• 6 months ago
In remarks on the Senate floor last week, Sen. Peter Welch (D-VT) spoke about Supreme Court ethics reforms.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Mr. President, my colleagues on the Republican side have made the assertion
00:07that this legislation would interfere with the independence of the judiciary.
00:13That's a serious assertion and it deserves to be respected and responded
00:19to. The judiciary is an absolutely vital branch of government that is independent.
00:27It is independent in the process by which it makes decisions that come
00:34before it for its decision. That's where it is independent. And as much as I
00:42disagree with many of the decisions of the Supreme Court, that court has the
00:47right, without interference from Congress, to make the decisions it makes. And there
00:52is absolutely nothing in this legislation that interferes with the
00:56judicial power that the court alone exercises in considering cases and
01:02making decisions. There is absolutely nothing. And to suggest by our colleagues
01:07that this legislation would do that is that flat-out wrong. What this
01:13legislation responds to is the conduct of individual justices that is, you know,
01:20frankly, pretty shocking. You get a call. Hey, there's a yacht that needs you
01:26on board. Hey, don't worry about how to get there. We've got a private plane. Hey,
01:34don't worry. If you didn't come, that seat would be unoccupied. And the justice
01:39actually does it. They get on that plane and go and they get on the yacht. Hey, by
01:44the way, we're having a fishing trip. It's in Alaska. It's really cool. Let's go.
01:50There's an empty seat. Why don't you come? It's worth a hundred thousand
01:53dollars, but it doesn't have to be reported. You know, when we talk about a
01:59code of ethics for the Supreme Court, and these are some of the examples of why
02:04it's needed, my constituents in Vermont say, Peter, what are you talking about? A
02:10code of ethics? They can get away with that. They can do that. They can take this
02:14free trip. It's really, really shocking. And you know, my colleague from
02:21Connecticut said it right. The Chief Justice has not only the authority, but
02:25the responsibility to deal with the problems of behavior in his own court.
02:29He's not doing it. He is not doing it. And another point that my colleagues make,
02:37that I'm in a hundred percent agreement with, we need a Supreme Court that has
02:42the credibility and confidence of this country. Because we face very difficult
02:47decisions that are quite contentious and divide America. And when those are
02:52contested and they go to the court, and the court renders a decision that all of
02:57us have to abide by, whether we were on the winning side or the losing side, we
03:02absolutely must have a court that has credibility. And the credibility has to
03:08be, if it's going to be enhanced by the court, by following codes of conduct, by
03:16giving American people confidence that they're on the level. They're not doing
03:23it. These free trips, these private planes, the private yachts, that is just
03:29self-serving and frankly gross. Who has the opportunity to take those trips in
03:36the job they do? By the way, this is an important job they have, but it's a job.
03:40And you know, you do your job, you get your paycheck, you show up for work, you
03:44treat the people you work with decently, but you don't have some expectation
03:48because of the particular job you have, you get free special trips just because
03:53you are, quote, important. That's not part of the deal here. That's not
03:59constitutionally protected. That's not anything to do with the independence of
04:03the judiciary. That is just about venal self-serving conduct by people who
04:08happen to have a lifetime appointment. The other point here that is really
04:12truly shocking and astonishing, we've got over 800 judges, circuit court,
04:17appellate court, bankruptcy judges. They have a code of conduct. They can't do
04:21this. There's only nine folks that can do it and they're on the Supreme Court. They
04:26should have the highest standards that apply to them, self-imposed. They
04:30have no standards. This is the Supreme Court eroding the confidence the public,
04:38all of us, whichever side of the decision we're on, are entitled to have from the
04:43people who have that lifetime appointment and they are squandering it.
04:47They are turning a blind eye to the needs of the people that they serve. So
04:53this ethics legislation is unfortunately necessary because the Supreme Court will
05:00not do what it has the responsibility to do. The Chief Justice of the United
05:06States Supreme Court will not face down colleagues on that court who are just
05:12disregarding normal rules of decency. So I say to the chair of my colleagues and
05:19I say to my colleagues on the other side of the aisle, all of us should be doing
05:23everything we can to restore confidence in the judiciary. This is
05:28step one. I yield back.

Recommended