• 3 months ago
On Tuesday, Rep. Russ Fulcher (R-ID) questioned FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel on NEPA during a House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00experts to review that, be thoughtful about it, and engage with our global counterparts is valuable
00:04and it's valuable for our geopolitical leadership. And I second that, Madam Chairwoman. I yield back.
00:10The gentleman's time has expired and the chair now recognizes the gentleman from Idaho's First
00:15District for five minutes for questions. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Carr, I paid particular
00:21attention to your comments just a few minutes ago regarding the importance and the beneficial
00:30aspects of speeding up the process of approval across federal lands with NEPA,
00:36National Historic Preservation Act. And I actually have legislation that would do that,
00:41and that's in the works. So hopefully that will make some headway with that. But
00:47in a previous conversation, you had talked about a federal lands desk, if I recall correctly,
00:56and the possibility of a conduit there that might speed things up. And so this was not part of my
01:04original line of questioning, but is there anything further? It's been a while since this
01:09conversation has taken place. Is there anything further developments on the federal lands desk?
01:15Is this something that we need to take further steps for here? I think we need to continue to
01:19move forward. There's a lot of infrastructure ideas that we can do. For instance, we streamlined a lot
01:23of rules at the FCC that apply to small cells, which is one type of technology. We need to
01:28extend those to more technologies. And the federal lands desk, I think, would help as well, because
01:33Congress has taken a lot of stabs at streamlining the permitting process for federal lands. But a
01:37lot of these agencies like Forest and otherwise, they have important day jobs as well, and they
01:41just don't get around to this quickly enough. So I think we had a place at the FCC where folks
01:45could come and help dislodge some of those applications. I think it could be helpful.
01:49So it's particularly pertinent to my state. We've got two-thirds of land mass approximately
01:55where that's an issue. I've also heard about backlogs as a concern, specifically within BLM
02:03Forest Service. Are you hearing anything like that that might be
02:09slowing down the process or the channels? We hear about this constantly. I've visited
02:14places all across the West where you'll go to a lay-down yard, an outdoor warehouse, and they'll
02:19have multiple antennas sitting there, many, many miles of conduits sitting there. So the hard part
02:24of getting all that equipment out there and purchasing it is done. They're not just sitting
02:27there waiting on approvals from the government to get out there and build it. And I think that's a
02:32real big problem. The further west you go, the higher percentage of federal lands. If you pick
02:37a spot to build and it just happens to be federal lands, it can take you two times longer than if
02:42that plot of land happened to be privately owned. We've got to close that gap. Appreciate that. Chair
02:46Rosenworcel, did you want to make a comment on that? Yeah, I just want to acknowledge this is
02:49a good point. Across the country, about one-third of our land is owned by federal authorities.
02:54It is the least built-out land when it comes to communications. And I believe it was in the
02:58Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act that Congress required the GSA to set up a uniform form
03:04for all of our federal agencies when a provider wants to approach them because they want some
03:08construction. I think that form is called Form 299. But the deadlines on that form are long.
03:15They can take 270 days to respond. Just to be clear, the FCC's deadlines for states and localities
03:22are 90 days and 150 days. I think we should expect a faster response time from our federal
03:28authorities. And I'd encourage you to look into the status of Form 299. Appreciate that. Appreciate
03:32that very much. Thank you. I'd like to shift gears just a little bit. This has been touched on as
03:37well. But I hear feedback on it. I want to ask Commissioner Carr if he can expound on this a
03:43little bit. This is regarding the effect of the Title II proposal and the impacts on small and
03:49rural providers. We have a lot of those in my state. But I'm hearing the possibility of price
03:56controls. That's a concern in the industry. And the potential impact on these smaller and rural
04:03providers. I want to get your feedback on that. Is that a real concern? And what should we be doing
04:11about this? Thanks. I think price controls as a policy matter is the absolute wrong direction
04:18because we need to be attracting billions of dollars across the country into these networks.
04:22And there's a risk out there. The FCC and its digital equity order opens the door to rate
04:27regulation at the federal level, even though it disavows it in the separate Title II decision.
04:31But you're seeing a number of states, New York being an example, that are trying
04:34to impose price controls on their own. Similarly, you see the Commerce Department,
04:39the Biden administration, pressuring states, Virginia is one example, Tennessee is another,
04:44to adopt price controls, even though the law that you passed here in Congress told Commerce
04:48Department no rate regulation. So there certainly is this latent and growing effort to impose it.
04:54And it's a policy and legal mistake as well. Thank you for that, Chair Rosenworcel.
05:00This has got to be really quick. And I can follow up with a written question as well. But can you
05:05speak very quickly to the possibility of improving the process of adding entities to the FCC's
05:13covered list? And again, the authority was given by Congress to

Recommended