• 5 months ago
In a video released on social media Tuesday, Sen. James Lankford (R-OK) spoke about President Biden's executive orders on immigration.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00Senator James Lankford here. I'm just stepped outside of the Capitol itself. I've been reading
00:06through same thing some of you might have been reading through, and that is the information
00:10about the new asylum changes that the administration says they're planning to be able to make and
00:16to be able to read through. It reads like a document that looks like it's going to do
00:19a lot, but when I go through it, I ask the some of the basic questions. What's missing
00:23from this? So let me just get my initial reactions. I'm still waiting to be able to get the full
00:27details on it. First reaction is pretty simple on this. It only deals with very high numbers.
00:32If there's very high numbers coming across, then they quote unquote kick in this new authority
00:37on it. The bill that I was actually working on several months ago, this was the bolt on
00:42piece at the end was the high numbers. We affected the very first person. The bill that
00:46I'd helped write was the first person that came across. Their screening would be differently.
00:52They would have a faster process. They would have fewer appeals. So it was set up to say
00:55the first person that comes across will be arrested, will be quickly screened and quickly
00:59deported. This doesn't do anything until they get into high numbers. They're also using
01:03the number 2,500 as the number that they're going to say is a high number. That sounds
01:08like it when people say, well, your, your number is like four or 5,000 totally different
01:12apples and oranges on it. You got to read what they're not including. They're not including
01:16all the people in the CPP one app. That's about 1600 people a day that are bringing
01:20in. They're not including the Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, Venezuela, and folks that are coming
01:24across. They're getting parole. Those are going to all be exempted. They're all exempting
01:28all the folks that are unaccompanied minor coming in. So this number is going to be four
01:31or 5,000, uh, pretty high on it as well. That was always my pushback to say that's too high
01:37of a number, but they're also just starting with that number, then doing nothing for those
01:42folks that are coming in. They're also using authority that they know is going to be enjoined
01:46by the court immediately rather than doing the things that they know they could do immediately.
01:51So here's my frustration. There are things this administration could do right now today
01:56that they know won't be enjoined by the court. They could turn off the parole authority they
02:00turned on. That's about 2,500 people a day that they're currently welcoming in that this
02:06administration started that, that they could turn off immediately. So the 5,200 or so people
02:12coming in a day right now, they could turn off 2,500 of those immediately. They could
02:16also put in place, uh, the state department things that they've had in the past, uh, both
02:21negotiations with Guatemala, Honduras, uh, and, and El Salvador and others to be able
02:26to turn people around. They turn those off. This administration did. Those things could
02:30be turned back on. They could do the remain in Mexico. There has to be some kind of conversation
02:35with Mexico. If they're saying they're going to turn people around, they could do the remaining
02:38Mexico. That would be a stronger policy. Uh, they could do the state department or recalcitrant
02:43country policies before that. If people come in or recalcitrant country, they could turn
02:47them around quickly. They could do department of justice actions that if you're a repeat
02:52offender coming across multiple times, that's a felony. They could be prosecuted as a felony
02:57rather than just being released in the countries. All of those things they could do for free.
03:01They don't need additional money at all for those things. Those are things they could
03:05already do. They're choosing not to do any of those, but they're announcing some big
03:09change that they want to be able to put in place that they know the court's going to
03:12join immediately on it so they can then say at the end of it, we tried to do something
03:17on it rather than do the things that they know would be effective right now. So I'm
03:21going to hope that something actually works on this because we desperately need this administration
03:26to take immigration seriously and what's happening on our border. My challenge to them is enforce
03:31the border. You've got the same law president Trump had the same law president Obama had.
03:36If they enforce the law, they don't want to enforce it like president Trump did. If you
03:40go back to president Obama, we had half a million people illegally crossing a year,
03:44half a million. Now we have two and a half million people illegally crossing. If this
03:49administration will just do what president Obama did, that'd be better than what they're
03:53doing. But right now this administration's continue to be able to wave people in. They've
03:57created a crisis and now literally months before an election, they're trying to be able
04:01to put out a statement to say, here's how we're going to fix it in ways they know are
04:05not going to be either allowed by the courts or will take months and months and months
04:09to actually implement on it. So I hope I'm wrong. I'm willing to be able to see the rest
04:13of the details on it. But as I read through the initial proposal, I'm extremely skeptical
04:18on how they're going to implement this and what they're going to do in the days ahead.
04:21But I'll continue to track it like everybody else does at this point. I'll let you know
04:24what I see when I see the rest of the details.

Recommended