• 4 months ago
At a House Rules Committee hearing on Tuesday, Rep. James Comer (R-KY) spoke about President Biden's audio interview with special counsel Robert Hur.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Thank you very much, Chairman Burgess and members of the House Rules Committee.
00:04The Oversight Committee's February 27th subpoena required the Department of Justice to produce
00:08audio recordings of President Biden's interview with Special Counsel Robert Err regarding
00:13the President's mishandling and improper disclosure of classified materials.
00:18The Department failed to produce them.
00:20The Oversight Committee held a markup to consider a report holding Attorney General Merrick
00:24Garland in contempt of Congress and favorably passed that report.
00:28This is not a complicated matter.
00:30The Executive Branch and its agencies, including the Department of Justice, are not above Congress's
00:35right to oversee those agencies.
00:38We, as members of the House of Representatives, have a duty to ensure congressional subpoenas
00:43are fully complied with by those who receive them – people, companies, and particularly
00:49the federal government.
00:51My colleagues on the other side of the aisle constantly talk about the threats to our institutions,
00:56but then they turn around and defend the DOJ's noncompliance with a duly authorized
01:01subpoena showing their partisanship.
01:05If my colleagues will not defend the institution of Congress – the institution they are a
01:10part of – how can we listen with a straight face when they talk about the sanctity of
01:15our other institutions?
01:16The President has asserted executive privilege over these audio recordings.
01:22Congressional scholars find this assertion bizarre and meritless.
01:26The President has waived any executive privilege over these audio recordings by releasing a
01:31transcript of the entire interview to the public.
01:35When the transcript was released, President Biden's own White House spokesperson claimed,
01:40quote, in keeping with his commitment to cooperation and transparency throughout this investigation,
01:46the President declined to assert privilege over any portion of the report, end quote.
01:53My question to the White House is, what happened to cooperation and transparency?
01:59What reason does the White House have to inappropriately assert executive privilege now?
02:05The White House has shown it is willing to alter transcripts to protect Joe Biden's
02:09image.
02:10It is insufficient to simply take the Justice Department at its word that the transcripts
02:15have not been altered.
02:17The Department of Justice does not get to decide how to comply with a subpoena, just
02:25as the people who receive subpoenas from DOJ cannot determine how they will comply.
02:30The Oversight Committee has conducted its own investigation into President Biden's
02:34mishandling of classified materials, and its findings contradict key portions of the White
02:39House's and President Biden's personal attorney's official narrative.
02:45Months of investigating by the Oversight Committee have revealed the White House has attempted
02:48to withhold the truth from the American people.
02:52As I stated in our markup, the Oversight Committee's timeline begins well before the White House's
02:57narrative that President Biden's private lawyers just stumbled upon classified materials in
03:03November 2022 at the Penn Biden Center.
03:07By May 24, 2022, six months before the White House's story began, the White House counsel,
03:15Dana Remus, contacted a Biden former employee to retrieve President Biden's materials from
03:20the Penn Biden Center.
03:22She then traveled there herself to pick boxes up, again, as I stated previously, and have
03:30not yet received an answer.
03:32Why would the most senior lawyer at the White House be going to pack up an office that was
03:37supposed to only have pictures and personal documents in it?
03:41Why were President Biden's personal lawyers visiting the Penn Biden Center days before
03:46the, quote, discovery of classified materials if they thought they were just picking up
03:51pictures and letters?
03:53Why were they calling FedEx to pick up boxes and a White House employee was leaving with
03:57boxes before the November 2nd discovery?
04:03These are questions I continue to ask because so far, none have been provided, not by special
04:07counsel Herr, not by the White House, not by the Department of Justice, and certainly
04:12not by President Biden.
04:14If the Attorney General chooses to defy Congress and not produce the audio recordings, he must
04:19face the consequences of his actions.
04:22The path before us is clear, and the Oversight Committee recommends the Attorney General
04:26be found in contempt of Congress.
04:28Neither he nor President Biden are above Congress's oversight.
04:32Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
04:33I yield back.
04:35Chair, thanks a gentleman.
04:36The gentleman yields back.
04:37Chair now recognizes and welcomes back to the Rules Committee the Ranking Member of
04:41the Oversight Committee, Mr. Raskin.
04:43Thank you very kindly, Chairman.

Recommended