you the big ones.

01:46In 2015,

01:48Jawaharlal Nehru,

01:50in Article 251,

01:52which was made in 1953,

01:54he had lost his sleep

01:56about the Urdu language.

01:58And there are some laws on it,

02:00which are not being implemented.

02:02And not all of them have come together.

02:04There is the Constitution,

02:06there is the Republic,

02:08which was not implemented after 1973.

02:10Jawaharlal Nehru took only one vote,

02:12he became the Chief Justice for four months.

02:14And then he gave a decision.

02:16And within 120 days,

02:18in the Latin spirit,

02:20everywhere, the decision was written in Urdu,

02:22that there will be Urdu language here.

02:24There was a competition,

02:26there was a court,

02:28everything was done.

02:30Has it been implemented?

02:32Has there been a review petition on it?

02:34Has there been an appeal from the National Assembly?

02:36It has not come.

02:38This means that the decision

02:40given by the mighty Supreme Court,

02:42the mighty Chief Justice,

02:44like Mr. Bandyal said on 15th May,

02:46the KPK, Punjab,

02:48and the KPB are also waiting,

02:50we will keep it,

02:52this election will be held on 15th May.

02:54The countdown has started,

02:56we were there for so many days,

02:58your media, God willing,

03:00has a very aggressive role in it.

03:02And they also had a very

03:04strict eye on it.

03:06And we used to say in our programs

03:08that this is such a long time left,

03:10it seems that it has not been done.

03:12It has been said that

03:14this cannot be implemented technically.

03:16Will Mr. Bandyal's ears be pierced?

03:18No.

03:20Nothing happened to the Supreme Court?

03:22No.

03:24Even now, Mr. Mansoor-e-Ishaq,

03:26according to me,

03:28the 10 best judges in the history of Pakistan,

03:30I include

03:32Qazi Faiziyah and

03:34Mansoor-e-Ishaq.

03:36They are outstanding judges.

03:38They are extraordinary judges.

03:40But Mr. Mansoor-e-Ishaq said

03:42that there is no option.

03:44But you will have to do it.

03:46But one thing that

03:48Mr. Mansoor-e-Ishaq did not say,

03:50he said that when they

03:52transgress the constitution,

03:54they do it technically.

03:56You are not interpreting,

03:58you have transgressed,

04:00for which there is no permission.

04:02Or when Umar-e-Tahab Bandyal

04:04made Chaudhry Pervez-e-Ilaichi

04:06the Prime Minister,

04:08I will say one thing,

04:10that when you

04:12transgress the constitution,

04:14the Supreme Court,

04:16they should take this

04:18very serious

04:20step.

04:22Because the people who

04:24have been transgressing for 75 years,

04:26they will interpret

04:28all these things

04:30and transgress.

04:32So for God's sake,

04:34stay within the constitution

04:36which has been given by Mr. Niazi.

04:38He is speaking factually correct.

04:40Mr. Niazi, this Supreme Court

04:42was not like Mr. Bandyal's Supreme Court.

04:44It was weak,

04:46it had flaws,

04:48it had a lack of unity.

04:50In this Supreme Court,

04:52especially this decision

04:54can have a difference

04:56in its technicalities.

04:58But everyone agrees

05:00with the interpretation

05:02of the original 13th January decision.

05:04Do you think this is different?

05:06Wouldn't it be easier

05:08to pass this decision

05:10than to pass the decision

05:12of Mr. Bandyal's court?

05:16The first aberration

05:18comes when

05:20Sanju said

05:223,000 years ago

05:24in the auto war,

05:26know your enemy and know yourself.

05:28Either

05:30like

05:32Mr. Niazi

05:34was saying,

05:36either I

05:38don't understand

05:40that they really don't know

05:42against whom the Supreme Court

05:44is contesting.

05:46If it is contesting against

05:48the government of Shahbaz Shaikh,

05:50then I will agree with you

05:52and agree with them.

05:54But the back cover is different.

05:56Everyone knows.

05:58This means that

06:00they are

06:02just expediencing.

06:04They are

06:06just

06:08consoling themselves.

06:10But the crisis is

06:12that the Supreme Court

06:14has 11 judges.

06:16What is the decision

06:18of 13 of them?

06:20And I don't think

06:22that the government

06:24accepted it.

06:26In which Mr. Kali is also included.

06:28You give it to the Sunni

06:30Unity Council.

06:32Or I don't know,

06:34give it to the PTI.

06:36You get more strength in that.

06:38If all the judges had decided

06:40in the same way,

06:42then I think it would not have been possible.

06:44But when they said that we dissolve

06:46Sunni unity,

06:48they had to do 4-5 things.

06:50PTI is not there,

06:52but as you said,

06:54Mr. Niazi said something

06:56that I don't know

06:58what the logic is.

07:00I don't remember.

07:02Because the optics type

07:04was like this,

07:06and everyone agreed

07:08to the 8 judges.

07:10And on the other hand,

07:12what should be said

07:14is that

07:16the decision

07:18in which

07:20the Sunni Unity Council

07:22who did not have seats,

07:24or they were given

07:26a statement,

07:28you took their seats back.

07:30That your party is over.

07:32So I don't think

07:34it could have gone unattended like this.

07:36The rest, Mr. Tehreek,

07:38or our intellectual friends,

07:40or our other media people,

07:42are obviously correcting

07:44the interpretation.

07:46But behind that,

07:48there are also our desires.

Category

Transcript

Recommended