'Very Disturbing': Troy Nehls Grills Buttigieg On 'Vent And Burn' At East Palestine Derailment

  • 3 months ago
During a House Transportation Committee hearing last week, Rep. Troy Nehls (R-TX) spoke about the East Palestine derailment.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00The gentleman yields.
00:07Mr. Nels is recognized for five minutes.
00:09Thank you Madam Chairwoman.
00:10Good to see you Mr. Secretary.
00:14Sixteen months since East Palestine, obviously the NTSP report came out the other day.
00:19I've been placing close attention to it as I chair the Rails Subcommittee here.
00:24And I believe that she produced a very detailed report.
00:29And some of her findings, quite honestly, are very disturbing.
00:33One of the areas is that post-derailment actions.
00:36And when the American people saw this big blue, this cloud above their city, the decision
00:42to vent and burn and that procedure, according to the report, it appeared that Norfolk Southern
00:50made that decision.
00:52Obviously they were able to, I don't want to say convince or get the incident commander
00:59to agree with that.
01:01The report appears that the NTSP said that Norfolk Southern compromised the integrity
01:11of that decision to vent and burn the tank cars by not communicating expertise and dissenting
01:16opinions.
01:18The justification, according to the report, is polymerization, which is that chemical
01:24reaction that could cause the explosion.
01:26So the point is that they said we have to do the vent and burn because we feel this
01:30thing could blow up.
01:33What are your thoughts on that?
01:34How would incident commanders allow them to do that when we had dissenting opinions?
01:43One of the most troubling things in that report, I agree, was the finding that the
01:48polymerization that was feared by those who thought that by undertaking that vent and
01:54burn action they were preventing an explosion might not have actually occurred, meaning
01:58that the vent and burn did not have to happen.
02:01So certainly while that will go to different parts of the decision chain than those that
02:07our department is directly involved with, we want to closely follow how NTSB's recommendations
02:13are taken on board, both in terms of how they apply to a railroad and how they apply to
02:17anybody in that incident command.
02:19I can understand it was in a rural area, first responders, many of them volunteers driving
02:24to incidents in their pickup truck with bunker gear in the back.
02:27Maybe I don't want to say the skill set wasn't there, but they just didn't.
02:30If a derailment like that would have happened in the city of Houston or Boston or someplace,
02:34I don't think you would have burned it.
02:35You would have had a massive showing of logistical support with hazmat teams, this and that.
02:41In your testimony, I'm concerned about the Railroad Crossing Elimination Program.
02:45We know we have about 700 plus deaths a year as it relates to rail, and your testimony
02:52says it's improving or eliminating 400 rail crossings.
02:55In IJA it's 500 million.
02:57My friend, I don't think that's enough.
03:00We need to do more.
03:01If that is a safety issue, we need to do more.
03:05What do you think we should do with that program?
03:07If you'd like to propose growing that program, we'd love to work with you on it.
03:11We've had our chance to go out to some of the first projects, get funding there.
03:13We announced it in North Dakota.
03:15The enthusiasm in communities is extraordinary, and I think it's so far been very well received.
03:20How about the Ask Rail?
03:21What do you think about the Ask Rail?
03:22The report says they didn't know what was in the cars.
03:27The first responders didn't know the chemicals.
03:29They didn't know the consist in the cars, but the actual consist was up in the locomotive,
03:35but they didn't get it for a couple of hours.
03:37So here these first responders are out there trying to figure out what the hell's in these
03:39cars and they didn't have it.
03:41Now the Ask Rail I think is a good thing.
03:43I think all class ones use it, but we have to do something to make sure that we have
03:47the connectivity with cell service in these rural areas because the Ask Rail app will
03:52be combat ineffective if we don't have it.
03:55One of the colleagues mentioned about the close call reporting system.
03:58I support it.
03:59I think it's a good idea.
04:00How do you think that quickly, how do you think that will improve safety in our rail
04:04industry?
04:05We think it creates one more opportunity to flag safety issues.
04:09We're glad to have a handful of participants, but we really believe it ought to be everybody.
04:13I agree.
04:14Whether that's done by some kind of requirement through Congress or whether we all just continue
04:18pushing the class ones, I really hope we can get them.
04:21Automatic track inspection.
04:22Obviously a lot of technology out there.
04:24I don't think a lot of people know about it.
04:26How can we, this is the tough stuff.
04:27How do we get labor and the railroads together on the same page as it relates to these technologies?
04:34ATI is a great thing.
04:35I mean, it can do a lot.
04:36I think a lot of the best technologies in the history of our economy have a track record
04:41of creating and expanding jobs, even if they change some of the aspects of what those jobs
04:47are like.
04:48But our posture is that any, and to be clear, we support and sometimes even ourselves use
04:53ATI.
04:54We just haven't seen the data that allows us to be confident that you can remove the
04:58human factor.
04:59Sure.
05:00One quick thing.
05:01You support two-man crew?
05:02We do.
05:03Okay.
05:04Last one.
05:05The tank cars, the DOT 111s, the 105s, 117s, I don't know if everybody understands that,
05:09but we want to phase those out, right, the 111s by 2029.
05:13I think we can do it quicker.
05:14I think we can do it quicker.
05:16I would like to move that up and I'll do everything I can to do that.
05:20That is great news and one of the provisions we're most excited about in the pending bipartisan
05:24legislation.
05:25All right.
05:26Thank you.
05:27The gentleman yields.
05:29Ms. Sykes is recognized for five minutes.
05:32Thank you.

Recommended