Major Development Reserved Seats Case | Court Reporter Raja Mohsin Ijaz Gives Inside News
#reservedseatscase #supremecourt #electioncommission #pti #sunniittehadcouncil
Major Development Reserved Seats Case | Court Reporter Raja Mohsin Ijaz Gives Inside News
Major Development Reserved Seats Case | Court Reporter Raja Mohsin Ijaz Gives Inside News
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00On July 12, the Supreme Court ruled that 11 judges considered Mr. Tariq-e-Insaab's parliamentary status.
00:0811 judges were rejected by the Election Commission because of the decision of the Supreme Court on January 13.
00:17The PTI people were declared independent.
00:228 judges clearly said that these seats belong to Mr. Tariq-e-Insaab and they should be given.
00:28Two judges, Justice Mando Khel and Chief Justice Qazi Faiz-e-Issaab, said that 40 people belong to the PTI.
00:36The rest should be decided by the Election Commission.
00:41Justice Yahya Afridi said that he had a suggestion.
00:45He agreed to the status of the PTI, but he also said that the PTI did not have an application petitioner.
00:52The Sunni Council should be given the seat, but no one said that it should be given back.
00:56Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan and Justice Ameen-ul-Din gave their views.
01:12Our special representative Mohsin Raja is with us.
01:16Mohsin, tell us, the decision was made on July 12.
01:1915 days ago, the PTI was given time to collect the affidavits.
01:257 days later, the Election Commission of Pakistan notified us of all the issues.
01:33How far has the timeline reached?
01:36What is the next course of action?
01:39If there is no action on a judgment, because the Election Commission has not officially asked for an opinion.
01:50When will the next action be taken?
01:56The government is passing a law.
01:58Yes, Mohsin.
02:00The time given in the Supreme Court decision is over.
02:0715 days, 7 days.
02:09In the first 15 days, the PTI was given time to collect the affidavits.
02:14After that, the Election Commission submitted its compliance report to the Supreme Court within 7 days.
02:20The Election Commission of Pakistan has technically acted on the decision.
02:26On some issues, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has said that the Election Commission has referred to the Supreme Court.
02:37The majority judgment has asked for clarification.
02:45The interim party elections of Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf have not been held.
02:51They were declared illegal.
02:53There is no organizational structure of the party.
02:55We do not know from whom the issuance of the certificate should be accepted.
03:01The chairman of Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf is not a chairman in the records of the Election Commission.
03:09The time given in the constitution for the participation of any political party is 3 days.
03:19In this judgment, it is said 15 days.
03:21I have understood everything.
03:23I want to know from you.
03:25If the majority judgment of the Supreme Court is not followed, will the Supreme Court itself take action?
03:35Or will someone have to go to the aggrieved party?
03:37You have decided that the majority judgment has not been followed.
03:39So, please do not judge.
03:43Both things can happen.
03:45One minute.
03:47A party can go.
03:49The oppressive party can also go.
03:51The Supreme Court of Pakistan has to come to a detailed judgment.
03:55It can write a lot of things on its own.
03:59The interesting thing is that the seats were taken.
04:07According to the PDM, the decision of Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf was made.
04:11Now Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf is in the mood to go to the Supreme Court.
04:15The situation is a win-win situation for them.
04:17They consider this situation better for themselves.
04:19The reason for this is that Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaf is trying to avoid any kind of judicial reform.
04:31I think something has to be done about this.
04:35I apologize to all three panelists.