Sheldon Whitehouse Presses Witnesses About The Economic Consequences Of Economic Inequality

  • 3 months ago
During a Senate Budget Committee hearing last week, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) questioned witnesses about economic inequality.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Thank you, Dr. Stiglitz. Let me begin with a few more broad and general questions for
00:10you. First, does economic inequality itself have economic consequences? And what happens
00:23to those economic consequences as economic inequality worsens?
00:33That's a great question. It used to be thought that there was a trade-off. Arthur Okun, who
00:40was chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under President Johnson, wrote a book called
00:45The Big Trade-Off. And the argument then was that if you want to reduce inequality, you
00:52would have to accept lower growth. But that thinking has totally changed. And now we know
00:59that countries face a high price for inequality. The IMF studies – and the IMF is not a left-wing
01:07institution – has shown that that is the case. It was a central piece of my book called
01:13The Price of Inequality. One of the reasons for that is that as you get more inequality,
01:21the adverse effects get worse, and we've had an increase in inequality. And the manner,
01:27the ways in which inequality has increased related to monopolization, financialization,
01:33also have adverse effects on the economy.
01:40In the context of the harms that are driven by economic inequality, could you elaborate
01:48a bit on the extent to which our tax code actually contributes to economic inequality,
01:55and hence to the economic evils that follow?
02:01It contributes in several different ways that have already been highlighted. One of them
02:07is that it leads to increased financialization of the economy. The financial sector, in turn,
02:19has engaged in activities like predatory lending. But even apart from that, just increased debt
02:30leads to greater instability, and that instability, the brunt of that is borne by ordinary Americans.
02:37So it increases inequality. Our tax code encourages real estate speculation, provides preferential
02:48benefits for CEOs. We've already had a discussion of that. It taxes the very, very rich at a
02:55lower rate than it does working Americans. So these are just a few of the ways in which
03:02our tax code actually exacerbates the inequalities and creates structures which promote inequality.
03:14And if we were to look at efforts to take advantage of those tax code failings, and
03:22perhaps consider tax avoidance as an industry, how would you rank the size of the tax avoidance
03:36industry and its positive or negative contributions to society and the economy?
03:47The tax avoidance industry has become a major global industry. It's partly a consequence of globalization.
03:55Globalization has expanded the scope for tax avoidance activities and given an advantage
04:03to individuals and multinationals who operate in many countries because they can take advantage
04:11of these tax avoidance activities. They can afford the best tax lawyers who excel at tax
04:20avoidance. But one of the central points of my remarks, my initial remarks, was that those
04:26tax avoidance activities not only are taking away directly, that is to say those tax lawyers
04:35are bright people, they could have been doing, contributing to our economy, and instead they're
04:39trying to take money away from government. But they distort our economy. We have investments
04:51in real estate, we have investments in fossil fuel, we have investments in the financial
04:57sector that would not be there if our tax system hadn't actually encouraged those kinds
05:04of investments.

Recommended