Garbarino Hammers Janet Yellen: ‘It’d Be A Serious Mistake To Limit Our Fraud Prevention Tools’

  • 3 months ago
On Tuesday, Rep. Andrew Garbarino (R-NY) questioned the Secretary of the Treasury Jent Yellen on financial fraud during a House Financial Services Committee hearing.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Bayard, the gentleman from New York, Mr. Gabarino, is recognized for five minutes.
00:04Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, Madam Secretary, for being here today.
00:08Back in September, the CFPB announced that it is considering a Fair Credit Reporting Act
00:13brief that includes a broad and novel definition of data broker.
00:16Of what?
00:17As I mentioned to Director Tropra, I'm very concerned that this proposal may not recognize
00:22how consumer data is used for identity verification and fraud prevention. Use of data for these
00:27purposes is not the same as using it for credit eligibility purposes and, therefore, shouldn't be
00:31subject to the FCRA. Further, the companies that provide identity and fraud prevention technology
00:37to finance institutions should not be regulated under the FCRA, as they already fall under the
00:43Bank Secrecy Act, USA Patriot Act, and the Graham-Leach-Bliley Act. It would be a serious
00:49mistake to limit our fraud prevention tools in the system. Given that the Bureau's proposal
00:56may severely impact the ability to prevent fraud and conduct identity verification, has the CFPB
01:02spoken to anyone at FinCEN or Treasury regarding its brief proposal?
01:08I'd have to ask. I don't know what contact there's been. I have not talked to Director
01:15Tropra about this, but my staff may well have done so.
01:19If they haven't, will you commit to engaging with the Bureau on this?
01:23Certainly, I'm happy to look into it.
01:26All right. Wouldn't it make sense, though, for the Bureau to minimize its impact on the
01:30Bank Secrecy Act, compliance, and other law enforcement and privacy statutes?
01:36If it has that impact, it would make sense.
01:38All right. I appreciate that. Thank you very much.
01:42Over the last two decades, China has unleashed a global lending spree, mainly through its Belt
01:47and Road Initiative, showering mostly developing countries with hundreds of billions of dollars
01:51in an effort to expand its influence and become a political and economic superpower.
01:56China's opaque loans differ from most other loans to developing countries by advanced nations or
02:00institutions like the World Bank. They usually carry higher interest rates and shorter maturities,
02:05requiring refinancing every couple of years, and frequently using national assets as collateral.
02:10As more countries are on the cusp of default, raising interest rates are only going to make
02:14it more expensive to pay off debt denominated in dollars and other key currencies.
02:19Mr. Secretary, what should the role of international financial institutions be in
02:22addressing the needs of those that have outstanding Chinese debt and are currently
02:26in desperate need of relief from Beijing? We're working extremely hard to relieve the
02:33debt burdens of low-income countries that clearly need to restructure their debt and are trying to
02:42do so in the context of an IMF program. And as you say, China is often the holdout and the most
02:50difficult lender to deal with. We have been addressing that in all that we do. It's a topic
03:00I've raised in all of my bilateral meetings with my Chinese counterparts. We've raised this
03:09with the IMF and World Bank. A sovereign debt roundtable has been created to deal with some of
03:18the issues that China continues to raise in multiple debt restructurings. And while I still
03:26have serious concerns, some progress has been made in the context of common framework debt
03:35restructurings. So Zambia, Ghana, for example, are countries where progress has been made. China's
03:43come to the table, but there is more to do clearly. You've said that you've spoken to World Bank and
03:50IMF about this. Estimates peg China's lending to developing world at a trillion dollars, which
03:54makes them a bigger lender than the World Bank and IMF. But China is still considering emerging
04:01and developing economy under the eyes of the IMF. Do you believe that the U.S. should now use its
04:06influence in international organizations to change China's status as a developing country,
04:11specifically at the IMF? I guess I need to look at that. I'm not prepared to give you an answer on
04:19that. All right. Well, again, it's my understanding that the IMF considers China an emerging and
04:25developing economy, which allows them better terms under certain loans. And if they're giving
04:31out a trillion dollars a year to other countries, I think we should look into it. We oppose in the
04:36World Bank and all of the MDBs any lending to China whatsoever, given China's income level and
04:43extensive lending around the world. And we've pushed and they have reduced very substantially
04:52the lending that they do. We vote against all of it. Thank you. I just want to say this statement.
04:57International banks play an important role in our nation's economy, particularly in New York.
05:01I recognize that Basel III endgame is not in your current jurisdiction, but financial impact of these
05:05rules cannot be understated. I would encourage you as Treasury Secretary to talk with banking
05:10regulators and other FSOC members about the impact of this rules. Gentleman's time has expired.

Recommended