Analysis: China and Philippines Reach Deal Over Disputed Shoal

  • 2 months ago
China and the Philippines have increasingly clashed over a shoal in the South China Sea. But they may have now reached an agreement. Reporter Rik Glauert speaks to Ray Powell of Stanford University about what the deal could mean.
Transcript
00:00So what exactly do we know about the agreement that China and the Philippines have supposedly
00:04made about the Second Thomas Shoal? What are they trying to solve and what progress have they made?
00:09So what they've been trying to solve is the question of how much freedom does the Philippines
00:15have to resupply its outpost at the Second Thomas Shoal in the manner it chooses to do so. And for
00:22the Philippines it's a matter of principle, it's a matter of sovereign rights, it's a matter of
00:28freedom of navigation, it's a matter of not surrendering jurisdiction over its own outpost.
00:35For China, which of course claims the outpost is illegal because China claims almost the entirety
00:41of the South China Sea, it is trying to strong arm the Philippines into essentially abandoning
00:48its rights. So China seems to have been willing to allow a certain amount of resupply as long
00:58as it was able to inspect any resupplies and not allow any quote construction materials out to
01:05the Sierra Madre. Why has China, Beijing come to the table to discuss this with the Philippines?
01:13Well I do think that China has suffered very great reputational harm on the international
01:18stage through its visible aggression and of course the Philippines has played its part in that by
01:24by generating and releasing all of these extremely evocative photos and video that have shown its own
01:32country people and the world how aggressive China has been. So China, this is a kind of a bleeding
01:39wound that China would like to stop and you know I mean look at what harm China has faced. It has
01:46essentially succeeded through its aggression in uniting its potential adversaries against it.
01:52You've seen all of these new agreements between the Philippines, the United States and Japan with
01:57some participation from Australia. Why would it be in the Philippines and China and perhaps even
02:04the region's best interest for a de-escalation in this area? Sometimes it's in a nation's national
02:10interest to go ahead and escalate or to allow escalation. In China's sense or China's view on
02:16things, escalation often works in order to sort of normalize a new aggression. So for example
02:24off of Jinmen Island in Taiwan you had the escalation after the death of the two fishermen
02:29in February that has you know since the China has tried to exploit that to normalize increasingly
02:35aggressive patrols around Jinmen under the pretext of protecting its fishermen. So escalation is a
02:40tactic of China but it tends to escalate in ways that it thinks that it can sort of win the victory
02:47by normalizing a new aggression. In this case the Philippines has been unwilling to sort of allow
02:53the normalization by capitulating and allowing China to sort of win the argument.

Recommended