Imran Khan offers to talk with Sohail Warraich's Analysis
#Khabar #ImranKhan #AsimMunir #PTI #SuhailWarraich #AdialaJail #breakingnews
Imran Khan offers to talk with Sohail Warraich's Analysis
Imran Khan offers to talk with Sohail Warraich's Analysis
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00But Mr. Sohail Warraich, you are saying that we should let it be a delusion and not do this work,
00:05that open people should talk to the army about negotiations.
00:08So, maybe behind this transparency, isn't there a reason that Imran Khan doesn't want an accusation of any deal?
00:14Is this why open people are making this proposal?
00:17Look, the request is that, we know that in Pakistan, acceptance and acceptance go hand in hand.
00:27But, obviously, we also know that if the establishment gets upset,
00:32then it becomes difficult for the government to stay.
00:34And whenever a government is coming, we also know,
00:38that behind the scenes, there are negotiations.
00:41There are conditions on Benazir, there are conditions on Nawaz Sharif.
00:45It is possible that when Imran Khan came, there were negotiations before him.
00:49Now that Shahbaz Sharif has come, it is possible that there were negotiations before him.
00:54But, if you do this in the middle of a conflict,
00:57then the constitution, which is a consensus document,
01:03and on which the army has taken a stand,
01:05and on which the politicians also take a stand,
01:08won't this be his open opposition?
01:10And the second thing is that,
01:12maybe Mr. Khan doesn't consider other politicians equal to him.
01:17That is why, as a Prime Minister,
01:19you remember, when there was a meeting with the opposition,
01:22he used to get up and leave.
01:24So, to destroy your opponent,
01:28to accommodate him,
01:30he is not a non-believer.
01:32If you go and shake hands with the Prime Minister of India,
01:36and the opposition political parties of Pakistan,
01:39you don't even want to sit with them.
01:42So, this is not appropriate.
01:45How can we call this a democratic, constitutional attitude?
01:49Okay, you don't like that.
01:52It is possible that his current election is also doubtful.
01:57But, we have seen that,
01:59sometimes you have to negotiate with the Taliban.
02:03Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah and Gandhi,
02:06Gandhi, who was British,
02:09he considered them to be the rulers.
02:12But, he negotiated with them.
02:14As a result of those negotiations, India became free.
02:17As a result of those negotiations, Pakistan became free.
02:20You always negotiate with those you don't even believe in.
02:26Because, the culture, the consciousness of the centuries,
02:29has taught us this.
02:31Sir, if both the parties talk,
02:33they can make themselves stronger on the third power.
02:39But, Habib Akram,
02:40after a long political struggle,
02:44we have seen that,
02:45once again, negotiations are needed.
02:46And, Allah wants to announce it.
02:47And, the middle path is needed.
02:49But, do you think that,
02:51legally and politically,
02:53it is not appropriate,
02:54it is not possible,
02:55that this should be done in a constitutional and democratic way?
02:58Not that,
02:59Allah announces it like this.
03:01Like Mr. Khan is saying,
03:02appoint a person,
03:03talk to me.
03:04It is against religion,
03:05politics,
03:06and constitution.
03:09Meher,
03:10one thing we should keep in mind is that,
03:12in the past,
03:13there have been such negotiations.
03:15And, obviously,
03:16they were a little hidden.
03:18But, it was not that,
03:19no one knew about it.
03:21For example,
03:22there were regular negotiations
03:24between Respected Benazir Bhutto
03:26and General Pervez Musharraf.
03:28The final result of which,
03:31came out in the form of NRO.
03:33And, that NRO,
03:34later,
03:35went to court
03:36and was dismissed.
03:37It was made a regular law.
03:38So,
03:39this negotiation
03:40is not something new.
03:41Between the army
03:43and the political parties.
03:45Here,
03:46the question arises,
03:47that,
03:48who is the
03:49party
03:50in this matter?
03:51If you see,
03:52then,
03:53this situation
03:54has become
03:55almost
03:56the same
03:57as PML-Q
03:58which was
03:59related to
04:00General Pervez Musharraf.
04:01Almost
04:02the same
04:03kind of
04:04government
04:05unity
04:06is also
04:07with the
04:08current
04:09establishment.
04:10So,
04:11when
04:12there is such a situation
04:13that
04:14in a party
04:15or in a group
04:16of parties,
04:17if the political power
04:18of the party
04:19is not enough
04:20to make a decision
04:21or make a statement,
04:22then,
04:23it is obvious
04:24that
04:25it is not
04:26appropriate
04:27to talk to the party
04:28because
04:29the conversation
04:30ends without a conclusion.
04:31Sir,
04:32excuse me,
04:33because you are
04:34drawing parallel
04:35and correlations,
04:36BB never
04:37threatened Musharraf
04:38or called him
04:39a dirty harry
04:40or a
04:41Jafar Mir Sadiq.
04:42So,
04:43there is
04:44a background
04:45to this.
04:46But,
04:47the other
04:48party
04:49sitting
04:50on the other
04:51side of
04:52the table
04:53has already
04:54voted for
04:55PTI,
04:56but they
04:57themselves
04:58are not
04:59agreeing.
05:00Now,
05:01this can
05:02definitely
05:03be a
05:04rejection
05:05of democracy,
05:06but this
05:07is the
05:09only
05:10way
05:11to
05:12make
05:13a
05:14decision.
05:38This
05:39is
05:40the
05:41only
05:42way
05:43to
05:44make
05:45a
05:46decision.
05:47This
05:48is
05:49the
05:50only
05:51way
05:52to
05:53make
05:54a
05:55decision.
05:56This
05:57is
05:58the
05:59only
06:00way
06:01to
06:02make
06:03a
06:04decision.
06:05This
06:06is
06:07the
06:08only
06:09way
06:10to
06:11make
06:12a
06:13decision.
06:38This
06:39is
06:40the
06:41only
06:42way
06:43to
06:44make
06:45a
06:46decision.
07:07This
07:08is
07:09the
07:10only
07:11way
07:12to
07:13make
07:14a
07:15decision.