Gov. Kevin Stitt Holds Oklahoma State Legislation Press Briefing

  • 4 months ago
On Friday, Gov. Kevin Stitt (R-OK) held a press briefing.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com
Transcript
00:00 Hello, everybody. Happy, happy, signy die to everyone. This has been, it's great. This
00:14 is our last press conference of the year. And so I've enjoyed chatting with everybody
00:18 every Friday and getting to know everybody better. And so hopefully it's been helpful
00:22 for you. You know, I'm still disappointed. We, as you know, there was a couple of nominees
00:31 that didn't get over the finish line. And so I think that's something that Oklahomans
00:35 need to understand. There's some weird stuff happening on that. Heather Turner was a great,
00:41 great Oklahoman, ran the Jenks Chamber of Commerce. She didn't get confirmed as our
00:46 Commerce Secretary, excuse me, Commerce Director. Dr. Cori Finch, a medical doctor, great Oklahoman,
00:56 veteran, did not get confirmed as the Secretary of Health and Mental Health. Deb Shropshire,
01:03 she's also a medical doctor, has worked at DHS for, I don't know, 15 years, did not get
01:08 confirmed as the Secretary of Human Services. Susan Bergen, great Oklahoman, rancher, agricultural,
01:19 just very, very successful agricultural person. And Susan did not get confirmed as the OSU
01:26 new regent. Alex Gray did not get confirmed for the state school board, or state education
01:36 board, higher education board. Leah Gattis did not get reconfirmed. She was already on
01:41 the Wildlife Commission, didn't get reconfirmed to be on the Wildlife Commission. And then
01:47 Audrey Cadigan did not get confirmed for the Libraries Board, which I didn't think the
01:54 Libraries Board was a really controversial board, but somehow something happened on that
02:00 board as well. But it's been a productive session. We started out the session by passing,
02:08 which I'm really, really happy about. I was talking about it in 2019 when I first became
02:12 governor and it was to eliminate the grocery tax. As you know, we were one of only 12 states
02:17 that taxed groceries and very regressive tax, disproportionately hurting people in the lower
02:24 income bracket. And so we're excited to get that across the finish line. That got done
02:28 early, early on, and we're excited to get that implemented. Also had some of our priority
02:35 bills get done this session. The first one was the Women's Bill of Rights, and that was
02:42 kind of codifying my executive order. So I was really excited to get that one done. We
02:47 set up the framework for business courts. And you've heard me talk about that before.
02:53 And for Oklahomans that haven't heard me, I want Oklahoma to be the most business-friendly
02:58 state in the country. And if we do that, that is going to help our economy. That's going
03:01 to help education, healthcare, infrastructure. It's going to help our state grow. It's going
03:06 to help wages increase. And so we just put the framework together for business courts.
03:12 We're seeing other states stumble. You see what's happening with President Trump and
03:16 the court system in New York, which I thank everybody. This is going to have a huge long
03:21 tail with businesses fleeing New York when they see what they can do to someone up there
03:27 in that court system. It's just unjust. It's unbelievable. And so you see Delaware stumbling,
03:33 and I want to make sure that our businesses know they're protected in the state of Oklahoma
03:37 from out of control, weaponization of district attorneys, attorney generals. We want to make
03:45 sure that we, the people know that they're safe in the state of Oklahoma. Choosing Child
03:50 Mirth Act was also a priority. The felony reclassification, this is a huge, huge win
03:57 for Oklahomans. Obviously, criminal justice reform is something that I've been passionate
04:02 about since I came into office in 2019. We were last place when I was running for governor
04:07 in incarceration rates. We incarcerated more men and women than any other state. And so
04:12 we went about looking at some of our policies, and now we're 40th. We've saved the taxpayer
04:17 hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars by locking up people that we're actually afraid
04:23 of, not just who we're mad at. And so this classification is something that other states
04:28 have done it. Texas went through this, but it was a huge battle. We've been working on
04:32 it for years. And I want to specifically give a lot of kudos to Representative Osborne.
04:38 He did an amazing job of working with district attorneys and working with all the groups
04:43 to get our classification A, B, C, D on crimes. And there's still some work to do, but also
04:50 narrowing the ranges of sentences. I think most Oklahomans would agree with me that it's
04:55 really weird for the same crime to be punished 40 years in one county and one year in another
05:02 county. So we're trying to limit those ranges and actually determine what the punishment
05:06 should be, and then make sure that it kind of is across the state of Oklahoma. So C and
05:12 Ds, we actually got some ranges. We got the ranges kind of in line. A and B crimes are
05:19 still going to work on next year, but Osborne did an amazing job. Senator Rader, also want
05:24 to give him a lot of kudos and shout outs for working on that. Just did a great job
05:29 of bringing people together. So really glad we got that across the finish line as well.
05:33 But with that, let me open it up to questions and comments, what you'd like to hear more
05:37 about. With those, you said they're on a [INAUDIBLE]
05:45 Yeah, so basically they're fired from their jobs. So the governor appoints people. The
05:51 governor's job, like Kevin Corbett, for example, was in the job as Secretary of Health for
05:58 five years, and it wasn't confirmed last year. We put Cory Finch up, Dr. Finch. And so he's
06:05 been running that, advising the governor, meeting with that agency. And I don't know
06:11 exactly how long he's been on the job, but he can no longer work. And so the governor
06:16 will appoint another person. So we'll appoint new people to all these different positions.
06:22 But what's hard is it's, man, it's hard to find the right people. And if anybody's ever
06:27 hired someone, having to recruit and go through the interview process, finding the right people
06:32 with the right acumen. And then the Senate's job is to confirm those, advise and confirm,
06:41 I think is what it says. And so as long as they don't have criminal backgrounds and they
06:47 generally are moving in the right direction, that's the job, is just to make sure that
06:50 they're good Oklahomans and they meet all the qualifications.
06:54 It's not to pick on-- and I'll move on to commerce for a second. Commerce has been leaderless
07:00 now for about 18 months. Last year, they fired the person that we put over that. And so I
07:09 don't know exactly what they're looking for, but my job is to nominate the very best Oklahomans.
07:13 And I'll go back to the drawing board and we'll hopefully get in the month of June,
07:17 we'll get some other people back up to run these agencies and advise the governor on
07:22 these very, very important things as we're running the executive branch. But hopefully
07:26 Oklahomans understand what's happening and they have to call and ask their senator what
07:30 they had against Heather Turner or Dr. Cory Finch and what the reason was there.
07:36 [INAUDIBLE]
07:37 Yeah, I think-- and I've received a lot of texts. And as most people are, that was probably
07:49 the conversation around most of the dinner tables last night and it will certainly be
07:53 today. It's kind of occupying a lot of the news right now. In one sense, when you hear
08:01 somebody is convicted of 34 counts of something, you're like, man, they must have done something
08:07 really, really wrong. But when you really drill down and you realize what's happening,
08:13 people are starting to really question and start being--
08:16 Governor, you have a lot of decisions to make. I can't say the next 15 days, but if I'm not
08:23 mistaken, you've decided to veto or sign or talk of vetoes or bills sent to you in the
08:30 last five minutes, you have a lot of bills. I asked you a little bit yesterday about the
08:34 commerce reforms, right? They want to split commerce into two divisions. I'm curious your
08:39 thoughts on that as it relates to-- they will confirm your appointee, but if they want to
08:45 do that, they can do that. And also, you're from Tulsa. There's a bill sent to you regarding
08:54 liability for the application of poultry lease. And this is a major issue. The state has questioned
09:03 this bill. Limit that liability. Limit the landowner's right to sue if they are following
09:09 a management plan by the state. I know you support agriculture, but I also know your
09:13 business is based in the Tulsa area. The city of Tulsa is very opposed to this. And as a
09:19 landowner, I'm sure you may have thoughts on your own rights to sue if somebody has
09:25 impacted your land. So I'm curious your thoughts on all those bills. Anything you may have
09:29 decided on already or want to ask about?
09:33 So we do. We have 14 days to review them. I think we got 90 bills yesterday, something
09:39 like that. Our team's going through all those right now. As far as the commerce bill, we'll
09:44 dig into that more. But if there's great reform, and I think one of the parts of that bill
09:50 is they put a committee together, five House members, five Senate members, to review big
09:55 projects, it's a great idea. We have no problem with that. And so generally, I'm OK with that.
10:02 But I think the real question is, yeah, I mean, why not confirm Heather Turner? So now
10:09 we're going to go out and we're going to do our best to find the next Heather Turner.
10:12 And Heather was the Jinks Economic Development, one of the fastest growing cities in our state.
10:19 And hopefully we can find another great person to put up and start running that agency until
10:24 next May. And then we'll hopefully get the next one across the finish line. So I'll review
10:31 that bill. But generally, no problem with it. There's better ideas. I mean, I've even
10:36 considered privatizing the Commerce Department. Other states have done that and do a public
10:40 private partnership and really get that out of state government and pay people based on
10:45 performance. Right. So they pay them based on what type of deals they bring into the
10:50 state. So if there's reform and there's things that we want to do, we're generally OK with
10:56 that. The poultry bill, I've already signed it. Very excited about that bill. It's one
11:01 of the one of the reforms that we've been looking for for a long time. And basically
11:06 just so Oklahomans know what that means is if you have a permit to have a chicken farm,
11:13 for example, and in a poultry house and this is what you do, this is your living and you
11:17 follow in all the rules that your permit says, then you're immune from someone coming in
11:24 and saying, well, you should have done something different. The rules weren't strict enough
11:28 or this or that. If we want to change the rules in Oklahoma, change the rules. But you
11:33 can't have a business, have a permit doing what they're supposed to do and then come
11:39 in and let a frivolous lawsuit take place and somehow put them out of business. That's
11:44 that's that's un-American. It's not going to happen in Oklahoma. So for those reasons,
11:49 I signed that bill. We had an attorney, former attorney general that sued the chicken industry,
11:55 even though they were following all the rules at the time saying they should have done something
11:59 different. Took 13 years and this attorney general brought this lawsuit back up. And
12:04 so hopefully this will settle this once and for all. If you have a permit and you're doing
12:09 what the state says you should do in my in my movie, that is that's what you should be
12:15 doing. And so for those reasons, I signed the bill and but it also increased the fines.
12:21 If you're not doing what you're supposed to do, then the Department of Ag should hammer
12:26 you for that or you should be held accountable for not following the rules on your permit.
12:31 So that's that's that's what that bill said. I was glad to get it across the finish line.
12:36 I wanted to ask about the budget this year that is supposed to be part of your contract
12:49 that the Walters signed for the bookings. The agency says that it can touch a lot of
12:58 different things while their operations are broad as it relates to promotion and public relations.
13:05 So I'm just curious if you were concerned to see something like that in the budget.
13:10 That's something you would want to talk to. I'm just curious to hear your thoughts.
13:15 Yeah. So I mean, we're in the weeds and I always try to explain to Oklahoma what's happening.
13:20 But but generally, if someone's using state resources, not generally, if someone's using
13:27 state resources for self-promotion, that's wrong. We want to stop that. The first my
13:31 first executive order when I came into office in 2019 was to ban lobbyists from state agencies
13:38 hiring lobbyists. So I may do a new another executive order to stop state agencies from
13:45 hiring outside PR firms. I don't like it. I don't like it. But I also don't like picking
13:50 on one executive agency or one Department of Education. And if there's a rule that's
13:56 good for one agency, maybe let's have it across the board for all state agencies. And so let's
14:02 not pick on just one agency. So we're still reviewing that. It's part of the budget. It's
14:07 part in some kind of limits bill. And so we're looking at that. I know that that was a very
14:12 controversial piece of legislation on the floor. So we're still reviewing it. But do
14:17 I. There's no possible way I want state dollars being spent to promote. And if you've got
14:24 a comms department in your shop and in your state agency, why don't we hire PR firms?
14:29 I think it's a waste of taxpayer money all the way all across the board.
14:33 Speaking of the education department, you're probably aware that the Board of Education
14:40 approved several administrative rules and proposals. The legislature did not bring them
14:45 up for a vote. That's a policy you need to determine if they're approved or disapproved.
14:52 What do you think about that? When might you decide or act on that?
14:57 I think on those and that it comes to me in a resolution format. So we have longer than
15:02 the 15 days to act on them. So we have, I think, 20, 25 days or so. We're still reviewing
15:07 all those. But I know that we all want to improve education. We believe in accountability.
15:16 But as far as the details of those bills, I'm still going through those. Our teams are
15:19 going through them. But yeah, the legislature did not act on them. And so those are on our
15:24 desk. And we will have a response here over the next 20 days or so.
15:29 Yesterday, House Democrats criticized the budget saying, "You left a billion dollars
15:34 on the table."
15:38 The Democrats said we wanted to spend another billion? Is that what you're saying?
15:42 That's what they said. They said, "You left a billion dollars on the table."
15:46 Do you have plans to, you know, the income tax cut does not make it across. Do you have
15:51 plans to call them back in for a special session? Are you waiting, you know, new leadership
15:56 in the House and Senate next year?
15:58 If I could call the Democrats back in and get a tax cut, I would do that tomorrow. But
16:04 I find it interesting that the Democrats are saying we left a billion dollars on the table.
16:09 Listen, government's not the answer. Actually, most of the time, government is the problem.
16:14 We want to get government out of people's lives, creating more government. You guys
16:18 have heard my speech on this all the time. So no, we did not. We overspent again.
16:25 We've got to keep spending around where our revenue is, but we also have to keep where
16:30 we've got to keep a healthy savings account so we don't put ourselves in a bad situation.
16:34 So yeah, I'm sure politicians can think of 100 things to spend taxpayers money on.
16:40 I'm not one of those. I think we should give that back to the taxpayer in the form of a
16:44 tax cut. And but I would want we ask those same Democrats, what do they want to tax people?
16:51 How much is how much is enough? How much spending is enough? And so we still spent too much,
16:58 but so happy that we still have a great savings account. Our economy's our economy's booming.
17:03 We passed some great legislation to continue this momentum as the most business friendly
17:07 state and very optimistic. I mean, people are looking looking to Oklahoma because as
17:13 much as we're spending, California is spending a whole bunch more than us. And so we're looking
17:17 really good.
17:18 Right now, it looks to be established.
17:24 Change. Is real.
17:29 Yeah, I'm not familiar with that bill. But as far as our support for Israel, 100%, we
17:38 support Israel. And, you know, anything we can do there, our biggest, biggest and best
17:44 ally in the Middle East and the democracy over in the Middle East that they just think
17:49 the way that we do. And we want to be supportive of them. So beyond that, I don't know exactly
17:54 what that bill does.
17:59 Well, in our executive in our in our executive order, we had every agency appoint an AI designee
18:19 to kind of walk through and make sure we're we're we're we're coordinating the AI for
18:24 that agency. And then we're letting our chief information officer know how we can implement
18:28 a AI through the agencies to make government more efficient. As far as having an overall
18:34 AI expert, that's something I'll talk to the to the IT team to see if we need to do that.
18:39 There's no plans that I know of to do that at this point. But but yesterday was a great
18:43 announcement. We have Google coming in to help us on workforce. They're training about
18:46 10,000 Oklahomans for free. And that's something all for our young people out there and for
18:51 people watching. You know, there's some tools that you can get retrained and AI is an emerging
18:57 industry that's going to continue to disrupt every part of business where the manufacturing,
19:04 agriculture, the education space, call centers. And the more you can get familiar with that,
19:10 I think the better off and the more marketable your skills are. So I just encourage people
19:15 and Oklahomans to take advantage of those tools. And that's certainly something that
19:20 we're pushing throughout state government.
19:22 Yeah, you know, super, super disappointing. And I think Oklahomans need to need to understand
19:39 this. It's a it's a short term win. Right. So think about this for a second. I could
19:45 have signed that bill and taken a victory lap and and yeah, look, I'm supporting law
19:50 enforcement. Everybody knows I support law enforcement. But here's the facts of that
19:55 bill of what it actually does. We there's our way. If you're a police officer, you get
20:02 75 percent of your income for life. When you retire, you get 75 percent of it. They make
20:10 about some of the larger municipal law enforcement makes one hundred and sixteen thousand dollars
20:17 a year. That's a lot of money where I come from. Eighty seven thousand dollars a year
20:22 you already get for life. OK, this bill took it to 90 percent, 90 percent. So now you're
20:29 going to get 90 percent of your income. The argument was was going to help with recruiting.
20:34 Let me ask you a question. If I can retire right now and get 90 percent of my salary,
20:41 that incentivizes me to retire early. If I had to, if I could only get 75 percent of
20:46 my retirement, I would say, well, Sarah, man, we have to replace 25 percent of our income.
20:51 Maybe I should work for a few more years. Yes. She would tell me, absolutely. We're
20:54 going to keep you working. But if I can get 90 percent of my salary, it's going to encourage
20:59 me retirement now. So that's on the practical side. So but what people don't realize is
21:05 next year, guess what? The firefighters are going to want 90 percent. The teachers are
21:11 going to want 90 percent. Highway Patrol wasn't in this deal. They're going to come back and
21:16 want 90 percent. This is exactly what happened. There's a great national article on this that
21:21 that was talking about this exact same thing. California did this exact same thing when
21:26 their pensions were in good shape. They took them from 75 percent to 90 percent. Guys,
21:33 if there's no limit on government spending, take them to 100 percent. How about 110? It's
21:38 not fair that you have any deduct when you retire. Right. Let's say 100 percent. The
21:42 private sector can't compete with that. OK. And so the problem is we're going from 75
21:48 percent to 90 percent. So it's disappointing. But again, it's a short term win. And when
21:54 you have people that are politicians looking for the short term win, looking for the endorsement
21:58 from law enforcement as I run next time, then you vote that way. OK. And that's why Oklahomans
22:05 voted for me, because I'm the businessman governor and they know that I don't just go
22:09 along to play the political games. And so I even think it's the best politics. I think
22:14 Oklahomans understand they're too smart for those those little flyers that get mailed
22:19 out that say, oh, he's not for police or he's not for this or he's not for that. They know
22:24 when you're fighting for them. And so anyway, it got overridden. That's the law. Now, law
22:32 enforcement, the municipal law enforcement. But more than that, the pension, the retirees
22:37 think about this. The retirees that wanted a cola cola is like a cost of living adjustment.
22:43 Let's say I retired and I retired 20 years ago. And when I retired, I only had 75 percent
22:49 and I get forty five thousand a year. So that's what salaries were 20 years ago. Well, occasionally
22:53 I'd want a cola. I want a 3 percent increase. Well, you can't do a cola if the pension funds
22:59 don't have the money in them. And so all the new guys that are three years from retirement
23:04 or one year that are at the top of the helm that get to hire the lobbyists to come in
23:08 here and pass this legislation, they love them. But all the retirees, they can kiss
23:14 their coal is goodbye for probably, I don't know, 20, maybe forever, because if the pension
23:19 funds take a turn like like I think they will, then there won't be money for coal. And so
23:25 anyway, short term gain politically today, long term problematic for taxpayers in Oklahoma.
23:32 It's the Pop Museum. Probably. I think that's in the budget negotiation. So I agree with
24:01 that. I agree not to veto certain things that we agreed on. And I'll stick with my word
24:06 on that. The museum in Tulsa, I think it was in it was it was a bill last year. They're
24:13 funding it this year as long as Tulsa can privately fundraise the matching funds for
24:19 that. And so we're probably going to get that across the finish line. I don't know exactly
24:23 where that's at or if I've signed that one yet, but that was one that's probably going
24:26 to go forward. It's part of that budget negotiations. You know, we agreed not to veto the things
24:45 that we agreed were in there on. So if there's things that are added later on, yes, we think
24:51 that's a fair game and we'll look at that closely. But the deal that we cut on that
24:56 Wednesday is whatever was agreed upon at that point, we were not going to veto that budget
25:01 in exchange for some of the business court, some of the business friendly items that we
25:04 were able to get in the in the agreement as well. So we're still looking through that
25:08 to see if was there anything added on that was not part of our agreement on the day we
25:13 agreed to it. Yeah, I don't think that was in the original agreement. So we're still
25:21 looking at that part of it. Thanks, everybody. Have a great weekend.
25:25 - Thank you.
25:26 [BLANK_AUDIO]

Recommended