Gwen Moore Laments Unemployment Insurance Funding 'That Punishes States That Do A Good Job'

  • 3 months ago
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing on Tuesday, Rep. Gwen Moore (D-WI) questioned witnesses about unemployment insurance fraud and federal assistance to states.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00 Thank you so much, Mr. Chairman, and thank you, Mr. Ranking Member.
00:05 I think this is an extremely important discussion, and I want to get a few things straight before
00:11 I move on.
00:14 I think, Ms. Phillips, you were talking about the non-fraudulent improper payments that
00:22 were made.
00:23 Would you say that we have not disaggregated what percentage of the overpayments were fraudulent
00:32 versus non-fraudulent, accidental?
00:39 Thank you, Representative Moore, for that question.
00:42 The ETA-227 has no demographic information.
00:46 Demographic.
00:47 There is no disaggregated demographic information.
00:51 It is broken down by what type of non-fraud improper error code a state reports on that
01:02 quarterly report.
01:06 But we do know which ones were fraudulent versus improper payment.
01:13 What percentage is that?
01:15 That wasn't clear to me.
01:19 Everyone could look at the information state by state or nationally, but I can only speak
01:24 right now to Illinois' numbers.
01:28 In 2023, as I mentioned just a minute ago, I just want to make sure I am completely accurate
01:35 here, that 62% of Illinois' total improper payments, total overpayments, were considered
01:44 non-fraud improper payments.
01:47 Mr. Taylor, would you agree with that?
01:48 I probably should have asked you that.
01:52 What percentage of these payments were improper and other parts fraudulent?
01:56 It depends on the state, Representative Moore.
02:00 There was a wide variety of disparity when it comes to what we call first party and third
02:04 party fraud.
02:05 Third party fraud being the stolen identity, first party improper.
02:11 The reason I have just burnt up so much of my time on this, Mr. LeHood, is because I
02:18 just think our committee was focusing on this as if the majority of these payments were
02:26 fraudulent.
02:27 Thank God we made these payments because I think it was Ms. Phillips that said 64% of
02:34 folk live paycheck to paycheck.
02:38 We know what people were doing four years ago.
02:40 I mean, they were maxing out their credit cards, hoarding toilet paper.
02:48 We want to just be clear that it was important.
02:52 All of you would agree that despite the fraud, which is terrible, that we saved people's
02:59 lives literally by providing this benefit.
03:03 Ms. Townsend, your re-employment work strategies.
03:08 I'm very impressed with your ability to get people back to work.
03:13 It's a model that everybody is looking at.
03:16 I'm wondering if what we used to say, that you bite your hand, spite your face or whatever.
03:28 Haven't we found that states that did a remarkable job of avoiding inflationary problems over
03:37 the years reduced staffing and then found themselves in this situation where we had
03:44 an emergency and they just didn't have the staffing in place as a punishment almost,
03:50 where they're doing so well in getting people unemployed.
03:57 I'm wondering if any of you feel that the formula maybe punishes states that do a good
04:05 job.
04:07 Maybe I'll ask you that, Ms. Phillips.
04:11 And also, yeah, go on.
04:14 I think I'd go back to Mr. Redeman's comments earlier that the way the resource justification
04:20 model works is that when there's a low demand for unemployment benefits, that is also a
04:29 low administrative amount of money that states have.
04:33 You can't fix the roof during that time.
04:37 So that's one point.
04:40 But I also want to comment on the workforce aspect because as a former fellow UI administrator,
04:49 states across the country are working on the RESEA program.
04:54 Most administrators believe that the UI program is a temporary, it's a trampoline.
05:00 But the people that are eligible to apply for UI are workers and they want to get back
05:05 to work.
05:06 And most state agencies are working on that.
05:10 Can I ask something very quick before I get cut off?
05:14 Do we see instances where there are barriers to applying to unemployment?
05:19 I mean, like the state has taken the position that we don't want to provide this benefit.
05:26 And so many more people who are eligible and need it don't get it.
05:31 And that also lowers the numbers and sort of masks the need.
05:36 Representative Moore, I can really only speak from my experience in Illinois that there's
05:43 no preventing people from applying.
05:46 But I think we know, especially through the pandemic, the challenges that any UI claimant
05:53 faces in applying and the administrative burdens that they face on online applications, on
06:00 certification processes, on other documentation that they need to provide.
06:07 I know I'm over time, but one of the things that I cannot unsee is I observed these live
06:14 claim filing observations and I watched people from five different regions in Illinois apply,
06:21 including an older woman, 76-year-old woman from downstate Illinois near Carbondale who
06:27 was struggling mightily.
06:29 She came into the office because she couldn't apply online.
06:34 It wasn't working for her.
06:35 There were many different blockades that I won't go into.
06:39 But there are improvements that can be made to the actual application process.
06:46 Thank you so much, Mr. Chairman, for your indulgence.
06:49 Thank you, Ms. Moore.

Recommended