#hassanayub #haidernaqvi #chaudhryghulamhussain #aniqanisar #PTI #imrankhan #CJP #supremecourt
"Pakistan ka aik Qaidi Batadein jis ko Khane main Murgha Milta Ho..."Hassan Ayub's Analysis
"Pakistan ka aik Qaidi Batadein jis ko Khane main Murgha Milta Ho..."Hassan Ayub's Analysis
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00 We should respect the courts.
00:03 I should respect the courts.
00:05 All of us citizens should respect the courts.
00:07 Is it legally required?
00:08 No, apart from that.
00:09 The courts have, like Haider Naqvi said, they have a stick.
00:16 The courts have only moral authority.
00:19 The courts have no guns, no cannons, no sticks, no swords.
00:23 The courts have a reputation.
00:25 If a judge makes a decision and if the government doesn't follow it,
00:32 then a person like me will raise his voice and say that he is with the court.
00:37 In my opinion, the court's respect is necessary for all institutions.
00:42 But the court has to maintain its moral authority.
00:46 When the court is judicially restrained,
00:48 the judge has the right to the court,
00:51 but the judges around the world don't use their authority to punish.
00:57 We saw Talal Chaudhary being punished,
01:00 we saw Daniyal Aziz, we saw Nihal Hashmi.
01:04 And who knows who will be punished in the coming days.
01:08 But if they don't get punished,
01:10 then they can abuse a particular group of people,
01:13 but they don't even notice them.
01:16 And even if they notice,
01:18 if you misbehave with Zeba Chaudhary,
01:21 then our High Court will show judicial restraint and clear them.
01:25 Because you always keep a soft corner for a particular person.
01:33 I fail to understand that if judges have to maintain their moral authority,
01:38 then they should decide the cases on their merit,
01:42 and no one should get undue favour.
01:46 Or at least no one should feel that they have a soft corner.
01:52 The line of moral authority is very vague.
01:56 It is not clear what is the moral authority of politicians,
02:01 or the moral authority of the court.
02:03 What is written in the law is there,
02:05 but what is not written in the law,
02:07 is very vague.
02:08 How do we define it?
02:09 And you were praising Mr. Hassan,
02:12 why were you praising him for the conversation?
02:14 I have given him the job.
02:16 He is talking about the Taks, Bengal, India, Sen.
02:21 He goes around and around.
02:24 So, there is a provocation.
02:27 I say, let's avoid these things.
02:30 Hassan Ayyub, don't provoke.
02:31 I am not provoking, I am sending him a sword.
02:34 Mr. Chouhi, listen to me.
02:35 Mr. Chouhi, check your mobile.
02:37 What should I do?
02:39 I am not a uncle.
02:41 Why should I come into the defence of anybody?
02:44 Mr. Chouhi, you have to talk again.
02:45 I am saying, a person has been noticed today,
02:48 and he is saying that he will do mischief,
02:50 and I will do mischief.
02:52 With whom do you want to do mischief?
02:55 Everyone has their own temperament.
02:57 If someone criticizes someone,
02:59 then it is his right to give a reaction.
03:01 But here, the law is mentioned.
03:03 The law is written, it is very clear.
03:07 But the moral authority thing,
03:09 or any argument, it becomes very vague.
03:11 What should we do about that?
03:17 Mr. Chouhi.
03:20 There is no moral authority.
03:23 There are laws according to the law.
03:27 Either there is mischief, or there is no mischief.
03:30 If there is mischief, then sooner or later,
03:33 the law will take its own course.
03:35 Number two, there is a high moral ground.
03:38 There is a high moral authority,
03:41 whose hands are clean.
03:43 You tweet about a person every day.
03:47 He is corrupt.
03:49 He is a certified fraud.
03:51 What is your job?
03:53 You do your job.
03:55 You support people who are not even tired at night.
03:58 You discuss their charges with the media.
04:02 He is a convict.
04:04 I am talking about conviction.
04:06 He is a convict and he has been convicted.
04:09 The courts have given him a side.
04:11 I have not given him a side.
04:13 The courts have given him a side.
04:15 I am talking about the court's respect.
04:17 You don't want the program to go ahead.
04:19 What can I do?
04:21 Mr. Chouhi, let's move the program forward.
04:23 Let's go to Haider.
04:25 I wanted to say something.
04:27 Let's not talk about moral authority.
04:29 Let's not talk about the constitution.
04:31 Let's not talk about a community.
04:33 Let's not talk about a specific person.
04:35 Let's talk about a small thing.
04:37 The whole of Pakistan is listening.
04:39 Let's talk about a small thing.
04:41 Should all people have equal rights?
04:45 If they should,
04:47 should the citizens of Pakistan have equal rights?
04:50 If they should,
04:52 then those rights should be given to all people.
04:55 Just like judges have rights,
04:57 the people have rights.
04:59 Yesterday, a person was brought to the court.
05:01 Today, how many prisoners have requested
05:04 that they have the same rights as citizens of Pakistan.
05:07 So, giving them equal rights
05:10 and justice
05:12 is the responsibility of the court of Pakistan.
05:16 If they keep taking rights for themselves
05:18 and the people don't get anything,
05:20 then this is not justice.
05:22 But, Haider, one right is what the poor get
05:26 and one right is what the rich get.
05:29 You know, not one, but two Pakistans,
05:32 not two, but one Pakistan.
05:34 That's the situation.
05:36 That's the ground reality.
05:38 We cannot deny that.
05:40 The thing is,
05:42 whoever doesn't get the right,
05:44 no matter how rich he is,
05:46 he says he is poor.
05:48 The thing is,
05:50 it's the responsibility of the court.
05:52 You're talking about the constitution, right?
05:54 It's written in the constitution.
05:56 It's the responsibility of the court
05:58 to give equal rights to every citizen of Pakistan.
06:01 Under the constitution,
06:03 no matter what the case is.
06:05 So, we can say that the rich and the poor are equal.
06:08 We'll have to see.
06:10 Our different circles,
06:12 whether they're in the court or elsewhere,
06:14 if these poor people,
06:16 who are in such numbers,
06:18 if their houses reach your house,
06:20 where will you go?
06:22 So, it's better that you do justice
06:24 before this time comes.
06:26 Let's go.
06:28 Quickly, I have to go to the break.
06:30 Look, Islam is called equality.
06:32 And our country's name is
06:34 Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
06:36 Its mirror is Pakistan
06:38 based on Islamic teachings and the Quran.
06:40 And the Quran also says equality.
06:42 So, the thing is,
06:44 the principle should be one.
06:46 If a prisoner has all the special rights,
06:48 tell me,
06:50 which one prisoner of Pakistan
06:52 has got a treadmill,
06:54 a dumbbell,
06:56 a chicken,
06:58 basically,
07:00 and a mutton?
07:02 They can talk to their children overseas.
07:04 If these rights are not being fulfilled,
07:06 all the prisoners
07:08 expressed their concerns
07:10 that they should also be given these rights.
07:12 So, should the government
07:14 or the judiciary
07:16 provide these facilities to all the prisoners?
07:18 Let's go.
07:20 Mr. Chaudhary, I have to go to the break.
07:22 But I can't go without your answer.
07:24 You would like to respond to this discussion
07:26 that everyone should get equal rights,
07:28 one should get full VIP treatment
07:30 and the rest should not.
07:32 Does this comparison make sense to you?
07:34 What sense does it make?
07:36 The leaders of these people
07:38 should also be gathered there.
07:40 They have been eating
07:42 the food provided by the government.
07:44 Who are they talking about?
07:46 We don't have any leader.
07:48 Sir, we don't have any leader.