Nóż w głowie Dino Baggio 1999
Transcript
00:00Welcome from the airport. We interrupt the program of the Polish TV to give a special report dedicated to the Polish football.
00:07Because in a moment a special commission of Interpol will come to Poland to take care of a well-known, infamous case.
00:15Knife in the head, Dino Baggio. I remind you, during the match between Wisła and Parma, an Italian footballer was hit and later our team was excluded from the games.
00:24Perhaps in a moment we will be witnesses of sensational events. Here is the delegation of Interpol.
00:30Hello, I am from Polish Television.
00:33Good morning. The first good news. We speak Polish.
00:37What is the purpose of the visit of Interpol in Poland?
00:39We came here to solve, to detect three cases.
00:43I'm sorry, to solve for whose recommendation?
00:45Yes, it's true. We have a recommendation from the International Tribunal of Human Rights and from the European Union.
00:51If the International Tribunal of Human Rights means that someone's rights have been violated?
00:55Have rights been violated? Yes, that's a good question.
00:58We are here just to explain this case. We will study the materials, listen to witnesses.
01:02Have you already listened to Dino Baggio?
01:04Of course.
01:05And what did he say?
01:06He said, and I was so happy that I was coming to the city of the Pope.
01:09And how did he react to the blow to the head?
01:12He said, I lost my orientation to such an extent that I did not know if the match was about hitting a net with a ball or a footballer with a knife.
01:20Mr. Inspector, let's move on to serious matters.
01:22Will there be any other sanctions, when it comes to the world football authorities, outside of the disciplinary ones, in relation to the Polish club?
01:29I mean, two things have been drawn up.
01:31Firstly, protective helmets will be introduced for players, such as in hockey or American football.
01:37And secondly, and this is a very important matter for you,
01:39the possibility of moving all international meetings from Polish territory to neutral territory is being considered.
01:45Here are the activists of Polish football.
01:47That is, our footballers will not play in the country?
01:50Well, I can't answer this question now, but there is such a possibility.
01:53And all this through one fan, perhaps sick?
01:56Perhaps sick, yes. Such a fan can happen anywhere.
01:59We do not deal with the case of this fan.
02:01We are concerned with how the authorities of Polish football reacted to this incident.
02:05And how did they react?
02:07They tried to conceal this matter from us, camouflage it, negate it, and finally make it smaller, asking for a reduction in the amount of punishment.
02:14Stop, stop. I'm sorry, gentlemen journalists, I have to intervene here.
02:18Your questions are clearly different from the topic.
02:21Mr. President, we will ask questions.
02:24It's about the answers.
02:29All this was happening before the eyes of the state, as well as before the eyes of the representatives of Interpol.
02:33Gentlemen, what do you say? How do you comment on this event?
02:35Why are you beating those gentlemen?
02:38Because they do not care about the good of Polish football.
02:42Mr. President, we have known for a long time that you care about the good of Polish football.
02:46In this case, the Fair Play Cup from all Polish media.
02:51If they give it, it is taken. For the good of Polish football.
02:55Ladies and gentlemen, to explain what the good of Polish football is,
02:58this cup prepared by the famous Polish artist Andrzej Mleczko,
03:02we give to Interpol, hoping that it will really be explained
03:07what is hidden under this famous slogan of the good of Polish football.
03:12We wish you good luck in this mission.
03:14Thank you.
03:16Will Interpol agree to accompany us with cameras during your visit to Poland?
03:21Of course, because there are media.
03:24We invite you to the bus, we will go to the stadium now.
03:26Stop, stop. The agreement must be unanimous.
03:29Why?
03:30And the Polish side does not express such an agreement.
03:32For the good of Polish football.
03:35To tell the truth, we were prepared for such a solution,
03:40knowing the Polish side, the Polish football.
03:43That is why we also hid special cameras in the cup and in the ball.
03:48And that is why we will live directly, all the time,
03:52now relate what is happening when it comes to Interpol,
03:56which will collect materials in our country,
03:59and at the same time, on the other hand,
04:01everything that Polish football players will try to hide.
04:05Interpol
04:29Excuse me, may I?
04:30What can I do for you?
04:31Sit down.
04:32Here?
04:33No.
04:34Please, of course.
04:36Thank you.
04:44Don't you think that a man, like every animal, is equipped with aggression?
04:49Why do you look at me when you say animal?
04:52Do you mean something?
04:53No, no, no.
04:56You see, the point is that every generation should have its own war.
05:02Otherwise, the aggression is directed to the stadiums.
05:06Not only to the stadiums.
05:08Aggression is unpredictable, it spreads.
05:12That's the point.
05:13So that it doesn't spread everywhere, on the streets,
05:16these blockades, demonstrations, under the offices.
05:21The point is to direct it to the stadiums,
05:27where we want it, and close it there.
05:31To channel it, to create a closed circuit.
05:34That's it.
05:35You see, the aggression of the fans, the spectators,
05:41should be directed to Legia, Amiga to Pogoń,
05:45Wismar to Górnik, and so on.
05:47Just a closed circuit.
05:50Then all the most aggressive elements will finish themselves.
05:57I think so.
05:58I think so.
06:00Lobotomy at your own risk.
06:02I agree, at your own risk.
06:05Nature is wise, it knows who to finish and when.
06:08Wise.
06:10But you have to help it.
06:11Exactly, exactly.
06:12But what to do when a calm man is preparing?
06:16Normally.
06:19You can call a few agents to the stands.
06:24Lobotomy.
06:26Well, like everywhere.
06:29That's what I thought.
06:32Oh.
06:36You know what's interesting?
06:40Baseball needs big facilities, not small pubs and bars.
06:47I'm asking.
06:48They practice old fragments of the game.
06:52The moment of impact.
06:54How many baseball players do you have registered?
06:57200.
06:59But I'm asking about the whole country.
07:01The whole country has 200.
07:04And last year Poland imported 200,000 kilos.
07:09The equipment is used up.
07:10Because they put it in the heart.
07:13The whole heart.
07:17Wait a minute.
07:18You said 200,000?
07:21Yes.
07:22Where did you get this information from?
07:24Statistics.
07:26Statistics?
07:29You know what?
07:31The professor of statistics drowned in a lake that was about 10 centimeters deep.
08:23Excuse me.
08:37The following question.
08:38Are we at the stadium I was talking about in the report?
08:42It's not about the name.
08:43It's about the parameters of the facility and the relationship between the players.
08:49It's not about the name.
08:50It's about the parameters and the relationship between the players.
08:56Stop.
08:57If you allow me.
08:59This is a reconstruction of the situation from the match in Vistula Parma at a critical moment.
09:06At a critical moment.
09:07This is Dino Baggio.
09:10This is Dino Baggio.
09:13This is the Reds.
09:16This is Julio.
09:18Here is the ball.
09:19Here is the ball.
09:20Here is the ball.
09:24If you have any questions, I ask.
09:27This is the registration of Parma.
09:29This is Dino Baggio.
09:31Excuse me.
09:32Is the player's number consistent with the actual test?
09:35Please check this with the report.
09:38Number 9?
09:40Number 9.
09:41If it is 9, it means 9.
09:43Thank you.
09:48What is the purpose of this facility?
09:50It's different from the Italian side and from the Polish side.
09:53Here we have an objective picture.
09:55I propose to Interpol to start with a bare fact.
09:59A bare fact.
10:00A nudist fact.
10:02I would convince you.
10:03Of course.
10:05I would use additional data.
10:06What data?
10:07Additional data.
10:09Plurals.
10:11Data?
10:13He came on the floor.
10:15For facts, sir.
10:16I serve here.
10:18What do you mean, sir?
10:19Can I ask for contact?
10:21Sir, there are no contacts, but they are supposed to come.
10:25There is none at the moment.
10:27As a spokesman for the Polish football, can I ask you to comment on one thing?
10:32And explain.
10:34I am not able to talk to you.
10:36I interrupt you.
10:37I interrupt you now.
10:38I have to tell you that Polish football has nothing to do with this.
10:41Who do you not understand? Me or the interpreter?
10:44You are proposing some facts to me. Do I understand you well?
10:50Can I ask you a series of questions?
10:52Yes.
10:53The official position of the Polish football is as follows.
10:56Please do not interrupt me.
10:57The authorities of the Polish football.
11:00We allowed you to carry out an objective examination.
11:05You started by pointing out facts.
11:09Please, you have to show it.
11:10Here you are.
11:11You have facts.
11:12Please, what?
11:13You have players.
11:15A Polish player.
11:16Please, do not shout.
11:17I have no players.
11:18Please, do not shout at my ear.
11:19You are the owner of the club.
11:20I am sorry.
11:21You are the owner of the club.
11:22Stop.
11:23Stop.
11:24If you allow me.
11:26I have one more question.
11:27The measure has disappeared.
11:28I apologize.
11:29We should focus more on the aspects of football.
11:32The measure has disappeared.
11:34It was our measure.
11:37I would like to ask you about the measure.
11:39I would like to ask you to repeat the question.
11:41Where is the measure?
11:42I repeat the question.
11:43Where is the measure?
11:44The measure was in the hands of the representatives of Interpol.
11:46Please, ask your colleagues.
11:48Not us.
11:49What should I ask them?
11:51Where is the measure?
11:52I have already asked twice where the measure is.
11:56I repeat the question.
11:58This is a scandal.
12:01I have two questions to the representatives of Interpol.
12:04I represent the authorities of the Polish football.
12:06Do you care about the Polish football?
12:10Of course.
12:11And the second question.
12:12How many such incidents have you studied during the last season of football?
12:17I am afraid that this is a shame on the Polish football.
12:21We have studied all such events.
12:24Unfortunately, I will not give you the exact number.
12:27Because these are strictly secret data.
12:30I will ask the next question.
12:33Can I ask for the measure?
12:34I will ask for the measure.
12:35No, no, no.
12:36I will ask for the measure.
12:37Inspector Martin from UKOMP.
12:39We are listening, we are listening.
12:40Ladies and gentlemen, it is mainly about safety.
12:43We have calculated such a safety factor, which is similar in all our stadiums.
12:48And at the Vistula Stadium, there are 0.15 incidents.
12:52At the same time, on Polish roads, for example, the same safety factor is 0.72.
13:00And these numbers speak for themselves.
13:02Will you be able to use these data in other situations?
13:05Ladies and gentlemen, please.
13:06I have a question.
13:07Wait a minute.
13:08I have to explain this question.
13:090. How many?
13:110.72
13:120. How many?
13:130.15
13:14Ladies and gentlemen, if we take now, for example, the entire last season of football in Poland.
13:20Have you evaluated the atmospheric conditions of the stadium?
13:23Please allow me.
13:24Please allow me.
13:26I will not finish the sentence.
13:27If we take the entire Polish football season.
13:30Last year, one Italian was injured.
13:35Let's take, for example, in Italy.
13:38For example, in the Netherlands.
13:39In the Netherlands, ladies and gentlemen, 34 Italians were injured last year.
13:4332 Italians.
13:44Nothing to add.
13:45We will not take the plus.
13:48And there was no such case.
13:50On what?
13:51Outside.
13:52But.
13:53On the rubber.
13:54It is very big.
13:56I wanted, as a spokesman for Polish football.
13:59And not only as a translator, to say my opinion.
14:01That if I have such words to translate as Nagonka.
14:04I can not get out of it in a philological sense.
14:07I can be Nagonka and put me in a difficult situation.
14:10The Japanese have 35 words to say the word no.
14:1535 words.
14:17Eskimos have 17 words for different colors of snow.
14:22It's not Nardaburl.
14:25Well, you can translate it differently.
14:27It is a tendency to not like Polish football.
14:30It is a tendency to not like Polish football.
14:38Ladies and gentlemen, maybe we should organize this conversation.
14:41I see that the gentlemen from Interpol do not really understand what is going on.
14:44Maybe gentlemen, maybe you will ask about what interests you.
14:46Because it seems that's why you came, right?
14:49Professor Berger.
14:51There is no Professor Berger.
14:55Wladyslaw Berger, Institute for Knockout Research.
14:58I would like to say that this tragedy that happened at the football stadium in Kraków.
15:02This is just the back of the knife in Polish football.
15:08And so FIFA, the World Football Federation,
15:12said on the walls of this world.
15:16I have a question for the Polish police.
15:22What are the forecasts for the co-creator of the Polish-English revenge in Chorzów?
15:29Sir.
15:34Well, such a number is not done.
15:36You know it perfectly.
15:37And I know it.
15:38And let's be serious, okay?
15:40Please.
15:41The question was serious.
15:44How much?
15:46I will shoot about 0.17, 0.19.
15:49Well, you see.
15:50But these are the data that we have, and you don't have them yet.
15:54And where do you get this information from?
15:57Can I say?
15:59Polish Football Association.
16:01Gentlemen, let's stand so that we can all communicate here.
16:06The situation requires a decisive surgical cut.
16:11Colonel Prof. Metylski from the Kończyn Research Institute.
16:14Kończyn Protection Institute.
16:16Colonel Prof. Metylski.
16:18The incident that took place during the match of Wisła Parma.
16:23From the point of view of course, ballistics is impossible.
16:25It couldn't have happened.
16:26Thank you.
16:27Facts speak for themselves.
16:31POLICE
16:37Well, then, gentlemen, please ask your questions.
16:39They can be troublesome and confusing.
16:43I will start, if I may.
16:46What did the Polish police do in the Dinobadzio case?
16:49If, of course, the materials are not classified due to the good of the investigation.
16:54Nothing is classified in this case.
16:55I will answer every question.
16:58Did the police arrest the suspect?
17:02148 suspects.
17:04How many?
17:05148.
17:07And you let them all go home?
17:10They're all in jail.
17:12Excuse me.
17:13I will repeat the question.
17:15How many people are in jail in this case?
17:18148 people.
17:21And none of them wants to confess?
17:23Everyone confesses, except one.
17:24Well, then I don't understand where the problem is.
17:28Well...
17:30None of them can prove it.
17:31Because he threw a knife into the Dinobadzio.
17:35Wait a minute.
17:36So how would you catch them?
17:37For what?
17:38We didn't catch them.
17:40They came on their own.
17:41Each of them reported himself.
17:43He said that he threw a knife into the Dinobadzio.
17:47And everyone brought two witnesses to this.
17:50Why are they doing this?
17:53The Vistula Club awarded a reward.
17:555,000 PLN.
17:56For helping to catch the suspect.
17:59Well, they report being underage.
18:01Until the age of 16.
18:04But we can't put them in jail.
18:08Oh, sorry.
18:14Uh-huh.
18:16All right, let them through the window.
18:17I'll be there in a moment.
18:18Gentlemen.
18:20The next one who threw a knife into the Dinobadzio
18:22has just reported himself.
18:24It was him.
18:25And he has two witnesses.
18:28So what?
18:29I'll listen to him.
18:30And you'll watch it through the mirror.
18:33There you go.
18:34That's a very good idea.
18:35Day, gentlemen.
19:01Day, gentlemen.
19:02Good day.
19:03Good morning.
19:05Please, have a seat.
19:11Are you sure that one of you threw a knife at Dino Baggio?
19:14Yes, it was me.
19:16And you two?
19:17We are witnesses.
19:18We are witnesses to this incident.
19:21And how far were you?
19:23We were very close.
19:26Very close.
19:27On the left side and on the right side.
19:30I see.
19:31As close as possible.
19:32As close as possible, yes.
19:33I understand.
19:34Well, you can't be closer.
19:35Of course.
19:36So you saw, gentlemen, how you threw the knife.
19:39Of course.
19:40Naturally.
19:41Of course.
19:42Yes.
19:43Sir.
19:44Mr. Inspector, of course.
19:45Yes.
19:47And I understand that you can recognize this knife.
19:50Naturally.
19:51Yes.
19:54Well, that's great.
19:55This is a very important evidence.
19:58But you know, gentlemen, this is a false testimony up to the age of three, but it's a formality.
20:04No, no.
20:05Up to five.
20:06Up to five.
20:07You see?
20:08Everything changes.
20:09Gentlemen, please.
20:10Gentlemen, two of you.
20:11That one on that table.
20:13Come to me from behind.
20:14Sit down for a moment, yes?
20:15Yes, yes.
20:16For a moment.
20:17Okay.
20:29Did you throw this knife at Tino Baldzio?
20:31Yes.
20:34This one?
20:35This one.
20:36Take a look.
20:37For sure.
20:38For sure this knife.
20:39For sure this knife?
20:40Yes.
20:41Thank you very much.
20:42You helped me a lot.
20:43You can join your colleagues now, if you can.
20:45Okay.
20:52Can I ask you from the left?
20:53No.
20:54Yes, please.
20:55Please.
20:56Left.
20:57Listen, you won't teach me, okay?
20:59My left.
21:00I know which is right and which is wrong.
21:01Please.
21:02Please.
21:03Is this the knife your colleague threw at Tino Baldzio?
21:07Of course.
21:08Are you sure?
21:09Do you recognize him?
21:10Yes.
21:11Yes, this knife.
21:12Thank you very much.
21:13You're welcome.
21:14You helped me a lot.
21:15Let me tell you.
21:16You know, this is my civic duty.
21:18Of course.
21:19Of course.
21:20Okay.
21:23So, in this case, let's bring in the last gentleman.
21:35Is this the knife?
21:36Is this the knife?
21:40Was that the knife?
21:42The Italian side says so.
21:44But we very closely studied the behavior of Tino Baldzio
21:48at a slow pace, cage by cage.
21:51The player's behavior indicates that it could not have been a knife.
21:56Fortunately, we can repeat this experiment and prove everything.
22:02Teacher Smoleń!
22:04Teacher Smoleń!
22:05Smoleń!
22:06The situation is about to break!
22:08Smoleń!
22:09I am, I am!
22:10Smoleń!
22:11Yes, yes, I am!
22:12I'm listening to you!
22:13Now I will ask the teacher Smoleń to hit the head with a knife.
22:17This will be a back hit.
22:19If he behaves identically to Dino Baggio, it means that it was a knife.
22:23If he behaves differently, it means that it could not have been a knife.
22:27Attention!
22:33Now you can clearly see that it was either Dino Baggio or a knife.
22:39Please compare with the sketch.
22:42Mr. Teacher, now there will be an impact from the front.
22:47Please concentrate.
22:49Here you go.
22:58Please look.
22:59Direct physiological reaction.
23:02Absolutely.
23:04What is the end protection instrument for this?
23:08Colonel Metylski.
23:09Ladies and gentlemen, here we have the so-called train behavior.
23:15It just goes.
23:17Wait a minute.
23:19Teacher Smoleń got hit in the head with a knife.
23:23And Dino Baggio got hit in the head with a tripod.
23:25Yes.
23:26So the impact force is different.
23:28Yes.
23:29I want Teacher Smoleń to get hit in the head with a tripod.
23:32With a communist tripod.
23:34With a tripod.
23:36In fact, we do not know from which place the knife flew.
23:40I mean, the object.
23:41Ah, from which place.
23:42This can be set very simply.
23:44How?
23:46We have a record of the whole match on tape.
23:48Yes.
23:49We will need two shots.
23:51At the moment of simultaneous projection, automatic trajectory induction occurs.
23:56Could you say the last sentence, because it is very important.
23:58Yes.
23:59Automatic trajectory induction occurs.
24:02And in this way, with one swing, we can determine both the case and the place.
24:08Both the case and the place.
24:10Do we have the tape on the spot?
24:12Colonel.
24:13Yes.
24:14Colonel, do we have this fragment when the knife thrown from the stands hits the Dino Baggio player?
24:21No.
24:22From the moment of impact to the throw into the stands.
24:25So we have no problem.
24:27No, what's the problem?
24:29We can take this tape straight from Italy.
24:31Oh, sorry.
24:32From Italy.
24:33Colonel, do we have this tape?
24:36We have it in the Institute.
24:37And when can we see it?
24:39An hour.
24:40An hour.
24:41Well.
24:42Very simple.
24:43Very simple.
24:44Very simple.
24:45Very simple.
24:46This object was thrown from the field into the stands.
24:50That's right.
24:51That's how we determine it.
24:52Can we determine, with the help of your technicians, where it fell?
24:57Of course.
24:58With what accuracy?
25:00Five centimeters.
25:03Can I ask you?
25:05Please, please, please.
25:07Do you know that I am also interested in the location of this object?
25:10Please.
25:11Please.
25:12Please look here.
25:14The knife hit the eye.
25:15This is the young man.
25:17Please.
25:18Go back there.
25:20Can we go back?
25:22Yes.
25:23Please look.
25:26It's Rafał.
25:28It's Rafał.
25:29It's Rafał.
25:30Excuse me.
25:31Excuse me.
25:32Excuse me.
25:33Excuse me.
25:34It's a revenge.
25:35It's a revenge.
25:36Excuse me.
25:37Excuse me.
25:38Excuse me.
25:39Excuse me.
25:40I have to talk to you for a moment.
25:43What is it?
25:44You said revenge?
25:47What do you think, why did they throw it from the field?
25:52What do you think, why did they throw it from the field?
25:58Because I undressed unnecessarily.
26:00Where?
26:01They undressed in men's clothes.
26:05And why?
26:07To take a shower.
26:08There was a training here.
26:09I understand.
26:11You took a shower, undressed and?
26:16Well.
26:17And you took a shower, right?
26:19Well, not quite.
26:22Because Rafał came into the closet.
26:26Because it was a men's shirt.
26:29This Rafał?
26:30Yes.
26:31I understand.
26:32With a knife.
26:34Okay.
26:35And what?
26:36You took a shower.
26:40You can say that.
26:42I understand.
26:43And what?
26:46The whole team came back.
26:49They came to you, right?
26:51The whole unit?
26:52Sixteen.
26:58With reservists.
27:00And what?
27:02I understand that one of them could be jealous, right?
27:09He could be.
27:19And what happened to Rafał?
27:23He disappeared.
27:24I haven't seen him since then.
27:25He disappeared?
27:35Let the witness forget things.
27:36Come here, Daniszek.
27:39And you sit down.
27:45And you admit that you threw a knife, right?
27:47Because he admitted it too.
27:52What did you throw?
27:53Together.
28:00Maybe someone didnt make a right choice here?
28:02I'll be back in a minute.
28:04And you guys decide which one to throw.
28:08Did you see Svaniaczek?
28:10It was nice to see him when he was in Mexico.
28:13And now there's a little smoke and look what's going on.
28:18Have you been to a match with Górnik lately?
28:20What? I'm not afraid of footballers.
28:23NBA?
28:24More or less.
28:25America?
28:26Yes.
28:27Listen, I have a matter to discuss.
28:29You know, I won't be able to play today because of the sanctions.
28:32And I'm sure they'll let you play as a youngster.
28:35You'd kick Rafał's ass.
28:37But be discreet.
28:38If someone said anything to you, you'd say it was because of the board.
28:41Do you know where they are after the match?
28:43On Giebelach.
28:44Yes.
28:45But be discreet.
28:47Don't crack and I'll handle it.
28:49Easy.
28:54Łódź, take the youngster.
28:57Łódź, take the youngster.
29:06Rafał is on Giebelach.
29:08I'm going to check the lockout.
29:27Here you are.
29:35Any questions?
29:38I have a request.
29:40Namely?
29:42A bomb in the nose.
29:43A bomb in the nose.
29:45One?
29:46Two.
29:47Three.
29:48Four.
29:49Five.
29:50Six.
29:51Seven.
29:52Eight.
29:53Nine.
29:54Ten.
29:55One?
29:57Seven.
30:01Just a moment.
30:02I don't want any misunderstandings.
30:04Gentlemen, a knockout is a state of very interesting unconsciousness.
30:12A knockout is not only in boxing.
30:16It's not only boxing.
30:18Anyway, here you are.
30:21Let's see.
30:26And he gets in the pose.
30:29Well, we'll just watch.
30:44Oh, my.
30:45It started as a seagull and it broke out again at this end.
30:49Herbert's got the right hand loose now.
30:51She's in trouble.
30:52Leg out.
30:55It's used to eliminate the opponent from the game.
30:59And what is our institute doing in this matter?
31:04Has anyone of you wondered why a sparrow can hit a tree and nothing all day long?
31:13And a human?
31:15Here you are.
31:17The advantage of a sparrow over a human lies in the lumbar extension between the skull and the brain.
31:24Thanks to this, all blows directed at the head of a sparrow are amortized.
31:30Here in our institute, we try to improve and develop a human in the same way as a sparrow.
31:38We all know what electric shocks are.
31:41We all know what electric shocks are.
31:45We burn brain cells with electric current.
31:51Well, we don't burn them, but we amortize the frontal lobes of the brain.
31:57I emphasize, we amortize.
31:59We create an amortizer between the forehead and the brain.
32:04A human equipped with this type of lumbar can withstand blows…
32:13Lechutka, tell me, how many blows can you withstand?
32:20He can't count anymore.
32:34Autumn, autumn, autumn,
32:42the golden leaves are falling from the tree.
32:48This knife cannot be taken out, it threatens the implosion of the eyeball.
32:52The patient cannot also lie down, because the knife under its own weight would stick into the eye.
32:57This knife protrudes by itself, but at a rate of one millimeter per week.
33:02Thanks to this, the eye grows very quickly.
33:05And the strangest thing is that the material from which the knife is made is absolutely harmless.
33:10On the contrary, it works very well.
33:13Isn't this a regular metal, this knife?
33:15Oh, sir, if it were a regular metal, the patient would react completely differently.
33:19How?
33:21I'll show you.
33:23Mr. Professor, Mr. Professor Milewicz!
33:25Mr. Milewicz!
33:27Will you please stand up for the experiment?
33:29And what will it be?
33:31From the front or from the back?
33:33From the back.
33:35No, no, we believe you. The experiment is not necessary.
33:39Mr. Professor, you said that the material from which this knife is made has an additional effect on the patient.
33:45How does it affect?
33:47First of all, on the speed of association and significantly increases the level of intelligence, especially emotional.
33:53And what does it result from?
33:55Directly from the chemical composition of the knife.
33:58And what is the chemical composition of this knife?
33:59Oh, we don't know that. The material is strange and completely unknown.
34:05Are you doing something in this direction?
34:07Yes. We asked specialists from NASA. They arrived yesterday. They are studying the problem. We don't know their positions yet.
34:15So we'll be waiting.
34:17Oh, yes. Mr. Professor Nowak from NASA. He is also interested in this issue.
34:22Nice to meet you. May I?
34:24Also a Pole.
34:25I'm going to work right away.
34:27We'll put this mask on Rafał. For safety, of course.
34:31Then we'll carefully cut off a piece of this knife.
34:36And this will be our sample.
34:38We'll put this sample into this device.
34:42And the device will perform analysis and tell us exactly what this knife is made of.
34:51What are the ingredients? Where do they come from?
34:53And when will the results be?
34:55About half an hour later.
34:57Gentlemen, they are calling from the stadium. There is already a fragment of this tape with the knife. We can mark the trajectory.
35:04Great. We're going to work.
35:06Thank you.
35:08I would very much like to see it.
35:10No problem.
35:12Thank you.
35:14So I'll join you.
35:16OK.
35:18Bye.
35:24Ladies and gentlemen, I checked it three times.
35:28From these checks, it turns out that the trajectory of this knife is perfectly straight.
35:33No degree of curvature.
35:35What does it mean? It means that it goes beyond the stadium, beyond Kraków, beyond Poland.
35:40I say straight.
35:42I have a question for Mr. Inspector. What is it?
35:46This is the moment of impact.
35:50Yes, exactly.
35:51The moment of impact. In which place?
35:54Are you going to say that the tape is unnecessary?
35:57Satellite images.
35:59These are strictly secret documents. Where do you get it from?
36:02From you.
36:04Sir, I don't remember exchanging documents.
36:07Will you allow us to stop this charting?
36:09No.
36:11These are emotions.
36:13Let's talk outside the protocol.
36:16These documents go to the archives.
36:18Don't treat this as an incident.
36:22Don't treat this as an incident.
36:24Gentlemen!
36:27Don't treat this as an incident.
36:30Don't treat this as an incident.
36:33This is a minor matter.
36:36I just wanted to show you the data.
36:41We just wanted to show that we are on the right side.
36:44Excuse me.
36:45Excuse me.
36:47Did I understand your thought correctly?
36:49That this knife came to us from outside Poland?
36:54From outside.
36:56Well, the arguments of the Italian side have been completely overturned.
37:02The only confirmed fact is the bloodshed of the player Dino Baggio.
37:08In this situation, we accuse Dino Baggio of polluting the sports facility in Wisła.
37:12And we demand the Italian side to compensate for the inequality of the sports facility in Parma.
37:20We showed the world that we are honest and innocent.
37:27And I think that we fully deserve the right to organize winter games in Zakopane.
37:35Bravo!
37:37Bravo!
37:39Bravo!
37:42Bravo!