• 3 months ago
On "Forbes Newsroom," Mini Timmaraju, President and CEO of Reproductive Freedom for All, discussed her organizations $100 million plan to help bolster reproductive rights in the 2024 elections, and warned about Project 2025's plans to attack abortion.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Hi, everyone. I'm Maggie McGrath, editor of Forbes Women. Abortion and reproductive rights
00:07have been one of the most motivating factors in driving voters to the polls in the midterm
00:12elections, and they are poised to be one of the biggest issues in the 2024 presidential election.
00:19Here to explain exactly what's going on is Minnie Timaraju. She is the president and CEO of
00:26Reproductive Freedom for All. Minnie, thank you so much for being here.
00:31Thank you so much for having me.
00:33Let's start with a $100 million campaign that your organization is taking part in.
00:39It's called Abortion Access Now. And what is it?
00:44You know, this is an opportunity for nine national reproductive rights, health and
00:48justice organizations to come together and really make historic investment in voter education,
00:55leading up to the election, but also building our grassroots momentum for a 2025 Congress
01:03so that we are equipped with the most robust and most organized and most activated membership
01:08across our orgs to really fight for federal legislation and be ready for, frankly, all the
01:14scenarios that we are mapping out, given all that's in flux politically in this country.
01:19So this is nine organizations, organizations you've heard of, like Planned Parenthood and ACLU,
01:25organizations you might not be as familiar with, like the National Women's Law Center,
01:29In Our Own Voice, National Asia-Pacific Women's Forum. What we're trying to do here is bring
01:34together the breadth and the depth of the reproductive rights movement to really make
01:40sure we're approaching this from the most robust, expansive policy lens possible.
01:46And that means, in practical terms, that we're not just fighting for restoring a federal right
01:51to abortion, although that is like critical, like baseline, we've got to get back to a right
01:56in all 50 states, but we're also fighting for expanded access to abortion care. Because for
02:02a long time in this country, even though we're always the law of the land, in so many parts of
02:06the country, women, particularly women of color, women in rural areas, pregnant people who had a
02:11hard time making ends meet, didn't have access to care because of prohibitions on access, whether
02:17it was distance, whether it was cost. So we're really aiming for a very robust platform. And we
02:23know eight of the ten Americans now support abortion access and understand how vital it is
02:28for very unfortunate reasons, right? Because of Dobbs and the overturning of Roe. So how do we
02:35capitalize, unfortunately, on a very tragic situation to get the best, most robust policy
02:40possible in a place like Washington, D.C., which is a tough place? It is a tough place. Now,
02:45100 million dollars is a lot of money. How are you and your cohort intending to spend this?
02:51Is this on advertising? Are you supporting candidates? What's the division of dollars here?
02:56We are, this is a C3 and a C4 side campaign. The bulk of what we're doing right now is C3,
03:04and that 100 million represents money that's already been invested by many of the orgs,
03:07that we've already committed to this fight, and some new money that we're raising for this work.
03:12So for an example, the types of things we're doing, we're definitely doing digital ads,
03:16but we are not leading with digital ads. We're honestly leading with organizing. So a lot of
03:21these resources are going to our partners and our allies in states where we have a lot of critical
03:28grassroots mobilization to do, where our movement may have a thinner bench of organizations with
03:34members. We know that this has to be a people-powered movement, that we cannot rely on
03:39the whims of what's happening in Washington, D.C. We also know that to truly build long-term
03:45political power for our movement, it's about making sure our numbers are well represented
03:49in the variety of states, not just the states where we've been investing with ballot measures,
03:54or not just in battleground states where there's going to be a lot of air time on abortion.
03:58We've got to go to tougher places and tougher folks who don't get that information and educate
04:04them on the stakes. So it's a lot of voter education through digital and online organizing,
04:09a lot of actual like boots on the ground, door to door, a lot of community, you know,
04:14town halls, house parties, a lot of the old school tactics that are really vital to breaking through
04:19the noise, to really educate folks who are not getting the information in traditional ways.
04:26I see. I was going to ask if this was part of a get out the vote measure in battleground states,
04:30and if some of the money was going, and then if some of the money was going to go towards
04:34the ballot measures, which we're seeing the petitions for the signatures in a few different
04:38states. But this sounds like it's supplementing those efforts.
04:41That's right. It is. And the way that I would ask folks to think about it,
04:45the way I'd explain it is this is focused on a federal solution. So while many of our orgs are
04:50sitting at the tables and the campaigns in the states on ballot measures, and some of our orgs
04:55like us, Planned Parenthood, EMILY's List, we have federal PACs, we endorse candidates,
04:59we can legally do that through our other mechanisms. This campaign is mostly focused
05:04on voter education and voter mobilization around a federal policy, a set of federal
05:10policy solutions to the crisis. Federal policy, when it comes to federal policy on abortion and
05:16reproductive health care, it sounds like a tall order in this political environment.
05:22How likely are we to see a federal action here? You know, it's definitely a tough environment.
05:30I think it's still not outside of our grasp. You know, we feel very confident about the
05:35stakes. I'm putting my hat as Reproductive Freedom for All for our PAC. I feel very confident in our
05:42stakes and our chances in the House of Representatives. We're working really
05:47closely with our friends in the DTRIP, and we've got enough targets in this country that are very,
05:52very close, where we feel very optimistic about the U.S. House. The Senate is tough,
05:58but the latest polls have most of our Senate battleground races ahead of President Biden,
06:04which is an important thing right now, and doing really well. And some of our toughest races
06:10in the U.S. Senate are in places where we have a lot of momentum around ballot measures, Arizona,
06:15Nevada, and then even in Montana. So, you know, Jon Tester is running alongside a ballot measure.
06:21You know, Ruben Gallego is running alongside a ballot measure. And then in places like Michigan
06:25and Ohio, you've had recent victories that have really mobilized voters around abortion,
06:30and you've got U.S. Senate candidates, Sherrod Brown, we're hoping Alyssa Slatkin, she's still
06:35in her primary, will be capitalizing on how holding the Senate is going to be critical to
06:40protecting those wins in those states. And then, look, at the White House, we've been very clear
06:45that only a Biden-Harris administration can deliver on a federal right to abortion,
06:50that you need a pro-reproductive freedom trifecta, which I understand probably sounds
06:55unrealistic to a lot of people, but we're running to win. We believe abortion, and the data all
07:00shows it, that when it's on the ballot, it wins. So we need to make this election a clear contrast
07:06between Joe Biden and Donald Trump around abortion access. One candidate in one party
07:12wants to restore that right, and one candidate in one party wants to rescind all the good work
07:17this administration has done, plus pass and sign a national abortion ban, despite what Donald Trump
07:23says. And it's really clear, and you mentioned Project 25-5 when we started, so I mean,
07:28that's the blueprint that we really have to educate Americans on. There's a lot to unpack
07:34there. I just want to go back to something you said. You said some of the candidates that the
07:37PAC has supported are polling ahead of Joe Biden. Why is that important? Are you making contingency
07:43plans in case he pulls out of the race and a different candidate steps in for the Democrats?
07:48It's important. I'm so glad you asked me. We're not making contingency plans.
07:52All of our work is around a Joe Biden-Kamala Harris ticket, but I'm glad you asked me to clarify.
07:57Why I think it's important to note that the Senate candidates are running ahead of the President is,
08:03I'll be candid, there's a lot of doom and gloom right now in the Democratic, you know, operative
08:06class here in Washington, D.C. When I'm in the States, what I'm hearing on the ground from my
08:11members, and I have four million members and a lot of them in these battleground states,
08:15they're feeling optimistic, they're feeling confident, and it's showing up in how they're
08:18supporting and polling for these Senate races. So I trust the data of local folks thinking about
08:25who they're supporting for the Senate or in a ballot measure in the state legislature more
08:30than I trust where they're at with Donald Trump and Joe Biden right now, when we know many folks
08:34are not yet dialed into the presidential and, quite frankly, where we know there's still a margin
08:39for us to make up in the presidential. So not about contingency plans, more about the really
08:45strong strength of these candidates, because I've got a lot of folks in my ear saying,
08:49how can you count on the Senate? I'm like, look at how well they're doing.
08:53Interesting. Now, you mentioned no matter what president, former President Trump says,
08:59there's only one candidate who will protect abortion rights. And I wanted to ask you about
09:03the RNC platform, because ahead of the convention next week, the RNC released its policy platform.
09:09And when it comes to reproductive health and abortion, a lot of the headlines used words like
09:15a dramatic shift and a softening in the RNC's historic position when it comes to abortion.
09:23It seems like they are moving away from federal limits or a federal ban on abortion based on some
09:29of the analysis of this platform. But, Minnie, I want to ask, what do you make of the RNC platform
09:34and how it treats reproductive health? Yeah, I mean, it's terrifying. So, look,
09:40I mean, I think the American people are very familiar with Donald Trump's incredible talent
09:45at lying and kind of hiding the truth. A couple of things. First of all, you know, Project 2025,
09:54which is the Heritage Foundation led blueprint for a future Trump administration,
09:57despite his efforts to deny it. I mean, recent reporting today from CNN indicates
10:03over 25 plus authors and folks involved with Project 2025 were also Trump administration
10:09leaders. So they're entangled. They're all part of the same allied organization,
10:15organizational infrastructure that a Biden administration will put forth. And, you know,
10:20you mentioned the Supreme Court cases. You know, what's really terrifying about the medication
10:24abortion and the emergency abortion care cases is the court didn't actually settle the law.
10:28They just punted the cases down the road. And when you look at Project 2025, and right there
10:33in plain writing is plans for a Trump admin to rescind those actions. So those are executive
10:40actions by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. Going back to the platform, I was really disturbed to
10:45see the number of outlets that called it softening of language because what the GOP did was really,
10:53really sneaky. They did not do their laundry list of bills that they've supported in the past. And
10:59they made a big show of having a public fight with some of the most extreme abortion activists in
11:03their party. But what they did do was put language that very clearly indicated that they support
11:09states invoking the 14th Amendment and applying it to embryos and fetuses. What that does is it
11:17extends, it basically creates a pathway for legislation that enshrines personhood for
11:26embryos. That is the basis for some of the most challenging, scary attacks on abortion,
11:32but also contraception, and also IVF. You know, the big Alabama case that everybody got
11:37really worked up about on IVF that was based on personhood, personhood theology, personhood
11:44ideology. So that's the root of that movement. And at least a dozen or so anti-abortion leaders
11:52praised it openly. They weren't hiding it, that that was actually a big deal for them.
11:57Because you think about this court, and you think about states enacting rules like that,
12:01you can say leave it to the states, leave it to the states. States enact legislation like this,
12:05it goes to this court. And now we have a federal personhood decision from this Supreme Court. And
12:13that would just be endgame for contraception, IVF, and so many other reproductive technologies.
12:20And listen, that's always been what that movement has advocated for. And we can see it in the light
12:26of day. So excited that so many people caught it. Disappointed in the narrative in the press,
12:31but it's our job as advocates to educate folks about this.
12:35Now, we're talking both about the RNC platform and Project 2025. And this might feel like a
12:40really basic question. But for folks who are seeing headlines about both of these things,
12:44what is the difference between Project 2025 and the RNC platform?
12:50Yeah, I mean, the difference is that the RNC platform is the, quote, official on the record
12:56policy that the party has adopted. But really, in a year where you have an incumbent, and for all
13:03intents and purposes, Donald Trump is functioning as an incumbent in this situation, it is the
13:08president's message. And Donald Trump, I think, is smart to make the message seem more moderate
13:16and palatable. But what Project 2025 is, is actually a lot more powerful. And look, Democrats
13:22have their own versions of this too, right? You have allied groups that support the president
13:27that put out their policy platforms like ours. And you have those organizations endorsing or
13:33supporting that candidate, right? So every side has this. So if you line up Joe Biden and Kamala
13:40Harris, and their equivalent organizations putting out platforms like Project 2025,
13:45they match very clearly what a Biden-Harris administration has done. And that is how you
13:50know what's accurate. When you look at Project 2025, and you look at the Trump administration,
13:56and who he appointed, and what he did in office, not what the GOP platform says,
14:02his campaign mandate, but what he actually did. And that is our message. Look at what Donald
14:08Trump did, not what he's saying through the GOP platform now, but what the folks who ran his admin
14:13did, they overturned Roe. And it was in that blueprint. So believe it when they say they're
14:20going to do it again. What specifically in Project 2025, in the writing most concerns you?
14:27You know, what's the most concerning and what's created a lot of alarm is alternative ways for
14:32them to ban abortion without Congress. You know, we do everything we can to fight back and win back
14:37the House. Hopefully, and I feel very confident, we lose the White House. What that does, and what
14:44Project 2025 sets up is we don't actually need Congress to do these things. Because one of the
14:49things I hear often at the doors is, well, Trump can't do that because he's not going to have
14:53Congress, right? Or he won't have a supermajority in the Senate, and they won't be able to pass a
14:57national ban. And Trump himself has said things like that to the press, like, well, I'm not going
15:01to even be able to pass that. Well, Project 2025 reveals how by using things like the Comstock Act,
15:08an antiquated 1800s anti-obscenity law that was used to prohibit abortion access by mail,
15:16they can shut down abortion pills by mail. It also talks about rescinding approvals for
15:22rescinding approval of medication abortion, a case that was in front of the Supreme Court that they
15:26punted on. Medication abortion is the most popular and most effective and most accessible
15:33and affordable way for abortion care in this country, and it's used in the majority of all
15:36abortions in the country. So we call those efforts backdoor abortion bans. And it also calls on
15:42rescinding the Biden era, you know, EMTALA rule, which was the rule that allowed for emergency
15:48care in abortion cases where it would save the life of the pregnant person. So there's a lot of
15:55stuff like that that's damaging. And there's a lot of stuff that's just silly and inflammatory,
15:59but it indicates how serious these folks are, like changing HHS to the Department of Life,
16:06you know, getting rid of the Gender Policy Council, removing all language about abortion from key,
16:11you know, from key administration documents and executive orders. It seems silly,
16:19but it's quite chilling when you think about the zeal in which they want to just erase abortion
16:25from the federal landscape. But it indicates that these are not folks who are like eight out of 10
16:32Americans. These are zealots who have extremist views that are wildly out of step with the United
16:37States of America. You mentioned the Comstock Act, and I want to ask because we're in this
16:43moment four months out from the general election. Joe Biden is still the commander in chief at this
16:48point in time. Is there any effort to repeal the Comstock Act while Biden is in office and before
16:55the election? Because this keeps coming up in the interviews I've been doing around abortion and
17:00reproductive health care and the concern that this 19th century law, this 1800s law could affect
17:08the way people get reproductive care in 2024. Absolutely. So Senator Tina Smith has a bill she's
17:17filed. I think there's going to be a House companion filed soon. Members, I mean, Senate
17:22Democrats and House Democrats are working on a pathway to rescind, I mean, to revote, to repeal
17:26Comstock. Of course, they don't have the majorities yet to do so, but they are getting ready to do
17:33that. And when I talked about abortion access now and our coalition to get ready for a federal
17:38trifecta, if we win the House and the Senate, we don't win the White House. We're still going to
17:42be pushing for every single piece of legislation and force Donald Trump to veto it. Now, I just
17:48said we're four months out from the general election. We just saw a few Supreme Court
17:53decisions on abortion cases, but they've released all the decisions they can for the time being.
17:59It kind of feels like we're in, I don't know if we would call it a quiet period or a purgatory,
18:03but July is a weird time for for decision making, if you will. So what's your mandate right now?
18:10How are you thinking about this moment in time? So in light of so, you know, even though we had
18:17the two abortion cases where they effectively punted back to lower courts and said we're not
18:21going to really deal with the underlying question, right, we are very active. We joined
18:28several court reform coalitions and we started lobbying on court reform. You know, I think with
18:33the Chevron case and the immunity case, there's a larger discussion about not just abortion and
18:38reproductive freedom, but our very democratic institutions. How much overreach can the
18:43executive branch have? How much power are we giving the judiciary over the executive branch,
18:49over administration? How much power are we giving the president? So some of what we're,
18:56you know, I talked earlier about how a lot of what we're doing as an organization,
18:59Reproductive Freedom for All, but also Abortion Access Now is going to be focused on organizing,
19:04because no matter what, we have to make sure our grassroots movement is empowered with this
19:09information, not only for the election, but also for what comes after the election,
19:14also for fighting back, joining citizen lobby efforts to expand the court, to have stricter
19:21ethics for the court. We need stronger citizen action around the host of issues around democracy,
19:28voting rights. We don't get back to real representative democracy, which is, frankly,
19:34the challenge of reproductive freedom, but also so many other issues that progressives care about,
19:38whether it's gun violence, whether it's climate change. These are all issues that the majority
19:43of Americans support reforms for, and yet we haven't been able to get past the gridlock. So
19:49we've got to keep making sure that our activists and our base, the majority of Americans,
19:54have access to democratic levers of power. So we're really focused on getting out the vote,
20:00but also continuing to build real political power throughout this country.
20:05Mini Timaraju, thank you so much for explaining all of this to us,
20:10and I hope to have you back as the election season continues.
20:14Happy to be there. Happy to be back, and it's so good to chat with you.

Recommended