• il y a 3 mois
Last Week Tonight with John Oliver S11E19

Category

📺
TV
Transcription
00:31Bienvenue, bienvenue, bienvenue !
00:32La dernière fois qu'on s'est rencontré c'était à Okinawa, merci beaucoup d'être venu !
00:35Cela a été une semaine occupée.
00:37La maison blanche a terminé un changement de prison avec la Russie,
00:39les élections disputées vénézuéliennes ont éclaté partout dans le pays,
00:42et Donald Trump a eu une apparition désastreuse devant l'Association Nationale des Journalistes Noirs,
00:47avec peut-être le point le plus bas étant celui-ci.
00:50Pouvez-vous croire que la vice-présidente Kamala Harris n'est que sur le ticket parce qu'elle est une femme noire ?
00:54Je peux dire que non, je pense que c'est peut-être un peu différent.
00:57Elle était toujours d'héritage indien et elle ne promouvait que son héritage indien.
01:02Je ne savais pas qu'elle était noire jusqu'à quelques années auparavant,
01:06quand elle s'est rendue noire et maintenant elle veut être connue comme noire.
01:09Je ne sais pas, est-ce qu'elle est indienne ou noire ?
01:12Elle était indienne tout le temps et tout d'un coup elle s'est rendue noire,
01:15et elle est devenue une personne noire.
01:20Je veux dire ça de la manière la plus désagréable possible.
01:22Cela s'est passé à peu près comme on peut l'imaginer.
01:26Mettre Trump devant un public noir et demander qu'il parle de la race
01:29n'allait jamais être plus élevé que si la dame disait qu'elle était indienne et noire.
01:33Ça, c'est de la déception.
01:35En plus, ce n'est pas ce qu'il faut dire, mais Harris ne s'est pas transformé en noire
01:39comme si c'était un interstate off-ramp.
01:42Son père est noir et sa mère est indienne.
01:44Je ne peux pas imaginer ce que J.D. Vance, un homme avec trois enfants biraciens,
01:48pensait en regardant Trump là-bas.
01:50Il était probablement en train de se dire
01:51« Regardez-moi ce délire ! »
01:55« Vous pensez que ces couches viennent de partout ? »
02:00Mais on va retourner aux Olympiques.
02:02Ils ont été en cours toute la semaine, avec des éclats notables
02:04de la flage olympique qui a été volée vers l'envers,
02:06à la délégation south-coréenne qui a été introduite
02:08comme la République démocratique de la Corée,
02:10qui est, fun fact, la Corée incorrecte,
02:13à la triathlon qui s'est déroulée dans le Seine,
02:15malgré le fait qu'il n'ait pas été testé plusieurs fois pour la pollution.
02:18Cependant, ça nous a donné cet incroyable commentaire de couleur
02:21concernant les préparations de Seth Ryder, un triathlète américain.
02:24Il s'est préparé pour ce qu'il se passerait ici
02:28par, essentiellement, la micro-dose d'E. coli.
02:31Il a dit qu'il ne pouvait pas s'habituer à son corps en petites doses
02:35et qu'il ferait des choses à la suite de ces Jeux,
02:38comme ne pas laver ses mains après aller dans le bain,
02:41des choses comme ça.
02:42Wow !
02:43Il se trouve qu'il y a aussi une chose
02:45qu'une histoire trop olympique.
02:47Je dois dire que Ryder a dit qu'il était en train de se moquer,
02:50ce qui est bien pour plusieurs raisons,
02:52au moins que ne pas laver ses mains n'est pas
02:54la façon dont vous micro-dosez de l'E. coli.
02:56La façon dont vous faites ça, c'est en mangeant à Chipotle.
02:59Tout le monde le sait.
03:01Mais il y a eu des moments magnifiques aussi,
03:03du triomphe de Simone Biles,
03:04à ce salopard de South Korea,
03:06qui a gagné le silver,
03:07à ce gars qui a gagné des médailles,
03:08tout en se disant qu'il est venu
03:10pour passer les Jeux olympiques.
03:12Il a l'air d'avoir été appelé pour un dernier travail,
03:14et ce travail a invoqué Microsoft Excel.
03:17Malheureusement, il y a eu aussi
03:19des controverses incroyablement stupides.
03:21Il y a eu un abruti transphobique
03:23contre ce boxeur algérien supposément trans,
03:25malgré le fait qu'il n'est pas trans.
03:27Et il y a eu même de l'envie
03:29contre l'ouverture incroyablement française,
03:31qui a apporté un chorus de Marie Antoinette,
03:33un relais de torches à l'étage de Paris,
03:35et un can-can au sein de la scène.
03:37Le seul moyen d'être plus français,
03:40c'est s'il y avait eu un menage à trois
03:42avec trois personnes en vêtements de clown.
03:44Et vous savez quoi ? Il y en a eu.
03:46Il y a eu aussi un menage à trois de clown.
03:48Mais un élément de la cérémonie
03:50a reçu un extrait.
03:52Cette scène, dans laquelle les dragueuses
03:54et d'autres acteurs se sont réunis à table,
03:56était censée évoquer des fêtes pagaines,
03:58mais certains ont vu quelque chose d'autre,
04:00et ont été furieux.
04:01J'ai pensé que l'ouverture
04:03était un désastre, en fait.
04:05J'ai pensé que c'était un désastre.
04:07La moquerie du dernier repas.
04:10Les catholiques et les chrétiens
04:12à travers le monde ont été effrayés.
04:14Ils peuvent faire certaines choses.
04:16J'ai pensé que c'était terrible.
04:18C'est toujours étrange
04:20de voir Trump s'occuper des religions.
04:22Pour écouter ce que j'ai entendu dire récemment,
04:24je ne savais pas qu'il était chrétien
04:26jusqu'à quelques années auparavant,
04:28quand il s'est transformé en chrétien.
04:30Tout d'un coup, il s'est transformé
04:32et est devenu un chrétien.
04:34La critique de cette scène
04:36a aussi focusé sur cet homme,
04:39même s'il n'a pas l'air d'être un chrétien
04:41qui crache une réception de mariage.
04:43Il est allé sur CNN pour s'excuser
04:45et a répondu à une question suivante
04:47avec une réponse quintessentielle française.
04:49Ce qu'il y a de beau dans la religion chrétienne,
04:51c'est le pardon.
04:53Donc je demande pardon
04:55si j'ai offensé.
04:57Les chrétiens du monde me l'accorderont,
04:59j'en suis sûr.
05:04Impossible.
05:06Il reste toujours des traces du passé.
05:08Je les conserve.
05:11Dans ma main, je les garde.
05:37Il y aura clairement plus à dire
05:39sur les Olympiques.
05:41Mais on va commencer par notre histoire.
05:43L'élection de 2024.
05:45C'est probablement la dernière histoire
05:47que vous voulez qu'on raconte.
05:49Sous les hémorroïdes hippos,
05:51mais au-dessus de la vie sexuelle de vos parents.
05:53Ils ont essayé de tirer un rouleau.
05:55C'est comme ça que ton père a fait mal à sa jambe.
05:57Il y a bien sûr beaucoup de discussion
05:59sur ces deux candidats.
06:01Mais nous allons nous concentrer
06:03sur le troisième candidat.
06:06C'est lui.
06:08C'est lui.
06:10Un candidat qui est au centre
06:12de tous les médias.
06:14Et c'est lui.
06:16C'est lui.
06:18C'est lui.
06:20C'est lui.
06:22C'est lui.
06:24C'est lui.
06:26C'est lui.
06:28C'est lui.
06:30C'est lui.
06:32C'est lui.
06:34Cool.
06:35Pour être honnête, ça n'a pas l'air d'un advertisement de campagne, mais plutôt d'un profil de date d'un gars qui a juste perdu sa garde.
06:41Et bien, c'est un peu bizarre de travailler en jeans, d'un sac à l'autre. Je comprends.
06:46Il faut mettre le temps et le travail pour obtenir notre type de corps, n'est-ce pas ?
06:50Au sein de l'gym, je suis connu comme John Oliver Esquire, parce que c'est lui qui m'a montré que j'étais capable de faire du sport.
06:55Et c'est lui qui m'a montré que j'étais capable de faire du sport.
06:58Et c'est lui qui m'a montré que j'étais capable de faire du sport.
07:01Au sein de l'gym, je suis connu comme John Oliver Esquire, parce que c'est lui qui m'a montré que j'étais capable de faire du sport.
07:07Est-ce que c'est HGTV ? Parce que je suis tout gainé.
07:11Appelez-moi le troisième petit poisson, parce que je construis une maison en bois.
07:15La campagne de Kennedy s'est vraiment intéressée à son quirkiness,
07:18offrant aux supporters la possibilité de gagner des choses comme Go Whale Watching avec R.F.K. Jr. et sa femme Cheryl Hines,
07:23ou Winniday of Falconry avec R.F.K. Jr.,
07:26ou Winniday of Falconry avec R.F.K. Jr.,
07:31et il a attiré une grande base de supporters,
07:33et les polls ont découvert qu'il n'y a pas d'issue ou de sujet qui unifie les votants de R.F.K.
07:38qui peuvent être attirés par toutes sortes de raisons.
07:41C'est un candidat honnête, très honnête.
07:44Les Kennedys sont vraiment une royauté dans ce pays, parce qu'ils font les choses correctes.
07:49Sa famille a toujours été pour les droits des privilégiés.
07:54Il est venu à tous les votants et a dit que s'il votait pour lui, il allait pouvoir acheter une maison.
08:01Il est anti-establissement sans tout le bagage.
08:03Il va rétablir la confiance et la transparence à nos institutions fédérales,
08:06parce qu'il est un homme d'intégrité, il a de l'honneur et il est honnête.
08:10Les gens l'aiment pour beaucoup de raisons,
08:12même si appeler un Kennedy anti-establissement, c'est un dérangement.
08:16C'est comme appeler les Windsors anti-veste.
08:18C'est juste pas vrai.
08:20Les Kennedys sont la définition de l'establissement,
08:22et les Windsors sont les veste-biches.
08:25Mais ce que la plupart des gens connaissent de R.F.K.
08:28c'est qu'il est souvent appelé un théoriste de conspiration.
08:30C'est une charge qui a été apportée tellement souvent,
08:32qu'il a pu lire une liste d'insultes dans cette ad.
08:50...
08:56...
08:58...
09:00...
09:02...
09:04...
09:06...
09:08...
09:10...
09:12...
09:14...
09:16...
09:18...
09:20...
09:22...
09:24...
09:26...
09:28...
09:30...
09:32...
09:34...
09:36...
09:38...
09:40...
09:42...
09:44...
09:46...
09:48...
09:50...
09:52...
09:54...
09:56...
09:58...
10:00...
10:02...
10:04...
10:06...
10:08...
10:10...
10:12...
10:14...
10:16...
10:18...
10:20...
10:22...
10:24...
10:26...
10:28...
10:30...
10:32...
10:34...
10:36...
10:38...
10:40...
10:42...
10:44...
10:46...
10:48...
10:50...
10:52...
10:54...
10:56...
10:58...
11:00...
11:02...
11:04...
11:06...
11:08...
11:10...
11:12...
11:14...
11:16...
11:18...
11:20...
11:22...
11:24...
11:26...
11:28...
11:30...
11:32...
11:34...
11:36qui pourraient l'exécuter.
11:38C'est vrai. Il suggère de donner des impôts de maison à des acheteurs d'une mauvaise crédite,
11:42garantie par Fanny et Freddy, une idée sans précédent historique.
11:48Et si vous vous demandez, est-ce que ce gars ne se souvient pas de 2008 ?
11:51Je ne sais pas, mais je dois rappeler qu'ils n'ont pas trouvé la larme jusqu'en 2010,
11:56alors il a peut-être une excuse incroyable.
12:00Mais ne pas penser complètement à la politique, c'est juste le début.
12:03Vous devez savoir qu'RFK est aussi beaucoup plus à la droite sur certains sujets
12:07que vous pouvez imaginer.
12:08Sur l'immigration, il a condamné la politique de Trump de rester au Mexique et de finir la guerre.
12:12Et sur la Gaza, il a répétement opposé un accord de cesse-feu,
12:15a comparé la guerre là-bas à la dénazification de l'Allemagne,
12:19et a appelé les Palestiniens, probablement les gens les plus affamés
12:21par les organisations de l'aide internationale dans l'histoire du monde.
12:25Et il me semble que vous pouvez dire n'importe quelle chose de stupide
12:27si vous mettez simplement le mot « probablement » à l'avant.
12:30Probablement, Boeing a un grand an.
12:32Je veux dire, il n'y en a pas, mais vous pouvez l'arguer et perdre ce putain d'argument.
12:38Mais ce n'est pas seulement la politique
12:39où Kennedy ne peut pas être celui que vous voulez qu'il soit.
12:42Il a aussi admis de voler sur l'avion privé d'Epstein.
12:45Et quand on lui a demandé cela sur un podcast, il a donné une réponse tellement honnête
12:49que l'hôte a l'air de ressentir la nécessité de tenter de l'aider.
12:52Donnez le contexte, évidemment, à l'épisode d'Epstein,
12:54parce que vous avez basiquement...
12:55D'accord, alors, d'abord, vous savez, je suis à New York pour la plupart de ma vie.
13:04Oui.
13:05Et vous vous rendez compte de tout le monde à New York.
13:08Je veux dire, je connaissais Harvey Weinstein, Roger Ailes,
13:11O.J. Simpson qui est venu à ma maison, Bill Cosby qui est venu à ma maison.
13:16Vous connaissez aussi de bons gens.
13:17Oui, je connais.
13:19Je connais beaucoup d'eux, mais vous ne connaissez pas ces gens qui sont des créatures de champs
13:24et qui nous racontent tout ça, n'est-ce pas?
13:26Je veux dire, bien sûr, mais c'est toujours un qui-est-qui des meurtriers de la vingtaine et des offensés sexuels.
13:32Et bien, il y a beaucoup de choses avec lesquelles vous pouvez vous dépasser.
13:34C'est juste New York.
13:36Je ne suis pas sûr que c'est l'une d'entre elles.
13:38Les rats, c'est juste New York.
13:40Tirer votre vêtement quatre blocs par semaine, c'est juste New York.
13:43Une personne dans votre voiture de subway parlant de Jésus et une autre en faisant des flips
13:46et éventuellement, la personne en faisant des flips,
13:48accidentellement, frappe la personne parlant de Jésus.
13:50C'est juste New York.
13:51Mais avoir un Rolodex qui se trouve être partie de l'enregistrement des offensés sexuels,
13:55c'est un problème pour vous, Bobby.
13:57Laissez-nous sortir d'ici.
13:59Et dans d'autres histoires personnelles, il arrive encore pire.
14:02Il y a un mois, un article de Fantasy Fair a révélé qu'un ancien avocat l'avait accusé d'un assaut sexuel.
14:06Et c'est quelque chose pour lequel vous avez l'impression d'avoir une forte dénonciation.
14:10Mais au contraire, ce que vous obtenez, c'est ceci.
14:13Écoutez, j'ai dit ça depuis le début.
14:16Je ne suis pas un garçon de churche.
14:18Je ne cours pas comme ça.
14:19Mais j'ai dit dans mon discours d'annonce que si j'avais tant de squelettes dans ma salle de bain,
14:31qu'si ils pouvaient tous voter, je pourrais courir pour le roi du monde.
14:36D'accord, je suis désolé.
14:39Tout d'abord, je ne suis pas un garçon de churche.
14:41Si l'implication est que les gens associés à la churche ne commettent pas d'assauts sexuels,
14:44mon gars, j'ai de la mauvaise nouvelle pour toi et ta famille catholique.
14:48En plus, la jeunesse est une mauvaise façon de répondre à des allégations.
14:52Vous avez assauté un bébé, peu importe ce que ce soit.
14:54Mais surtout, considérez que l'assaut allégé a eu lieu quand vous aviez 40 ans.
14:58Et en plus de tout ça, quand il a été demandé si plus de femmes pourraient venir,
15:01Kennedy a dit qu'on verra ce qui se passera.
15:04Et la seule façon pour laquelle cette réponse pourrait être pire,
15:07c'est s'il l'a suivi.
15:08Hey, est-ce qu'ils vous ont dit que Bill Cosby est venu chez moi?
15:11Parce qu'il l'a fait.
15:12Mais évidemment, le plus grand problème avec RFK,
15:15c'est sa réputation d'un théoriste de conspiration et anti-vaxxer.
15:17Et si vous le soutenez, vous pouvez penser que c'est un peu trop.
15:20Vous pouvez penser qu'il est allé sur un podcast que j'ai écouté
15:22et qu'il a l'air totalement raisonnable.
15:24Et qu'il en fait beaucoup.
15:26Nous avons écouté un tas.
15:27Et en faisant cela, nous avons remarqué un pattern intéressant.
15:30Sur les plus mainstream, il va sortir de son chemin
15:32pour sembler raisonnable et ouvert d'esprit.
15:34En fait, il a une ligne qu'il aime déployer beaucoup,
15:36dans les podcasts et dans d'autres enjeux.
15:38J'ai une tête critique.
15:40Si quelqu'un me montre que j'ai fait quelque chose de mal, j'ai changé.
15:43Je ne suis pas douillet, je ne suis pas douillet dans ce sens.
15:46Je vais toujours changer d'avis
15:49si quelqu'un me confronte avec des faits.
15:54Si quelqu'un me montre un fait et que je suis malade,
15:58je vais changer d'avis.
16:00Et je m'excuserai.
16:02Ça a l'air plutôt bien.
16:04Même si « montre-moi un fait »
16:06ressemble à ce que dirait un personnage d'action de John Oliver
16:08quand tu lèves la ligne sur son dos.
16:10Ça, et ce n'est pas un harcèlement sexuel si c'est un cheval.
16:13Malheureusement,
16:14l'histoire lui a montré qu'il est beaucoup plus enthousiaste
16:17que ce qu'il aimerait impliquer.
16:18Avant d'arriver à ses plus célèbres vues sur les vaccins et la COVID,
16:21vous devriez savoir qu'elles ne sont pas sa seule alarmante.
16:24Prenons l'AIDS.
16:25C'est un fait scientifiquement prouvé
16:28que l'AIDS est causé par l'HIV.
16:30Mais dans les années 80,
16:31les gens ont regardé le fait qu'il se répandait
16:33dans les Etats-Unis et l'Europe,
16:34surtout dans les communautés gays,
16:35et ont essayé de trouver d'autres facteurs
16:37qui pourraient le causer.
16:38Aujourd'hui, la plupart d'entre eux acceptent
16:40que ces premières théories étaient des fins mortes.
16:42Mais, incroyablement,
16:43aussi récemment que trois ans auparavant,
16:45RFK disait quelque chose comme ça.
16:47Il y avait beaucoup de gens qui disaient
16:49que ce n'était pas un virus,
16:50que le virus était un virus passager.
16:54Et ces gens mourraient principalement
16:56à cause des poppers.
16:57100% des gens qui mourraient
16:59au début de l'AIDS
17:03étaient des gens adhérents aux poppers,
17:06qui sont connus pour causer
17:08les rats de sarcoma carpose.
17:11Et, vous savez,
17:13ce sont des gens qui faisaient partie
17:15d'un style de vie gay,
17:17où ils brûlaient la flamme
17:18sur les deux côtés.
17:19D'accord.
17:20Donc, il y a beaucoup de choses là-dedans,
17:22du style de vie gay
17:23à la répétition de la claime
17:24que les gens mourraient principalement
17:26à cause des poppers,
17:27à la note que les poppers
17:28causent la sarcoma carpose,
17:29ce qui, pour l'enregistrement,
17:30ne le font pas.
17:31Plusieurs études,
17:32dans les humains,
17:33ont trouvé que même l'utilisation
17:34de poppers lourds
17:35n'a pas signifié
17:36l'association avec le risque
17:37de la sarcoma carpose,
17:38ce qui a du sens,
17:39vu que les poppers
17:40sont encore vendus
17:41partout dans la ville.
17:42J'ai ces trois blocs
17:43d'ici,
17:44comme j'ai fait
17:45avant chaque émission.
17:46Comment pensez-vous
17:47que j'y arriverais ?
17:49Mais il ne s'est pas arrêté là-dedans.
17:51Kennedy a aussi argumenté
17:52qu'Anthony Fauci,
17:53qui, à l'époque,
17:54travaillait dans l'NIH
17:55et d'autres experts,
17:56voulait appeler le virus HIV,
17:58en partie,
17:59pour que son agence
18:00et l'industrie pharmaceutique
18:01puissent profiter
18:02de la production d'AZT,
18:03qui était la première drogue
18:04approuvée par la FDA
18:05pour traiter le HIV et l'AIDS.
18:07C'est une partie
18:08d'une série d'arguments
18:09appelée le denial d'AIDS,
18:10qui a fait de vrais dégâts.
18:12L'un de ses principaux proposants,
18:13un scientifique nommé
18:14Peter Duisburg,
18:15a aidé à persuader
18:16le gouvernement du Sud-Afrique
18:17à ne pas fournir l'AZT
18:19aux personnes avec l'AIDS,
18:20une décision qui a été estimée
18:21à un coût
18:22de plus de 330 000 vies.
18:25Mais RFK a récemment écrit
18:26que les arguments
18:27de Duisburg étaient
18:28si sains,
18:29si élégamment fabriqués
18:30et si compétitifs.
18:31Et élégamment fabriqués ?
18:33Ça serait dégueulasse
18:34si vous écriviez
18:35une copie
18:36sur le dos
18:37d'un bar de chocolat.
18:38Mais dans ce cas,
18:39c'est juste obscène.
18:40Et ce n'est pas seulement l'AIDS
18:41où Kennedy a fait
18:42de grands accusations
18:43qui ne ressemblent pas
18:44à la réalité.
18:45Voici ce qu'il a dit
18:46l'année dernière
18:47dans une conversation
18:48sur Twitter
18:49avec Elon Musk,
18:50qui suggère
18:51que les drogues psychiatriques
18:52peuvent être la cause
18:53des tirs à l'école.
19:07...
19:28OK.
19:29So, before we go any further,
19:31let me just say this.
19:32I also don't want
19:33to be doing this.
19:35I don't want to be
19:36debunking his argument
19:37at length.
19:38I am so close
19:39to taking a hit
19:40of these poppers.
19:41You have no idea.
19:42But he's made
19:43so many confident
19:44assertions there.
19:45And if you leave
19:46even one unchallenged,
19:47people will think,
19:48well, maybe
19:49there's something to it.
19:50So, with that in mind,
19:51first,
19:52Prozac hit the market
19:53in 1988.
19:54And as you probably
19:55already know,
19:56there were tons
19:57of shootings
19:58and mass shootings
19:59before then,
20:00including at schools.
20:01As to the claim
20:02other countries
20:03have as many guns
20:04as we do,
20:05there's no doubt
20:06that the world
20:07is affected
20:08by a factor
20:09of more than two.
20:10And as for linking
20:11school shootings
20:12to the amount
20:13of psychiatric drugs
20:14our children are taking,
20:15researchers haven't found
20:16any link between
20:17antidepressants
20:18and school shootings.
20:19In fact,
20:20one study found
20:21that over 87%
20:22of the secondary school
20:23shooters it sampled
20:24were not on
20:25psychiatric medications
20:26at the time
20:27of their attack.
20:28So, multiple facts
20:29there are just plain wrong,
20:30despite how confidently
20:31he just spewed
20:32them out there.
20:33He could just as easily
20:34say that dairy intake
20:35and ice cream
20:36in particular
20:37may contain
20:38neuroglycerides
20:39that initiate
20:40psychopathic behavior,
20:41except none of that is true.
20:42I just made all
20:43of that shit up.
20:44Neuroglycerides
20:45isn't even a word
20:46and lactose quarterly
20:47isn't a magazine.
20:48But it does show
20:49just how easy
20:50it is to reel
20:51people in
20:52when you're spouting
20:53self-assured bullshit
20:54on an unchallenged
20:55platform.
20:56And if you're noticing
20:57a pattern here,
20:58the RFK will find
20:59a problem
21:00and then work backwards
21:01to point at the big,
21:02powerful entity
21:03that's basically
21:04what he's done
21:05with vaccines.
21:06Although again,
21:07he will deny that,
21:08insisting he's not
21:09anti-vax at all.
21:10Here he is making
21:11that point under oath
21:12before Congress.
21:13I have never been
21:14anti-vax.
21:15I have never told
21:16the public
21:17avoid vaccination.
21:18The only thing
21:19I've asked for
21:20and my views
21:21are constantly
21:22misrepresented
21:23so that the truth
21:24of what I believe
21:25is not we're not
21:26allowed to have
21:27a conversation
21:28about that
21:29with the American
21:30people.
21:31I believe vaccines
21:32should be tested
21:33with the same rigor
21:34as other medicines
21:35and medications.
21:36That's a pretty
21:37vehement denial.
21:38And quick shout-out
21:39to the guy
21:40recording that
21:41like it's his
21:42kid's dance recital.
21:43When are you going
21:44to watch that footage,
21:45dude?
21:46You do know
21:47there are other
21:48cameras recording
21:49this, right?
21:50But here's the thing.
21:51Remember when I said
21:52Kennedy goes on
21:53a lot of podcasts
21:54and can sound
21:55reasonable?
21:56He goes on a bunch
21:57of fringy ones, too.
21:58And when addressing
21:59vaccines,
22:01he sends out
22:02a very different
22:03message,
22:04like on this one
22:05three years ago.
22:06Our job is
22:07to resist
22:08and to talk
22:09about it
22:10to everybody.
22:11I see somebody
22:12on a hiking trail
22:13carrying a little baby
22:14and I say to him,
22:15I don't know,
22:16I can't,
22:17I'm vaccinated.
22:18And he hears that
22:19from me.
22:20If he hears it
22:21from 10 other people,
22:22maybe he won't
22:23do it.
22:24Maybe he will
22:25save that child.
22:26When they hear
22:27that from 10 people,
22:28it will make
22:29an impression on them.
22:30You know,
22:31and we all
22:32kept our mouths shut.
22:33Don't keep
22:34your mouth shut anymore.
22:35Confront everybody
22:36on it.
22:37I love that.
22:38I love it.
22:39Thank you.
22:40I love that.
22:41I love it.
22:42I have to say,
22:43that is exactly
22:44the kind of person
22:45I'm expecting
22:46to be co-hosting
22:47an anti-vaccine podcast.
22:48The sort of person
22:49you'd expect to see
22:50walking around
22:51a grocery store
22:52during a COVID surge
22:53licking everything
22:54to fortify her immune system.
22:55But I only say that
22:56because she actually
22:57did that
22:58because of course
22:59she fucking did.
23:00But also,
23:01you don't get to say
23:02I'm not anti-vax
23:03and then
23:04wander around the woods
23:05telling people
23:06to not vaccinate
23:07their babies
23:08like you're some
23:09red-pilled version
23:10of Smokey the Bear
23:11who I'm realizing
23:12is clearly where
23:13you get your
23:14workout wardrobe
23:15inspiration from.
23:16Over the years,
23:17Kennedy promoted
23:18a number of theories
23:19about vaccines,
23:20including how
23:21they supposedly
23:22cause autism.
23:23We've discussed
23:24his claim
23:25that a preservative
23:26called thimerosal
23:27was invented
23:28several years ago.
23:29Not only is it bullshit,
23:30thimerosal hasn't been
23:31in children's vaccines
23:32since 2001
23:33except for the flu vaccine
23:34and even then,
23:35there was and remains
23:36a version without
23:37thimerosal in it.
23:38But Kennedy parlayed
23:39the initial panic
23:40he helped cause
23:41into founding
23:42the Children's Health Defense,
23:43one of the country's
23:44leading anti-vaccine
23:45organizations.
23:46And he's continued
23:47to fearmonger
23:48about a connection
23:49between thimerosal
23:50and autism
23:51ever since.
23:52In 2015,
23:53he said of kids
23:54getting vaccinated,
23:55they get the shot,
23:56they go to sleep
23:57and three months later,
23:58their brain is gone.
23:59This is a holocaust,
24:00what this is doing
24:01to our country,
24:02which is clearly absurd.
24:03A vaccine cannot
24:04make someone's brain
24:05go away,
24:06although I'm increasingly
24:07believing that
24:08a dead worm
24:09might actually
24:10be able to.
24:11And if you don't see
24:12a certain cruelty
24:13in how Kennedy
24:14tends to talk
24:15about autistic people,
24:16you're not wrong.
24:17It goes well beyond
24:18the anti-vax community's
24:19general gross tendency
24:20to imply that
24:21they'd rather have
24:22a kid die from polio
24:23or measles
24:24than be diagnosed
24:25with autism.
24:26Because just listen
24:27to him here.
24:28I bet that you've
24:29never met anybody
24:30with full-blown autism
24:31your age.
24:32You know,
24:33headbanging,
24:34football or a helmet on,
24:35non-toilet trained,
24:36non-verbal.
24:37I mean,
24:38I've never met
24:39anybody like that
24:40my age.
24:41But in my kids' age,
24:42now one in every
24:4334 kids has autism
24:44and half of those
24:45are full-blown,
24:46meaning that description.
24:47OK, first,
24:48if there's limited
24:49variety in the people
24:50you've met your age,
24:51maybe it's because
24:52you've only had
24:53100 kids
24:54or because
24:55you've only ever
24:56hung out with
24:57the same circle
24:58of five or six
24:59sex offenders or murderers.
25:00I don't know.
25:01I'm just asking questions.
25:02And I could talk about
25:03the history of autism
25:04diagnoses and how
25:05they're still so new.
25:06The first person
25:07to be given one
25:08died just last year.
25:09I could talk about
25:10the fact that
25:11autistic people
25:12were long misunderstood
25:13and institutionalized.
25:14I could also
25:15throw in that
25:16there is definitely
25:17no such diagnosis
25:18as full-blown autism.
25:19Or you know what?
25:20I could just let
25:21this guy with autism
25:22point out that
25:23there is no such
25:24diagnosis as full-blown
25:25autism.
25:26I could also
25:27throw in that
25:28there is no such
25:29diagnosis as full-blown
25:30autism.
25:31I could also
25:32throw in that
25:33there is no such
25:34diagnosis as full-blown
25:35autism.
25:36I could also
25:37throw in that
25:38there is no such
25:39diagnosis as full-blown
25:40autism.
25:41I could also
25:42throw in that
25:43there is no such
25:44diagnosis as full-blown
25:45autism.
25:46I could also
25:47throw in that
25:48there is no such
25:49diagnosis as full-blown
25:50autism.
25:51I could also
25:52throw in that
25:53there is no such
25:54diagnosis as full-blown
25:55autism.
25:56I could also
25:57throw in that
25:58there is no such
25:59diagnosis as full-blown
26:00autism.
26:01I could also
26:02throw in that
26:03there is no such
26:04diagnosis as full-blown
26:05autism.
26:06I could also
26:07throw in that
26:08there is no such
26:09diagnosis as full-blown
26:10autism.
26:11I could also
26:12throw in that
26:13there is no such
26:14diagnosis as full-blown
26:15autism.
26:16I could also
26:17throw in that
26:18there is no such
26:19diagnosis as full-blown
26:20autism.
26:21I could also
26:22throw in that
26:23there is no such
26:24diagnosis as full-blown
26:25autism.
26:26I could also
26:27throw in that
26:28there is no such
26:29diagnosis as full-blown
26:30autism.
26:31I could also
26:32throw in that
26:33there is no such
26:34diagnosis as full-blown
26:35autism.
26:36I could also
26:37throw in that
26:38there is no such
26:39diagnosis as full-blown
26:40autism.
26:41I could also
26:42throw in that
26:43there is no such
26:44diagnosis as full-blown
26:45autism.
26:46I could also
26:47throw in that
26:48there is no such
26:49diagnosis as full-blown
26:50autism.
26:51I could also
26:52throw in that
26:53there is no such
26:54diagnosis as full-blown
26:55autism.
26:56I could also
26:57throw in that
26:58there is no such
26:59diagnosis as full-blown
27:00autism.
27:01I could also
27:02throw in that
27:03there is no such
27:04diagnosis as full-blown
27:05autism.
27:06I could also
27:07throw in that
27:08there is no such
27:09diagnosis as full-blown
27:10autism.
27:11I could also
27:12throw in that
27:13there is no such
27:14diagnosis as full-blown
27:15autism.
27:16I could also
27:17throw in that
27:18there is no such
27:19diagnosis as full-blown
27:20autism.
27:21I could also
27:22throw in that
27:23there is no such
27:24diagnosis as full-blown
27:25autism.
27:26I could also
27:27throw in that
27:28there is no such
27:29diagnosis as full-blown
27:30autism.
27:31I could also
27:32throw in that
27:33there is no such
27:34diagnosis as full-blown
27:35autism.
27:36I could also
27:37throw in that
27:38there is no such
27:39diagnosis as full-blown
27:40autism.
27:41I could also
27:42throw in that
27:43there is no such
27:44diagnosis as full-blown
27:45autism.
27:46I could also
27:47throw in that
27:48there is no such
27:49diagnosis as full-blown
27:50autism.
27:51I could also
27:52throw in that
27:53there is no such
27:54diagnosis as full-blown
27:55autism.
27:56I could also
27:57throw in that
27:58there is no such
27:59diagnosis as full-blown
28:00autism.
28:01I could also
28:02throw in that
28:03there is no such
28:04diagnosis as full-blown
28:05autism.
28:06I could also
28:07throw in that
28:08there is no such
28:09diagnosis as full-blown
28:10autism.
28:11I could also
28:12throw in that
28:13there is no such
28:14diagnosis as full-blown
28:15autism.
28:16I could also
28:17throw in that
28:18there is no such
28:19diagnosis as full-blown
28:20autism.
28:21I could also
28:22throw in that
28:23there is no such
28:24diagnosis as full-blown
28:25autism.
28:26I could also
28:27throw in that
28:28there is no such
28:29diagnosis as full-blown
28:30autism.
28:31I could also
28:32throw in that
28:33there is no such
28:34diagnosis as full-blown
28:35autism.
28:36I could also
28:37throw in that
28:38there is no such
28:39diagnosis as full-blown
28:40autism.
28:41I could also
28:42throw in that
28:43there is no such
28:44diagnosis as full-blown
28:45autism.
28:46I could also
28:47throw in that
28:48there is no such
28:49diagnosis as full-blown
28:50autism.
28:51I could also
28:52throw in that
28:53there is no such
28:54diagnosis as full-blown
28:55autism.
28:56I could also
28:57throw in that
28:58there is no such
28:59diagnosis as full-blown
29:00autism.
29:01I could also
29:02throw in that
29:03there is no such
29:04diagnosis as full-blown
29:05autism.
29:06I could also
29:07throw in that
29:08there is no such
29:09diagnosis as full-blown
29:10autism.
29:11I could also
29:12throw in that
29:13there is no such
29:14diagnosis as full-blown
29:15autism.
29:16I could also
29:17throw in that
29:18there is no such
29:19diagnosis as full-blown
29:20autism.
29:21I could also
29:22throw in that
29:23there is no such
29:24diagnosis as full-blown
29:25autism.
29:26I could also
29:27throw in that
29:28there is no such
29:29diagnosis as full-blown
29:30autism.
29:31I could also
29:32throw in that
29:33there is no such
29:34diagnosis as full-blown
29:35autism.
29:36I could also
29:37throw in that
29:38there is no such
29:39diagnosis as full-blown
29:40autism.
29:41I could also
29:42throw in that
29:43there is no such
29:44diagnosis as full-blown
29:45autism.
29:46I could also
29:47throw in that
29:48there is no such
29:49diagnosis as full-blown
29:50autism.
29:51I could also
29:52throw in that
29:53there is no such
29:54diagnosis as full-blown
29:55autism.
29:56I could also
29:57throw in that
29:58there is no such
29:59diagnosis as full-blown
30:00autism.
30:01I could also
30:02throw in that
30:03there is no such
30:04diagnosis as full-blown
30:05autism.
30:06I could also
30:07throw in that
30:08there is no such
30:09diagnosis as full-blown
30:10autism.
30:11I could also
30:12throw in that
30:13there is no such
30:14diagnosis as full-blown
30:15autism.
30:16I could also
30:17throw in that
30:18there is no such
30:19diagnosis as full-blown
30:20autism.
30:21I could also
30:22throw in that
30:23there is no such
30:24diagnosis as full-blown
30:25autism.
30:26I could also
30:27throw in that
30:28there is no such
30:29diagnosis as full-blown
30:30autism.
30:31I could also
30:32throw in that
30:33there is no such
30:34diagnosis as full-blown
30:35autism.
30:36I could also
30:37throw in that
30:38there is no such
30:39diagnosis as full-blown
30:40autism.
30:41I could also
30:42throw in that
30:43there is no such
30:44diagnosis as full-blown
30:45autism.
30:46I could also
30:47throw in that
30:48there is no such
30:49diagnosis as full-blown
30:50autism.
30:51I could also
30:52throw in that
30:53there is no such
30:54diagnosis as full-blown
30:55autism.
30:56I could also
30:57throw in that
30:58there is no such
30:59diagnosis as full-blown
31:00autism.
31:01I could also
31:02throw in that
31:03there is no such
31:04diagnosis as full-blown
31:05autism.
31:06I could also
31:07throw in that
31:08there is no such
31:09diagnosis as full-blown
31:10autism.
31:11I could also
31:12throw in that
31:13there is no such
31:14diagnosis as full-blown
31:15autism.
31:16I could also
31:17throw in that
31:18there is no such
31:19diagnosis as full-blown
31:20autism.
31:21I could also
31:22throw in that
31:23there is no such
31:24diagnosis as full-blown
31:25autism.
31:26I could also
31:27throw in that
31:28there is no such
31:29diagnosis as full-blown
31:30autism.
31:31I could also
31:32throw in that
31:33there is no such
31:34diagnosis as full-blown
31:35autism.
31:36I could also
31:37throw in that
31:38there is no such
31:39diagnosis as full-blown
31:40autism.
31:41I could also
31:42throw in that
31:43there is no such
31:44diagnosis as full-blown
31:45autism.
31:46I could also
31:47throw in that
31:48there is no such
31:49diagnosis as full-blown
31:50autism.
31:51I could also
31:52throw in that
31:53there is no such
31:54diagnosis as full-blown
31:55autism.
31:56I could also
31:57throw in that
31:58there is no such
31:59diagnosis as full-blown
32:00autism.
32:01I could also
32:02throw in that
32:03there is no such
32:04diagnosis as full-blown
32:05autism.
32:06I could also
32:07throw in that
32:08there is no such
32:09diagnosis as full-blown
32:10autism.
32:11I could also
32:12throw in that
32:13there is no such
32:14diagnosis as full-blown
32:15autism.
32:16I could also
32:17throw in that
32:18there is no such
32:19diagnosis as full-blown
32:20autism.
32:21I could also
32:22throw in that
32:23there is no such
32:24diagnosis as full-blown
32:25autism.
32:26I could also
32:27throw in that
32:28there is no such
32:29diagnosis as full-blown
32:30autism.
32:31I could also
32:32throw in that
32:33there is no such
32:34diagnosis as full-blown
32:35autism.
32:36I could also
32:37throw in that
32:38there is no such
32:39diagnosis as full-blown
32:40autism.
32:41I could also
32:42throw in that
32:43there is no such
32:44diagnosis as full-blown
32:45autism.
32:46I could also
32:47throw in that
32:48there is no such
32:49diagnosis as full-blown
32:50autism.
32:51I could also
32:52throw in that
32:53there is no such
32:54diagnosis as full-blown
32:55autism.
32:56I could also
32:57throw in that
32:58there is no such
32:59diagnosis as full-blown
33:00autism.
33:01I could also
33:02throw in that
33:03there is no such
33:04diagnosis as full-blown
33:05autism.
33:06I could also
33:07throw in that
33:08there is no such
33:09diagnosis as full-blown
33:10autism.
33:11I could also
33:12throw in that
33:13there is no such
33:14diagnosis as full-blown
33:15autism.
33:16I could also
33:17throw in that
33:18there is no such
33:19diagnosis as full-blown
33:20autism.
33:21I could also
33:22throw in that
33:23there is no such
33:24diagnosis as full-blown
33:25autism.
33:26I could also
33:27throw in that
33:28there is no such
33:29diagnosis as full-blown
33:30autism.
33:31I could also
33:32throw in that
33:33there is no such
33:34diagnosis as full-blown
33:35autism.
33:36I could also
33:37throw in that
33:38there is no such
33:39diagnosis as full-blown
33:40autism.
33:41I could also
33:42throw in that
33:43there is no such
33:44diagnosis as full-blown
33:45autism.
33:46I could also
33:47throw in that
33:48there is no such
33:49diagnosis as full-blown
33:50autism.
33:51I could also
33:52throw in that
33:53there is no such
33:54diagnosis as full-blown
33:55autism.
33:56I could also
33:57throw in that
33:58there is no such
33:59diagnosis as full-blown
34:00autism.
34:01I could also
34:02throw in that
34:03there is no such
34:04diagnosis as full-blown
34:05autism.
34:06I could also
34:07throw in that
34:08there is no such
34:09diagnosis as full-blown
34:10autism.
34:11I could also
34:12throw in that
34:13there is no such
34:14diagnosis as full-blown
34:15autism.
34:16I could also
34:17throw in that
34:18there is no such
34:19diagnosis as full-blown
34:20autism.
34:21I could also
34:22throw in that
34:23there is no such
34:24diagnosis as full-blown
34:25autism.
34:26I could also
34:27throw in that
34:28there is no such
34:29diagnosis as full-blown
34:30autism.
34:31I could also
34:32throw in that
34:33there is no such
34:34diagnosis as full-blown
34:35autism.
34:36I could also
34:37throw in that
34:38there is no such
34:39diagnosis as full-blown
34:40autism.
34:41I could also
34:42throw in that
34:43there is no such
34:44diagnosis as full-blown
34:45autism.
34:46I could also
34:47throw in that
34:48there is no such
34:49diagnosis as full-blown
34:50autism.
34:51I could also
34:52throw in that
34:53there is no such
34:54diagnosis as full-blown
34:55autism.
34:56I could also
34:57throw in that
34:58there is no such
34:59diagnosis as full-blown
35:00autism.
35:01I could also
35:02throw in that
35:03there is no such
35:04diagnosis as full-blown
35:05autism.
35:06I could also
35:07throw in that
35:08there is no such
35:09diagnosis as full-blown
35:10autism.
35:11I could also
35:12throw in that
35:13there is no such
35:14diagnosis as full-blown
35:15autism.
35:16I could also
35:17throw in that
35:18there is no such
35:19diagnosis as full-blown
35:20autism.
35:21I could also
35:22throw in that
35:23there is no such
35:24diagnosis as full-blown
35:25autism.
35:26I could also
35:27throw in that
35:28there is no such
35:29diagnosis as full-blown
35:30autism.
35:31I could also
35:32throw in that
35:33there is no such
35:34diagnosis as full-blown
35:35autism.
35:36I could also
35:37throw in that
35:38there is no such
35:39diagnosis as full-blown
35:40autism.
35:41I could also
35:42throw in that
35:43there is no such
35:44diagnosis as full-blown
35:45autism.
35:46I could also
35:47throw in that
35:48there is no such
35:49diagnosis as full-blown
35:50autism.
35:51I could also
35:52throw in that
35:53there is no such
35:54diagnosis as full-blown
35:55autism.
35:56I could also
35:57throw in that
35:58there is no such
35:59diagnosis as full-blown
36:00autism.
36:01I could also
36:02throw in that
36:03there is no such
36:04diagnosis as full-blown
36:05autism.
36:06I could also
36:07throw in that
36:08there is no such
36:09diagnosis as full-blown
36:10autism.
36:11I could also
36:12throw in that
36:13there is no such
36:14diagnosis as full-blown
36:15autism.
36:16I could also
36:17throw in that
36:18there is no such
36:19diagnosis as full-blown
36:20autism.
36:21I could also
36:22throw in that
36:23there is no such
36:24diagnosis as full-blown
36:25autism.
36:26I could also
36:27throw in that
36:28there is no such
36:29diagnosis as full-blown
36:30autism.
36:31I could also
36:32throw in that
36:33there is no such
36:34diagnosis as full-blown
36:35autism.
36:36I could also
36:37throw in that
36:38there is no such
36:39diagnosis as full-blown
36:40autism.
36:41I could also
36:42throw in that
36:43there is no such
36:44diagnosis as full-blown
36:45autism.
36:46I could also
36:47throw in that
36:48there is no such
36:49diagnosis as full-blown
36:50autism.
36:51I could also
36:52throw in that
36:53there is no such
36:54diagnosis as full-blown
36:55autism.
36:56I could also
36:57throw in that
36:58there is no such
36:59diagnosis as full-blown
37:00autism.
37:01I could also
37:02throw in that
37:03there is no such
37:04diagnosis as full-blown
37:05autism.
37:06I could also
37:07throw in that
37:08there is no such
37:09diagnosis as full-blown
37:10autism.
37:11I could also
37:12throw in that
37:13there is no such
37:14diagnosis as full-blown
37:15autism.
37:16I could also
37:17throw in that
37:18there is no such
37:19diagnosis as full-blown
37:20autism.
37:21I could also
37:22throw in that
37:23there is no such
37:24diagnosis as full-blown
37:25autism.
37:26I could also
37:27throw in that
37:28there is no such
37:29diagnosis as full-blown
37:30autism.
37:31I could also
37:32throw in that
37:33there is no such
37:34diagnosis as full-blown
37:35autism.
37:36I could also
37:37throw in that
37:38there is no such
37:39diagnosis as full-blown
37:40autism.
37:41I could also
37:42throw in that
37:43there is no such
37:44diagnosis as full-blown
37:45autism.
37:46I could also
37:47throw in that
37:48there is no such
37:49diagnosis as full-blown
37:50autism.
37:51I could also
37:52throw in that
37:53there is no such
37:54diagnosis as full-blown
37:55autism.
37:56I could also
37:57throw in that
37:58there is no such
37:59diagnosis as full-blown
38:00autism.
38:01I could also
38:02throw in that
38:03there is no such
38:04diagnosis as full-blown
38:05autism.
38:06I could also
38:07throw in that
38:08there is no such
38:09diagnosis as full-blown
38:10autism.
38:11I could also
38:12throw in that
38:13there is no such
38:14diagnosis as full-blown
38:15autism.
38:16I could also
38:17throw in that
38:18there is no such
38:19diagnosis as full-blown
38:20autism.
38:21I could also
38:22throw in that
38:23there is no such
38:24diagnosis as full-blown
38:25autism.

Recommandations