• 5 months ago
#11thHour #ArshadSharif #Kenya #IslamabadHighCourt #SocialMedia #imranKhan #Jalsa #protest #asadqaiser #ptijalsa #WaseemBadami

(Current Affairs)

Host:
- Waseem Badami

Guests:
- Dr Babar Awan PTI
- Asad Qaiser PTI
- Shahid Khaqan Abbasi APP

Kenyan court announces verdict in Arshad Sharif murder case - Waseem Badami's Analysis

PTI leader Babar Awan's analysis on social media campaign against IHC's judges

Bani PTI kay Pas Tajveez Lekar Jarahe Hain kay NOC Ho Ya Nahi.... Asad Qaiser's Statement

Follow the ARY News channel on WhatsApp: https://bit.ly/46e5HzY

Subscribe to our channel and press the bell icon for latest news updates: http://bit.ly/3e0SwKP

ARY News is a leading Pakistani news channel that promises to bring you factual and timely international stories and stories about Pakistan, sports, entertainment, and business, amid others.
Transcript
00:00In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
00:14In the beginning, if anyone had the slightest doubt that the famous journalist of Pakistan,
00:22the famous anchor of Airway News, Mr. Arshad Sharif's murder, the way he was brutally murdered,
00:29it was exactly as it was being said.
00:33That is, a car was going from Kenya to a place 100-150 km away.
00:37Mr. Arshad was driving it and there was a traffic jam.
00:40The police stopped the car, but the car did not stop.
00:43The police had a doubt.
00:44The police thought that it was a stolen car.
00:47There was a message going around that the car was stolen.
00:50A child had also been killed.
00:51And the police thought that it was the same car.
00:53They fired bullets.
00:55In reality, a man lost his life.
00:57It was a case of mistaken identity.
00:59If anyone had faith in this theft,
01:02then today another clear presentation has been made to end that belief.
01:08When a high court in Kenya has given its own decision in this regard.
01:13And what are its details?
01:15You see, Kenya's high court has declared Mr. Arshad Sharif's murder illegal with the firing of Kenyan police officers.
01:22It has declared it a violation of human rights.
01:26Not only this, but the high court in Kenya has also issued an order for military action against the police officer who fired the bullet.
01:34In some words, the court has said that Mr. Arshad Sharif's murder was not a result of a mistake in identity.
01:39That is, the story that was told, the court refused to believe that story.
01:44It has been said that investigations must be carried out in the depth of this murder.
01:48In addition, not only this, but the high court in Kenya has ordered Mr. Arshad Sharif's family to pay one crore Kenyan shilling,
01:54which is about two crore Pakistani rupees.
01:57It has also been ordered to pay as compensation.
02:00On October 23, 2022, Mr. Arshad Sharif was killed by police officers in Magadi, about 110 km from Nairobi, Kenya.
02:10And it was said by the police that it was a mistake in identity.
02:14The Kenyan police said in a press conference that this car was hit by bullets due to a mistake in identity.
02:19On October 27, a funeral was held in Islamabad Faisal Masjid.
02:23He was buried in H11 graveyard.
02:26After that, his wife, Javeera Siddiq Sahiba, filed a case against the GSU General Service Unit and the five prominent police officers in Kenya on October 19, 2023.
02:38The decision was preserved on May 8, about two months ago.
02:43And today, two months later, this decision has been heard.
02:47There is no mention of this case in Pakistan.
02:50His wife also said after this decision that justice has been achieved to some extent there, but not here.
02:57After the murder of Arshad Sharif in Kenya, a Joint Investigation Committee was also formed in Pakistan on this issue.
03:02The Supreme Court has also taken notice of this, but no progress has been made so far.
03:07The government there still has the right to appeal on this within 30 days.
03:12And until then, the government of this crime will also remain silent.
03:16There have been many statements on this issue in Pakistan.
03:19It is very saddening and worrying that a high-profile murder has been committed.
03:27Obviously, every person's life is equally precious.
03:29Every mother loves her son equally.
03:31But if a high-profile murder has been committed, and even in that case, no result has been reached.
03:39And obviously, a long history has been filled.
03:41Start with Liaquat Ali Khan.
03:43Come to Benazir Bhutto Sahiba.
03:44Come to Arshad Sharif.
03:45So, if such a high-profile case is not reached to any logical conclusion,
03:50then what steps a common man would not have taken in this country in terms of justice?
03:56This itself is a question mark.
03:58As you saw yesterday, in Karachi, a DSP was martyred in broad daylight.
04:03Bullets were fired.
04:04So, when a person is forced to think, he gets worried.
04:09When such high-profile people are martyred in broad daylight,
04:13or when there is no evidence of their murder,
04:16then what about a common man?
04:18May Allah protect him.
04:19Coming to the next story, this is also linked in a way.
04:22The matter here is that there are more than one judge in a court in Pakistan, Islamabad High Court.
04:29Not one, not two, not three, not four, not five, but six.
04:32Six judges express their opinion that they are facing very special conditions.
04:37They are facing a lot of pressure.
04:39They don't just say these things in a closed room.
04:42In fact, they write a letter to their Chief Justice.
04:48In that, they also tell the details that this is happening with this person, this is happening with that person.
04:52Anyway, after that, the matter is that some opinions start coming on social media about some judges.
05:00The court thinks that this is an organized work from somewhere,
05:04an organized propaganda has started against those related judges.
05:09The short story is that in the history of Islamabad High Court,
05:12or at least in the current history,
05:14today a full court hearing is held on this issue.
05:16And its progress is made.
05:18Although the matter has not reached a final conclusion today.
05:20But the summary is that the court also expresses its concern in this regard.
05:24It expresses its optimism that this is an organized mission.
05:27And if the government is not involved at the time,
05:30then at least there is silence in it.
05:33This is what we understand from the mind of the court.
05:35This is a very important progress in this regard.
05:38And in some other regards,
05:40because our guests today are legal experts,
05:42and they also have a political affiliation.
05:45So we will talk to them in both the regards.
05:47Mr. Babar Awan, of course, is the senior advisor of Pakistan Jurisprudence.
05:51He is also one of the senior most advocate advisors of Pakistan.
05:54Today, the lawyer has also expressed his opinion in this regard.
05:57Mr. Babar Awan is present with us.
06:00Huzoor, Assalam-o-Alaikum.
06:03Wa-alaikum-as-salam.
06:05Sir, thank you very much for your time.
06:08Sir, please give your opinion on this.
06:11Obviously, if this is an organized mission against the judge,
06:15then there should be no worries and actions should be taken in this regard.
06:19But what is your opinion on this?
06:21Another opinion that the government gives,
06:23just a while ago Rana Sanaw Allah Sahib was saying
06:25that the judge should not be so over-sensitive about social media.
06:29Another government representative was saying that
06:33when the people of Pakistan Jurisprudence are saying so many things against Faisal Sahib,
06:37against Aamir Farooq Sahib,
06:39and what all happened in the judicial complex,
06:41then the sensitivity was not shown as much as it was shown in this regard.
06:44You yourself, and this is a very relevant question,
06:46because you yourself have faced a license violation
06:49in the same court,
06:51outside the court, through a famous press conference.
06:54So, in your opinion, should the court be more sensitive in these matters?
06:58What is your opinion on this?
07:29And the second result of this was that
07:31the police story was disproved in Kenya.
07:34And this is not a case of mistaken identity,
07:36but a culpable homicide,
07:38that is, it was intentionally killed.
07:40But the third aspect of this is extremely regrettable,
07:44regretful, and a very shameful aspect,
07:48which is that in Pakistan,
07:50even after almost two years,
07:52a famous journalist and anchor,
07:55who has done a lot of coverage on national issues,
07:59and has been a part of so many people,
08:01about his own death,
08:03not a brick, not an inch,
08:05and not a stone,
08:07from one place to another,
08:09has been placed.
08:11This is the criminal justice system of Pakistan,
08:13and the legal-constitutional atmosphere at the moment,
08:15this is a very big question mark for him,
08:17not a sign, but a shame.
08:19This is a black mark.
08:21I want to say the second and last thing on this,
08:23that this investigation,
08:25until it is not done,
08:27because the crime of this,
08:29in Pakistan's criminal justice system,
08:31there are 177 and then 179,
08:35that if a person has left Pakistan,
08:37and that person,
08:39I will give you a local example,
08:41he has left Karachi,
08:43he got one kind of wrong,
08:45he got another in Islamabad,
08:47he reached Lahore,
08:49he lost his life,
08:51this can happen only in one place.
08:53Why not Pakistani agencies are conducting
08:55the investigating agencies?
08:57Where are all these people,
08:59who say that we...
09:03Babar sir,
09:05if we connect Babar Awan sir on the telephone,
09:09Babar Awan sir,
09:11can you hear me, Babar Awan sir?
09:15If we can connect Babar Awan sir on the telephone,
09:17Babar Awan sir,
09:19can you hear me, Babar Awan sir?
09:21We are talking about this,
09:23that it has been two years,
09:25and in October,
09:27two years will be completed,
09:29and in this regard,
09:31there is no precedent,
09:33no mentionable precedent,
09:35in this case,
09:37is not there,
09:39this itself is a very big question mark.
09:41In the meantime,
09:43if we can connect Babar Awan sir,
09:45the Chief Justice of Pakistan,
09:47Tariq-e-Insaaf,
09:49has expressed his strict opinion,
09:51regarding some sitting judges,
09:53in the last few days.
09:55In fact, there is also news,
09:57that it is possible,
09:59that there is a reference regarding
10:01the Chief Justice of Islamabad High Court,
10:03but if we can show that shot,
10:05then show us,
10:07if there is any reference
10:09of Pakistan Tariq-e-Insaaf.
10:11I can't say anything,
10:13but what is coming,
10:15from January onwards,
10:17is not a praiseworthy thing.
10:19Pakistan Tariq-e-Insaaf,
10:21is the biggest judge of Pakistan's
10:23biggest court,
10:25I have a specific question,
10:27regarding him,
10:29do you trust your party?
10:31No, I don't trust my party at all.
10:33Look, the special things that happened
10:35in the meeting,
10:37first of all,
10:39the Supreme Judicial Council matter,
10:41definitely do it,
10:43regarding the Chief Justice.
10:45In today's meeting, he said,
10:47you should go to the Supreme Judicial Council,
10:49against the Chief Justice of Islamabad High Court.
10:51Absolutely.
10:53We have repeatedly requested,
10:55that you don't listen to our cases.
10:57And your demand is still there.
10:59We have repeatedly requested,
11:01in Islamabad High Court,
11:03today again,
11:05with the instruction of Mr. Khan,
11:07we demand that Mr. Khan's cases,
11:09should be in front of the Free and Fair Tribunal,
11:11in which we have requested the judge,
11:13to recuse them.
11:15Mr. Babbar, can you hear me now?
11:17The call got disconnected.
11:19Yes, I can hear you.
11:21Now tell me,
11:23we have shown some shots as well,
11:25so we have thought about it.
11:27Otherwise, it is clear that
11:29there is a more severe nature,
11:31in which someone is being touted,
11:33someone is being said,
11:35that he doesn't work without such and such sign.
11:37Doesn't he have any sensitivity,
11:39to such allegations?
11:41No, not at all.
11:43I think this is a wrong understanding,
11:45a wrong way, a wrong question.
11:47And we have to take this issue in a wrong way.
11:49The first thing is that,
11:51not only in the history of Pakistan,
11:53but in the history of this region,
11:55for the first time,
11:57the whole Constitutional Court,
11:59has openly said that,
12:01those who are behind us,
12:03have written their names,
12:05and are compelling us,
12:07that in specific cases,
12:09in a specific manner,
12:11we should do all this,
12:13according to their will.
12:15After that, the Balochistan High Court,
12:17wrote this,
12:19then the judges of Peshawar High Court,
12:21wrote this,
12:23then the judges of Karachi,
12:25Sindh High Court,
12:27wrote this,
12:29then a session judge of Punjab,
12:31wrote this,
12:33then a session judge of Punjab,
12:35wrote this,
12:37then a session judge of Punjab,
12:39wrote this,
12:41then a session judge of Punjab,
12:43wrote this,
12:45then a session judge of Punjab,
12:47wrote this,
12:49then a session judge of Punjab,
12:51wrote this,
12:53then a session judge of Punjab,
12:55wrote this,
12:57then a session judge of Punjab,
12:59wrote this,
13:01then a session judge of Punjab,
13:03wrote this,
13:05then a session judge of Punjab,
13:07wrote this,
13:09then a session judge of Punjab,
13:11wrote this,
13:13then a session judge of Punjab,
13:15wrote this,
13:17then a session judge of Punjab,
13:19wrote this,
13:21then a session judge of Punjab,
13:23wrote this,
13:25then a session judge of Punjab,
13:27wrote this,
13:29then a session judge of Punjab,
13:31wrote this,
13:33then a session judge of Punjab,
13:35wrote this,
13:37then a session judge of Punjab,
13:39wrote this,
13:41then a session judge of Punjab,
13:43wrote this,
13:45then a session judge of Punjab,
13:47wrote this,
13:49then a session judge of Punjab,
13:51wrote this,
13:53then a session judge of Punjab,
13:55wrote this,
13:57then a session judge of Punjab,
13:59wrote this,
14:01then a session judge of Punjab,
14:03wrote this,
14:05then a session judge of Punjab,
14:07wrote this,
14:09then a session judge of Punjab,
14:11wrote this,
14:13then a session judge of Punjab,
14:15wrote this,
14:17then a session judge of Punjab,
14:19wrote this,
14:21then a session judge of Punjab,
14:23wrote this,
14:25then a session judge of Punjab,
14:27wrote this,
14:29then a session judge of Punjab,
14:31wrote this,
14:33then a session judge of Punjab,
14:35wrote this,
14:37then a session judge of Punjab,
14:39wrote this,
14:41then a session judge of Punjab,
14:43wrote this,
14:45then a session judge of Punjab,
14:47wrote this,
14:49then a session judge of Punjab,
14:51wrote this,
14:53then a session judge of Punjab,
14:55wrote this,
14:57then a session judge of Punjab,
14:59wrote this,
15:01then a session judge of Punjab,
15:03wrote this,
15:05then a session judge of Punjab,
15:07wrote this,
15:09then a session judge of Punjab,
15:11wrote this,
15:13then a session judge of Punjab,
15:15wrote this,
15:17then a session judge of Punjab,
15:19wrote this,
15:21then a session judge of Punjab,
15:23wrote this,
15:25then a session judge of Punjab,
15:27wrote this,
15:29then a session judge of Punjab,
15:31wrote this,
15:33then a session judge of Punjab,
15:35wrote this,
15:37then a session judge of Punjab,
15:39wrote this,
15:41then a session judge of Punjab,
15:43wrote this,
15:45then a session judge of Punjab,
15:47wrote this,
15:49then a session judge of Punjab,
15:51wrote this,
15:53then a session judge of Punjab,
15:55wrote this,
15:57then a session judge of Punjab,
15:59wrote this,
16:01then a session judge of Punjab,
16:03wrote this,
16:05then a session judge of Punjab,
16:07wrote this,
16:09then a session judge of Punjab,
16:11wrote this,
16:13then a session judge of Punjab,
16:15wrote this,
16:17then a session judge of Punjab,
16:19wrote this,
16:21then a session judge of Punjab,
16:23wrote this,
16:25then a session judge of Punjab,
16:27wrote this,
16:29then a session judge of Punjab,
16:31wrote this,
16:33then a session judge of Punjab,
16:35wrote this,
16:37then a session judge of Punjab,
16:39wrote this,
16:41then a session judge of Punjab,
16:43wrote this,
16:45then a session judge of Punjab,
16:47wrote this,
16:49then a session judge of Punjab,
16:51wrote this,
16:53then a session judge of Punjab,
16:55wrote this,
16:57then a session judge of Punjab,
16:59wrote this,
17:01then a session judge of Punjab,
17:03wrote this,
17:05then a session judge of Punjab,
17:07wrote this,
17:09then a session judge of Punjab,
17:11wrote this,
17:13then a session judge of Punjab,
17:15wrote this,
17:17then a session judge of Punjab,
17:19wrote this,
17:21then a session judge of Punjab,
17:23wrote this,
17:25then a session judge of Punjab,
17:27wrote this,
17:29then a session judge of Punjab,
17:31wrote this,
17:33then a session judge of Punjab,
17:35wrote this,
17:37then a session judge of Punjab,
17:39wrote this,
17:41then a session judge of Punjab,
17:43wrote this,
17:45then a session judge of Punjab,
17:47wrote this,
17:49then a session judge of Punjab,
17:51wrote this,
17:53then a session judge of Punjab,
17:55wrote this,
17:57then a session judge of Punjab,
17:59wrote this,
18:01then a session judge of Punjab,
18:03wrote this,
18:05then a session judge of Punjab,
18:07wrote this,
18:09then a session judge of Punjab,
18:11wrote this,
18:13then a session judge of Punjab,
18:15wrote this,
18:17then a session judge of Punjab,
18:19wrote this,
18:21then a session judge of Punjab,
18:23wrote this,
18:25then a session judge of Punjab,
18:27wrote this,
18:29then a session judge of Punjab,
18:31wrote this,
18:33then a session judge of Punjab,
18:35wrote this,
18:37then a session judge of Punjab,
18:39wrote this,
18:41then a session judge of Punjab,
18:43wrote this,
18:45then a session judge of Punjab,
18:47wrote this,
18:49then a session judge of Punjab,
18:51wrote this,
18:53then a session judge of Punjab,
18:55wrote this,
18:57then a session judge of Punjab,
18:59wrote this,
19:01then a session judge of Punjab,
19:03wrote this,
19:05then a session judge of Punjab,
19:07wrote this,
19:09then a session judge of Punjab,
19:11wrote this,
19:13then a session judge of Punjab,
19:15wrote this,
19:17then a session judge of Punjab,
19:19wrote this,
19:21then a session judge of Punjab,
19:23wrote this,
19:25then a session judge of Punjab,
19:27wrote this,
19:29then a session judge of Punjab,
19:31wrote this,
19:33then a session judge of Punjab,
19:35wrote this,
19:37then a session judge of Punjab,
19:39wrote this,
19:41then a session judge of Punjab,
19:43wrote this,
19:45then a session judge of Punjab,
19:47wrote this,
19:49then a session judge of Punjab,
19:51wrote this,
19:53then a session judge of Punjab,
19:55wrote this,
19:57then a session judge of Punjab,
19:59wrote this,
20:01then a session judge of Punjab,
20:03wrote this,
20:05then a session judge of Punjab,
20:07wrote this,
20:09then a session judge of Punjab,
20:11wrote this,
20:13then a session judge of Punjab,
20:15wrote this,
20:17then a session judge of Punjab,
20:19wrote this,
20:21then a session judge of Punjab,
20:23wrote this,
20:25then a session judge of Punjab,
20:27wrote this,
20:29then a session judge of Punjab,
20:31wrote this,
20:33then a session judge of Punjab,
20:35wrote this,
20:37then a session judge of Punjab,
20:39wrote this,
20:41then a session judge of Punjab,
20:43wrote this,
20:45then a session judge of Punjab,
20:47wrote this,
20:49then a session judge of Punjab,
20:51wrote this,
20:53then a session judge of Punjab,
20:55wrote this,
20:57then a session judge of Punjab,
20:59wrote this,
21:01then a session judge of Punjab,
21:03wrote this,
21:05then a session judge of Punjab,
21:07wrote this,
21:09then a session judge of Punjab,
21:11wrote this,
21:13then a session judge of Punjab,
21:15wrote this,
21:17then a session judge of Punjab,
21:19wrote this,
21:21then a session judge of Punjab,
21:23wrote this,
21:25then a session judge of Punjab,
21:27wrote this,
21:29then a session judge of Punjab,
21:31wrote this,
21:33then a session judge of Punjab,
21:35wrote this,
21:37then a session judge of Punjab,
21:39wrote this,
21:41then a session judge of Punjab,
21:43wrote this,
21:45then a session judge of Punjab,
21:47wrote this,
21:49then a session judge of Punjab,
21:51wrote this,
21:53then a session judge of Punjab,
21:55wrote this,
21:57then a session judge of Punjab,
21:59wrote this,
22:01then a session judge of Punjab,
22:03wrote this,
22:05then a session judge of Punjab,
22:07wrote this,
22:09then a session judge of Punjab,
22:11wrote this,
22:13then a session judge of Punjab,
22:15wrote this,
22:17then a session judge of Punjab,
22:19wrote this,
22:21then a session judge of Punjab,
22:23wrote this,
22:25then a session judge of Punjab,
22:27wrote this,
22:29then a session judge of Punjab,
22:31wrote this,
22:33then a session judge of Punjab,
22:35wrote this,
22:37then a session judge of Punjab,
22:39wrote this,
22:41then a session judge of Punjab,
22:43wrote this,
22:45then a session judge of Punjab,
22:47wrote this,
22:49then a session judge of Punjab,
22:51wrote this,
22:53then a session judge of Punjab,
22:55wrote this,
22:57then a session judge of Punjab,
22:59wrote this,
23:01then a session judge of Punjab,
23:03wrote this,
23:05then a session judge of Punjab,
23:07wrote this,
23:09then a session judge of Punjab,
23:11wrote this,
23:13then a session judge of Punjab,
23:15wrote this,
23:17then a session judge of Punjab,
23:19wrote this,
23:21then a session judge of Punjab,
23:23wrote this,
23:25then a session judge of Punjab,
23:27wrote this,
23:29then a session judge of Punjab,
23:31wrote this,
23:33then a session judge of Punjab,
23:35wrote this,
23:37then a session judge of Punjab,
23:39wrote this,
23:41then a session judge of Punjab,
23:43wrote this,
23:45then a session judge of Punjab,
23:47wrote this,
23:49then a session judge of Punjab,
23:51wrote this,
23:53then a session judge of Punjab,
23:55wrote this,
23:57then a session judge of Punjab,
23:59wrote this,
24:01then a session judge of Punjab,
24:03wrote this,
24:05then a session judge of Punjab,
24:07wrote this,
24:09then a session judge of Punjab,
24:11wrote this,
24:13then a session judge of Punjab,
24:15wrote this,
24:17then a session judge of Punjab,
24:19wrote this,
24:21then a session judge of Punjab,
24:23wrote this,
24:25then a session judge of Punjab,
24:27wrote this,
24:29then a session judge of Punjab,
24:31wrote this,
24:33then a session judge of Punjab,
24:35wrote this,
24:37then a session judge of Punjab,
24:39wrote this,
24:41then a session judge of Punjab,
24:43wrote this,
24:45then a session judge of Punjab,
24:47wrote this,
24:49then a session judge of Punjab,
24:51wrote this,
24:53then a session judge of Punjab,
24:55wrote this,
24:57then a session judge of Punjab,
24:59wrote this,
25:01then a session judge of Punjab,
25:03wrote this,
25:05then a session judge of Punjab,
25:07wrote this,
25:09then a session judge of Punjab,
25:11wrote this,
25:13then a session judge of Punjab,
25:15wrote this,
25:17then a session judge of Punjab,
25:19wrote this,
25:21then a session judge of Punjab,
25:23wrote this,
25:25then a session judge of Punjab,
25:27wrote this,
25:29then a session judge of Punjab,
25:31wrote this,
25:33then a session judge of Punjab,
25:35wrote this,
25:37see,
25:39see,
25:41this government has no moral authority,
25:43these are the people of Forum 47,
25:45they are a fake government,
25:47they have come to power
25:49in an illegal way,
25:51so they have no moral authority,
25:53they have no strength,
25:55they have no recognition
25:57internationally,
25:59and they will do such things,
26:01because of which,
26:03they will deny our legal rights,
26:05but you have already told us your actions,
26:07and sir,
26:09how do you see Aleema Khan's statement,
26:11she says that Khan sir
26:13will never say for himself,
26:15that leave,
26:17just leave the party,
26:19do the trade,
26:21no, it is absolutely right,
26:23Khan sir will not say this,
26:25we are just talking about a policy shift,
26:27we understand that,
26:29it is only one thing,
26:31because Khan sir was a little too much in this,
26:33so he did not allow us,
26:35he said,
26:37take the NOC,
26:39if Khan sir,
26:41we have to decide,
26:43but there is one issue,
26:45that we do not need the NOC,
26:47now the time has come,
26:49that we will decide,
26:51but it is a big decision,
26:53in this big decision,
26:55we will definitely,
26:57that is why,
26:59first you will give permission to Khan sir,
27:01but Khan sir,
27:03in the court,
27:05his lawyer openly said,
27:07that you should not get the special permission,
27:09but the rest of the parties,
27:11should get it,
27:13Hamid Raza's statement,
27:15he said,
27:17I think Maulana sir will come,
27:19he will increase his rate,
27:21and he will leave,
27:23still he says,
27:25if you agree,
27:27he will stand with you,
27:29I have a relationship with Maulana,
27:31he is in the area,
27:33we are trying to have a meeting in a day or two,
27:35anyway,
27:37we are in a relationship,
27:39and,
27:41we have the same agenda,
27:43we have the same point of view,
27:45so,
27:47there can be no reason,
27:49for us to separate,
27:51we have to follow the law,
27:53and in this regard,
27:55Maulana sir,
27:57you are not disappointed,
27:59or you are disappointed,
28:01no, no,
28:03we raised our concern with him,
28:05but,
28:07we have a good relationship,
28:09I can assure you,
28:11and we will make a grand alliance,
28:13after this,
28:15we have a plan in Karachi,
28:17I am going to Lahore,
28:19and Karachi,
28:21to meet GDA leadership,
28:23so that we can make a grand alliance,
28:25and the main purpose of this alliance,
28:27is that,
28:29there should be a law and order in this country,
28:31so, you want that,
28:33when there is a meeting,
28:35Maulana, Jamiat-e-Ulema-e-Islam,
28:37should also stand with you, right?
28:39yes, of course,
28:41we understand that,
28:43there is a one point agenda,
28:45in which there should be a law and order,
28:47so, sir,
28:49if tomorrow,
28:51a decision is made,
28:53what do you mean by that?
28:55what if you don't get a special session?
28:57why should I presume that?
28:59I hope that,
29:01God willing,
29:03we will get it,
29:05because there is no cure,
29:07that we don't get it.
29:09now, you are thinking,
29:11I am sure,
29:13and sir,
29:15Mr. Fawad, Mr. Imran, Mr. Ali Zahid,
29:17what is the status now,
29:19that,
29:21it is neither confirmed,
29:23nor it is confirmed,
29:25that Mr. Khan will decide himself,
29:27is that it?
29:29yes, of course,
29:31Mr. Khan will decide himself,
29:33because,
29:35he has lived with them,
29:37so, Mr. Khan will decide.
29:39by the way,
29:41did you call Mr. Fawad,
29:43and say,
29:45brother,
29:47keep it low,
29:49because,
29:51if there are any concerns,
29:53or any issues,
29:55he should talk to the party.
29:57what did Mr. Fawad say,
29:59in response?
30:01no, I spoke to him once,
30:03I told him,
30:05he said,
30:07I will not give any statement,
30:09I will try.
30:11you must have seen,
30:13that he hit you,
30:15with a stick,
30:17he came to say that,
30:19that is an innocent question.
30:21I have only one target now,
30:23I tell you Mr. Badami,
30:25look, in politics,
30:27I am not interested,
30:29nor I have any desire,
30:31I just want,
30:33that in my life,
30:35there should be some steps,
30:37to make the law,
30:39in this country,
30:41because of me,
30:43there should be 1% role,
30:45to make the law.
30:47Sir,
30:49regarding the statements,
30:51in the end,
30:53I want to ask,
30:55because Mr. Afridi's statement,
30:57is being discussed a lot,
30:59in our program,
31:014-5 years ago,
31:03he gave the statement,
31:05that the army chief,
31:07is the father of the nation,
31:09we asked him last week,
31:11he said,
31:13yes,
31:15he is right,
31:17but what was wrong,
31:19in the statement,
31:21the statement was right,
31:23so what is your opinion,
31:25regarding this,
31:27I just,
31:29that is Mr. Afridi's,
31:31own opinion,
31:33he is our brother,
31:35he is our friend,
31:37he is the party's policy,
31:39and we,
31:41we will,
31:43follow the party's policy,
31:45according to the party's policy,
31:47he is not the father,
31:49no,
31:51our only,
31:53our only,
31:55priority,
31:57is not the law,
31:59it is the constitution,
32:01supremacy of parliament,
32:03freedom,
32:05nothing else,
32:07nothing is above the law,
32:09if there was a question,
32:11we have answered it,
32:13thank you sir,
32:15thank you very much,
32:17Mr. Asad Qaisar is with us,
32:19in the meantime,
32:21a new political party,
32:23is born in Pakistan,
32:25Mr. Shahid Haqqan Abbasi,
32:27is its founder,
32:29we have given Mr. Haqqan some time,
32:31after a short break,
32:33we will ask him some innocent questions,
32:35Prime Minister,
32:37as I said,
32:39Mr. Shahid Haqqan Abbasi,
32:41is a former Prime Minister of Pakistan,
32:43and Mr. Miftah Ismail,
32:45is the founder of a party,
32:47you have heard about it,
32:49Awam Pakistan Party,
32:51and we have given Mr. Shahid Haqqan Abbasi,
32:53a lot of time,
32:55you have heard a lot about this party,
32:57we will try to take the discussion,
32:59a little further,
33:01thank you very much,
33:03Mr. Shahid Haqqan,
33:05Sir, I was thinking,
33:07correct me if I am wrong,
33:09recently in Pakistan,
33:11a new party was formed,
33:13here in Karachi,
33:15Mr. Mustafa Kamal,
33:17PSP, Pakistan Land Party,
33:19although there were others,
33:21but ultimately,
33:23they were unsuccessful,
33:25they had to close the party,
33:27do you have enough reasons,
33:29to believe that this party,
33:31will prevail,
33:33the other parties,
33:35that were formed,
33:37were firm parties,
33:39one day,
33:41there were officials,
33:43there were electables,
33:45and then,
33:47you would see,
33:49in a week or 10 days,
33:5120-30 people would join,
33:53this is not that party,
33:55this is a grassroots party,
33:57and the solution to the country's problems,
33:59the country's problems,
34:01will be solved,
34:03and a new thought,
34:05will be given to the country,
34:07Sir, this is a very good thing,
34:09that an organic work is being done,
34:11not an engineered work,
34:13but my question is,
34:15if an engineered work,
34:17was not able to be done,
34:19the support from here,
34:21the support from there,
34:23the electable,
34:25was not able to be done,
34:27and ultimately,
34:29whether it is an engineered work,
34:31or a needed work,
34:33there is always a loss,
34:35there is always a failure,
34:37that is why,
34:39there is a need,
34:41for a grassroots party,
34:43that can solve the country's problems,
34:45have better people,
34:47have skills,
34:49have integrity,
34:51with this,
34:53the country will move forward,
34:55otherwise,
34:57there is no solution,
34:59there is no solution,
35:01there is no solution,
35:03there is no solution,
35:05there is no solution,
35:07there is no solution,
35:09there is no solution,
35:11there is no solution,
35:13there is no solution,
35:15there is no solution,
35:17there is no solution,
35:19there is no solution,
35:21there is no solution,
35:23there is no solution,
35:25there is no solution,
35:27there is no solution,
35:29there is no solution,
35:31there is no solution,
35:33there is no solution.
35:55There is no solution,
35:57there is no solution,
35:59there is no solution,
36:01there is no solution,
36:03there is no solution.
36:25I forgot to say,
36:27that the new party,
36:29that has been formed,
36:31that has been formed after PSP,
36:33and Alhamdulillah,
36:35its MNA has also come,
36:37it is not as much as they were thinking,
36:39it is much less than that,
36:41but it has come,
36:43but you are saying that
36:45all the political parties
36:47are against us,
36:49and which political party
36:51do you think
36:53is doing the best work
36:55in the country?
36:57Right now,
36:59everyone is looking for power,
37:01if they get power,
37:03they are ready to make
37:05all kinds of deals,
37:07this is nothing new,
37:09if you look at the last 4 years,
37:11every party has been looking
37:13for power,
37:15everyone has got power,
37:17but still,
37:19everyone has failed.
37:21This is all about power,
37:23what else is there to fight for?
37:25If they were in power,
37:27then their narrative was different,
37:29if they are not in power,
37:31then the narrative is different.
37:33When we are in power,
37:35we don't remember the constitution,
37:37nor do we remember the principles,
37:39nor do we remember the parliament,
37:41so when we move away from there,
37:43then we remember everything.
37:45Isn't this a Civilian Supremacy
37:47war that Mr. Imran Khan is fighting?
37:49The Civilian Supremacy war
37:51when you are in power,
37:53that was the time to fight the war,
37:55you will bring Civilian Supremacy
37:57with your actions,
37:59you should have shown
38:01with your actions that the
38:03civil government can work,
38:05can solve the problems of the country,
38:07can adopt democratic values,
38:09can give respect to the parliament,
38:11you didn't do all that.
38:13And if I ask you,
38:15do you think that when
38:17you were fighting the Civilian Supremacy
38:19war, when you were in jail,
38:21if I say this,
38:23at that time you thought
38:25that it was a Civilian Supremacy war,
38:27later you got the idea
38:29that it was just a game for power.
38:33Look, when it was about the constitution,
38:35when it was about giving respect
38:37to the parliament,
38:39the people were together,
38:41when the Muslim League was removed from there,
38:43and started talking about power,
38:45then the result of the February 8th election
38:47is in front of you.
39:15You should have stopped the leakage
39:17that you are suggesting today,
39:19that I will stop smuggling,
39:21and the people would have been relieved,
39:23the people would have enjoyed it.
39:25Yes, this is not just a matter
39:27of one government,
39:29when you live in governments,
39:31you should talk about it,
39:33you should solve it.
39:35I was the Prime Minister
39:37for 10 months,
39:39I was a representative of a Jamaat,
39:41but despite that,
39:43the people were relieved,
39:45and believe me,
39:47if you had followed that path,
39:49your taxes would have increased,
39:51you wouldn't have to pay taxes today.
39:53This budget,
39:55I will call it a shameful budget,
39:57because in this budget,
39:59for the people,
40:01you could have saved more
40:03by putting more burden on the people,
40:05but you didn't even try.
40:07It was not possible for Pakistan
40:09to give relief,
40:11you didn't even think about it.
40:13You didn't even think about it.
40:15The income tax issue is fine,
40:17when Mr. Miftai Ismail
40:19pitched the last budget,
40:21it was also said that
40:23it is an election budget,
40:25so all the governments
40:27do something in the election budget
40:29so that there is some benefit
40:31in the election.
40:33But sir, you also believe
40:35through your answer
40:37that it is not that simple
40:39smuggling has started
40:41in the last 5-6 years,
40:43it was smuggling as usual,
40:45which we should all try to do.
40:47This is not just a matter
40:49of one government,
40:51when this thought comes up,
40:53that is why I say that
40:55until the politicians of this country
40:57do not sit down,
40:59you will not find a solution
41:01to the problem.
41:03This smuggling is not just
41:05a matter of one government,
41:07it has increased to such an extent
41:09that it is having an impact
41:11on your budgetary numbers.
41:15And are you adding
41:17any more famous names
41:19to your political party
41:21in the coming days?
41:23Yes, we will invite,
41:25we have not invited anyone yet,
41:27the party has been launched,
41:29we will also make a vision document
41:31which we will put in front of the media
41:33in 3-4 weeks,
41:35and then we will go
41:37and invite everyone.
41:39This is a journey,
41:41it does not happen in a day,
41:43but by the grace of Allah,
41:45there is a lot of progress
41:47in the political circles
41:49and we will make a way
41:51in the public.
41:53I will take a few names
41:55that are very obvious,
41:57for example,
41:59Mustafa Naz Khokhar
42:01was with you in the initial days,
42:03this is a journey,
42:05he will join us tomorrow.
42:07Is there any possibility
42:09of Mr. Zubair coming?
42:11I have not talked to anyone
42:13about Mr. Zubair yet,
42:15we will talk to the people
42:17who we think should come
42:19to the party,
42:21we will contact them
42:23and invite them.
42:25Is Mr. Zubair among them?
42:27We will talk to them
42:29about their thoughts,
42:31we will talk to them
42:33about their views.
43:01Why should a voter
43:03think that
43:05he will vote for
43:07Shahid Khan Abbasi?
43:11If he is present,
43:13he will vote.
43:15If he is not present,
43:17he will not vote.
43:19Why should he
43:21vote for you?
43:23Why should he leave everyone
43:25and vote for you?
43:27We think that
43:29we will talk to the people
43:31about their problems.
43:33All the parties have failed.
43:35Everyone is in trouble.
43:37Everyone is in pain.
43:39We have not been able to
43:41find a solution to any problem.
43:43The problems are increasing
43:45and all the parties
43:47are silent.
43:49Whoever will talk about
43:51the problems of the country,
43:53whoever will have the ability
43:55and integrity,
43:57because people are disappointed
43:59with the parties.
44:01They see that there is nothing
44:03left in the parties.
44:05Today, no party is talking
44:07about the problems.
44:09It is only about power.
44:11The assembly has become
44:13the center of abuse.
44:15No one is talking about
44:17the people of the country.
44:19Is the PTI voter also
44:21disappointed with the PTI?
44:23Yes, of course.
44:25If the PTI had not formed
44:27a government,
44:29the situation would have been
44:31very different.
44:33Don't you think that
44:35the situation would have been
44:37very different if the PTI
44:39had not formed a government?
44:41If the PTI had not formed a government,
44:43the situation would have been
44:45very different.
44:47I am ready to go to jail.
44:49I don't want to go to jail.
44:51If the PTI had formed a government,
44:53wouldn't this have happened?
44:55If you are so afraid about this,
44:57then don't do politics.
44:59If the politics of this country
45:01is that an army chief is appointed
45:03then what about the population of their country?
45:05You are not in the same situation
45:07as the population of this country.
45:09If you ignore the politics,
45:11then it is the right.
45:15The PM'd could have
45:19taken 50-60 seats.
45:21At that time, as you are saying that it was the right to remain unconfident,
45:24then it was also the right to rule for the remaining 10 years after being unconfident, right?
45:29It was the right to remain unconfident, but that was your choice, right?
45:32Yes, but...
45:33You did not make a wrong decision on a regular basis, right?
45:36Now, you...
45:37Yes, you did not make a wrong decision on a regular basis.
45:40It was a very wrong decision politically.
45:42You were unconfident, you removed the government, it was your right to remain unconfident.
45:46Now, you have to see what politics is.
45:48You have put all the responsibilities of a failed government on your shoulders
45:51and you did not make any decisions yourself.
45:53You exposed yourself.
45:54You got the result of that in the election.
45:56Are you saying this today or did you have this opinion even then?
45:58When Mr. Khan's government fell, did you have this opinion even then
46:00that sir, go to the elections, do not take power?
46:03Yes, my opinion was exactly the same.
46:05It was in the Jamaat as well.
46:06And I have said this many times on TV as well.
46:08But when a Jamaat makes a decision, it becomes your decision.
46:11So, unfortunately, my decision was also made.
46:14So, we did not run the government for 16 months.
46:16If we had run the government, the results would have been different.
46:20The people of Pakistan forgot about Mr. Khan's failure
46:24and gave the answer to the PDM in the elections.
46:27Do you think that it was a wrong idea to bring down the government under the pretext of being unconfident?
46:31It was a regular decision, but it was also politically wrong.
46:34Look, I do not consider it politically wrong.
46:37It was the right decision.
46:38Because the PTI government had already failed.
46:43Mr. Imran Khan and Mr. Bajwa had also acknowledged this.
46:48When the vote was taken, Mr. Bajwa had completed the numbers.
46:52Mr. Imran Khan did not have the majority.
46:55It is true.
46:58Towards the end, Mr. Mifta Ismail was telling me that
47:01there was a dinner with Mr. Bajwa on a podcast.
47:04In that, you personally gave Mr. Bajwa this opinion
47:07that sir, do not take power, there will be a lot of problems.
47:09Is this how it happened?
47:12Anyway, let me and Mr. Bajwa stay between us.
47:15Mr. Mifta did not let you stay. What can I do?
47:18No, Mr. Mifta himself said that I do not want to comment on it.
47:22It is a personal matter.
47:23These things should remain between two people.
47:25Okay, let me do it.
47:26He also said that Mr. Bajwa himself invited us to dinner.
47:29And we both were in jail after a while.
47:32And this cannot happen without Mr. Bajwa's consent.
47:34Yes, it is November.
47:36He invited us.
47:38We were responsible people of the party.
47:41We took permission.
47:43Mr. Mifta was there, I was there, Mr. Khawaja was there.
47:45We met at his request.
47:47And what happened there was only about the country's economy.
47:53Anyway, after 5-6 months, we were all in jail.
47:57This is also a coincidence.
48:00And you met with Mr. Mian's permission?
48:02Yes, yes, we met with the permission of the Jamaat.
48:05Mr. Bajwa's government was going on better than Mr. Mian's, right?
48:08Jail and all that was going on, right?
48:10Yes, yes.
48:11He said that he wanted to talk about the economy.
48:13We left the government 3-4 months ago.

Recommended