'Modern-Day Voter Suppression': Mary Gay Scanlon Tears Into GOP Bill On Non-Citizen Voting

  • last month
During a House Rules Committee hearing prior to the Congressional recess, Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon (D-PA) spoke about a bill on non-citizen voting which is already illegal in federal elections.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00And with that, I would call on, I believe, Mrs. Scanlon from Pennsylvania.
00:04Thank you, Madam Chair.
00:08Okay, so we have a bill here which is
00:12pretending to protect our election systems from people who are not citizens
00:18voting in our federal elections, but let's be clear that that's not happening.
00:24It's already illegal for non-citizens to vote in federal elections, and there is no evidence that
00:31non-citizens are voting in federal elections. No study backs this up.
00:37Including, in fact, to the contrary, the Cato Institute has put out a study that found that non-citizens don't vote illegally in
00:45detectable numbers. Sure, things happen everywhere,
00:49but this is not a real issue. Voter fraud is incredibly rare, and
00:54non-citizen voting is even more rare. So all this bill is going to do is
01:00disenfranchise American citizens. This bill repeats the GOP playbook for modern-day voter suppression,
01:07which we've already seen and rejected in my home state or Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and numerous other states.
01:13So by that, I mean when you implement strict voter ID requirements,
01:18which discriminate against
01:20eligible voters by limiting the forms of ID which the law will recognize for voting purposes.
01:25The classic example is the state that allows voters to vote if they have a hunting ID, but not a student ID.
01:32So we don't need to look too far for examples of restrictive ID.
01:37One of the primary forms of ID allowed by this bill is real ID, which as
01:42Chairman Stile noted, it does not in fact say that it shows citizenship, and in fact
01:49non-citizens can get real ID for in a number of different situations, and not all states indicate citizenship.
01:56So we're imposing yet another burden upon our states if they're going to have to go back and
02:02you know, add citizenship to their real ID
02:06issuance.
02:07But beyond that, again, something we're very familiar with in Pennsylvania is that people have not gotten real ID.
02:14It's estimated that only 20% of eligible
02:17Pennsylvanians will have real ID by the time it becomes mandatory in a year. Other states are similar.
02:24Kentucky, I think, is only around 30% because many states
02:28had
02:30large conservative factions who were afraid of real ID, who did not want it to be
02:37mandatory because they did not want there to be a national ID system.
02:41They did not want big government
02:44issuing national ID. So there's been very slow uptick, and it's kind of, I think as Mr. Morelli noted,
02:51it's a little bit odd that we have
02:54the House Republicans pushing additional requirements here upon our states and upon people who are resistant
03:00to Big Brother knowing everything about them.
03:03You know, we saw the privacy concerns, the low acceptance rate of real ID, and it's been around since
03:112005, and we still have less than half the people who could get it
03:16using it, shows that if you put an administrative burden on citizens to prove their citizenship
03:22in order to register to vote, if you don't make it easy for them to do that,
03:27you're going to reduce the number of registered voters,
03:29which is something that we had to address when we had strict voter ID rules in Pennsylvania, and we proved that
03:39600,000 eligible voters in Pennsylvania were going to be
03:43disenfranchised because the forms of ID which had been accepted by the
03:48Republican legislature under that legislation
03:50were too restrictive, and we see a similar thing happening here. If this bill passes and it's implemented nationwide,
03:58Republicans will have taken away the vote from millions of eligible
04:03American voters, not to mention that it's going to place a significant financial and
04:10administrative burden on our state
04:12government, which are already struggling to keep up with the requirements for real ID and other other forms here.
04:21Do our Republican colleagues know this? Did they not do their homework when
04:26drafting this bill, or was the purpose of the bill not really to address this non-existent problem,
04:32but just to give an opportunity to talk about voter fraud that doesn't exist?
04:37So it's pushing lies
04:40about our elections. It's really
04:45problematic, and I just obviously can't support this bill because it goes contrary to all of the evidence and a lot of work that I've
04:52seen and participated in over the years.
04:55Ranking Member Morelli, Mr. Stile mentioned that real ID in and of itself doesn't indicate
05:00citizenship, and that not all states have such a marker. Has there been any testimony or any evidence before the committee
05:08which brings this bill to us about how many states do indicate citizenship?
05:13No, there's no requirement that real ID have citizenship on it. So even though it's cited as documentary evidence,
05:20it's only for those states who would require citizenship on real ID, but real ID does not, as the chairman
05:27indicated, does not have that requirement.
05:29I mean, here's the challenge is it's going to take an armful of documentary evidence and a lot of work now to register to vote.
05:37The barriers for married women who have a different name than is on their birth certificate,
05:43and even if they showed a birth certificate, their driver's license, they're going to have two different names.
05:47One is the name that they were given at birth. One is if they've changed their name. Those aren't going to agree.
05:52You're going to have to provide documentary.
05:54I mean, think about this, the steps that you'll need to take simply to register, which is your right as a U.S.
06:00citizen to vote in elections.
06:02But now you're going to have to go through more information than you'd have to do almost any other activity,
06:07and this is guaranteed by law. It really is shocking the amount of
06:14evidence will be necessary. And by the way,
06:16if you went to register to vote and you had a birth certificate and your married name, or I'm sorry,
06:23driver's license, your married name, and a birth certificate, a different name, and
06:27the poll worker knew you because they're in the same neighborhood, and so I'm going to let this person register to vote.
06:32They did that, they'd be guilty of a federal crime.
06:34They could face jail time. And by the way,
06:37it doesn't mean that you weren't a U.S. citizen. It just means they didn't compile the proper
06:41documentary evidence because they knew who you were. Is that what we want now? For poll workers
06:46who know you, who know you're a citizen, who lived down the street from you to be facing jail time because they didn't get the
06:52documentary evidence that they thought was, that the bill requires as evidence that you're a U.S. citizen. Boy, that's shocking to me.
07:00Well, it's shocking and it's chilling of probably one of our most fundamental
07:05American rights to have a say in who runs the country, who we get to vote for.
07:10So,
07:12thank you for your testimony. I would yield back.

Recommended