‘This Would Be A Game Changer’: Blinken Touts Deal To Normalize Israel-Saudi Relations

  • 3 months ago
During a House Appropriations Committee hearing last week, Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) questioned Secretary of State Antony Blinken about economic coercion by China and the potential deals with Saudia Arabia.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00 Mr. Chairman, Mr. Cole.
00:01 Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
00:02 Mr. Secretary, as you know, the People's Republic of China has repeatedly used economic coercion
00:08 against the United States, our allies, and frankly, non-aligned countries as well, and
00:15 quite often trying to extract a political advantage or trap a country in a debt trap,
00:21 literally, in order to have influence over its behavior.
00:24 That runs very much counter, obviously, to a rules-based international order.
00:29 So I'm wondering what you and the Department are doing to counter those kinds of activities,
00:33 and frankly, do you have the tools that you need?
00:36 I know my colleague, Mr. Meeks, and I, along with Young Kim and Amy Barrow of the Foreign
00:43 Relations Committee, actually have legislation to try and give you more tools to deal with
00:47 that.
00:48 So could you tell us how serious do you view the problem, and what weapons you have and
00:52 are using, and what weapons you might need?
00:54 Yes, thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
00:56 I think it's an important question and one we're very focused on.
00:58 I'd say two things quickly about that.
01:00 One is we want to make sure that wherever we can, we can make – create a better alternative
01:08 for countries as they're looking at investment, because the main way that China exercises
01:15 this coercion is, of course, by getting the leverage that comes through investments, including
01:19 through Belt and Road.
01:20 So we have done a tremendous amount of work putting together all of the resources and
01:25 tools in our government, working with allies and partners through the PGI the President
01:31 established at the G7, the Mineral Securities Partnership, and other things, to be able
01:36 to effectively channel investment in places where it matters so that we can effectively
01:41 compete.
01:42 For us, of course, the secret sauce is the private sector.
01:45 We're never going to match, and we shouldn't match, China dollar for dollar when it comes
01:49 to state investment.
01:50 Our job is to be a catalyst of, support for, private sector investment.
01:56 And as we do that, I think there's no question that most countries would prefer to work with
02:00 us.
02:01 However, the other side of this is when you see, exactly as you said, examples of coercion
02:05 being exercised, using economic leverage that China has to get countries to do things that
02:09 it wants geopolitically.
02:10 A good example of that was Lithuania a few years ago.
02:15 And when Lithuania took steps in terms of its relationship with Taiwan that China didn't
02:19 like, China tried to squeeze Lithuania.
02:21 We came in.
02:22 We worked with EXIM to generate about $600 million in financing as an alternative to
02:27 the money that Beijing was pulling out or threatening to pull out.
02:32 We had a defense procurement agreement, the DOD put forward, that was very helpful as
02:36 well in going to the Lithuanians.
02:39 Commerce helped support and move supply chains away from the PRC.
02:45 And we mobilized posts around the Indo-Pacific to help Lithuania find new markets for the
02:50 markets that were being taken away when China was trying to exercise its leverage.
02:53 So I think there's actually a pretty good model there, a good model actually in the
02:57 way Australia responded to economic coercion some years ago from China that we can build
03:02 on.
03:03 And we really welcome working with you to make sure that not only do we have the tools,
03:06 but the tools are adequately financed so that we can come in and create the kind of resiliency.
03:11 Last thing I'd mention is the European Union has also gotten into the game on this in a
03:15 big way.
03:16 They have important legislation so that if states are on the receiving end of economic
03:20 coercion, the EU can come in and support them.
03:24 Well, again, we'd like to work with you on that.
03:26 So if there are specific things that you would need that we could be helpful with, I'd like
03:29 to know.
03:30 One quick question.
03:31 There's probably not enough time, but obviously we've all been intrigued by some of the things
03:37 I've read, at least about a potential agreement with Saudi Arabia.
03:42 Could you give us some sort of overview of where you are in those negotiations and where
03:47 you hope to be?
03:49 So we've been working – and this goes back well before October 7th – working with Saudi
03:55 Arabia and with Israel to pursue normalization between the two countries.
03:58 This would be a game changer.
03:59 It would be the first time that Israel has normalized relations with the largest Arab
04:06 and Muslim country in the world in terms of its significance.
04:11 And it would reshape the region and well beyond.
04:16 We have pursued the work to try to get that agreement.
04:19 It requires two things.
04:20 It requires first some understandings and agreements between the United States and Saudi
04:23 Arabia on security, on nuclear energy, and on defense cooperation.
04:31 Those agreements in principle are very close to being able to be concluded.
04:36 Now, of course, we will come to Congress with them when they're ready to be reviewed,
04:42 but we could be really weeks away from being able to conclude them.
04:46 However, in order for normalization to proceed, Saudi Arabia has made very clear that even
04:50 with the agreements between us completed, they have to have two things.
04:54 They have to have calm in Gaza and they have to have a credible pathway to a Palestinian
04:58 state.
04:59 So we, of course, are working on both.
05:01 We want to see both.
05:03 Whether a government in Israel in this moment is able to engage on that basis, I don't
05:11 know.
05:12 What I do know is until now, this has been a hypothetical or a theoretical question for
05:17 Israel.
05:19 Assuming we complete the agreements between the United States and Saudi Arabia, that hypothetical
05:23 or theoretical question becomes a real question that they will have to answer one way or another.
05:28 Thank you very much.
05:29 Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Recommended