• 6 months ago
During a House Natural Resources Committee hearing Tuesday, Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-CO) spoke about the Forest Service FY25 budget request.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00 I'd now like to recognize the gentleman from Colorado
00:02 for five minutes of questioning.
00:05 >> Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
00:06 Chief Moore, last year I asked you questions regarding wildfires,
00:11 specifically on thinning and fuels management.
00:15 You concurred that healthy forests should have between 50
00:17 to 80 trees per acre, as opposed to 250 to 300
00:21 that national forests near my district have.
00:24 As I said last time, in the fall of 2020,
00:26 Colorado saw the two largest wildfires in state history,
00:29 the Cameron Peak Fire and the East Troublesome Fire.
00:33 Most of these happened on federal land.
00:35 Despite robust funding, fuel material continues to pile
00:39 up on federal lands.
00:41 In fact, the fiscal year '25 presidential budget request
00:44 asked for more money while targeting 200,000 less acres
00:48 than last year.
00:49 Has there been any change since we spoke
00:52 on the Forest Service's position
00:54 on tree thinning and fuels management?
00:57 >> Yeah, we're constantly looking at fuels management.
01:01 And in Colorado, particularly along the front range,
01:04 that's one of our priority landscapes.
01:06 And so we have ramped up treatments
01:09 in the front range landscapes.
01:11 And so we're making actually a lot of progress there,
01:13 Congressman, in terms of what we're able to do in terms
01:16 of treatments on those landscapes.
01:18 >> Okay, very good.
01:20 Also, the last time that you were in front
01:22 of this committee you resisted the Forest Service using fuel
01:27 related categorical exclusions.
01:30 And that is why I introduced the locally led restoration act
01:33 to provide flexibility in stewardship contracts while
01:37 focusing on wildlife mitigation through fuel removal.
01:42 So my question is, you mentioned collaborating
01:44 with community leaders.
01:46 Please share what conversations, if any,
01:50 you have had regarding stewardship
01:52 and timber contracts with industry.
01:56 >> Yeah, so we've had a number of memorandum understandings
02:00 and agreements with some of the industry folks.
02:03 One of the latest ones we've had was with NAFO,
02:08 the National Association of Forest Owners.
02:10 And two of the contracts there had to do with, one,
02:16 is that for the timber owners, or the land owners,
02:21 we have agreed to allow them to jump on a fire if it's
02:26 in their area during an initial attack.
02:28 So that's been in place for a year now.
02:31 And we went back and did an after action review this past
02:34 winter to look to see if there was any value to that.
02:38 And we found out with the timber and forest owners
02:42 that there was value.
02:43 In fact, we saw a couple of fires that they were able
02:46 to get to that could have grown into larger fires.
02:49 The other piece that we, other agreement that we have
02:52 with industry is to look at opportunities
02:56 after a fire for reforestation.
02:58 And so we entered into an agreement,
03:00 actually with Sierra Forest Industries.
03:03 And in that agreement, they have reforested some
03:08 of the National Forest managed land as they were doing theirs.
03:11 And I think we had about 120 acres this past year on that.
03:14 And so we're looking at a lot of different opportunities
03:17 that partner with industry and other community leaders
03:21 to look at bringing them into the decision space
03:24 on what we do out there.
03:26 >> Okay. And that's good to see that progress being made.
03:29 What this bill would do, I just mentioned, is instead of all
03:33 or nothing contracts, it lets there be a counteroffer,
03:36 which is prevalent in the private sector,
03:40 but for some reason doesn't exist with forest service.
03:43 So I would love to see that legislation go forward,
03:47 give you that authorization as another tool in the toolkit
03:50 and another way for industry to be relevant in this space.
03:54 I've also proposed using private sectors
04:00 in whatever areas I can in all kinds
04:03 of government service areas.
04:05 There's a shortage of lumber
04:07 and wood products during the pandemic, for instance,
04:10 yet timber harvests have dropped since the early '90s
04:14 and wildfires have continued to skyrocket.
04:17 The U.S. produced 112 million board feet in '87, but in 2022,
04:22 less than 5 million board feet.
04:25 So production has gone down while wildfires have gone up.
04:30 You mentioned the problems with litigation.
04:32 Are there other things that could be done
04:34 to restore some balance here?
04:37 You know, no one's talking about clear-cutting millions of acres,
04:40 but having some kind of balance with American jobs and products
04:45 so we don't have to import so much from other countries.
04:48 >> Yeah, Congressman, I've committed earlier
04:50 with Chairman Tiffany to really take a look at our data
04:54 because the information that you just shared,
04:57 I have different information that says the opposite.
05:00 And I think, you know, you can sometimes have a seesaw effect
05:03 from year to year about what timber is,
05:06 but my data is telling me that we've seen slight increases
05:11 over the last 20 years, actually to the tune of about 30%.
05:15 And so I would like to be able to sit down,
05:18 and I've agreed already to sit down with committee members here
05:21 to go into a bit more detail on sharing that information.
05:25 >> Okay, thank you.
05:26 Are you at the back, Mr. Chairman?
05:27 >> Chairman Niels, I'd now like to recognize the gentleman

Recommended