'This Is Not Coordination Or Consultation': Tom Tiffany Pans Interior Dept.'s Public Comment Process

  • 4 months ago
During a House Natural Resources Committee hearing earlier this month, Rep. Tom Tiffany (R-WI) questioned Department of Interior officials about new regulations and the impact of local and state authorities.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00 Tiffany from Wisconsin you're up for five minutes. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Ms. Pacino
00:03 Is it correct that OSM recently rewrote finished the rewrite of the 10-day notice rule
00:10 Yes, that's correct what was wrong with the version that was done in 2020
00:17 So we engaged in that rulemaking after a review that was
00:24 requested of us in a directive
00:27 Executive order from the president and as a result of that
00:32 Review so so the president directed you to rewrite that rule is that accurate?
00:38 Sorry, if not specifically what the president directed was that the agency's look at a variety of regulations that had
00:46 Previously been issued we did our job to do that and there were ways that we felt would be more consistent with
00:54 Smacra by making some changes so when the president tells you to look at something. It's probably not a
01:00 Maybe is that right? It's a directive. It was an executive. It was an executive order to review to review the regulations
01:09 Mr. Chairman, I just say when the president says you need to look at something. They're probably saying do it
01:14 So the president was behind the rewrite of the 10-day notice rule that was just rewritten in 2020
01:22 Doesn't smack or give primacy to the states miss Pacino
01:25 So smack red does set up a process for which states can obtain primacy the states ask for this change
01:34 to the 10-day notice rule
01:37 So the as I mentioned the review that occurred
01:42 Was the result of of an executive order which has been done by other presidents that come into office as well
01:48 In the 10-day notice rule that's written now under your version. Isn't it correct citizen complaints have been elevated above?
01:56 consultation with local and state governments
01:59 No, no congressman that that's not the case in terms of elevated above but smack red does
02:08 explicitly provide for a process by which citizens have the right to come to
02:14 OSM re with a possible violation
02:18 States then are the ones who are directed and left to address that
02:23 Via potential violation of respond to you included that in this recent 10-day notice rule in regards to citizen complaints, correct?
02:31 We were acting consistent with smack breath
02:35 But you you elevated it to an even higher
02:40 Authority, isn't that correct?
02:45 I'm not quite sure. I understand the question. Yeah, I'll move on to another question here
02:49 Did you consult and coordinate with the states before writing this 10-day notice rule?
02:54 Yes, we received numerous comments from the states as part of the rule
02:59 not comments you are required to
03:03 Coordinate with states and local governments the establishment of rank equal not subordinate
03:09 Did you sit down at the table with them and say we're going to we are looking at the president has directed us
03:16 To rewrite the 10-day notice rule. Will you help us do that?
03:21 Did you have that discussion with those states like Wyoming?
03:24 What I can tell you congressman is that the process we followed is the one that's laid out in the Administrative Procedure Act
03:32 To engage in rulemaking and that's what we did which included reviewing numerous comments
03:37 By states as well as other stakeholders. Yeah, this is not coordination or consultation in any way shape or form. Mr
03:44 Chairman and we've been hearing this for a couple weeks now from the administration officials that have been coming forward
03:49 Yeah, we heard comments and things like that. That's not how it works. It is when these
03:55 environmental laws the
03:59 Fundamental environmental laws that were put in place back in the early 1970s when they were put in place
04:07 Lawmakers here made it very clear
04:09 You must sit down and treat these local and state units of government as equals so that they would have a say
04:16 Legislators congressional members of the time they knew the federal government could be overarching and that is exactly what we're hearing today
04:24 They decided to do this because states have told us Miss Pacino that they did not
04:31 They were not given a voice at the table. They have told us that
04:36 Why is the industry you said the industry is in decline why is it in decline?
04:41 What you're asking what you're asking me why the coal industry is in decline that's right. Yep, I
04:52 I
04:57 Think there are a variety of reasons and I guess if I had to pick one I'd say it their market forces that are
05:07 That have resulted and I'm pleased to have come to OSM re because of the job that it's doing in coal
05:13 Communities to help them move forward. Those are not market forces
05:18 Mr. Chairman when the federal government tries to put you out of business and
05:22 When the president himself is behind this effort as with the 10-day notice rule people can fully understand
05:31 Why we see a country in decline I?
05:34 Yield back
05:36 Thank you very much
05:37 Now we'll go to mr. Rosendale from

Recommended