• 5 months ago
#supremecourt #adhoc #pti #imrankhan #reservedseats #pmlngovt #salmanakramraja

Salman Akram Raja's detailed analysis on the appointment of ad hoc judges in the Supreme Court
Transcript
00:00According to Article 182 of the Constitution, if the court is not able to hold a court session due to the absence of a quorum of the judges of the Supreme Court,
00:13then the court can temporarily appoint an ad-hoc judge for whom the consultation of the Judicial Commission and the approval of the President are necessary.
00:23Now, the ad-hoc judges will naturally have the equal rights of the regular judges of the Supreme Court,
00:30but when the focus is on temporary nature for any reason, then why is so much criticism from you?
00:41Look, the timing of this is being done on the occasion, due to which obvious doubts are arising and criticism is also being done.
00:51If it had been said four or six months ago that since there is a lot of work, there are a lot of cases that are not being heard,
00:59that is why we need four more judges in the Supreme Court temporarily for six months, then the matter would have been understood.
01:06But now it has happened that almost 12 months have passed since the tenure of the Chief Justice.
01:13Suddenly it occurred to me that it would be great if there were four more judges.
01:17However, recently we saw in a case that the Chief Justice was left alone.
01:22Obviously, that case was such that many parties were interested in it.
01:31So, in such a case, when this judge is appointed or the indication of appointing is given,
01:37and it is also said that a reference will be brought to the Supreme Court against the PTI,
01:42that the PTI should be banned, that it should be said in reference to the PTI that it is a community that works against national integrity and self-determination,
01:51then it seems that the court is being arranged in a new way so that the minority can be made the majority.
02:02So, this opportunity of the appointment of four judges raises such questions.
02:08Sir, you do not have a problem with pending cases of around 54,000 to 60,000.
02:14You do not have a problem with 25% criminal appeals pending.
02:17There is a need, but due to time, it is being mixed up.
02:21And is it possible to raise questions about the best way?
02:24If this discussion had taken place before in the Judicial Commission of Pakistan,
02:29if the discussion had taken place inside first, and if it had been discussed later,
02:33would it have been better? Because right now, these are assumptions and conspiracies.
02:37No, no, look, the timing, the way it is being done, the context and context of it,
02:43with that, I think, the cases are not only strengthened, but the matter becomes clear.
02:49Look, the thousands of cases you have mentioned, they are always there.
02:53At any time, it will not happen in our history that the cases that are pending,
02:58they become zero, or they become one thousand, or two thousand.
03:01It is a number, it will remain.
03:03Either you say that we have to increase the number of judges from 17 to 27 in the Supreme Court.
03:11Why don't we do it? This can also be done.
03:14A constitutional amendment can be made, but we do not do that.
03:17We are saying that for an indefinite period, four more judges should be appointed.
03:22Salman Akram Raja Sahib, he feels that this does merit, given that the litigants are suffering.
03:28The litigants are suffering a heavy loss.
03:31No, it is not like that. Look, this is a bookish thing.
03:34We know that the history of Pakistan is based on the fact
03:38that which judges are in accordance with the wishes of the establishment,
03:44and which judges are not.
03:46We start the story with the case of Maulvi Tadmizuddin and Justice Muneer,
03:50and bring it to the day today.
03:52So don't say that all judges are the same, they are not.
03:55Some judges are there who are actually friends of the people,
03:59they actually want to explain the law, which is bad.
04:02And some judges are there who explain continuously,
04:05which is the center of power, according to his wishes.
04:08So there should be no doubt that this is not the case here.
04:12Bookish things are in their place, we know the reality.
04:15You wanted that this discussion should have been done inside,
04:18and then there would have been open names.
04:20Yes, let me tell you.
04:22Appointing an ad-hoc judge is not the solution to any problem.
04:25If you appoint an ad-hoc judge for 4 months or 3 years,
04:28what will happen after that?
04:30Cases are being filed in our country.
04:32Population is increasing, disputes are increasing.
04:34Your land records system is wrong.
04:36You don't get justice in the court.
04:39False cases are being filed. That is the real issue.
04:43Why don't you appoint an army judge?
04:48Why do you need an ad-hoc judge for that?
04:51Or sit in the parliament, amend the law,
04:54and say that we need 21 permanent judges.
04:57We need 25 permanent judges.
04:59Let me tell you, Mr. Salman,
05:01if such conditionalities are imposed on it,
05:04that for a long period of 3 years,
05:07it should be reduced to 1 year,
05:10or something more reasonable.
05:12Number two, sir,
05:14no judge will listen to political or political nature cases.
05:18They won't listen to cases that can change the political situation.
05:23But cases that were pending before their appointment,
05:26will be presented to them.
05:29And second, Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Esa,
05:32make a bench that he is heading,
05:35there won't be ad-hoc judges.
05:37Because your biggest problem is that
05:39you are saying that we are taking care of them.
05:42If these conditions are present,
05:44is it then acceptable to you?
05:46Who will impose these conditions?
05:48There must be a legal way to impose these conditions.
05:51These conditions cannot be imposed in the air.
05:53There is no such restriction in the constitution.
05:55When you appoint an ad-hoc judge,
05:57two have apologized,
05:58you will get two more names.
06:00So it won't be difficult for you to appoint four judges.
06:04You cannot impose any restriction
06:06in the constitution.
06:07There is no such restriction in the constitution
06:09that they will listen to a particular nature case
06:11or they will sit in a particular bench.
06:13Once you appoint them,
06:15then they will...
06:16Sir, but your complaint about the court packing is baseless.
06:19Justice Mansoor Ali Shah is sitting with Qazi Faiz Esa,
06:22Justice Muneeb is also sitting with Qazi Faiz Esa.
06:25I mean...
06:26No, it is not baseless.
06:27Look, this historian will talk about it.
06:29We will see.
06:30We always understand one thing.
06:33History is the last court.
06:35Some things cannot be said at this time.
06:37Some things we all see,
06:39we know,
06:40and they are written in history.
06:42The historian talks about them.
06:44Look, this is our reality
06:46that bench formation has been the most important event
06:49in our judicial history.
06:51When the National Imami Party was to be dismissed
06:54or to be dismissed,
06:55Wali Khan Sahib appeared in court.
06:57He objected to the formation of the bench.
06:59His objections were rejected
07:01and then that party was dismissed.
07:04The same thing happened in Mr. Putto's appeal.
07:06The judges who did not want to work with him
07:09were chosen and dismissed.
07:12One was told that his degree is valid.
07:15Justice Sabtar Shah.
07:17So this story has been going on since the beginning.
07:20The formation of the bench and the formation of the court
07:22are the most important events
07:24in the decision of any case.
07:26But sir, this is still very much part of the constitution.
07:29This is still very much part of the constitution.
07:31No gamesmanship or any sinister plan
07:34can be taken up.
07:36This is a part of the constitution.
07:38The law allows it.
07:40Look, we are not born today.
07:42We are 76-77 years old.
07:44It is written in the book
07:46that every work will be done with good intentions.
07:48But when all the work is not done with good intentions,
07:50when there is a polarized environment,
07:52when we have a history,
07:54when we have the wishes of Muqtadara,
07:56then we should take a step in that environment.
07:58Yes, what will you say, Mr. Salman Akram Raja?
08:02Any timing is everything.
08:04It is all about timing.
08:06The timing of this is not right.
08:10And look, there is no need to go into too much detail.
08:14The judges who are being mentioned,
08:16one of them suspended the decision
08:18of the five judges in the military courts.
08:22As a result,
08:24you see, it's been a long time,
08:26it's been a year and a half.
08:28Those people who should have been acquitted
08:30under the decision of the five judges,
08:32or at least come out of military custody,
08:34they are still...
08:36Sir, but Justice Tariq also gave a decision
08:38in favour of you in the Cypher case,
08:40by giving bail to Imran Khan.
08:42Look, sitting on a big bench
08:44and being in the minority is something else.
08:46But look, we have rights.
08:48And there is a reason for rights.
08:50A decision was made by the high courts
08:52to arrest people one by one.
08:54The case of Sanam Javed is in front of you.
08:56You arrest one person in six different cities
08:58on the same day,
09:00putting an incident.
09:02At one place there is a bail,
09:04at another place there is a joke.
09:06According to that, the high courts
09:08decided that in this case,
09:10there will be no arrest again
09:12without informing the court.
09:14That decision was also rejected in the Supreme Court,
09:16due to which the corruption of the past year
09:18is possible.
09:20If it was said that these women
09:22or these people who are arrested
09:24again and again,
09:26before arresting them,
09:28a reasonable reason would be given to the court,
09:30then all this would not have happened.

Recommended